President Trump..."The Unselect Committee will not like what they asked for!"
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
This is not insignificant. This is another YUGE piece to the overall plan.
I'm Insignificant, and I approve this message.
No you are not. Username does NOT check out.
Oh more introducing evidence?
Getting real, Pedes. Bring it on!
Doomers be like "Lalala nothing is happening lalallala"
I know I know... I have been railing on doomer gloomers lately and well... I won't be letting up any time soon.
So...what exactly is happening with Kerik, GC, that doomers and gloomers shouldn't ask pertinent questions about?
Is Kerik only a feint and/or decoy like apparently Mike Lindell is (with his Supreme Court filing that didn't get filed prior to Thanksgiving and President Trump not being reinstated by August 2021 or September 2021)? Moves and Counter moves and disinformation is necessary, right?
So....which is Kerik in The Plan? Disinformation to keep the DS spinning, or will he actually testify and present damning evidence to the television world that proves 2020 election fraud?
You are so confident in always being hard on folks. Which part, which actor, which role is Kerik playing in this show?
You should know.
Do you care to wager?
Asking pertinent questions is not dooming. Asking loaded questions with heavy bias is dooming and will not be tolerated.
I don't know exactly what is role is, but Trump agreeing to waive attorney privileges AND publicly announcing that he is indicates that Trump has a lot of confidence into how this plays out.
My guess is this is an opportunity to subvert the media completely and present evidence in an uninterruptable capacity. It will then be impossible to suppress the evidence.
So...why didn't they take advantage of that with the AZ audit hearing and at Lindell's cyber symposium, tough guy?
Asking no questions and pushing hopium with loaded bias, while not allowing critical thought and free conversation is the opposite side of the same coin.
Someone wake me up when the shooting begins.....yawn.
I didn't expect anything but a down vote from you in response to my questions.
You are a one dimensional character in this show. To you, everyone who asks questions and/or is frustrated by this crap show is a doomer, gloomer, and/or a shill that needs mod intervention and deporting. Everything is a nail that needs a hammer.
Your litmus tests for posters are a failure to recognize what one of the greatest warriors of modern times recognized: "War is Hell". Your shill-baiting is boorish and anti-free discussion, at best.
A little more empathy, humility and understanding that this war is Hell and that you, and frankly nobody else knows where this is headed and which players are playing what roles...
...Would go a long way.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Nope. You are off base and wrong. Being articulate and venting frustrations and asking questions is highly encouraged. If you actually followed any of my posts (which you obviously do not) you would have seen me iterate this before.
What is NOT acceptable is people asking loaded questions with "gotch ya" responses. That is NOT asking hard questions that is spewing bias under the guise of a question in a pathetic attempt to force their dooming to stay on display. That will NOT be tolerated now or ever as that is not done in good faith, but with the intent of having someone's dooming vindicated. Doomers have been wrong about everything. Nothing they claimed was happening went the way they thought. But instead of admitting they were wrong, they just wait until the cabal gets a small table scrap of victory to come out of the woodwork.
Also, read the damn sidebar.
Everyone has been wrong about the twists and turns of The Plan, especially hopium pushers and hopium addicts. They are as worthless as the alleged doomers but allowed none the less.
No one has accurately predicted what has happened and where we are at. No one.
The current pivot and theory in attempting to explain where we are at is the Devolution. We shall see.
I don't view it from this skeptical perspective because I am a shill (I am definitely not a shill.)
I view it this way because history over and over again has taught us that skepticism is necessary in dealing with the DS opponent, especially after 9/11.
Our enemies used our conservatism, our patriotism, our love for right, our disdain for wrong, our love of Country, our disdain for liberalism , our support for GW Bush, our support of "Republicans", our disdain for liberals, our energy, our organization to advance the DS agenda and most Patriots didn't see it until after the fact.
We cried tears, shouted support, waved our flags, sang the Star Spangled Banner in our homes and churches, while GW Bush stood atop the World Trade Center rubble with a bullhorn in one hand and his arm around a firefighter with the other.
We saw off our young men and women to war in the Middle East with hearts steadfast and minds and mouths arguing on behalf of the moral correctness of the GW Bush Admin.
We sobbed as caskets were offloaded at military bases around our Country.
Flags were placed in our yards, streets and in the windows of our homes.
When we woke up, it was too late. The Patriot Act, the EffBeeEye and the SeeEyeAye are all used against the great citizens of this Country.
We gave them our energy and support.
Be skeptical.
Don't blindly give it to them again.
Don't trust. Ask questions.
Demand that they earn our trust. Demand that they earn our support.
As Satan comes posing as an Angel of Light, so does the DS...wrapped in a flag and patriotism: robbing, stealing, murdering and destroying.
Don't help them!
Don't let them!
Oh this should be interesting.
They will just deny the public hearing part ...national security and all.
Is that the Trump card?
One of thousands.
