1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

The US is the world's leader? or is it the world's ATM machine. I suspect they are considering leaving WHO because the US's money is gone, not the US is gone itself.

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice how he doesn't even mention what his company or job was? Obviously because he's not proud of it, or that it provides no actual value, and it would just invite criticism

11
magaphraust 11 points ago +11 / -0

I suspect Panama's next move will be to reassume control over the canal, saying see "China is not in charge, so it's ours again". While making backroom deals with China, just to keep it out of the public eye.

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get what you're saying, but even if they straight up injected AIDS into pigs it would be "seriously unlikely to contaminate consumers", wouldn't mean I'd be okay with it.

But maybe that's a strawman. I'm still against it since MRNA can straight up alter the organism's genome (for what's supposed to be a temporary amount of time, but has been shown it can be lifelong). And there is no information about potentially side effects with that.

I mean just making up a scenario, say the MRNA injection had some unintended side effect like creating prions. Now I could get some neurodegenerative disease from eating some bacon? No thanks.

3
magaphraust 3 points ago +3 / -0

How can you categorize a democratically elected, by overwhelming mandate, government as a "hostile takeover"?

2
magaphraust 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never understood the whole "protecting" the fish thing. Can you not put a filter on the pump inlet? Even with concerns of clogging, just enclose the inlet in a giant mesh filter that fish can't fit into, and is far enough away fish would never even feel the suction. Or are they saying the reservoir the water comes from might get too low and harm fish? (which in that case, humans > fish, and you can shut it off when it's no longer needed)

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Being that their sole purpose is to manipulate and exercise power over the world, I think funding will soon dry up since they no longer have that capability.

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless this definition is just plain wrong: Criminal Record

In most countries, a criminal record is limited to unexpunged and unexpired actual convictions (where the individual has pleaded guilty or been found guilty by a qualified court, resulting in the entry of a conviction), while in some it can also include arrests, charges dismissed, charges pending and charges of which the individual has been acquitted.

I don't care enough to lookup if the US is one of said countries, but this at least puts fourth a common understanding of what "criminal record" means.

7
magaphraust 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not to mention why would they not immediately say that after such a "panic" was caused? This seems much more like "let's make up a story to fit what happened", rather than "this is actually what happened"

4
magaphraust 4 points ago +4 / -0

Should tell the illegals to rat on who hired them, and if they do they get a $1000 Then fine the business the thousand dollars plus the cost of deportation, and then it doesn't cost the tax payer anything, and the illegal is in a better position to support themselves in their own country.

2
magaphraust 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're basically exploiting the sunken cost fallacy with people's morality.

3
magaphraust 3 points ago +3 / -0

For those who are at the least willing to discuss it, I think one of the easiest and fastest ways is the "Fine People Hoax". It's quick, the full clip is less than a minute, and it's just a blatant in your face lie (that for whatever reason still gets repeated to this day). Just show them the clip of him saying fine people on both sides, point out all the news stories and politicians using that. Then say "okay lets go back to the clip", and just let it play for like 20 more seconds where Trump says "and I don't mean the white supremacists, they should be should be condemned totally"

It's such a short period of time from what they said was so horrible to where he clarifies his position, and no reasonable person can think that was a legitimate mistake. It's a lie, that's not even twisting the truth, it is the exact opposite of what he said, that is so easy to disprove. Then just ask them to consider the idea that if the media and all these people are willing to lie about that, that it's at least possible they are deliberately lying about other things. Here's a short and sweet compilation of this event

4
magaphraust 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think most people have the capability to defy orders from authority when it's a sudden and extreme order. But these evil people don't do that right out of the gate. They just move in tiny steps, where even if you don't agree, it's so tiny of a disagreement that you just do it. And then it goes farther and farther until you find yourself doing things you never would have if it was the first order.

I'd think the percentage of people that can stand up to that tactic are even less. Being disagreeable is not always a bad trait.

3
magaphraust 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just hope he's not used as a scapegoat, I mean he's guilty for sure, but it was not just him.

Don't forget how many thousands and thousands of doctors, nurses, care-givers, etc.. knowingly went along with this, killing people for money. They should not escape justice.

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of the smart meter BS is forced on people. Can you not install it in a fireproof box or something?

9
magaphraust 9 points ago +9 / -0

Stealing everyone's money and printing even more, and still being trillions in debt

3
magaphraust 3 points ago +3 / -0

Male athletes now banned from women's field hockey in England.

Fixed it for you

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems like a trap.. are you telling me the US government doesn't have access to listen in or tap any phone they want? Should be done through more secure means, like proton mail

4
magaphraust 4 points ago +4 / -0

If this was me, and I wanted to verify, I'd include several photos of myself in front of the screen or phone I wrote the email on. (Several just because of AI nowadays)

3
magaphraust 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could be, but then what about the explosion? By that I mean it was a bunch of fireworks and camping propane tanks.. that's pretty much someone making a "bomb" who has only watched cartoons about what makes a good bomb.

I mean unless whoever did it didn't actually want to hurt anybody aside from the driver. (which that's totally possible)

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to mention the officer initially on the crosswalk at the beginning of the video suddenly morphs through his own body

view more: Next ›