The question is whether she was actually required to do that exact O-course or was just doing it to show that she could? I went through Navy AOCS in 78 and the O-course was very similar to that one shown. It had to be complete in X amount of time or you were attrited. If you could not go over that wall, for instance, you were attrited. The females, there were no pilot/NFO candidates in my class but there were a couple of Intel females going through with another class, were not required to do the rope climb over the wall. They ran around the wall. So there were a couple of guys that were attrited for not being able to go over the wall or it took them too long and they didn't finish the course in time. The women also had more time to complete the course, "I THINK", that's just my recollection and I may be wrong.
Now the point is, I don't think a pilot needs to be able to do a rope climb to be a good pilot, there are just so many candidates that they have to weed them out somehow and I do believe they should be physically fit, not my point. But if it isn't important for women to climb over a wall it shouldn't be a determining factor for men either. This was back in 78 mind you, not 2025 after Biden & Co. got ahold of the military. So who knows what is going on with standards these days?
Well, if this is true, all you are doing by advertising it is giving ammunition to the enemy. I don't know what they'd do with this information, but I know none of us can do anything with it other than give you a verbal medal for figuring it out. There's no point in knowing for us, but there may be for "them". So why share any information that isn't actionable and "may" hurt the effort?
No one amongst my small group of libtarded acquaintances is being repilled at all. They all only consume MSDNC and as such, have no clue about any of the topics that would lead them out of the desert. Consumed with TDS. Until Trump can take control of MSM, don't expect his support to change much.
They are all starting to see the plan, which they all thought they'd be able to thwart in real time. So many things they didn't see coming, like DOGE. They now know that their secrets are going to be exposed and without the ability to start a war to divert attention, they know they are done for.
If the coins are gold, fine. If the crypto is not redeemable for gold, it's a scheme and no different than what we have. If you want an example of a proper gold/silver backed crypto coin go to www.kinesis.money and read up about it. The gold/silver is stored in private vaults located in major financial centers around the world and audited twice a year. They will ship you the physical in exchange for the crypto or you can peer to peer transfer, store it in your wallet,etc. No storage fees, exchange fees are .0045%, etc, etc. It's the real deal because it's REDEEMABLE. That's the key for any of these coins coming out.
The question will become how many shorts were they able to cover during this downdraft? Short positions are the gas for a moon shot, so the more shorts they cover, they less of a chance for a short squeeze. This is the usual MO for these crooks. I don't know the numbers behind this stock as I don't own it, but I've heard the short numbers were quite large at one point.
I would actually like to SEE the declass of CFH before I get too excited about moving on to the next step. Of course that goes for the Epstein files and all the other stuff we know is out there but yet to make an appearance.
Just another piece of dogshit thug who isn't worth the sweat off the ass of the kid he killed. Now this thug's dad is standing up for him instead of holding himself accountable for being such a shitty dad and not teaching his kid right from wrong. Execute the kid for premeditated murder.
If you go back to Sen Graham's question to Kavanaugh during his appointment hearing about enemy combatants and the answer he gave, that would be the only possible remedy that might be an exception to the constitution. He explained that civilian American citizens who committed traitorous acts during a time of war could be tried at military tribunals. I know that's a stretch and a far cry from deporting people, but perhaps there is room in that interpretation that would effectively work as a deportation after being convicted at a military tribunal. Just spit balling here.