6
sun_wolf 6 points ago +6 / -0

When people say Adams never has original ideas or thoughts, it’s not true. I probably disagree with him about 25% of the time, and when he is wrong he is extra frustrating, but he definitely seeks new ways of phrasing and looking at things.

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Fleccas Talks podcast is cultural/political and mocks the agendas of the corporate media, which includes the fear propaganda. They’re doing pretty classic, normal ‘90s-type comedy, which helps people chill out, laugh at Clown World, and it feels familiar, like hanging out with buddies.

4
sun_wolf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perhaps we need to build a potential comm words database. Obviously “pizza” is pedophilia, but what were the “murder hornets”? Was that comms for MS-13? I’ve also heard speculation that “climate change” is comms for “citizen revolution”, so when they say climate change is “spiking” in a country, that means the people are starting to agitate and revolt. Apparently during the trucker protest in Canada, The Science was simultaneously reporting that climate change was worsening in Canada. “Bedbugs” does seem like Islamic terrorists to me. Biden’s dog seems like comms for the secret service to me. There are many like this. Look for the news stories that are pointless.

6
sun_wolf 6 points ago +6 / -0

They used dead babies when they were pushing for a new forever war in Syria. It’s mostly been memory-holed but they were doing dead babies news stories around the clock. They only stopped when Trump fired those 57 missiles into an air hangar. Then they stopped talking about dead babies and started bitching about Trump again. It took the wind out of their war drums though and a war with Syria was smoothly averted.

Dead babies must be demographic-tested as the best way to sell war to women. I think a woman’s natural reaction to seeing war on the news is to oppose war, but lead with dead babies and the women seem to get emotionally sucked in. It’s probably crucial to get the women on board for the bloodshed before they really launch it.

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s been nice to see that many of the political commentators I follow have had a very measured, moderate response so far. The Devolution guys are all being very cautious and balanced, Scott Adams as well. Great Awakening has been very measured. The_Donald is getting more whipped up than I would like but at least there is pushback. I think there was a more measured response to this than there was to Ukraine, and a more measured response to Ukraine than there was to Covid, so we seem to be moving in the right direction of detaching from the kneejerk hysteria pushed by the corporate media.

7
sun_wolf 7 points ago +7 / -0

Has any dark-skinned ethnicity been banned from air travel because of their race?

Have dark-skinned parents ever been banned from sporting events because of their race?

Has anyone ever stated that dark-skinned people should not be allowed to purchase groceries?

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

I sometimes even sleep in them, they are that comfortable.

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

This shows how DeSantis doesn’t have the skills to take on the entire corporate media. They’re even playing halfway nice with him, and look at how weak, submissive, and passive he is. He lets Bill Maher completely dominate him. He is waiting for his turn to talk so he can go into his pre-rehearsed answer, “Well first, number one, and then second, number two, blah blah blah.” BORING!

President Trump wouldn’t let Bill Maher dominate him like that. Trump would have hijacked the point Maher was making, agreed and amplified, and spun it around with an even sharper quip that would have had the audience laughing and cheering, even despite themselves. Trump would have reframed the conversation to make Maher the weak and desperate one.

To the DeSantis supporters reading this, what is your counter-argument? This is what a DeSantis 2024 campaign would be like. Ron getting bitch-slapped and laughed at by Hollywood liberals on every TV show while Ron goes “I-I-I... well, hold on, I... no, that’s not - firstly, hang on... okay, wait.... aheh.” Meanwhile he’s taking bitch slap after bitch slap after bitch slap.

4
sun_wolf 4 points ago +4 / -0

RFK Jr. tweeted after Parkland that the NRA is a “terrorist organization”. That by itself should be enough to prevent Republicans from voting for him.

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Q silence seems strategic. If it was a LARP (which not even the Q haters seem to believe any more), why would “a guy in a basement” stop the LARP? If it was a Mossad set up, why would they stop right at the height of the J6 witch hunt? That would have been the BEST time to misguide the Q followers into “doing an insurrection”.

Instead Q’s silence seems to have coincided with Trump “stepping away” from The White House. I agree that some new posts from Q would be great, but it seems like some other more important calculation is going on there.

