5
jager 5 points ago +5 / -0

In the book, Vaccination Condemned, by Eleanor McBean, PhD, N.D., the author describes, in detail, personal and family experiences during the 1918 “Spanish Flu” pandemic. I managed to get a copy of this book (which has been removed from almost every library in the world) and the evidence is overwhelming. It was no accident that the first breakout was in a military base, and the vaccinated soldiers carried death with them across the world.

https://salmartingano.com/the-1918-spanish-flu-only-the-vaccinated-died/

2
jager 2 points ago +2 / -0

I always wondered here that came from thanks!

2
jager 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha yeah back when the Normans conquered England almost 1000 years ago :D

2
jager 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget Latane and Darley’s experiments on the bystander effect!

1
jager 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did this post disappear?

6
jager 6 points ago +6 / -0

Try opening it in Adobe Illustrator instead of Photoshop, I am positive it was created in Illustrator and not Photoshop.

2
jager 2 points ago +2 / -0

Missouri v Biden Twitter files case is ongoing...

3
jager 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reminder: Racine, Wisconsin is the Root of Art in Embassies, just as it is the Root and Model for the Eternal Enslavement Agenda. The collections that gave Art in Embassies its credibility and acceptance were from elite families in Racine. u/TrustTheTruth has been very busy on Twitter, they share the truth about Racine there under the handle DenyTheMark2020.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6jcxo7/art_in_embassies_program_gave_podestas_jeff_koons/

3
jager 3 points ago +3 / -0

Miles makes you think and I like some of his work, but William Greer is the man who shot JFK. This case has been solved for a while now. It's on camera. Bill Cooper told us in the 1990s.

https://educate-yourself.org/cn/drivergreershotjfk.shtml

1
jager 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q: Each of five neighborhood dogs (Saber, Ginger, Nutmeg, Pepper, and Bear) is enjoying one of the following activities: getting its ears scratched, playing catch, taking a nap, burying a chew toy, and going for a walk.

Pepper is either playing catch or burying a chew toy. Neither Ginger nor Saber nor Bear is on a walk. One of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. A dog not named for a spice is playing catch. Bear is getting some exercise. Can you figure out what each pooch is doing?

A: Sure! Let's start by organizing the information we have:

Pepper is either playing catch or burying a chew toy. Neither Ginger nor Saber nor Bear is on a walk. One of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. A dog not named for a spice is playing catch. Bear is getting some exercise. From (1), we know that Pepper can't be taking a nap, getting its ears scratched, or going for a walk. So, Pepper must be either playing catch or burying a chew toy.

From (2), we know that Ginger, Saber, and Bear are not on a walk. So, they must be doing one of the other activities.

From (3), we know that one of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. That means either Nutmeg or Ginger is getting its ears scratched.

From (4), we know that a dog not named for a spice is playing catch. That means either Saber or Bear is playing catch.

From (5), we know that Bear is getting some exercise. So, Bear must be going for a walk.

Putting all this information together, we can conclude:

Pepper is either playing catch or burying a chew toy. Bear is going for a walk. One of the dogs named after a spice is getting its ears scratched. This means either Nutmeg or Ginger is getting its ears scratched. A dog not named for a spice is playing catch. This means either Saber or Bear is playing catch. That leaves Ginger, Saber, and Nutmeg to take naps or bury chew toys. We don't have enough information to determine which dog is doing which activity.


Maybe it's smarter if you pay for it. I haven't even gotten it to reproduce logic problem success stories from reddit. Also interesting, the more I prompt it to consider details carefully and think logically the more unhinged and impossible the answers get.

1
jager 1 point ago +1 / -0

Give it a logic puzzle if you think it's smart. It can't reason about difficult coding problems or algorithms, but in my experience so far it has been pretty helpful for syntax questions.

1
jager 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell it to catsfive he doesn't listen when I do :(

view more: Next ›