Absolutely. This makes no sense, and the real dig is to figure out why. Why now? Why these rulings? How do we go from Roberts calling Obamacare a tax out of whole cloth to now this, when the left controls it all?
No, because they are the original jurisdiction for state v state disputes and failed to do their job when half the country was suing the other half of the country.
As much as the Supreme Court is supposed to be about the law, they're a political entity - part of the bureaucracy - as well.
They seem to be focusing on issuing a lot of rulings for cases they can go 9-0 on. I can't help but think that in normal times this would be another 5-4 with a whiny minority opinion about but muh duty to protects. In these times, a bunch of 5-4 rulings in cases like this would basically be as if they were raising a giant "please stack the supreme court" billboard.
It's really rare for any bureaucratic entity anywhere, ever, to volunteer to have its power castrated. Even if members are supposedly on the same side as the people who would be wielding the knife. This has worked against us a lot, but in this case seems to be working for us.
(There could be deeper movements at work, but such things aren't required to explain this.)
If it's just self-interest, look for them to go back to the usual behavior - 5-4 garbage with Roberts being his normal treacherous self - once the threat of court-packing is firmly defeated.
Omg great news , San Diego here ..even the Mexicans are pissed ..10s of thousands from S America are in convention center and hotels .. when the Mexicans came here they were hunted down like rapid dogs ( not saying they should be allowed ) however when the illegals come here from Nicaragua and other places they are given posh hotels, money , food cards, etc disgrace , San Diego is inundated it’s bad here
My guess is that whoever had the goods on on him is no longer alive or in a position of power to make good on their threats. Epstein/Maxwell or the like?
Illegal immigration is a catastrophic mess, costing taxpayers $60+ million PER WEEK; this doesn’t include costs related to crime. Over 80% of illegal immigrants are on welfare. Removing incentives would have a huge impact.
(1) Enforce the current laws.
(2) Increase the punishment:
◾ Anyone entering illegally (they have already broken federal laws) should be permanently prohibited from obtaining citizenship, asylum, and green cards.
This should include:
▪ All children of illegal immigrants.
▪ Children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants. (This was not the purpose of the 14th Amendment).
(3) No legal assistance will be provided to illegal immigrants to contest their deportation.
No politician, including a president, should be allowed to break our laws.
A likely explanation is in Jonathan Turley’s article; basically, SCOTUS is very concerned about the threats of “stacking the court”.
"The Court is expected to issue divided opinions on upcoming cases, but it seems to be frontloading opinions that drive home the fact that most cases are not driven by such ideological divisions."
The article didn’t address cases driven by “hating Trump”… but I digress.
Just more strange activity in this clown world we find ourselves in. At least this makes sense but why it happened is beyond me. It is almost like they are following orders.
It's a narrow ruling applicable to only to recipients of temporary protection status (TPS) on humanitarian grounds after U.S. recognized qualifying catastrophic event as defined in our immigration laws. It should be noted that TPS designations for countries are only valid for up to18 months but they end up being continuously renewed long after the catastrophic event is resolved.
DACA recipients recieved temporary protection because their parents brought them into the U.S. illegally or kept them in the U.S. illegally after their Visa expired. Also, DACA is an executive order, not a law.
These unanimous good rulings as of late are confusing the hell out of me.
Absolutely. This makes no sense, and the real dig is to figure out why. Why now? Why these rulings? How do we go from Roberts calling Obamacare a tax out of whole cloth to now this, when the left controls it all?
Could it be that SCOTUS is not controlled by communists/deep state and are simply doing their jobs?
No, because they are the original jurisdiction for state v state disputes and failed to do their job when half the country was suing the other half of the country.
Maybe we have the blackmail now.
As much as the Supreme Court is supposed to be about the law, they're a political entity - part of the bureaucracy - as well.
They seem to be focusing on issuing a lot of rulings for cases they can go 9-0 on. I can't help but think that in normal times this would be another 5-4 with a whiny minority opinion about but muh duty to protects. In these times, a bunch of 5-4 rulings in cases like this would basically be as if they were raising a giant "please stack the supreme court" billboard.
It's really rare for any bureaucratic entity anywhere, ever, to volunteer to have its power castrated. Even if members are supposedly on the same side as the people who would be wielding the knife. This has worked against us a lot, but in this case seems to be working for us.
(There could be deeper movements at work, but such things aren't required to explain this.)