Our President has more courage than all those lying bastards combined. He speaks confidently to those backed by the full force of the corrupt regime. And it's not just bravado.
When a credible witness testifies about crimes in open court, doesn't that invoke the duty of the judge sitting as a magistrate and the prosecutor to follow up?
I thought so... I was surprised the bicep guy in the Rittenhouse trial, a felon - wasn't arrested for having a firearm....
He got immunity for testifying.
But then he said that he carried his gun there in the back of his pants and was licensed to do so... the lawyer corrected him but only said he didn't have a concealed carry license. He lied under oath and misrepresented fact to the court.
Stream it live. Put it on Cspan. Archive it and spread it everywhere. Sidestep the MSM.
Exactly.
I'm more than ready for the Grand Finale, where the takedown occurs, Guantanamo is fully populated, military tribunals mete out justice and nooses are outfitted with necks.
BRING IT ON, Mr. President!
Wait. How does Trump waive attorney client privilege?
By saying, or signing a document that says, "in the matter of 'y', I waive attorney client privilege and permit the attorney to answer questions and provide information and evidence about 'y'.
Why give this info away! Now they can prepare. He should have let this be a shocking surprise to the deep state.
This sets the play ...
Umm, because maybe I just posted it now...
Nice bring it!
I agree with you that the evidence of election fraud is overwhelming and it is clear that election fraud ocurred in the 2020 election.
What is your theory in regard to why, given the overwhelming fraud, the evidence hasn't been presented in clear, concise, precise and compelling ways?
Even in the Arizona audit result hearing before the AZ State Senate, the witnesses seemingly stopped short of testifying in a complete, concise and compelling way...even Jovan stopped short (I watched the entire thing and was cheering them all on). Why?
Lindell said that he had terabytes of evidence of election fraud and evidence that China hacked the election, but then stopped short of providing the definitive evidence at his symposium. His own cyber expert stated that the evidence presented didn't support the China hack claim. Why?
I don't view it from this skeptical perspective because I am a shill (I am definitely not a shill.)
I view it this way because history over and over again has taught us that skepticism is necessary in dealing with the DS opponent, especially after 9/11.
Our enemies used our conservatism, our patriotism, our love for right, our disdain for wrong, our love of Country, our disdain for liberalism, our support for GW Bush, our support of "Republicans", our disdain for liberals, our energy, and our organization to advance/execute the DS agenda and most Patriots didn't see it until after the fact.
We cried tears, shouted support, waved our flags, sang the Star Spangled Banner in our homes and in our churches, while GW Bush stood atop the World Trade Center rubble with a bullhorn in one hand and his arm around a firefighter with the other.
We saw off our young men and women to war in the Middle East with hearts steadfast and minds and mouths arguing on behalf of the moral high ground/correctness of the GW Bush Admin.
We sobbed as caskets were offloaded at military bases around our Country.
Flags were placed in our yards, streets and in the windows of our homes.
When we woke up, it was too late. The Patriot Act, the EffBeeEye and the SeeEyeAye are all used against the great citizens of this Country.
We gave them our energy and support.
Be skeptical.
Don't blindly give it to them again.
Don't trust. Ask questions.
Demand that they earn our trust. Demand that they earn our support.
As Satan comes posing as an Angel of Light, so does the DS...wrapped in a flag and patriotism: robbing, stealing, murdering and destroying.
Don't help them!
Don't let them!
You may want to check your own premise:
Trump's team launched one lawsuit in each contested state none of which were heard. It went to the supreme court where it wasn't heard. Rudy Giuliani alone laid out the case for election fraud plainly and clearly continuously for about a month on his own channel (in between ads for cigars, granted).
When Giuliani brought his case before a Federal Court in Pennsylvania, this is what he said to the Judge:
"No, your honor, we are not" alleging fraud, Giuliani said, after Brann reminded him a newer version of the Trump campaign's lawsuit cut back those claims. It's a "fraudulent process," Giuliani continued.
You can find t hat fact in almost every article about Giuliani's Nov. 17th appearance before the Federal Court.
His odd PA press conference in front of the busted down Four Seasons landscaping business also was lackluster and underwhelming.
By the way, also documented in several other state cases, the Trump campaign lawyers made similar statements that the case was not about election fraud. You can read that fact in the record for your self.
From Powell's Kraken, to Lindell's cyber symposium, to Lindell's alleged Supreme Court case, to Trump Campaign's Court appearances, to the AZ Audit Result Hearing, etc. They seemingly stop short on presenting definitive evidence of election fraud.
Why?
When and where will the evidenced be presented?
How does this fit in to the winning strategy and The Plan?
Are all of these public efforts by these folks just sideshows to keep the DS busy, occupied and spinning?
What are the possible scenarios here?
You don't need to be slick if you are presenting incontrovertible proof.
Nah...documented proof wins the day.
Cool Beans! What a awesome genius!
One Trump Card...