Sounds like WW3 is pretty much on schedule for Oct-Nov of this year once most of the military get MS from the vaccine. On the flip side of that argument, the 40% that are not getting jabbed are most likely based and the heros we need.
like 9/11 on Bush's first year, I expect an American city to be nuked as a pretext for WW3
if that happens then I know the plan is off, which is why I don't think it will happen but still, if they had the power they would do it this year as a futile attempt to unite everyone under them
This was actually suppose to happen had Hillary won in 2016. Seattle was going to be decimated by “NK” and then the never ending globalist wars would continue. We seriously need to be thanking God that this never happened. The alternate timeline that could have happened is sickening.
Before anyone spouts off, not everyone in Seattle is a huge soy guzzling faggot. =P
Yeah, this was my immediate thought. 60% have not declined it?? Is it possible these statistics are skewed the same way voting polls were skewed by "shy voters?" People who haven't outright refused the vaccine, but have no intention of getting it? I sure hope that's the case, because 60% seems way too high.
BINGO! That's the first thing I thought of....yeah, that's great and all but it's not the majority and if the majority ARE getting the vaccine then damn, that IS a national security issue
I don't trust any of these bullshit statistics or the people that peddle them. They have absolutely no idea the exact number. Only God knows exactly certain things.
They pick the numbers that they have chosen to help them to manipulate the most people. They do this with everything.
Tell them to go to Legal and Cite the Nuremberg Codes. If they're facing the boot anyway, nothing to lose by it. In fact, it may just stir up some serious enough shit to make those cunts back off. Being threatened by force or coercion is directly forbidden under the codes.
If they're saying 60% to try and shame the soldiers into getting the vax, then I'd feel fairly comfortable wagering that they just flip the statistics upside down.
It's bullshit. Why would you trust liars? Who knows what the real number is? They CHOOSE the number they deem will most effectively manipulate people. Nearly 40% makes people think they are of the unpopular opinion, an outsider or "It must not be that big of a deal, maybe I should just get it to fit in with my fellow Marines." Don't fall for it. Stick to your own convictions.
Wouldn't it sound better (from a propagandist's point of view) if vax doubters were in the minority rather than the majority? It's akin to faking the polling numbers during the election cycle. It's a bogus figure meant to shape opinion.
Good, the most selfish thing a person could do is take that pseudo vaccine. "If" the virus is as deadly as reported, then all the vaccine would do is make them an asymptomatic spreader. Now a marine working in a hospital could infect a cancer ward, when he would normally be sent home when symptoms appear.
Remember for every Infantry grunt there is 10 support personnel. Infantry will not take the jab willingly. Too based and redpilled. Every grunt I knew hated liberals.
I just went to an all hands with an admiral and he has traveled to a bunch of noscs and he was preaching about how we all need to get the vaccinations! What a fcking loser.
What if, there is something in the vaccines . So when they turn on the 5g towers it vibrates or does something odd to what ever they put in the vaccines?
5G emmits waves that accelerate water particles. This accelerated h2o hears up like h2o in a microwave oven. 60% 40% is the ratio of folks that will never wake up.
Sounds like the [LAW OF WAR] Manuel comms.
Service members are being coerced. There’s a lot of shady tactics being used against them to get them to get the shots from preventing them such as being able to enter dining facilities, rebilleting them into undesireable units, not being offered equal time off, given extended quarantine times specifically away from their families, etc.
I’m a Navy vet and a Marine wife. I’m in multiple social media groups where this topic is always being discussed.
Service members legally have the choice, but are being coerced through less than honorable means.
It’s currently 100% optional. They cannot mandate vaccines that are not FDA approved, as they’re legally not allowed to use uniformed service members for medical experimentation.
But 60% ARE getting it?
This is a National Security issue.
That's what Gen. Flynn and McInerney said.
Sounds like WW3 is pretty much on schedule for Oct-Nov of this year once most of the military get MS from the vaccine. On the flip side of that argument, the 40% that are not getting jabbed are most likely based and the heros we need.
like 9/11 on Bush's first year, I expect an American city to be nuked as a pretext for WW3
if that happens then I know the plan is off, which is why I don't think it will happen but still, if they had the power they would do it this year as a futile attempt to unite everyone under them
This was actually suppose to happen had Hillary won in 2016. Seattle was going to be decimated by “NK” and then the never ending globalist wars would continue. We seriously need to be thanking God that this never happened. The alternate timeline that could have happened is sickening.
