You're not alone. Ex VP of Pfizer and other ex-executives of various pharmaceutical companies have said essentially this. And the data says it.
However, the media has done an excellent job of misleading people. It's odd, but even people that are normally skeptical of the media are eating up these lies. Likely herd mentality because if you look that even the data these agencies provide, they are not proportional to the insane irrational responses, but you have to check them for yourself and understand how this kind of data worse.
So the question becomes: Do you try to convince people of the truth and fail due to the brainwashing. Or do you try to offer a less optimal alternative but hopefully still a reasonably safe one so the economy can re-open and people can get on with their lives. And that alternative may be some relatively safer vaccines when compared to whatever insane experiments Pfizer and Moderna (linked to Bill Gates) have in store.
Man, I have NO fucking clue what to think about this bullshit, in the thinking for myself department. The news stories aren't good. Trump's message is INTERESTING, but maybe it's Sunk Cost Fallacy due to Warp Speed and being on record promoting it... but ultimately... I agree with halting this one for a bit until we know what the fuck is going on. Not that I'm taking any of these. Caught it last spring and like most people: no big deal.
Disinformation may be necessary but this is just ANNOYING, isn't it? Instead of being cryptic, explain your take!
I had a similar thought. There is definitely more behind this halt than meets the eye. My pregnant daughter had the vax...Moderna...and recently had a blood clot rupture between her uterus and her placenta. Last I heard blood clots were associated with Moderna, which is why they changed the name...not the formula, mind you...just the name. This halt doesn't pass the smell test.
In Europe they vaccinated a lot with Astra Zeneca... then women got blood clots, one died...then they recommended AZ only for people over 60 (as if they were disposable, but that's a different story) and after nobody wanted AZ any longer, they decided to change the name. I see a pattern here.
“ Women of childbearing age may also be at risk for infertility, as syncytin (the gammaretrovirus envelope encoded in the human genome the expression of which can be dysregulated by the synthetic syncytin RNA in the vaccine) is required for proper fusion of the placenta in the uterus and implantation of the egg. Indeed, the World Health Organization is now saying pregnant women should not get the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines due to reports of late-term miscarriages.”
That we KNOW of. For every 1 case of serious blood clots being reported, there are likely 100 more with anywhere from minor to significant blood clots that haven't been diagnosed yet.
Something just doesn't add up here. There have been far more adverse effects that they haven't stopped for. There has to be something else going on for them to halt this vax.
This is likely because they refused to make deals with Heir Fauci and the agencies as pay-to-play and got ahut down for it. Only benefits Pfizer and Moderna.
Let me tell you, if I’ve been told not to get the Johnson and Johnson then no way in hell I’m getting any other manufacturers! If the non mRNA is that bad, then mRNA has to be worse!!!! The deep state screwed up!!! They just told the entire country not to get the jab!!!
If it IS a depopulation scheme, the last thing you would want is a variety of "vaccines". In a perfect world, 100% of the people would all take the same "vaccine".
That way, you could efficiently tailor the new virus variant to destroy people who took that one "vaccine". All our eggs would be in one basket.
Perhaps it works too quickly. Needs time to inject as many vics as possible. We may see a mass die off in the future and I'm pretty sure of it hopefully I'm wrong.
That's what I said earlier.... I find it odd that only 6 had the clots to close the facility yet they continue the other more dangerous vaccines? Was wondering if J&J is a placebo and the DS sabotaged the injection site's results in order to do away with the placebo vaccine.
So is no one taking HQC? Oh thats right, its been essentially outlawed. A manufactured zinc ionophore that helps zinc penetrate cell walls and disrupt virus replication so your immune system can catch up and lay the beat down on the infection. Hospitaluzed patients recover in 2 days. Just sayin.
What about the natural zinc ionophore that you get from drinking red wine and onions? I suppose if you don't want to be a smelly drunkard you could always get some quercetin from amazon, walmart, or GNC. Couple that with some zinc and you should be good to go.
I have had tons of various vaccines and I am not going to take these (took a trip to China several hrs ago and had a bunch I had to get.) But I am scared to death for my family who wants to continue to travel and is getting the J&J jab. Better safe than sorry—I am taking HCQ, zinc, Vitamin D, C, & Magnesium. Why get a vaccine when we have very effective therapies?
