It’s even the opposite of everyone woke up one day and arbitrarily started picking on Jewish People. It’s more like everyone denied it and denied it for as long as they could until they finally had to admit they, too, had noticed. And even then, we’re still not saying it’s all. Some Jewish dude who owns a bakery is very likely not a part of the Epstein club. But to not notice this overwhelming amount of power and control by 1% of the population would be like not noticing that the inner city gang violence is being perpetrated by young black men. Not Asians, not Eskimos, not the Icelandic. It’s young black men. That doesn’t mean every young black man is a gang member because duh, obviously, but if we cannot point out who’s running the gangs, how do we expect to ever fix it?
That is my point. There are good and evil people of every race and each race needs to call out the evil people from their own tribe. When races stop doing that, it starts to destroy them. Black people are in a similar place of brainwashing where they are told that they need to defend black criminals (like George Floyd) or else “they will be next”. Jewish People have been similarly brainwashed. We have seen many black people wake up to, say, the BLM agenda and the 2020 riots and how this has actually hurt black communities more than helped them. I think with Epstein Island and the ADL controversy, Jewish People are now being put in a similar position. Do they continue to rally around their tribe or do they cut the evil ones in their tribe loose? And what will be better for the good, moral Jewish People in the long run?
You know, I’m very critical of Ben Shapiro, but I noticed he wasn’t defending the ADL during this current controversy, and I thought, “Good for him.” I still think Shapiro is controlled opposition, and that he’s made many political miscalculations, but if he wants to stand up against an evil organization like the ADL, then I can forgive much of his previous mistakes and say, “Well, on this one, at least he’s on the side of good.” There is still time for Jewish People not to go down with the sinking Epstein ship or the sinking Soros ship, but they have to call the evil out amongst their own.
Obviously this applies to all races, as I say. But right now we don’t have a problem with whites covering for white criminals, do we? Look at how quickly white people condemn and mock and call out these white tiki torchers. Look at how many times President Trump disavowed racism and white supremacy. If anything, whites have the opposite problem: they throw people from their own tribe under the bus almost TOO quickly. Like Dilbert being pulled from every newspaper because Scott Adams said it’s not smart to live near people who hate you. If black people or Jewish People were this kneejerk about throwing their own under the bus over the slightest mis-step, my entire post would be unnecessary. But those happen to be the two groups who are being pushed to have allegiance to their tribe over truth and morality.
Shining light on them is making them act even more grotesquely. I’m actually amazed they are unable to even pretend to be reasonable, normal people when the spotlight hits them. It wouldn’t even be that hard. But instead they over-react in their paranoia and turn even more grotesque. It’s very revealing.
I highly encourage non-Satanic and non-pedophile Jewish People to detach from these monsters and stop protecting and defending them as your tribe. THEY ARE NOT YOUR TRIBE. You have been conditioned by Hollywood and their trauma-based mind control to think you have to run cover for the Epsteins of the world, and that if you don’t, then you will “be next”. But that’s not it at all. It’s actually you being duped into running cover for the Epsteins and the ADL and the Marxists and the corporate media that is making people turn against you. And the more you defend these things, the more normal people think maybe you haven’t simply been duped. Maybe you actually do know what you’re doing.
I mean Leo Frank raped and murdered a small child and then tried to blame it on a black man. And you defended Leo Frank and started the ADL to protect future Jewish People who rape and murder children. Is it not obvious why every other race of people finds that disgusting?
I think he was in shock and trying to figure out if he was set up. To me it looks like he is playing back conversations he had with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Bush Sr. and suddenly seeing how it all fit. And it looks like he is also realizing that he’s the patsy of his own administration and he isn’t running shit. So there’s no rush to do anything because he’s irrelevant.
If he was in on it, then he would have known it was coming, and he would have worked out beforehand how he was going to respond. To me it doesn’t make sense that he would have intentionally chosen to zone out in front of children. Is there any explanation why he would choose to humiliate himself like that?
Right, but my theory is that Bush Sr. was behind it, along with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Saudi Arabia and Mossad. So Bush Sr. talking NWO fits because he was in on it. Those cousins would fit because of Bush Sr. Cheney fits because of where he was placed on the day. Rumsfeld fits because of where he was placed on the day. The Saudis fit because that’s where the hijackers were from. Mossad fits because of the Dancing Israelis.
But Bush Jr. looking like a dope as part of a plan he was in on? That doesn’t make sense to me. It actually reminds me of e-mails in the DNC Leaks where Chelsea Clinton is looking at the books for the Clinton Foundation and telling people that the numbers don’t make sense, which tipped me off that at that point she really thought it was a charity, not a money laundering front. And that would mean the Clintons, when raising her, didn’t reveal that they were criminals, but instead pretended to be philanthropists. Based on that, I suspect many corrupt people in Washington hide their corruption from their children, and Bush Sr. might have done the same with Bush Jr.
I think Bush Jr. zoning out on 9/11 was him figuring out that he had just been set up.
The world would still be in lockdown today without it. Schools would be shut down. No concerts. No restaurants. Basically no economy. Who knows what the suicide rate would be. Who knows how many more small businesses would have been driven into bankruptcy. Sports would still be shut down. Plexiglass everywhere. Mask mandates in grocery stores. And still, the mRNA injection would be on its way, so now not only are we still in lockdown, but the Covidians would be even more angry and hysterical than they were, and an mRNA injection would still be on the horizon for us to resist.
