2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +3 / -1

You're waiting indefinitely. The whole point is so you will sit back and do nothing while they usher in the Great Reset. After that you will either be murdered or enslaved.

4
lkjsdf9845 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm curious why most cases of SIDS happen exactly at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months of age.

4
lkjsdf9845 4 points ago +4 / -0

All the Russians I know are unhappy with Putin's domestic performance. They have the same complaints you would expect of any autocratic leader in a corrupt country.

...However, they are all universally happy with his performance internationally.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

So in other words, they mostly all already live in precisely those states where they will continue to have access to abortion, and thus demographics won't be impacted negatively by the banning of abortion.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

Call together the archers against Babylon. All you who bend the bow, encamp against it all around; let none of them escape. Repay her according to her work; according to all she has done, do to her; for she has been proud against the LORD

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah the only reason you can say it, is if you looked it up already. In which case you should have posted the link so we could read it for ourselves. Otherwise what's the point of posting it without the link? I actually agree with you already but this thread is useless and won't convince anyone who isn't on the same page.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah the words are all fuzzy, I can't even read it.

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too bad marriage contracts are no longer enforceable.

5
lkjsdf9845 5 points ago +5 / -0

FYI I just tried searching OpenVaers.com for Bell's Palsy and there are many reports for other vaccines such as influenza.

This vaccine problem has been going on for a lot longer than many realize. The covid vaccine is just the most obvious one because the adverse events are so numerous.

3
lkjsdf9845 3 points ago +4 / -1

Covid vaccine isn't the only vaccine that causes such problems.

Are you saying he never had ANY vaccines?

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

8kun certainly does NOT host CP. That would be illegal. (8kun allows all LEGAL speech).

Of course, this doesn't stop users (or saboteurs) from posting CP to the site, but good moderators (depending on the board in question) will remove such material immediately and ban the bad actor who posted it.

Worst case, if a board's moderator is MIA, there are functions available on each post for reporting CP so that the site owner can get it removed ASAP.

This CP problem (and the above solution) is not specific just to 8kun, but is the same on all sites containing user content. Reddit has the same problem. Facebook and Twitter have the same problem, etc.

It's not just about CP either. For example, the New Zealand shooter did post his manifesto to 8kun, but he also live streamed his mosque attack on Facebook. So why does the media always complain that we should shut down 8kun (using the New Zealand shooter as their example why) yet you never hear them making the same complaints about Facebook, where the shooting was actually live streamed.

The reason you hear them complaining about 8kun and not Facebook has nothing to do with the shooting. Rather, it's because Facebook censors political speech, while 8kun doesn't. This is the actual reason they hate 8kun. The shooting is just an excuse the media uses while calling for 8kun to be shut down.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution gives the Federal Government the right to make treaties with the native tribes.

Which they did.

Those people are sovereign on their own land. Whatever rights they have given away were through treaties with the Feds.

Tangentially, I think the reason for making sure States can prosecute non-natives for crimes committed on native land is to make sure people who prey on natives can be prosecuted, since the natives are unable to adequately defend themselves.

Lots of natives go missing every year.

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought Sandler was Republican?

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's actually a lot worse than the chart shows. In the 40s and 50s you are looking at the white population fertility rate. Whereas in 2020 you are looking at the fertility rate including whites and Mexicans.

Since we know that Mexicans have a high fertility rate, yet the chart shows the fertility as being below replacement levels, that means the white fertility rate is THAT MUCH LOWER so that the overall rate is below replacement even when including the highly fertile Mexicans.

The reality of the white population being sterilized is much worse than shown in the chart.

6
lkjsdf9845 6 points ago +6 / -0

Some numbers that may help:

There are 30,000 people who die every year from firearms in the USA.

20,000 of those are suicides. However, it's important to note that there are countries without guns who have a higher rate of suicide than the USA. For example, Japan has a higher suicide rate -- they just don't use guns. So banning guns is not going to change that 20,000 IMO.

That leaves 10,000 gun homicides every year, which includes all cases of self-defense, police shootings, etc. Many of those are justifiable homicides. Thus there are only a few thousand out of those which are actual murders. And half of all of those occur in only 1 or 2% of the counties in the USA (Democrat-run counties I might add, which have strong gun control laws). I should also mention that most of those murders are committed by felons, and it is already illegal for felons to possess firearms. Those guns are obtained illegally. Interestingly, even in the 1 or 2% of counties with the most murders, even then, the vast majority of those murders only occur in a few hot spots inside those counties.

FINALLY, let's compare this to DEFENSIVE GUN USAGE. Most of the time a gun is used, it is not for murdering people, it is for self-defense. And thus, most of the time a gun is used, it is never fired. In most cases of self-defense, you pull out your gun, and the other guy runs away.

This means that while homicides give us a body count -- we can count those bodies -- but with defensive gun use, there is almost never a body, since the gun was never fired. This means that we can only estimate the number of times a gun is used in self-defense every year in this country.

The low-end estimate is 50,000-80,000 times per year. And the high-end estimate is 4 to 5 million times per year.

So clearly guns are NOT meant to "assault" people, since the vast majority of the time the guns are used, the gun is never fired. Rather, guns are meant for DEFENSE. This is the same reason cops carry guns. (It turns out, cops don't have the right to just shoot people randomly, but rather they can only shoot in self-defense, the same as you or me). So cops also do not carry guns in order to assault people, but rather, for self-defense.

Considering the 2000 or so actual gun murders that happen every year in this country, mostly in a few hot spots of 1% of the counties in the country, and comparing that to 50,000 to 5 million times that a gun is used in self-defense, it seems pretty clear what the actual purpose of a gun is.

You can mis-use hammers or knives too, and people do use those tools to kill people, but that doesn't mean that killing is their primary purpose.

12
lkjsdf9845 12 points ago +12 / -0

I could never 100% know either

That's why it's such a great way to murder people.

5
lkjsdf9845 5 points ago +5 / -0

no logical reason to own an AR-15

Then why do cops carry them?

Keep in mind, cops don't have any more right to shoot people than you do. They only have a right to shoot in self-defense, the same as you.

So why do they carry AR-15s, if there's no logical reason to do so?

Maybe you need to learn about guns.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no such thing as white people, that's just a social construct. And yes, acting like white people is a real thing, is antisemitic. Stop being antisemitic.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop speaking about these things, it is antisemitic to even mention it.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is antisemitic and racist to point out who is a Jew and who is not. You will be censored and banned if you continue to speak out of turn. Some speech is not kosher.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›