Yes, I would make it illegal. No, that is not the current number one issue. And no, I don’t think the risk for pedophilia is as high with heterosexual couples as it is with homosexual couples. A pedophile man is going to have a much harder time maintaining a fake heterosexual relationship with a woman to acquire children than two pedophile men would have making an agreement to rape children together.
What prevents two pedophile men from posing as gay to purchase children? Do you support a single man acquiring children through adoption? Should a single man be allowed to purchase a young girl? Most people are against this because the potential for abuse is so high. Yes this discriminates against a single man whose motivations might be pure, but talk to most single (straight) men and they happily accept that (minor) amount of discrimination in order to protect children. This is also why we don’t let single men lead troops of Girl Scouts on three-day camping trips away from their parents. It’s weird. And any man righteously demanding he get to do so is suspect. If his intentions were genuinely pure, he would understand the concerns of parents and not even push for that position.
And all of this applies equally to gay men. They represent the same predatory threat.
I was pretty attached to the established WW2 narrative of Allies pure good and Nazis pure evil. There was emotional resistance against the idea that there was anything more complex or hidden behind the scenes in that conflict. That’s not a pro-Nazi position either, as I think Hitler was a Rothschild and in on the greater cabal plan. It’s also depressing to realize the Nazis weren’t defeated but were brought over and installed in the American government.
Comedy is like an emotional release valve on political conflict and division. If any group is turned into a sacred cow that cannot be equally mocked, it’s bad for THEM. Imagine a group of ten friends all laughing and taking the piss, but one is super sensitive and can never be mocked. He will be naturally isolated and disliked because of his special sensitive boy status. He will not be as good a friend. For men especially, taking the piss is how we bond and build trust.
I think he was selected precisely because he is so off-putting. Put conservative arguments in the mouth of a little dweeb with a high-pitched nasally voice.
It reminds me of Ann Coulter, where even when I agree with her, she has such a bitchy, combative attitude and skeletal appearance that I want to disagree.
Interesting that both of these people are happily allowed on the corporate media to speak for conservatives.
Biden also said it with the same plausible deniability as “all the earmarks” of Russian disinformation. He technically never said he saw the videos, he said he never thought he would see videos of beheaded babies. So he has that out already set up. Seems interesting/intentional that he said it that way.
Everyone also saw leaked videos of people in China “dropping dead in the streets” from Covid. That was how they got so many to sign on for 15 days to slow the spread. Remember that? No one was allowed to question the videos or challenge the idea of a 15 day lockdown because there was no time, no time, no time! If you question 15 days to slow the spread it’s because you hate grandmas.
When people say Adams never has original ideas or thoughts, it’s not true. I probably disagree with him about 25% of the time, and when he is wrong he is extra frustrating, but he definitely seeks new ways of phrasing and looking at things.
The Fleccas Talks podcast is cultural/political and mocks the agendas of the corporate media, which includes the fear propaganda. They’re doing pretty classic, normal ‘90s-type comedy, which helps people chill out, laugh at Clown World, and it feels familiar, like hanging out with buddies.
Perhaps we need to build a potential comm words database. Obviously “pizza” is pedophilia, but what were the “murder hornets”? Was that comms for MS-13? I’ve also heard speculation that “climate change” is comms for “citizen revolution”, so when they say climate change is “spiking” in a country, that means the people are starting to agitate and revolt. Apparently during the trucker protest in Canada, The Science was simultaneously reporting that climate change was worsening in Canada. “Bedbugs” does seem like Islamic terrorists to me. Biden’s dog seems like comms for the secret service to me. There are many like this. Look for the news stories that are pointless.
They used dead babies when they were pushing for a new forever war in Syria. It’s mostly been memory-holed but they were doing dead babies news stories around the clock. They only stopped when Trump fired those 57 missiles into an air hangar. Then they stopped talking about dead babies and started bitching about Trump again. It took the wind out of their war drums though and a war with Syria was smoothly averted.
Dead babies must be demographic-tested as the best way to sell war to women. I think a woman’s natural reaction to seeing war on the news is to oppose war, but lead with dead babies and the women seem to get emotionally sucked in. It’s probably crucial to get the women on board for the bloodshed before they really launch it.
It’s been nice to see that many of the political commentators I follow have had a very measured, moderate response so far. The Devolution guys are all being very cautious and balanced, Scott Adams as well. Great Awakening has been very measured. The_Donald is getting more whipped up than I would like but at least there is pushback. I think there was a more measured response to this than there was to Ukraine, and a more measured response to Ukraine than there was to Covid, so we seem to be moving in the right direction of detaching from the kneejerk hysteria pushed by the corporate media.