Before anyone spouts off, not everyone in Seattle is a huge soy guzzling faggot. =P
We.should sacrifice Seattle anyway
There it is.
When he posted "different timelines exist" I wonder if that meant different worlds or universes...
Your comment definitely reminded me of Q 1049 however.
remember that huge explosion in beirut?
They will blame it on aliens from outer space, just watch.
Yeah, this was my immediate thought. 60% have not declined it?? Is it possible these statistics are skewed the same way voting polls were skewed by "shy voters?" People who haven't outright refused the vaccine, but have no intention of getting it? I sure hope that's the case, because 60% seems way too high.
BINGO! That's the first thing I thought of....yeah, that's great and all but it's not the majority and if the majority ARE getting the vaccine then damn, that IS a national security issue
A lot more than that in my unit.
I don't trust any of these bullshit statistics or the people that peddle them. They have absolutely no idea the exact number. Only God knows exactly certain things.
They pick the numbers that they have chosen to help them to manipulate the most people. They do this with everything.
Any repercussions for people not getting it? Army is giving people until June or July to get it or get booted with a less than honorable.
Tell them to go to Legal and Cite the Nuremberg Codes. If they're facing the boot anyway, nothing to lose by it. In fact, it may just stir up some serious enough shit to make those cunts back off. Being threatened by force or coercion is directly forbidden under the codes.
-Former AF/AFSOC MSgt (Ret)
That is 100% false.
Semper Fi Bitches
I hope that 40% can get the job done. And that the other 60% are tougher than the "vaccine". Not smarter. ?
If they're saying 60% to try and shame the soldiers into getting the vax, then I'd feel fairly comfortable wagering that they just flip the statistics upside down.
Gen US pop is only supposed to be 20%. Includes military as I read it. Does that make sense given the mad rush to do all seniors and 1st responders?
It should be higher! I'm slightly disappointed.
I am very disappointed.
It's bullshit. Why would you trust liars? Who knows what the real number is? They CHOOSE the number they deem will most effectively manipulate people. Nearly 40% makes people think they are of the unpopular opinion, an outsider or "It must not be that big of a deal, maybe I should just get it to fit in with my fellow Marines." Don't fall for it. Stick to your own convictions.
Wouldn't it sound better (from a propagandist's point of view) if vax doubters were in the minority rather than the majority? It's akin to faking the polling numbers during the election cycle. It's a bogus figure meant to shape opinion.
Good, the most selfish thing a person could do is take that pseudo vaccine. "If" the virus is as deadly as reported, then all the vaccine would do is make them an asymptomatic spreader. Now a marine working in a hospital could infect a cancer ward, when he would normally be sent home when symptoms appear.
Government and Trust do not go hand in hand my fren :)
gotta pump those numbers up, those are rookie numbers
Put as much faith in this data as you would put in the election polls. It's meant to shape opinion and nothing more.
Remember for every Infantry grunt there is 10 support personnel. Infantry will not take the jab willingly. Too based and redpilled. Every grunt I knew hated liberals.
And they're generally going to be the healthiest among us. Least likely to succumb to this virus.
That's encouraging
I just went to an all hands with an admiral and he has traveled to a bunch of noscs and he was preaching about how we all need to get the vaccinations! What a fcking loser.
What if, there is something in the vaccines . So when they turn on the 5g towers it vibrates or does something odd to what ever they put in the vaccines?
5G emmits waves that accelerate water particles. This accelerated h2o hears up like h2o in a microwave oven. 60% 40% is the ratio of folks that will never wake up. Sounds like the [LAW OF WAR] Manuel comms.
It's a big sorting mechanism.
What countries are the jabs getting deployed in?
Service members are being coerced. There’s a lot of shady tactics being used against them to get them to get the shots from preventing them such as being able to enter dining facilities, rebilleting them into undesireable units, not being offered equal time off, given extended quarantine times specifically away from their families, etc.
I’m a Navy vet and a Marine wife. I’m in multiple social media groups where this topic is always being discussed.
Service members legally have the choice, but are being coerced through less than honorable means.
You can resist this in the military?
It’s currently 100% optional. They cannot mandate vaccines that are not FDA approved, as they’re legally not allowed to use uniformed service members for medical experimentation.
Thank you
Only 40%? that's a problem.
We know that 40% is an under estimate for sure
Only 40%? Those are rookie numbers. Gotta pump those numbers up!