If it's just self-interest, look for them to go back to the usual behavior - 5-4 garbage with Roberts being his normal treacherous self - once the threat of court-packing is firmly defeated.
It would seem that SCOTUS is sending a message to the court packing crowd.
If the 9 current justices agree to back whatever ruling any 5 of them concur on unanimously, the additional justices will meaningless.
I can't imagine what else it could mean, it can't be that they all agree on the merits.
Very good explanation. I think you’re right. None of them want the court packed.
I think it also sends a message to any potential nominees, you won't be welcome on bench, we (the rightful justices) will shun you.
Subtle, but anyone in the judiciary probably already knows what the deal is.
Wait what other good things have they decided on besides the CA gun ban?
I think the CA ban removal was a single federal judge for CA, not SC.
What else have they ruled on recently? I guess I missed these things!
That law was so clearly written that not even a single liberal Justice could deny it. Nine to nothing. I love it.
Honestly, law never stopped a leftist judge. Never. Remember, Obamacare is just a tax.
So why now?
Yeah...q-incidental?
Omg great news , San Diego here ..even the Mexicans are pissed ..10s of thousands from S America are in convention center and hotels .. when the Mexicans came here they were hunted down like rapid dogs ( not saying they should be allowed ) however when the illegals come here from Nicaragua and other places they are given posh hotels, money , food cards, etc disgrace , San Diego is inundated it’s bad here
Whoa.
Seems the left is falling apart
Half my neighborhood would be gone lol
More than that in here NY
My guess is that whoever had the goods on on him is no longer alive or in a position of power to make good on their threats. Epstein/Maxwell or the like?
Illegal immigration is a catastrophic mess, costing taxpayers $60+ million PER WEEK; this doesn’t include costs related to crime. Over 80% of illegal immigrants are on welfare. Removing incentives would have a huge impact.
(1) Enforce the current laws. (2) Increase the punishment: ◾ Anyone entering illegally (they have already broken federal laws) should be permanently prohibited from obtaining citizenship, asylum, and green cards. This should include: ▪ All children of illegal immigrants. ▪ Children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants. (This was not the purpose of the 14th Amendment). (3) No legal assistance will be provided to illegal immigrants to contest their deportation.
No politician, including a president, should be allowed to break our laws.
This! ☝?I like the way you think! ??
They ought to leave. To put nicely get da fuck out and stay da fuck out.
Your "put nicely" comment made me spit out my tea… ???
I wanna help.
1000% have to be! Wow.
Post 461
What makes a movie GOOD? GREAT actors? Q
Pack your bags Esse. The wise Latina just sold your ass out.
Lololol
Exactly! Roberts aside, the fact that Sotomayer AND Kagan went along with it!? I'm struggling to pick my jaw up off the floor.
Kagan did more than go along, she WROTE it!
I realized that after I commented haha! Isn't that the BEST!? Completely insane.
Yeah, shove it up your arse deep state freaks.
Attn WinsAnon.
STICKY
No doubt!
A likely explanation is in Jonathan Turley’s article; basically, SCOTUS is very concerned about the threats of “stacking the court”.
"The Court is expected to issue divided opinions on upcoming cases, but it seems to be frontloading opinions that drive home the fact that most cases are not driven by such ideological divisions."
The article didn’t address cases driven by “hating Trump”… but I digress.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/supreme-court-critics-decision-jonathan-turley
Does this actually mean anything for sending their asses back home?
Now deport them!!
Wow Roberts getting his act together? maybe a little worried
You hear that Lumbergh, you can take your TPS and shove it up your ass.
Just more strange activity in this clown world we find ourselves in. At least this makes sense but why it happened is beyond me. It is almost like they are following orders.
military in control...they had to cut deals
Does this have any affect on DACA?
Unfortunately, no.
It's a narrow ruling applicable to only to recipients of temporary protection status (TPS) on humanitarian grounds after U.S. recognized qualifying catastrophic event as defined in our immigration laws. It should be noted that TPS designations for countries are only valid for up to18 months but they end up being continuously renewed long after the catastrophic event is resolved.
DACA recipients recieved temporary protection because their parents brought them into the U.S. illegally or kept them in the U.S. illegally after their Visa expired. Also, DACA is an executive order, not a law.
Ok. Fine. Since the SCOTUS only seems to apply to the foreign territory that is DC, go ahead and pack em all in there, and throw away the key.
Will be a good show.
Another reference to “Green”! We are “Green to go”! WWG1WGA “Go Fly”
your logic is correct.