Trump is building his own Cloud infrastructure outside Bezos Cloud (Amazon Web Services). This is great news.
(media.greatawakening.win)
LET'S GOOoOo
Comments (54)
sorted by:
That's good news. I wish that we could just utilize the provision in eo13818 to forfeit AWS and buy it up in a government asset auction.
While I'd like that, the most American and truest capitalistic answer is not to take the private assets, but build better competition and drive them out of business. I wonder if TMTG will simplify the cloud stuff even further while abiding by American Principals. If they do that they could spell the death for the tech titans, also I hope they buy a search engine and create their own Browser
I mean I mean that’s nice in theory and might have been possible at some point in the past, but hasn’t been possible for a LONG time to “build better & beat them.”
Mega-corporations like AMZN, MSFT + others have way too much money; too many resources; and too many ways to totally kill competition.
Whether by flat out buying out the competition, passing laws to kill them, buying teams of lawyers to defeat them in court, I really don’t think that’s feasible to “beat them” today.
I hope Trump absolutely buries them and if this is true what he’s building, I’ll migrate everything to his service & away from MSFT / AMZN / Google / etc…
yeah im currently maintaining one application in AWS and am in the process of building and deploying my own application there as well... theres just not a good alternative currently for people like me who wear all the hats in one company and are also running another, and therefore dont have time to setup an in house solution
But if TMTG comes up with a viable alternative, even if its 10-15% more expensive I would definitely swap and say it's worth it just for the privacy standards and American values
Exactly and agree!!
I would absolutely pay more for a company that is not pure evil like silicon valley has all become!
I agree with you to some degree. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are all massive monopolies. According to our economic rules (that arent enforced because our politicians are bought and paid for by Corporations, Bankers, and Hedgefunds), they should be forcefully broken up. Hell, they should've never been allowed to grow this large.
We have monopoly and antitrust laws for these kinds of companies. We actually have laws on the books that deal with so many modern issues. We just have an enforcement problem.
Bingo.
Its the other way around.
Taxpayer money was used to create facebook, google and every other CIA controlled corporate entity.
If we try to go against them, they have the unfair advantage of billions upon billions of dollars of mockingbird money paid for by you and other taxpayers.
They did not originate in a capitalist environment and they are rightly owned by the American people, because we provided their funding.
I said the same thing basically and then just read your comment. Great minds.
I thought the fact that the SeeEyeAye built AWS was a well known fact, surprised this wasn't the first comment.
That's pretty anti-capitalist isn't it? I mean, isn't that pretty much what socialists want to do?
And at what amount can we say that a company's profits are too much to make? At what point is an individual's income going to be labeled as too much.
In fact, this is the type of thing I often hear from liberals when they talk about companies and individuals not paying their fair share in taxes and that it's wrong that they are profiting as much as they are.
It's not ok to pick and choose who can benefit from capitalism.
Where did you get the odd notion that Silicon Valley Corporations represent "capitalism"? Capitalism is the mask used to dupe normies into being OK with fascicom totalitarianism ie a sheep skin for psychopathic wolves. Read relevant Q drops.
Keep in mind AWS was built upon the carcass of AOL and WorldCom (amazon literally bought their assets for pennies on a dollar in Northern Virginia), which were arguably the biggest money laundering scheme and accounting fraud in the 90s.
The retail part of Amazon isn't even profitable, all the money is in AWS.
Is it such a leap to think all these monopolistic corporations exist because government sanctions them because they are really government owned entities that started out from darpa Ala fakebook ie lifelog? I've heard rumors in the past that Amazon could have never survived as it did on such a shoe string and in the red alot for many years at its beginning without backing by some kind of funding that wanted its existence.
I don't know if anything is real anymore. But if Facebook was an operation to monitor all our social movements, Amazon was meant to track our purchases and business secrets and possible break main street so we are even more government dependent. The big guys all got passes to stay open during covid...government always exempts itself from its rules.
I thought that was obvious from the amount of money being spent on it. Server farms aren't cheap.
Full Presentation Here
That presentation is really weird. The parts where they show structure are just so bizarrely vague and generic.
I didn’t think so in the least.
It looks perfectly normal and understandable to me.
It is a very high-level, 50,000 FT overview for investors and apparently the various government agencies such as the SEC.
What in it specifically did you think was so weird?
