The data shows that you are flat out wrong. These gene therapy injections are causing unprecedented deaths and serious adverse events.
EGCG from green tea extract is also a zinc ionophore
It sure was (same with ebola). Check out the work/books by Dr. Leonard Horowitz.
http://tetrahedron.org/a-new-theory-on-the-origin-of-aids
One of the delivery vehicles they used to get it out into the public was small pox vaccines: http://survivorbb.rapeutation.com/viewtopic.php?f=194&t=2309
Also for further proof HIV is man made see the Strecker memo: https://streckermemorandum.com see video version here: https://vimeo.com/5084751
Have you tried suramin (from pine needle tea) as an anticoagulant?
Even worse. Fauci has known CQ is a potent inhibitor of SARS virus since at least 2005.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318
Conclusion: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.
Is every death listed in VAERS caused by the vaccine? Nope but the VAERS data does show a huge spike in deaths starting in 2021. Also many of them happen in people who weren’t in hospice care/verge of death within 48hrs. Out of thousands of cases The average number of days between vaccine and death is 8. The proximity of the death to the vaccine make the vaccine the likely cause.
https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/vaers.analysis/viz/VAERSDataAnalysis/VAERSDash
They have been. The depop agenda has multiple angles of attack: they add poisons/toxins/carcinogens to our air, food, water, pharmaceuticals (including vaccines), personal hygiene products, cleaning products, etc.. Also wireless radiation is a carcinogen. We are completely bombarded with toxins and carcinogens all day everyday unless one takes extreme measures of protection (grow own food, avoid wireless radiation, etc.). All of our govt agencies that are supposed to protect us are captured agencies/corrupt. Think former big pharma execs working at FDA/CDC and former monsanto execs working at EPA.
Montagnier hates Gallo. Gallo and Fauci tried to steal his work and take credit for discovering/isolating the HIV virus. Montagnier has also supported Dr Judy Mikovits and her book Plague of Corruption. Pretty sure he’s a good guy.
Here’s Mikovits’ take on the covid19 vaccines (they are bad): https://www.bitchute.com/video/o8qFlvb8G04H/
You nailed it Hermit. See here for some good citations re: the massive decline in infectious diseases being driven by improvements in sanitation, etc..
https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/diseases
“VACCINATION DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPRESSIVE DECLINES IN MORTALITY SEEN IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE CENTURY…NEARLY 90% OF THE DECLINE IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE MORTALITY AMONG US CHILDREN OCCURRED BEFORE 1940, WHEN FEW ANTIBIOTICS OR VACCINES WERE AVAILABLE.” —
ANNUAL SUMMARY OF VITAL STATISTICS: TRENDS IN THE HEALTH OF AMERICANS DURING THE 20TH CENTURY, JOURNAL OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, DECEMBER 2000
Also ALL vaccines compromise our immune systems and are riddled with animal viruses from the dirty animal cell lines they use to grow them.
Here’s a good list of studies you can send their way. In short we’ve been trying to develope a coronavirus vaccine since sars-cov in the early 2000’s. They’ve never been able to get past the animal studies because the spike protein antibodies create pathogenic priming (causes the immune system to overreact when exposed to a wild virus).
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186 (Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516275 (Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382 (Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus)
https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/123158 (Anti–spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection, pathogenic priming)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270 (Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease)
Some docs talk about possible ways to protect yourself from people shedding the spike protein. They mention Ivermectin can disrupt the spike fro attaching to the ACE2 receptors in target cells. They also mention vitamin D, zinc, and HCQ.
https://rumble.com/vfzodp-could-their-shot-be-harming-you.html
The J&J shot is still gene therapy like the other two. The only difference is how it delivers the synthetic genetic material. J&J uses a “dead” adenovirus from chimps (gross) to deliver the genetic material directly into your cells nucleus which causes it to create the RNA instructions to create the spike protein. The other two use nano lipids to delver RNA into the cell (doesn’t go into nucleus).
