Canada's Bill C-16 coming to bite the USA. Freedom of speech precludes the forcing of speech. Not using someone's pronouns (shudder) is not hate speech. Sorry. It is merely a lack of speech.
Saw this yesterday on another site - technically, she is a TERF, but she makes some excellent points and therefore, it has already been pulled down from YT once. I can see why she pisses some people off but it is amazing to sit back and realize how messed up as a society we are right now where basic common sense seems radical.
(And while I like his work, she is right to call out Andy Ngo.)
You can really trip them up doing that because they can only give examples, not a definition. If they do give a definition then I tell them their responses are hate speech.
Forcing you to say things I want you to say, is not my right.
That is the theme with liberal faggots. They don’t actually want to gain sympathy or empathy, or try to connect on a human level to try and change minds. They just want what they want, and they want it now. They don’t want to earn or work for anything. Pack of losers.
There are ways to solve this problem. If I can define my pronouns to be whatever I want and you're a bigot if you don't play my game, I can assure you I'll come up with some pronouns that you really don't want to say.
Start with the black supremacists pushing this crap: My new pronouns are: Massah and Massah's. "Ex. Massah says Massah doesn't like tomato on Massah's hamburger. Massah wants a refund."
And I if you run into the bleeding heart variety: My new pronouns are: Mein Fuhrer and Der Fuhrer's. "Mein Fuhrer says you must call Der Fuhrer "Mein Fuhrer" or you're a bigot."
If they want to play this stupid game, give them some very stupid prizes to win.
No discrimination exists because teachers shouldn't use or give a fuck about anyones pronouns. If a non-trans demanded to be called princess sparkle flutterdust, they would be ignored. If/when a 'trans' demanded anything just as outlandish, they too would be ignored. Or demand to be called majesty, or dawg, or some other shit. Demand all you like, no-one has to give a fuck about you and your tantrum throwing.
Refusing to use a student's pronouns because of who they are is discrimination.
Who they are? Like, a boy with a penis he got at birth? Give me a break. If you got/had a penis, ain't nothing in the world ever going to change you into some other than what you are: a boy. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
JBP is rapidly becoming a prophet. Also, the ACLU must be disbanded immediately. They used to protect rights such as these. Now they want full on soviet thought control mandated and compelled speech to be a thing. They have outlived their purpose.
Here is the thing, this is...at best, a VERY VERY VERY uphill battle. The Court has already very explicitly and plainly stated that only very specific kinds of speech are crimes. Otherwise the Government has no business to restrict what people say. They made it very clear speech is not a hate crime, actually doing a crime with the motive of "hate" is a crime.
The uphill battle comes in the fact that overruling previous president has ONLY been done once in US history with Brown vs Board of Ed. And there it was only legally possible because the previous ruling had an "escape" of "if they be separate but equal" to enable a future ruling to overturn it. Which is what happened, it was proven it was not equal, and thus actually they full upheld the previous ruling, and used the "Escape" to strike down segregation.
Since Free Speech was so plainly and openly defended, the Court cannot now legally impose censorship. It would mean the violation of precedent.
The ACLU would have to equate using the wrong pronoun to be legally the same as a "Fire in a crowded theater" or a plain and direct call to violence or treason. And while that might be possible with liberal logic.... if the Court actually conducts that big of a breach of precedent it will shatter the very basis of the legal system.
That's the thing, they can try to push this shit through several times until it finally sticks.
I really am in favor of exceptionally cruel and unusual punishment for entities that try to break down the Constitution.
Canada's Bill C-16 coming to bite the USA. Freedom of speech precludes the forcing of speech. Not using someone's pronouns (shudder) is not hate speech. Sorry. It is merely a lack of speech.
I self identify as "his imperial majesty" and expect tributes accordingly, to be paid to me in 24 carat gold.
Your move ACLU.
Saw this yesterday on another site - technically, she is a TERF, but she makes some excellent points and therefore, it has already been pulled down from YT once. I can see why she pisses some people off but it is amazing to sit back and realize how messed up as a society we are right now where basic common sense seems radical.