The problem is that for a substantial part of the public, they were not leaving their homes UNTIL a vaccine was released. They didn’t want a pill. They didn’t want natural immunity. They didn’t want HQC. They didn’t want Ivermictin. They wanted to be injected with a vaccine and that was it. As President, what do you do when half the population decides they are no longer going to leave the house? You pretty much have to give them the thing they are demanding. And if there had been no mandates, like Trump said and did, then would people be angry that there was a “vaccine”. The people who wanted it could get it and the people who didn’t wouldn’t. And there, you end the lockdowns.
People forget that it didn’t turn bad until the Democrats rigged the election and Biden started threatening people to take the injection. Emotionally they have taken that experience and projected it onto Trump, but that was all Biden.
This is what makes me think Bush Jr. wasn’t actually in on it, but they did it behind his back. Otherwise why would he sign off on this? Rumsfeld was out on the Pentagon lawn helping victims like a hero. That sounds like the kind of set up someone might choose for themselves.
But zoning out in front of a classroom of children while holding a storybook in my hands? Why would anyone choose that? Especially as The President? Wouldn’t you choose something badass and cool?
Instead they infantilized him and humiliated him. So odd. To me it feels like a parent giving his kid a spanking and then a time out and telling him to go sit at the kid’s table and think about who’s in charge.
If true, this could explain the theory that Bush Jr. flipped and that’s why the nod after Jeb! received the letter.
I’ve thought about that too but for me it doesn’t add up because a) Trump has brought patriots together in defiance of an agenda that was barely even noticed before him, and b) Trump completely destroyed the corporate media, which has been one of their biggest weapons in the Information War. Why would the enemy burn that weapon as part of their own plan? They could have run a Jeb! or a Rubio and CNN could have continued to pretend to be a balanced network.
For the Q LARP theorists, why don’t they write a bunch of gibberish riddles and then wait a year and see if they land any deltas. Because that is their theory, right? That a bunch of gibberish will line up as well as Q posts do? Why not prove that?
Ever notice when they mock Q with fake gibberish drops, their gibberish is never interesting? It never sparks a movement of followers? They never seem to look at that and go, “Huh? So this guy in his basement starts fake-posting as someone named Q and it creates a worldwide movement almost as big as MAGA but hey, that’s not worth researching. It’s only a crazy impressive accomplishment and the biggest, most brilliant LARP of all time, reaching Shakespearean levels of influence, but whatever. It’s probably just typing TRUST THE PLAN over and over again for 5000+ posts.”
If they aren’t corrupt and in on the cabal’s plan to take the land from the people of Maui, why don’t they say something like, “I am as concerned about these outside billionaires and their deranged plans for fifteen-minute so-called smart cities as you are sir, but the agenda for today’s meeting is blah blah blah.”
He’s actually stating that all scientific claims around the pandemic are non-credible. He has been going pretty hard against $cience lately which is a big shift for an atheist. He was even mocking the Big Bang a few episodes ago.
A strong offense is a good defense. Instead of arguing for our right to not wear masks, perhaps we should be arguing to take away the Covidians right to wear masks, or in other words, make wearing masks in public illegal.
It is my actual position on masks that it should be illegal to wear them in public, but even if you are more lenient on them, why not push to make them illegal so that when the Covidians push back, we have room to retreat in a negotiation and perhaps we all settle on making it an individual choice.
The problem with the Covidians is they won’t stop pushing their agenda because they’ve never felt like anything of theirs has been challenged and taken away. They haven’t felt any loss in their own position. No one has stopped them from wearing a mask. No one has stopped them from taking multiple boosters. No one has stopped them from sanitizing their hands. Everyone has let them do what they want.
Perhaps the strategy should be to take away what THEY choose to do. Put THEM on the defensive. Push to make masks in public illegal. Outlaw boosters. Ban hand sanitizer. Make them spend their energy arguing for their right to soak their hands in a jug of hand sanitizer every day. Tell them no, we’re banning that shit. Stock up now if you really want it because we’re pulling it from shelves. They won’t even think about trying to force a mask on your kid’s face at that point, they’ll be so distracted fighting for hand sanitizer.
I knew you wouldn’t get it. I’m not pro-mask. I am explaining why this argument has so far failed to persuade the Covidians. Imagine we are in the War Room and I am explaining to you the motivation behind an enemy troop movement. Would you freak out and go, “Enemy! Enemy! Why would you say that?!”
This is fine to point out, but people easily dismiss the warning label because there’s been bullshit warning labels on products for years now. Everyone is trained to ignore this shit. People think, “Oh, the masks probably DO work, but they just have to write this to cover their asses legally.”
Yeah that Trump ad now seems like comms. I’m trying to remember when it was first released. I think it was shortly after C19 was launched, and the launch of C19 seems to me to be the indicator that the cabal was going to rig 2020, which would have then triggered the sting theory, which would have meant that was when Trump knew he would be running in 2024. I believe it was also around this time that the Keep America Great! slogan was retired and we heard more of the Best Is Yet to Come messaging.
OK fren, I probably pushed back on you too hard out of my frustration with Fauci. Have a nice day!