I know it can feel lonely at times but you have an army behind you. WE ARE WITH YOU!!
Here ya go: https://www.bitchute.com/video/sTNinIXleBMk
Bump. Here's one more paper:
Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis.
And a great write up about the paper can be found here: https://www.thewashingtongazette.com/2021/04/medical-journal-warns-about-maskss.html
True, this is not a conventional journal and that is precisely why it exists. It was founded out of a concern that valid scientific observations that depart from current trends will not make it through the conventional peer review process with a thesis that is radical or breaks an emergent mold. The journal, published by the Elsevier Public Health Emergency Collection, has a prestigious editorial board that utilizes high standards in selecting material for publication, and can provide a home for unorthodox scientific papers. Indeed, given the state of censorship and the vast scientific confusions that have followed in the wake of lockdowns, such journals are needed more than ever.
Tellingly, this paper is written by a single author, which is to say that one person has stuck his neck out to take responsibility for its contents. John Ioannidis has demonstrated that a feature of problematic studies is that they are performed and reported on by large teams of researchers rather than a single author. This makes sense: large teams can distribute responsibility for truth claims. Not so with single author papers. This enhances, but does not prove, the credibility of published research by single authors.
The well-published and cited author Baruch Vainshelboim works in the Cardiology Division, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System/Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States, and has had an affiliation with Pulmonary Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel. He obtained his Ph.D. (Universidade do Porto) in clinical exercise physiology in pulmonary rehabilitation and hence has a strong interest in the relationship between health and masking.
The entire paper is worth reading. It cites most known studies and knowledge in the scientific literature prior to the Spring of 2020, including the WHO: “Facemasks are not required, as no evidence is available on its usefulness to protect non-sick persons.”
The author goes on to explain a myriad physiological dangers associated with mask wearing:
"In addition to hypoxia and hypercapnia, breathing through facemask residues bacterial and germs components on the inner and outside layer of the facemask. These toxic components are repeatedly rebreathed back into the body, causing self-contamination. Breathing through facemasks also increases temperature and humidity in the space between the mouth and the mask, resulting in a release of toxic particles from the mask’s materials. A systematic literature review estimated that aerosol contamination levels of facemasks including 13 to 202,549 different viruses. Rebreathing contaminated air with high bacterial and toxic particle concentrations along with low O2 and high CO2 levels continuously challenge the body homeostasis, causing self-toxicity and immunosuppression."
And some psychological harms of masks:
"As described earlier, wearing facemasks causing hypoxic and hypercapnic state that constantly challenges the normal homeostasis, and activates “fight or flight” stress response, an important survival mechanism in the human body. The acute stress response includes activation of nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and the immune systems. These include activation of the limbic part of the brain, release stress hormones (adrenalin, neuro-adrenalin and cortisol), changes in blood flow distribution (vasodilation of peripheral blood vessels and vasoconstriction of visceral blood vessels) and activation of the immune system response (secretion of macrophages and natural killer cells). Encountering people who wear facemasks activates innate stress-fear emotion, which is fundamental to all humans in danger or life threatening situations, such as death or unknown, unpredictable outcome. While acute stress response (seconds to minutes) is an adaptive reaction to challenges and part of the survival mechanism, chronic and prolonged state of stress-fear is maladaptive and has detrimental effects on physical and mental health. The repeatedly or continuously activated stress-fear response causes the body to operate on survival mode, having sustained increase in blood pressure, pro-inflammatory state and immunosuppression."
And the conclusion:
"The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize proper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health."
This article represents a new challenge to the pro-masking position. It argues that masks are not merely a “talisman,” as the Journal of the American Medical Association said in April 2020 (before the authors were forced to retract three months later). The situation is far worse: masks are not just useless, but actively damaging to individual health and social well-being.