Based on looking at the invidual technologies, assuming they are what they say they are, the answer from my perspective is no. J&J is not the least dangerous.
Unless the report I read on the J&J vaccine was incorrect (it wasn't from J&J itself so I can't say for sure) it injects actual DNA (made from SARS-cov-2) into the nucleus of a human cell which then makes the cell make the mRNA -> protein -> same as Pfizer and Moderna. So its basically the same except it adds the extra step of injecting DNA into the nucleus of our cells.
The mRNA vaccines are extraordinarily unilkely to write to our DNA. The J&J, if this is how they work, are MUCH more likely to do so (still very unlikely, but far more than the mRNA vaccines).
Of course honest testing and data would be the best indicator, but since that doesn't exist, I'm going with hell no on the J&J vaccine.
If anyone has the official J&J documentation on this vaccine please let me know.
It is however the numbers with clots are very low actually. Not a large enough number statistically that this would be the typical action taken by leadership. IMO
I still don't see a reason to get vax for such a mild illness. Would anyone take such a risk to avoid the common cold?
You're not alone. Ex VP of Pfizer and other ex-executives of various pharmaceutical companies have said essentially this. And the data says it.
However, the media has done an excellent job of misleading people. It's odd, but even people that are normally skeptical of the media are eating up these lies. Likely herd mentality because if you look that even the data these agencies provide, they are not proportional to the insane irrational responses, but you have to check them for yourself and understand how this kind of data worse.
So the question becomes: Do you try to convince people of the truth and fail due to the brainwashing. Or do you try to offer a less optimal alternative but hopefully still a reasonably safe one so the economy can re-open and people can get on with their lives. And that alternative may be some relatively safer vaccines when compared to whatever insane experiments Pfizer and Moderna (linked to Bill Gates) have in store.
I believe DJT.
The moment you stop thinking for yourself is the moment you lose in a disinformation war.
Man, I have NO fucking clue what to think about this bullshit, in the thinking for myself department. The news stories aren't good. Trump's message is INTERESTING, but maybe it's Sunk Cost Fallacy due to Warp Speed and being on record promoting it... but ultimately... I agree with halting this one for a bit until we know what the fuck is going on. Not that I'm taking any of these. Caught it last spring and like most people: no big deal.
Disinformation may be necessary but this is just ANNOYING, isn't it? Instead of being cryptic, explain your take!
This is exactly what I think. Gotta force everyone to take Moderna / Gates vaccine.
Trump's statement on J&J convinces me more that maybe this was the only real vaccination.
All the others are 100% going to lead to your death in the next 2-4 years.
Out of the 3, Jnj doesn’t use mRNA
Yep, he said it was just a competition thing!
I had a similar thought. There is definitely more behind this halt than meets the eye. My pregnant daughter had the vax...Moderna...and recently had a blood clot rupture between her uterus and her placenta. Last I heard blood clots were associated with Moderna, which is why they changed the name...not the formula, mind you...just the name. This halt doesn't pass the smell test.
In Europe they vaccinated a lot with Astra Zeneca... then women got blood clots, one died...then they recommended AZ only for people over 60 (as if they were disposable, but that's a different story) and after nobody wanted AZ any longer, they decided to change the name. I see a pattern here.
“ Women of childbearing age may also be at risk for infertility, as syncytin (the gammaretrovirus envelope encoded in the human genome the expression of which can be dysregulated by the synthetic syncytin RNA in the vaccine) is required for proper fusion of the placenta in the uterus and implantation of the egg. Indeed, the World Health Organization is now saying pregnant women should not get the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines due to reports of late-term miscarriages.”
Makes sense. And then they can threaten more shutdowns if we don't comply.
It could be the reason Trump denounced the people who halted it. The others are funded by gates
Very well could be.
6 blood clots out of 7 million doses....
That we KNOW of. For every 1 case of serious blood clots being reported, there are likely 100 more with anywhere from minor to significant blood clots that haven't been diagnosed yet.
Don't forget that we are the animal test. The safest Covid vaccine is the one you don't take.
Something just doesn't add up here. There have been far more adverse effects that they haven't stopped for. There has to be something else going on for them to halt this vax.
