Sorry for not linking the article but yeah I'm not gonna link it. Trust me. I almost got eye cancer from reading most of it...
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
“They’re not trying to capture an accurate count,” said Smith, a Democratic Tennessee election official who had traveled to Phoenix to advise the auditors.
But Smith assured me it was nothing to worry about—because, he said, “they’re not recounting the election.”
these people make my blood boil
I mean really, though, how hard IS journalism anyway?
You simply have to say Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How... but do it truthfully.
It's that darn sticky truthfulness that gets them every time.
It's cool. The further out into the twilight zone normies are led, the easier it is to smack them in the face with a custard pie of fact. A healthy dose of public humiliation works wonders at times.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJI7DIVm3OM
He may be partly right. After widespread election fraud is proven, it is likely that the entire election becomes null and void, due to (massive) fraud. We aren't "recounting" that garbage. Then we get to redo the election, and laugh at how many "real" votes the Joe-Kamala administration receives in a second election, as we cheer the return of Glorious Leader to his rightful office.
That last part happens after we send in the cleaners to first rid the white house of the stench left in it by Joe, and his biting dog, and Kamalas stanky tramp-twat.
This to me is spectacularly unfair.
We had a legit winner. He gets to take the office. Simple as that.
Anything else is fuckwittery of the highest order. (Apparently such that it gets a whole new word to describe it :)
You don't get to cheat your ass off in every state in order to get a "DO OVER"
You cheat in one county, you are disqualified. Trump wins. End of discussion.
Really, that IS the end of the discussion.
I think it would be particularly enlightening to many to see the results of a real election; not just for President, but for all elected officials. It will show who cheated in a way no other method could. It would show which states are most affected by systemic fraud (like CA).
Such an activity would drive so much change. I can't think of a safer, larger red-pill than a new election done properly (by the military?).
I'll allow it
Kek
Mainly because I think that is what is coming
Your logic is sound, and I agree that it should be that way, but my understanding of how our constitution instructs the government to respond to cases of "widespread" election fraud suggests that the election is to be done again, and the military is to be put in charge of the (new) election process.
Admittedly, my understanding of the constitutional process for correcting a fraudulent election may not be correct. And, there is no historical precedent to illustrate exactly how that process would work, but from my research, I believe that something like this is highly likely to occur.
Empire Co., 322 US 238 (1944)). "There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61(1878)
To your point, is there anything in the Constitution that outlines procedures for a situation such as this one? Even if widespread fraud is proven, I don't think there is. What was the John Adams quote? "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." So we were never meant to be here. The fact that we are says a lot about who we are.
Agreed
Redo of the election serves another purpose. Controlled rollout of secure voting.
If they combine a “redo” election with new voting technology it will solve a few problems at once. It will curtail optics of a straight military junta. It will establish in one swoop the new voting protocols, while still under military observation, and force people to accept it. And globally it will provide the winner legitimacy.
How do you “install” secure voting? You redo the most fraudulent election in our history with a system that can’t be frauded.
Imagine what those results are going to look like. It’s going to be even more of a landslide than the November election was pre-algorithm.
It may not be totally fair, but strategically it’s probably the right way.
It would seriously be very ugly. The people who were on the fence that voted for Biden, and there were several, would not vote for him again. It might not seem like a bunch, but when you're talking 15-20% of ACTUAL Biden voters switching, you're looking at a 100 million to 40 million type of mauling. One so massive it sets back the deep state to the stone age.
Me like your theory, boozy mcfuckface
Man that username so seldom fits your quality remarks but OK
Treason is as treason DOES. No “do-over” ever. Bigly penalty for treason. Make examples.
I love Fraud Vitiates Everything (Supreme Court, 1878)
I usually apply it as "...including invalid certifications and inaugurations", meaning that the Trump win isn't among that which needs to be vitiated. Just the Biden steal of it and the treasonous certification and inauguration.
I just don't like how the do-over it literally gives the other side another CHANCE to win, this time legally. Sure we believe they won't, but they shouldn't even have the chance. They cheated. They deserve nothing but severe punishment, not a second shot at the brass ring.
To my mind, Trump won the election, that's it, period. The other side doesn't deserve another bite at the apple.
That said, I'm cool with a whole new election if the military runs it (and isn't all cucked out and communistic like literally every other facet of this fecal govt of ours is).
Clearly the Founders did not consider or forsee this happening. They would have off'd treasonous bastards if they did this in their era. I believe they would have expected future generations to do just that and that's why there is no specific guidance on election theft. The conclusion I draw from the Constitution is put treasonous bastards to death and redo election.
And if we all thought Trump won in a landslide in November, imagine how many more votes he'll get now with scads of Biden voters with buyers remorse will get a do-over.
Exactly my thinking. Kek!
I think this is really the crux of their approach.
The States validated and ratified the vote, and sent electors, who caucused with electors from the other States, and voted. The vote was then accepted by the Federal Government.
Ergo, the election is over because the vote was "legal".
"It depends on what the definition of 'is', is." - Bill Clinton
They are going to define the process as the truth. Not the truth as the truth. Indeed, it's what they have been saying for months.
Then maybe we should convict every single one of them of treason so no one ever tries this BS again.
I like this guy....