To be sure, anyone is free to challenge the conclusions, attack the extensive footnotes, take issue with the interpretation, or otherwise blast what is clearly a hypothesis. However, the journal editors chose to publish this unconventional perspective because it is consistent with vast amounts of the consensus at this time last year, before the orthodoxy suddenly changed, and the evidence that has accumulated during the past twelve months. In addition, taking this position today involves serious professional risk: NYU communication professor Mark Crispin Miller is being investigated merely for suggesting that his students think critically about masks by reading studies that conclude masks are not an effective means of curbing the spread of respiratory viruses as well as those that reach the opposite conclusion.
That is correct. The claim that VAERS only captures 1% of all events isn't just a conspiracy theory, a study conducted by Harvard came up with that estimate:
So we can take the numbers from VAERS and multiply them by 100X to get a sense of the real number. Right now VAERS is showing 2,342 deaths from covid19 vaccines so we may be looking at 234,200 deaths! If VAERS only captures 5% then the numbers are off by 20X and we'd be looking at 46,840 deaths. Either scenario is devastating.
I like X22 but he's wrong. IMO the J&J/AstraZeneca vaccines are even worse than the Moderna/Pfizer b/c they actually deliver synthetic genetic material directly into the cell's nucleus.
The J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines are essentially the same: they both use a 'dead' Adenovirus to deliver synthetic DNA to a cell's nucleus to get it to produce the mRNA that instructs the cell to create the spike protein (moderna and pfizer deliver mRNA directly to the cell via lipid nanoparticles and don't use an Adenovirus nor do they go into the nucleus). These Adenovirus vector vaccines in particular seem to have an issue with blood clotting although they've all been shown to cause this issue.
You are correct. All three of the vaccines (moderna, pfizer, J&J) instruct your cells to create spike protein. Moderna and pfizer do it by directly delivering the mRNA to your cell's mitochondria to make the spike protein (never goes into cell nucleus) while J&J uses the shell of an adenovirus (which they allegedly altered to prevent it from replicating) to go into your cell's nucleus to deliver the genetic material which causes it to produce the mRNA to instruct the mitochondria to create the spike protein. Same end result but different methods to achieve it. The all involve gene therapy.
High risk people are the last people who should be getting an experimental biological agent/gene therapy with zero long term safety data in human and deadly track record in animal studies due to pathogenic priming.
https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/123158 (Anti–spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection, pathogenic priming)
With all due respect it doesn't sound like your dad dug deep enough in his research.
Take a look at these studies: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186 (Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382 (Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus)
https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/123158 (Anti–spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection, pathogenic priming)
Here's a quick summary of the above. There are 2 main issues:
Issue #1: The vaccine induces your body to create spike proteins in your cells which then trigger your body to create spike protein antibodies (SPA's). These SPA's have been shown in animal studies to skew macrophage response when the recipient encounters the wild virus again. this skewing causes the cytokine storm to rage unchecked b/c the SPA's attack/kill the type 2 macrophages which 'turn off' the cytokine storm which eventually causes death (this is called pathogenic priming or hyper sensitivity). These SPA's can also potentially cause blood disorders and attack the placenta and create autoimmune disorders.
Issue #2 (according to vaccine expert Geert Vanden Bossche) is the SPA's (which are part of our acquired immune system and are specific to the original spike protein) outcompete our innate immune system (NK cells, etc. which can counter ALL variants) so when there are variants that have a different spike protein than the one the vaccine trains our bodies to recognize it will leave the vaccinated person very exposed b/c their innate immune response is outcompeted. Also doing the mass vaccination during the middle of a pandemic is training the virus to become more virulent and come up with more contagious variants/new spike proteins.
OpenVaers is a third party web app that provides charts/summaries of the VAERS system data. VAERS is what’s run by the CDC. A good chunk of the CDC’s annual budget comes from big pharma ie vaccine pushers so if anything its in their self interest to suppress vaccine injury data. The deep state wants people to take their poisonous vaccines to make money and depopulate/cripple the sheeple.