It's gotten as relevant as the Nobel Prizes.
This author made an important mistake claiming two of the brothers are attorneys. In truth, NONE of the brothers are attorneys, and the case on the docket at the Supreme Court was filed pro se (meaning representing themselves, or without an attorney). That makes it even more intriguing and, in my opinion, an important sign that We The People need to learn more about our own legal system and start representing ourselves as these brothers did.
The 13th Amendment to the Constitution was dropped after the Civil War after questions about whether it had been fully ratified arose. What did that amendment say? It said that no one with foreign honors or answering to a foreign agent could serve in Congress. If that amendment was in place today (as it should be), NO ATTORNEY COULD SERVE IN CONGRESS, as the "Bar" as we know it, is a British institution. We the People would truly be representing themselves. We need to take this under serious consideration as we rebuild our republic.
And don't forget to take a close look at what happened to the 13th Amendment.
We know where it all goes. Now the rest of the world is learning, too.
What he's saying is FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING.
Actually, this is the first thing I've seen that could introduce the military in a clearly legal manner. It is some of what gives me hope about this case.
Just vote NO against judges unless they have given you a solid reason to vote YES.
This is a good book. When we decided we needed a financial advisor, we studied this book and then devised several questions we would use as a "test": like the fact we'd emptied one of our retirement accounts to pay off our house. Their response gave us the info we needed to decide if we were on the same page or not.
We rejected a couple advisors before we landed on one we felt comfortable with.
I'll go further than that: Let's go back to only the departments authorized by the Constitution. And while you're at it, put the 13th Amendment back where it belongs.
Very possibly. But Musk is getting kudos for the revelations, Zuckerberg wouldn't.
Unfortunately, there's a difference here. Musk bought Twitter, so wasn't part of the crimes. Zuckerberg would be implicating himself.
The truth of what they've been doing to the children.
No kidding. I'd assumed that the "4 a.m. talking points" had originated at Twitter, but apparently not. Maybe they just get a "good idea" and spread it around. How unoriginal of them...
That is the important part, fren - God willing. Pray.
There's already a significant amount of "force" on the Supreme Court justices: the Dems have proposed legislation that would both pack the court and remove their lifetime appointments. They have plenty of reason to take - and rule positively on - this case.
If that's the solution, then it should be with paper ballots, voter ID, and purple thumbs once you've voted. And with the military overseeing all the voting and counting of ballots.
Because his audience is home for the weekend to read them.
Good for him!
I hope all those MLB umpires with FTX splashed on the front of all their shirts are embarrassed. What a sh*tshow.
We know why. You know why. Joe Biden is an illegitimate (p)resident. That's why. Remember? We are watching a movie.
This needs to be a class action lawsuit. That's what I'm waiting for.
Seems to be supportive of a Second American Revolution, does it not?
You are NOT excused from failing to fulfill your oaths of office. If you had doubts and a pause for a full investigation was not forthcoming, you should have either refused to certify the election, or failing that, resigned your office in protest. Expect judgement to find you.
Do not give in - go to jail if you have to. Or resign rather than certify the election. Stand up and be a patriot! It will take all of us standing up to bring down this monster.
How's that for another level of justice for some?