If Arizona decertifies, Biden is no longer the president of the UNITED States.
He becomes a walking constitutional crisis.
Decertification needs to happen as soon as possible.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (110)
sorted by:
I believe there is language that indicates ALL states must certify their votes before a president can be declared the winner. Not totally sure that's true, but what I've read before.
This is correct. Congress cannot certify until all states have certified.
So, what happens when a state decertifies? We're gonna find out.
Devolution. The government is incapacitated, and the military must act.
Especially when foreign interference proven...Iβm totally on board the devolution train. Nothing else really makes sense at this point. Although I wonder if they are waiting for mass US protests like in Europe before the reveal. This is what concerns me...
What about the pedo that just resigned?
Patel Patriot theorized in his devolution series that Trump used a Presidential Executive Action Document (PEAD) to suspend counting the EVs sometime prior to the Jan 6th Joint Session of Congress. There are no instructions in the Constitution for rectifying a stolen election. If the votes were never actually certified, however, there is no need to decertify them as audit results are revealed.
It also means Trump has been in power the entire time.
"We're in territory we've never been in before"
There is a first time for everything. When a law has no precedent, it called a Case of First Impression.
To adopt the most persuasive rule of law, courts will look to various sources for guidance. These sources include:
It seems to me that because at least 15 other election have been thrown out due to election fraud, mainly absentee vote fraud, that the court could draw some conclusion under "the law in other jurisdictions"
Since it is our Custom that those who commit fraud, not benefit from their crime, that seems like it could give weight to overturning election too.
Lastly Legislative History and Intent would be applicable. It certainly was not the intent of law to allow for voting machine companies, in league with foreign countries to run algorithms to swap votes.
And there's going to be different opinions and interpretations from people on our side. I've already seen the arguing.
unzips
Soon please!
Sooooo Were we go as one we must go all???πππππ
I, for one, great appreciated your comment
I recall digging into this in Jan... and if a state does not certify electors by Jan 6, they are excluded from the count. The total number of electors is reduced and the winner must still receive the majority of electors... so total electors would go down by 11 from 538 to 527 and the amount needed to win would be 264. So need to pull more than just Arizona's electors to 'decertify'. Then again, there is no real precedent for decertification so who knows what the heck will happen.
The election was fraudulent. It is proven and there is historical precedent on a resolution for a fraudulent election.
If this theory were correct, there could be a President that was only certified by one state.
AZ would decertify their votes for Biden because they discovered Trump won their state. Iβm assuming, they would then certify their votes for President Trump. So all states would be certified except for a small window during the procedure.
So you're saying that in 2017 if New York, or Cali "decertified " their electors then Trump would no longer have been president (and Obama would be)? Is it that easy for one state to remove a president? Seems a bit illogical to me.