Has any dark-skinned ethnicity been banned from air travel because of their race?
Have dark-skinned parents ever been banned from sporting events because of their race?
Has anyone ever stated that dark-skinned people should not be allowed to purchase groceries?
This shows how DeSantis doesn’t have the skills to take on the entire corporate media. They’re even playing halfway nice with him, and look at how weak, submissive, and passive he is. He lets Bill Maher completely dominate him. He is waiting for his turn to talk so he can go into his pre-rehearsed answer, “Well first, number one, and then second, number two, blah blah blah.” BORING!
President Trump wouldn’t let Bill Maher dominate him like that. Trump would have hijacked the point Maher was making, agreed and amplified, and spun it around with an even sharper quip that would have had the audience laughing and cheering, even despite themselves. Trump would have reframed the conversation to make Maher the weak and desperate one.
To the DeSantis supporters reading this, what is your counter-argument? This is what a DeSantis 2024 campaign would be like. Ron getting bitch-slapped and laughed at by Hollywood liberals on every TV show while Ron goes “I-I-I... well, hold on, I... no, that’s not - firstly, hang on... okay, wait.... aheh.” Meanwhile he’s taking bitch slap after bitch slap after bitch slap.
The Q silence seems strategic. If it was a LARP (which not even the Q haters seem to believe any more), why would “a guy in a basement” stop the LARP? If it was a Mossad set up, why would they stop right at the height of the J6 witch hunt? That would have been the BEST time to misguide the Q followers into “doing an insurrection”.
Instead Q’s silence seems to have coincided with Trump “stepping away” from The White House. I agree that some new posts from Q would be great, but it seems like some other more important calculation is going on there.
But Q repeatedly saying “Trust the Plan” implies a plan that would not appear to be the swamp draining everyone expected. If Plan A had been for Trump to win in 2020 and then drop the hammer, what exactly would there have been for us to “trust”? It would have been a smooth path of winning from Trump’s victory in 2016 to then winning and dropping the hammer in 2020.
After the Fake Election and the installation of Joe Biden, when it seemed like Trump and MAGA were in complete disarray, it was the first time since the start of the Q drops that I felt like there was a part of the story that actually needed to be trusted in. And that before this happened, I wasn’t Trusting the Plan, I was Watching the Plan.
Seeing Biden inaugurated should have been the end of Q, except it wasn’t that easy, and for the same reasons it was never easy to dismiss Q. The mathematically impossible coincidences. The deltas. The winks between Q and Trump. And somehow the same thing happened for almost everyone who followed Q. We stuck with it and suddenly The Plan seemed to start to reveal itself in public, week after week, with Q now silent, as if to tell us the show has now started.
If you backwards engineer this theory, it makes sense in many ways. First, if they knew in 2017 that they had to use 2020 as a sting to link the DNC/The Swamp with a foreign domestic enemy as a way to drop the hammer on all of them at once, then they would have also known that American Patriots, weary of despotic tyranny, would have to be guided in their reaction so as not to throw off the plan the military had prepared. At that point the idea of an Internet backchannel to coordinate the truth movement, go around the corrupt corporate media, and prepare people for a sting election, would be a logical strategic move.
It was a red pill to learn that when a Muslim mentions Jesus Christ, they say, “Peace be upon Him.” Compare that to what the Talmud says about Christ, or even what Ben Shapiro said about Him on Rogan: that He was a criminal who led an insurrection against the Romans and got what He deserved.
With Afghanistan, President Trump wanted America out. He said there’s nothing there but blood and sand. But every military expert said that as soon as America withdraws, the country will fall back into the hands of the Taliban.
So how does Trump get America out of Afghanistan without it looking like a loss for America? Let Biden do it. Why should Trump take the hit for “losing” the war in Afghanistan when it was these other guys who got the country into a losing position. Then when the Taliban got in there, they destroyed the poppy fields, which Trump had ordered, but the military refused. Almost seems like the Taliban might be less evil than we were told. But good luck having Trump explain that to a hostile corporate media.
With inflation, it seems like Trump was trying to destroy the fake Fed money by driving it into hyperinflation while he secured gold behind the scenes. Seems to me the strategy there is to drive the banksters into destroying their own currency and leaving them holding the bag of their own debt while America switches over to a gold-backed stable dollar. Another example of letting the people who created the problem own it.