(And while I like his work, she is right to call out Andy Ngo.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KesrQjhcTT0
Hate speech is Free speech
There is only speech and all of it is free.
Exactly. Otherwise the goalposts keep moving, when in reality there are no goalposts or boundaries on language.
I keep asking people to define hate speech.
You can really trip them up doing that because they can only give examples, not a definition. If they do give a definition then I tell them their responses are hate speech.
Yes Hate crimes are only ACTIONS taken against somebody. Words are not actions, hurting feelings is not a crime.
Beating a person because of their skin color IS a hate crime. Calling them a racial slur is just rude.
Eloquent.
Forcing you to say things I want you to say, is not my right.
That is the theme with liberal faggots. They don’t actually want to gain sympathy or empathy, or try to connect on a human level to try and change minds. They just want what they want, and they want it now. They don’t want to earn or work for anything. Pack of losers.
The ACLU arguing for compelled speech. Clown world.
Under rated comment! It is a consistent fight we should be training every generation for.
There are ways to solve this problem. If I can define my pronouns to be whatever I want and you're a bigot if you don't play my game, I can assure you I'll come up with some pronouns that you really don't want to say.
Start with the black supremacists pushing this crap: My new pronouns are: Massah and Massah's. "Ex. Massah says Massah doesn't like tomato on Massah's hamburger. Massah wants a refund."
And I if you run into the bleeding heart variety: My new pronouns are: Mein Fuhrer and Der Fuhrer's. "Mein Fuhrer says you must call Der Fuhrer "Mein Fuhrer" or you're a bigot."
If they want to play this stupid game, give them some very stupid prizes to win.
No discrimination exists because teachers shouldn't use or give a fuck about anyones pronouns. If a non-trans demanded to be called princess sparkle flutterdust, they would be ignored. If/when a 'trans' demanded anything just as outlandish, they too would be ignored. Or demand to be called majesty, or dawg, or some other shit. Demand all you like, no-one has to give a fuck about you and your tantrum throwing.
The exact same treatment for everyone.
STOP THEM NOW
Archived Tweet:
https://archive.is/WhaVN
Who they are? Like, a boy with a penis he got at birth? Give me a break. If you got/had a penis, ain't nothing in the world ever going to change you into some other than what you are: a boy. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
All the republicans were right. The ACLU and every "liberal" organization was simply tools for the tyrannical fascists within America.
JBP is rapidly becoming a prophet. Also, the ACLU must be disbanded immediately. They used to protect rights such as these. Now they want full on soviet thought control mandated and compelled speech to be a thing. They have outlived their purpose.
Follow the money. It is ALWAYS about the money.
I hope everyone at the ACLU keeps up with their covid vaccinations.
The ACLU is run by faggots and commies. Hows that for free speech?
Here is the thing, this is...at best, a VERY VERY VERY uphill battle. The Court has already very explicitly and plainly stated that only very specific kinds of speech are crimes. Otherwise the Government has no business to restrict what people say. They made it very clear speech is not a hate crime, actually doing a crime with the motive of "hate" is a crime.
The uphill battle comes in the fact that overruling previous president has ONLY been done once in US history with Brown vs Board of Ed. And there it was only legally possible because the previous ruling had an "escape" of "if they be separate but equal" to enable a future ruling to overturn it. Which is what happened, it was proven it was not equal, and thus actually they full upheld the previous ruling, and used the "Escape" to strike down segregation.
Since Free Speech was so plainly and openly defended, the Court cannot now legally impose censorship. It would mean the violation of precedent.
The ACLU would have to equate using the wrong pronoun to be legally the same as a "Fire in a crowded theater" or a plain and direct call to violence or treason. And while that might be possible with liberal logic.... if the Court actually conducts that big of a breach of precedent it will shatter the very basis of the legal system.
The Constitution is the supreme law of the land