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

But Q repeatedly saying “Trust the Plan” implies a plan that would not appear to be the swamp draining everyone expected. If Plan A had been for Trump to win in 2020 and then drop the hammer, what exactly would there have been for us to “trust”? It would have been a smooth path of winning from Trump’s victory in 2016 to then winning and dropping the hammer in 2020.

After the Fake Election and the installation of Joe Biden, when it seemed like Trump and MAGA were in complete disarray, it was the first time since the start of the Q drops that I felt like there was a part of the story that actually needed to be trusted in. And that before this happened, I wasn’t Trusting the Plan, I was Watching the Plan.

Seeing Biden inaugurated should have been the end of Q, except it wasn’t that easy, and for the same reasons it was never easy to dismiss Q. The mathematically impossible coincidences. The deltas. The winks between Q and Trump. And somehow the same thing happened for almost everyone who followed Q. We stuck with it and suddenly The Plan seemed to start to reveal itself in public, week after week, with Q now silent, as if to tell us the show has now started.

If you backwards engineer this theory, it makes sense in many ways. First, if they knew in 2017 that they had to use 2020 as a sting to link the DNC/The Swamp with a foreign domestic enemy as a way to drop the hammer on all of them at once, then they would have also known that American Patriots, weary of despotic tyranny, would have to be guided in their reaction so as not to throw off the plan the military had prepared. At that point the idea of an Internet backchannel to coordinate the truth movement, go around the corrupt corporate media, and prepare people for a sting election, would be a logical strategic move.

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was a red pill to learn that when a Muslim mentions Jesus Christ, they say, “Peace be upon Him.” Compare that to what the Talmud says about Christ, or even what Ben Shapiro said about Him on Rogan: that He was a criminal who led an insurrection against the Romans and got what He deserved.

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK fren, I probably pushed back on you too hard out of my frustration with Fauci. Have a nice day!

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s even the opposite of everyone woke up one day and arbitrarily started picking on Jewish People. It’s more like everyone denied it and denied it for as long as they could until they finally had to admit they, too, had noticed. And even then, we’re still not saying it’s all. Some Jewish dude who owns a bakery is very likely not a part of the Epstein club. But to not notice this overwhelming amount of power and control by 1% of the population would be like not noticing that the inner city gang violence is being perpetrated by young black men. Not Asians, not Eskimos, not the Icelandic. It’s young black men. That doesn’t mean every young black man is a gang member because duh, obviously, but if we cannot point out who’s running the gangs, how do we expect to ever fix it?

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is my point. There are good and evil people of every race and each race needs to call out the evil people from their own tribe. When races stop doing that, it starts to destroy them. Black people are in a similar place of brainwashing where they are told that they need to defend black criminals (like George Floyd) or else “they will be next”. Jewish People have been similarly brainwashed. We have seen many black people wake up to, say, the BLM agenda and the 2020 riots and how this has actually hurt black communities more than helped them. I think with Epstein Island and the ADL controversy, Jewish People are now being put in a similar position. Do they continue to rally around their tribe or do they cut the evil ones in their tribe loose? And what will be better for the good, moral Jewish People in the long run?

You know, I’m very critical of Ben Shapiro, but I noticed he wasn’t defending the ADL during this current controversy, and I thought, “Good for him.” I still think Shapiro is controlled opposition, and that he’s made many political miscalculations, but if he wants to stand up against an evil organization like the ADL, then I can forgive much of his previous mistakes and say, “Well, on this one, at least he’s on the side of good.” There is still time for Jewish People not to go down with the sinking Epstein ship or the sinking Soros ship, but they have to call the evil out amongst their own.

Obviously this applies to all races, as I say. But right now we don’t have a problem with whites covering for white criminals, do we? Look at how quickly white people condemn and mock and call out these white tiki torchers. Look at how many times President Trump disavowed racism and white supremacy. If anything, whites have the opposite problem: they throw people from their own tribe under the bus almost TOO quickly. Like Dilbert being pulled from every newspaper because Scott Adams said it’s not smart to live near people who hate you. If black people or Jewish People were this kneejerk about throwing their own under the bus over the slightest mis-step, my entire post would be unnecessary. But those happen to be the two groups who are being pushed to have allegiance to their tribe over truth and morality.

34
sun_wolf 34 points ago +34 / -0

White supremacy = talk all you want.

Jewish supremacy = shut it down!

