Yes it does. Probably why the SC refused to hear the cases. This shit started with Bush. Government has been illegitimate ever since then, meaning they are also illegitimate.
Exactly. They've had time to cover their tracks and replace all the fake ballots with (new) real ones.
They should have confiscated the ballots months ago. If anything the Dems may use this to silence any other claims of fraud when no evidence is found because they "tidied up" the ballots.
There was another non-contested county, i think in Washington, who decided to do a full hand-recount. It was an all mail-in ballot county. They found 6000 more ballots than envelopes. Jovan is a clever guy. His machines can tell if the ballots were printed on official paper, and other metadata-type results. Too big to cover up.
If we were talking hundreds of ballots like Florida 2000, you'd be right.
This is different. They cheated, in haste mind you, with tens of thousands of ballots. That's a different game all together and should stick out like a sore thumb.
Jovan has talked in length about the information below.
This is from page 10 from the link above off the CISA.gov website:
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS
Ballot style codes Most ballots have style codes (i.e. timing marks, code channels, QR codes, etc.) that are validated by the voting machines. Generally, these are in a proprietary format and can only be interpreted by a specific type of voting machine. If the codes are not recognized by the equipment, the ballot is rejected by the voting machine and manually reviewed by the election official.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS
Ballot paper specifications
Most ballots must be printed on a specific type of paper. If the ballot is printed on paper that does not match the specifications (i.e. length, paper weight, opacity, etc.), the voting machine will reject the ballot.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS
Ballot watermarks Some voting systems and some states implement watermarks to be printed on the ballot that are specific to an election or designate it as being printed by an approved printing authority providing a visual cue that the ballot is authentic.
I mean, it would be if it was 3 months ago like it ought to have been.
It's fucking march. So this is great news, but it's a little late to be HUGE. They've had time to fuck shit up.
Fraud vitiates everything.
Yes it does. Probably why the SC refused to hear the cases. This shit started with Bush. Government has been illegitimate ever since then, meaning they are also illegitimate.
It’s been illegitimate since the fed.
THIS RIGHT HERE.
since the titanic sunk!
INCOME TAX
( slavery )
Think further back. JFK tried to warn the world of what was happening. The C|A couldn't have that happen, so they took care of the "problem".
Everyone seems to forget that Trump used almost the exact same phrase in his speech on Jan 6th.
Well it's always been true. At least once this report is made public we'll finally have the independent audit AND recount to back it up.
So get out of here Debbie downer!
New word for me, thank you!????????????
Haha you're welcome fren. It's good to know words. Makes you sound smrat. Lol
Exactly. They've had time to cover their tracks and replace all the fake ballots with (new) real ones.
They should have confiscated the ballots months ago. If anything the Dems may use this to silence any other claims of fraud when no evidence is found because they "tidied up" the ballots.
There was another non-contested county, i think in Washington, who decided to do a full hand-recount. It was an all mail-in ballot county. They found 6000 more ballots than envelopes. Jovan is a clever guy. His machines can tell if the ballots were printed on official paper, and other metadata-type results. Too big to cover up.
If we were talking hundreds of ballots like Florida 2000, you'd be right.
This is different. They cheated, in haste mind you, with tens of thousands of ballots. That's a different game all together and should stick out like a sore thumb.
gonna be interesting if the real ballots did have actual counterfeit protection on them.
Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming is not just a catchphrase! Q
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/cisa-mail-in-voting-infrastructure-risk-assessment_508.pdf
Jovan has talked in length about the information below. This is from page 10 from the link above off the CISA.gov website:
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS Ballot style codes Most ballots have style codes (i.e. timing marks, code channels, QR codes, etc.) that are validated by the voting machines. Generally, these are in a proprietary format and can only be interpreted by a specific type of voting machine. If the codes are not recognized by the equipment, the ballot is rejected by the voting machine and manually reviewed by the election official.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS Ballot paper specifications Most ballots must be printed on a specific type of paper. If the ballot is printed on paper that does not match the specifications (i.e. length, paper weight, opacity, etc.), the voting machine will reject the ballot.
PHYSICAL BALLOT CONTROLS Ballot watermarks Some voting systems and some states implement watermarks to be printed on the ballot that are specific to an election or designate it as being printed by an approved printing authority providing a visual cue that the ballot is authentic.
Nothing is permanent....
TRUTH is Everlasting...and immutable!