It's too vague, no investor would be happy with that, when our company launched we had to give every square inch of infrastructure multiple times to secure investment. This is weird and just a definition of infrastructure.
you mean the infrastructure? thats pretty standard presentation for something like this
I work in Supply Chain and see a 1000 of these start up decks a year, none are this generic.
That is epic thanks!
Building more public cloud infrastructure is the way
I have my own personal cloud that is within my total control. 100TB and rising. Q said to save everything offline. So no commercial cloud for me.
Just a small matter of $$$$$$$$$$$
Man DWAC and CFVI got smoked today. Im buying more.
This is why VMWARE is no longer part of Dell. At the end of the year. VMware will be an independent company.
I would say, good morning.
Don't really want to have my stuff saved on Trump's computer either.
lol it will come down to needing to put your stuff on both the aws AND trump computers, just in case.
I think it is better and cheaper to just have extra tera bits of hard drive. for personal use.
Nothing wrong with creating your own home network and backing up only what you absolutely don't want to lose on somebody else's computer (just make sure to encrypt it first).
I haven't lost a file in over 30 years using my own resources and multiple backups.
I don't trust somebody else with my data.
As long as you have offsite copies in case of a fire or water main burst, you're golden.
Of course. BTW, there is no water anywhere near my office.
Thanks very much for the comment, however I do have to disagree. A cloud infrastructure is exactly what they are building to serve their internal products / applications.
On Slide 11, they describe in the bullet "Resilient Ecosystem" how they are building a "cloud-based architecture and hyper-converged infrastructure". On Slide 22, they describe the key elements of this cloud infrastructure which is a combination of several elements or service providers such as DNS Server, Load Balancer, and CDN. Smaller cloud providers outsource these individual elements to separate service providers. Large cloud providers like AWS do most of this themselves.
This leaves the main question which is whether they have a long-term vision to provide cloud services B2B in the future or only have this infrastructure in place for their own internal needs. Here on Slide 11 there is a clue in the section called "Scalable" where they talk about the "potential high-growth, high-margin, high ROIC economic model". This means once this bullet proof cloud infrastructure in in place and serving their internal needs (Truth Social and TMTG+), they can then look to sell cloud services to outside companies just like AWS does in the Bezos Cloud.
TLDR; buy DWAC frens
SAUCE > full presentation https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1849635/000119312521348593/d242442dex992.htm
Wow! OP not only responded without insulting someone who challenged his post, but actually has some expertise in the field he posted about!!
I am actually surprised.
Dumb question but is DWAC publicly traded at the moment?
Yes it has been for a month or so. Went off at $10 hit $175 and sits around $55 currently
Looking at the presentation, I see nothing that implies they will eventually be providing cloud services to people. You are right that they do seem to be building their own infrastructure though, because they basically have to. It would be suicide for them to just use aws or azure
Maria Bartiroma just interviewed the head of Rumble. Citizen Free Press has a link. He said they are in partnership with Trump, built infrastructure from the ground up that's independent and talks about creating/providing their own cloud services.
Cloud based architecture just means that the software architecture is built from the beginning to run on the modern cloud. I'm this case architecture means the structure of the software, not cloud servers as a whole. "Hyper-converged infrastructure" sounds like corporate jibber jabber to just say whatever their infrastructure (servers and networks) is that it'll just be well connected with itself and the service. I agree there's nothing to directly imply they're making their own cloud solutions like AWS. There would be a lot more server details and details about hardware or such that is not present. Most cloud systems, even the small ones, have in house controllable load balancing or other stuff like that.
Did you see slides 22 and 23 where they specifically mention;
“DB Servers, App Servers, CDN” etc?
Also; it just makes sense they have to - and want to - build out their own infrastructure; esp with POTUS Trump; do you think he doesn’t perfectly understand what they would do to TMTG the moment he went live on AWS, Azure, or some other globalist, communist infrastructure?
Do you understand what has happened / what big tech has done to companies like Gab + Parler, as well as thousands of other not-rabidly-communist web pages, video services, blogs, and anything else digital?
You can’t just create a social media site out of thin air; it has to live somewhere.
You have to register the domain name somewhere, have DNS, App + DB Servers, storage to host all the cat & Pepe memes frens will upload, etc.
If they tried to create something like that on any other big tech platform, it would get aborted the instant they tried to launch.
Trump almost HAS TO create his own full cloud storage / CDN platform….
.