47
sun_wolf 47 points ago +47 / -0

Shining light on them is making them act even more grotesquely. I’m actually amazed they are unable to even pretend to be reasonable, normal people when the spotlight hits them. It wouldn’t even be that hard. But instead they over-react in their paranoia and turn even more grotesque. It’s very revealing.

I highly encourage non-Satanic and non-pedophile Jewish People to detach from these monsters and stop protecting and defending them as your tribe. THEY ARE NOT YOUR TRIBE. You have been conditioned by Hollywood and their trauma-based mind control to think you have to run cover for the Epsteins of the world, and that if you don’t, then you will “be next”. But that’s not it at all. It’s actually you being duped into running cover for the Epsteins and the ADL and the Marxists and the corporate media that is making people turn against you. And the more you defend these things, the more normal people think maybe you haven’t simply been duped. Maybe you actually do know what you’re doing.

I mean Leo Frank raped and murdered a small child and then tried to blame it on a black man. And you defended Leo Frank and started the ADL to protect future Jewish People who rape and murder children. Is it not obvious why every other race of people finds that disgusting?

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he was in shock and trying to figure out if he was set up. To me it looks like he is playing back conversations he had with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Bush Sr. and suddenly seeing how it all fit. And it looks like he is also realizing that he’s the patsy of his own administration and he isn’t running shit. So there’s no rush to do anything because he’s irrelevant.

If he was in on it, then he would have known it was coming, and he would have worked out beforehand how he was going to respond. To me it doesn’t make sense that he would have intentionally chosen to zone out in front of children. Is there any explanation why he would choose to humiliate himself like that?

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, but my theory is that Bush Sr. was behind it, along with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Saudi Arabia and Mossad. So Bush Sr. talking NWO fits because he was in on it. Those cousins would fit because of Bush Sr. Cheney fits because of where he was placed on the day. Rumsfeld fits because of where he was placed on the day. The Saudis fit because that’s where the hijackers were from. Mossad fits because of the Dancing Israelis.

But Bush Jr. looking like a dope as part of a plan he was in on? That doesn’t make sense to me. It actually reminds me of e-mails in the DNC Leaks where Chelsea Clinton is looking at the books for the Clinton Foundation and telling people that the numbers don’t make sense, which tipped me off that at that point she really thought it was a charity, not a money laundering front. And that would mean the Clintons, when raising her, didn’t reveal that they were criminals, but instead pretended to be philanthropists. Based on that, I suspect many corrupt people in Washington hide their corruption from their children, and Bush Sr. might have done the same with Bush Jr.

I think Bush Jr. zoning out on 9/11 was him figuring out that he had just been set up.

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you want me to believe that a) viruses exist, b) long Covid exists, and c) original Covid caused myocarditis. Those are three big cabal lies you are pushing which in my opinion discredits you.

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

The world would still be in lockdown today without it. Schools would be shut down. No concerts. No restaurants. Basically no economy. Who knows what the suicide rate would be. Who knows how many more small businesses would have been driven into bankruptcy. Sports would still be shut down. Plexiglass everywhere. Mask mandates in grocery stores. And still, the mRNA injection would be on its way, so now not only are we still in lockdown, but the Covidians would be even more angry and hysterical than they were, and an mRNA injection would still be on the horizon for us to resist.

The problem is that for a substantial part of the public, they were not leaving their homes UNTIL a vaccine was released. They didn’t want a pill. They didn’t want natural immunity. They didn’t want HQC. They didn’t want Ivermictin. They wanted to be injected with a vaccine and that was it. As President, what do you do when half the population decides they are no longer going to leave the house? You pretty much have to give them the thing they are demanding. And if there had been no mandates, like Trump said and did, then would people be angry that there was a “vaccine”. The people who wanted it could get it and the people who didn’t wouldn’t. And there, you end the lockdowns.

People forget that it didn’t turn bad until the Democrats rigged the election and Biden started threatening people to take the injection. Emotionally they have taken that experience and projected it onto Trump, but that was all Biden.

5
sun_wolf 5 points ago +5 / -0

For a year and a half when there was “Covid” and no “vaccine”, no one was talking about myocarditis. Then the injection gets released and myocarditis is one of the “symptoms” of C19? Sounds like bullshit.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›