So the chance you of being the next victim is better than one in a million.
A state could not run a modest megabucks lottery with odds that unfavorable to the house.
That's all you know about. It is not a safe drug.
This is likely because they refused to make deals with Heir Fauci and the agencies as pay-to-play and got ahut down for it. Only benefits Pfizer and Moderna.
At least the J&J shot uses old technology with an attenuated virus. Not the mRNA gene therapy shit. Either way not getting poked.
Let me tell you, if I’ve been told not to get the Johnson and Johnson then no way in hell I’m getting any other manufacturers! If the non mRNA is that bad, then mRNA has to be worse!!!! The deep state screwed up!!! They just told the entire country not to get the jab!!!
If it IS a depopulation scheme, the last thing you would want is a variety of "vaccines". In a perfect world, 100% of the people would all take the same "vaccine".
That way, you could efficiently tailor the new virus variant to destroy people who took that one "vaccine". All our eggs would be in one basket.
That's where the whole DJT 4D chess thing comes into play ?♂️??
Perhaps it works too quickly. Needs time to inject as many vics as possible. We may see a mass die off in the future and I'm pretty sure of it hopefully I'm wrong.
They’ll ship the rancid J&J doses to a third world country who will convince its population the vaccines are safe. Oh....wait....?
That's what I said earlier.... I find it odd that only 6 had the clots to close the facility yet they continue the other more dangerous vaccines? Was wondering if J&J is a placebo and the DS sabotaged the injection site's results in order to do away with the placebo vaccine.
So is no one taking HQC? Oh thats right, its been essentially outlawed. A manufactured zinc ionophore that helps zinc penetrate cell walls and disrupt virus replication so your immune system can catch up and lay the beat down on the infection. Hospitaluzed patients recover in 2 days. Just sayin.
What about the natural zinc ionophore that you get from drinking red wine and onions? I suppose if you don't want to be a smelly drunkard you could always get some quercetin from amazon, walmart, or GNC. Couple that with some zinc and you should be good to go.
Its not hard, people. Stay healthy, my friends.
I have had tons of various vaccines and I am not going to take these (took a trip to China several hrs ago and had a bunch I had to get.) But I am scared to death for my family who wants to continue to travel and is getting the J&J jab. Better safe than sorry—I am taking HCQ, zinc, Vitamin D, C, & Magnesium. Why get a vaccine when we have very effective therapies?
I think it still has problems:
https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/nj-man-in-hospital-with-covid-after-being-fully-vaccinated/
https://www.9news.com/mobile/article/news/health/coronavirus/vaccine/mass-covid-vaccination-site-closes-early-adverse-reaction-johnson-johnson/73-5afd2ee5-042f-450a-838b-aa4729f2d4ac
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/colorado-vaccination-site-shuts-down-early-after-11-people-have-expected-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-19-vaccine-officials-say/ar-BB1frfRA
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/545856-shipments-of-johnson-johnson-vaccine-halted
Based on looking at the invidual technologies, assuming they are what they say they are, the answer from my perspective is no. J&J is not the least dangerous.
Unless the report I read on the J&J vaccine was incorrect (it wasn't from J&J itself so I can't say for sure) it injects actual DNA (made from SARS-cov-2) into the nucleus of a human cell which then makes the cell make the mRNA -> protein -> same as Pfizer and Moderna. So its basically the same except it adds the extra step of injecting DNA into the nucleus of our cells.
The mRNA vaccines are extraordinarily unilkely to write to our DNA. The J&J, if this is how they work, are MUCH more likely to do so (still very unlikely, but far more than the mRNA vaccines).
Of course honest testing and data would be the best indicator, but since that doesn't exist, I'm going with hell no on the J&J vaccine.
If anyone has the official J&J documentation on this vaccine please let me know.
J&J is the one without it. They use traditional means of delivery.
Yes.
To stop one ? may cause people to question them all.
Also a valid point
Isn't this the vax with the blood clot problems? I'm losing track...
It is however the numbers with clots are very low actually. Not a large enough number statistically that this would be the typical action taken by leadership. IMO
I don't know who to trust. Is this virus even real or is it just the flu?
Thinking same thing about the astra vax....