1
magaphraust 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yeah RFK is good on big pharma and wanting to expose corruption of our 3 letter agencies. But his stance on things like the border, climate change, guns, etc.. is very far left. (Although he at least debates that stuff in good faith, he doesn't just cry racism, or dance around questions)

2
magaphraust 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Yeah.. so we're going to go ahead and revoke you're first amendment rights, because you could really make us look bad. And if the jury ever heard what's really going on, i.e reality, then it may influence them. So you can no longer say anything about what we're doing, or what's happening"

The American justice system™

5
magaphraust 5 points ago +6 / -1

The bill would make entering the United States illegally a criminal offense of up to 180 days in jail.

We're going to make this illegal thing illegal

0
magaphraust 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah I never heard anything more about that. There were several different stories I saw on mysterious pallets of bricks showing up, wonder if anyone investigated it?

14
magaphraust 14 points ago +15 / -1

Why the hell is this our problem exactly ? It's so ridiculous that the US has be the world's police and piggy bank; while at the same time being ripped off, hated by everyone, and being $33,000,000,000,000 in debt. Let these people solve their own problems.

 

It's amazing how politicians in DC can always set aside their differences in order to spend (squander) other people's money, so long as they get their piece.

 

Since moral character no longer exists, we really need to just start tax payer funded bribes. We could spend a fraction of the money wasted to just pay off these politicians(leeches) to NOT screw us over, stop making war, and stop giving our money away.

0
magaphraust 0 points ago +1 / -1

I need to look more into this for sure.. but "instead process the payment on a cheaper, less secure network" screams straight up propaganda to me. I work in software development and I can tell you that "less secure" is corporate speak for "we have less control"

There are exceptions of course, and again I need to look more into this, so take that with a grain of salt.

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +2 / -1

No one will. They successfully set up a web of redundant cover your ass gimmicks. The circle of "I was just going off what they said" is never ending. And of course indemnity is very powerful tool.

16
magaphraust 16 points ago +17 / -1

Foreign aid is a key part to how D.C works. Without it, how would our politicians get their bribes?! Stop making things so difficult!

2
magaphraust 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just goes to show more and more that the uniparty is real. 99% of republicans do not want to fund Ukraine. Does that matter? Nope! It will happen anyways.

Every single year we go through this charade of "oh noes! the government is going to shut down!" Every single year! Nothing happens, it's all just an excuse for talking points and sound bites. All these people need to be put in Gitmo! Traitors, all of them!

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +2 / -1

I've never really been against crypto, but the idea that it can't be regulated I think is not true. If the government and banks lose too much control because of mass crypto adoption they will just put regulations on top of it (with easy excuses of, oh look at these criminal payments being made in crypto, we need to stop that). They could easily just make it a crime to use without registering with your identity.

Then regulate all exchanges to only work with registered accounts, all stores to only do business with registered accounts, require private individuals to exchange money through regulated 3rd parties or risk going to jail, etc..

Yes, you could technically still use it and bypass all that, but what use would it be when you can't use it to buy anything from non-criminals? You're not going to get mass non-compliance from corporations, and doubtful you'd get the numbers needed from private individuals. And since every transaction is tracked and public knowledge any money that non-registered uses have would be forever tainted. No one would take it.

4
magaphraust 4 points ago +5 / -1

Stuff like this got me in the habit of sending links alone in their own message. So something like:

Message 1: Wow did you see this {insert red pill}? Here is a link:

Message 2: {the link}

Then if I get a response of "Well where is the link?" I know it was blocked. I also have tmobile and have found a couple times of them doing this, pretty sure they did it on the Hunter laptop stories when they first broke, but I might be wrong on that. Too bad there are not more alternatives, I'm pretty much stuck with tmobile because of coverage, but it's not like the others are all that much better.

25
magaphraust 25 points ago +26 / -1

Definitely seems like a "cover your butt" type of strategy. "Well we never actually certified these results.."

14
magaphraust 14 points ago +15 / -1

Just to note, the shots were not free! They were paid for by the taxpayer. You think for one single second that big pharma would not try and get their cut? You think they would kill you for free? No they're going to charge for that too..

1
magaphraust 1 point ago +2 / -1

At the very very least there are police that need to be charged with involuntary man slaughter, but this is closer to straight up murder.

8
magaphraust 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yeah EVs make sense for a very specific and small subset of the population, for specific uses. The problem arises when bureaucratic nutjobs try to force it on people, and ignore the numerous issues with EVs.

  • Pretend EVs as just as affordable as normal cars
  • Pretend their range is just as good as normal cars
  • Pretend charging is just as readily available as normal cars filling up
  • Pretend charging is just as fast as filling up
  • Pretend manufacturing EVs is not devasting to the environment and doesn't involve exploiting child labor in poor countries (lithium mines)
  • Pretend that electricity used to charge EVs is clean and NOT powered by coal
  • Pretend that end of life EVs don't present huge issues with disposal or recycling
  • Pretend that current power infrastructure can handle mass EV adoption
  • Ignore the carbon cost of producing an EV, and how long you have to use it just to break even
  • Pretend that EVs work just fine in ultra cold environments
  • Pretend that EVs have just as long a lifespan as normal cars, and don't have exorbitant repair costs
  • Pretend batteries last a lifetime and don't need to be replaced (at price points where you could just buy a new normal car)

And all of this while also pretending CO2 is some apocalyptic gas that will destroy us. That it doesn't green the earth. Also throw in ignoring that "climate change" is also happening on other planets in our solar system, and seems to have everything to do with the sun and not humans.

19
magaphraust 19 points ago +20 / -1

And more importantly, wages have not kept up!

Inflation is going down, but most people think that means prices will go back to what they were. That's not what it means, prices will stay this high, they are just going up more slowly now. If inflation went to 0, that just means prices will stay where they are now, you'd need deflation for prices to go back down, or an increase in wages to match existing increases.

10
magaphraust 10 points ago +11 / -1

FJB: "I uh, made a fool of myself, umm, tripping up those stairs! C'mon man, make 'em shorter!"

"Sir, we can't just make the stairs shorter"

FJB: "I don't want excuses! The stairs are too big and too steep! Nobody can, ya know.. the thing"

"Go up them?"

FJB: "Yeah!"

"Alright sir, we'll se what we can do"

0
magaphraust 0 points ago +1 / -1

Anyone have another link to this? The https://archive.ph/X0dwU one doesn't seem to work anymore (at least not for me).

3
magaphraust 3 points ago +4 / -1

There does seem to be a "Badlands Media" channel on Rumble (can't find it on youtube), https://rumble.com/c/BadlandsMedia But I can't find anything related to "The Great American Restoration Tour" I would be interested in watching the full video too if anyone finds it.

11
magaphraust 11 points ago +12 / -1

I always liked the joke about them:

Dove's "redefine beauty" campaign promotes obesity because fat people have more surface area and thus consume more soap. 😂

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›