1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't??? What are you talking about? I still see three sentences, separated by line breaks

-1
sillysausage -1 points ago +1 / -2

Elon is a manchild who is at best an unwitting piece, and nowhere close to a player

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Until someone gets the required amount of votes?

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +2 / -1

So what you're saying is that environmentalists need to get a vaccine produced for every species currently facing mass die-offs for you to believe a die-off is happening. So I guess a sea turtle vaccine is next?

0
sillysausage 0 points ago +1 / -1

So, you're mad that she changed her mind? To something more in line with your thinking? How dare she!!

2
sillysausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the collapse of a lot more than Rome. Which America absolutely is. Very similar trajectories. Uncontrolled military expansion paired with a decrease in power amongst those allowed to vote and an increase in executive power and privilege.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

lmao testy testy

McCarthy famously sorted Trump's starbursts to remove Trump's least favorite flavors. Which is so hilarious and demeaning. He used to be part of a trio of supposed Republican powerhouses alongside Boehner and the man who looks like a closely shaved penis. Paul Ryan! That's his name. Now Mr. Starbursts is the only one left.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not a religion, it's just Another Roadside Attraction

2
sillysausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sudden collapse is normal, now. You're all gonna be hearing about it nonstop starting in about fifteen years. Mark me

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

But if she was high on fentanyl and had just used a counterfeit bill her death would be okay

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember when leftists were pilloried in the Bush years for saying similar things. "What, do you want the terrorists to attack us again?"

-4
sillysausage -4 points ago +1 / -5

It's astonishing how in sync y'all and the commie boards are with this issue. Communists give the same arguments for Russia's right to Ukraine as they do for China's right to Nepal, and Taiwan, and Hong Kong's soul as well as its land and whatever else China wants. But thought here generally seems to be for landmasses being independent of China.

I raise this not as any point, but as a matter of interest. What is it about Russia? Is it just a weird combination of admiration for an iron-handed Christian capitalist leader on one side and nostalgia for Communism's glory days on the other? Or is there something else?

Politics!

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, let's do that but for the numbers 400 years ago! I mean, if you're going to have stipulations changing the date anyway, might as well. Plus, we could reverse a bunch of genocides! Sounds like a good thing to do.

Also, your original plan doesn't account for the hundreds of millions of people who will need new homes when theirs are under water. And if China continues to accrue soft power the way it has and can clean up the biggest tourist spots and we continue to drop in and out of climate treaties (which are already little more than toothless genocide pacts, but the neoliberal media many here mistake for being completely climate-biased won't tell you that), there is a very good chance we end up as post-WWI Germany and get the lion's share of the blame, and the lion's share of the sanctions and forced immigrants.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't waste money on the appeal process. Put it into removing scanners from the process entirely instead. One avenue could actually reach somewhere. This legal avenue has run its course.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm more of a Calvin

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who cares? The votes were counted. Mail-in voting was an option. If you choose not to mail your vote and don't block the entire day for voting and get there as soon as polls open, that's on you. You failed your duty.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so all the white people need to leave America, then? At the very least, we need to start with the land that according to Article VI of our own Constitution, does not belong to us.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›