What you can do is take notes and write a summary of what's said.

Only if you want jail time. They make that very clear on the page related to this. Also I know this was there for the jury selection, but is it good as well for the trial?

Did not get caught doing this and leaking it!

I am concerned about Comey leading the prosecution

I am not so sure Comeys are tight with Clintons any more. Jim was thrown under the bus by Hillary, and instead of becoming the hero he wanted to be, he was hated by both left and the right (He was the closest that came to uniting left and right in that way ;)

For all you know Comeys will gleefully take revenge on Hillary and her brood with this case.

Agreed but the fact it is t televised gives me more hope actually. Means theres a better chance of it being a real trial not some made for tv bs

More swamp draining

I look at the judge and think of the Marx brothers. She resembles Harpo to me...

Personally, my timezone makes it impossible for me, but I am hoping someone else might record at least important bits. I know it will be hours and hours of dry mundane stuff

Same, at 9:15am Eastern

Same here @11:20

And yet, @Jack resigns right as the "rigged" trial starts.

maybe it’s a sham presidency and the white hats are pulling the strings?

Devolution

Just to add more to your comfort, Q already point all this and more in his drops last year and never told us to panic! Additionally, Q has told us that the timing of Maxwell case is significant. Keep the faith, Pede, it will be glorious.

Me either

Access code doesn’t work!

Wow. Very good catch.

It says the password for the conference call is not recognized 😂

u/#Noolib

Rule 53. Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited

Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.

Notes

(As amended Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002.)

Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1944

While the matter to which the rule refers has not been a problem in the Federal courts as it has been in some State tribunals, the rule was nevertheless included with a view to giving expression to a standard which should govern the conduct of judicial proceedings, Orfield, 22 Texas L.R. 194, 222–3; Robbins, 21 A.B.A.Jour. 301, 304. See, also, Report of the Special Committee on Cooperation between Press, Radio and Bar, as to Publicity Interfering with Fair Trial of Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Proceedings (1937), 62 A.B.A.Rep. 851, 862–865; (1932) 18 A.B.A.Jour. 762; (1926) 12 Id. 488; (1925) 11 Id. 64.

Committee Notes on Rules—2002 Amendment

The language of Rule 53 has been amended as part of the general restyling of the Criminal Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only, except as noted below.

Although the word “radio” has been deleted from the rule, the Committee does not believe that the amendment is a substantive change but rather one that accords with judicial interpretation applying the current rule to other forms of broadcasting and functionally equivalent means. See, e.g., United States v. Hastings, 695 F.2d 1278, 1279, n. 5 (11th Cir. 1983) (television proceedings prohibited); United States v. McVeigh, 931 F. Supp. 753 (D. Colo. 1996) (release of tape recordings of proceedings prohibited). Given modern technology capabilities, the Committee believed that a more generalized reference to “broadcasting” is appropriate.

Also, although the revised rule does not explicitly recognize exceptions within the rules themselves, the restyled rule recognizes that other rules might permit, for example, video teleconferencing, which clearly involves “broadcasting” of the proceedings, even if only for limited purposes.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_53