TL;DR:
They CAN produce the glass vials they claim they do, but they CAN'T produce the goop to fill them. Most, at least 70%, are probably saline/placebo. That could explain the 2-shot regimen.
The clot shots have been produced faster than is possible.
Consider the math:
3,626,624,617 people are counted as "fully vaccinated" with 2 doses as of December 11th, 2021.
That's 7,253,249,234 doses given.
There are 6 doses per vial of Pfizer.
So a total of at least 1,208,874,872.33 vials would have had to have been produced thus far. This is considering only Pfizer's dose/vial rate, but seeing how it is the most popular, let's go with it and apply percentages later while only counting what had been administered; we'll ignore vials that haven't been administered, for now, just as a "best case" scenario.
Let's see what the stooges say about their production rates:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00727-3
Some 413 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been produced by the beginning of March, according to Airfinity data. The company projects that this will rise to 9.5 billion doses by the end of 2021. A larger figure was published last week in an analysis from the Global Health Innovation Center at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. The centre’s researchers aggregated publicly announced forecasts from vaccine makers, which add up to around 12 billion doses by the end of the year.
12 Billion doses, aye? 2,000,000,000 vials then?
So, that seems possible with what has been administered at 1,208,874,872.33 vials administered. It wouldn't make sense with total production if we account for unused vials, though. We'll ignore that for now and assume the best...
A month is 2,628,000 seconds.
At one vial per second, it would take 459.998 months to create the number of vials that have already been administered. That's not counting what's not been used yet.
It's only been 12 months...
On its face, these numbers seem impossible. I doubt we could make the damned glass vials that fast, let alone synthesize whatever goop that goes in them.
But let's test these hypotheses...
Let's just look at the glass vial production then:
We’re now averaging around eight to nine million vials per month, so we’re really rocking – producing and shipping and producing and shipping...
The effort that people have put in has been nothing short of inspiring. It’s been 24/7, working 80-90 hour weeks, with some working through Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year. The people on the production line, in the quality teams, the program managers who look after the schedules – and all their related supervisors and managers – have been, I would say, maxed out.
So, one plant can make 8-9 million vials per month working 80-90 hour work weeks.
In order to keep up with the minimum production for the 1.208 billion vials administered, that's 11.19 factories that have to be running at this same rate since the start of January just for the glass vials. Consider the 2 billion vials and there would need to be 18.52 factories to keep up the production, solely for the Covid "vaccines" -- which means the vials produced only go towards the clot shots and nothing else.
Assuming glass vial production and the goop production can run in tandem, 19 or so factories doesn't seem too out of the realm of possibility. It's a lot, but let's keep moving.
Now, consider the goop.
Big Pharma won't say how quickly they can turn it out, but we can extrapolate from what they say in their site (Pfizer).
Based on current projections we expect to produce globally up to 50 million vaccine doses in 2020 and up to 1.3 billion doses in 2021.
1.3 billion doses is 216,666,666.67 vials. That's only 18% of the total 1,208,874,872.33 vials administered, mind you.
With 31,540,000 seconds in a year, it would mean they can only produce 6.87 vials of goop per second.
That means they claim they make an average of 593,568 vials of goop every day.
Considering that a glass vial factory can only produce 300,000 vials per day, it would mean at least two vial factories need to be exclusively servicing Pfizer's production rates for them to successfully bottle the goop. If we figure at least 19 factories are running, which isn't too impossible, this math easily checks out.
Back to the time frame though; let's see the rates.
Originally, I figured at one vial per second, it would take 459.998 months. But what at 6.87 vials per second?
At 6.87 vials per second and 1,208,874,872.33 vials, it would take 66.96 months just accounting for what we know to have been administered.
Well, that doesn't look too good either, but that's just if Pfizer was doing all the work at 6 doses per vial. Since Moderna can get 10-15 doses into a vial, we have to address this discrepancy.
Let's now split them by company and apply the percentages, just to be sure.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1198516/covid-19-vaccinations-administered-us-by-company/
Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses administered in the United States as of December 15, 2021, by vaccine manufacturer:
284,069,934 - Pfizer.
186,454,785 - Moderna
17,272,247 - J&J
499,123 - Other
488,296,089 - Total
So that's 58.17% Pfizer, 38.18% Moderna, and 3.54% J&J.
58.17% of the total vials administered would be 703,202,513.23 vials from Pfizer alone.
At 6.87 vials per second, that comes to 102,358,444.43 seconds, which is 38.94 months of production.
Yup, still impossible.
Since it's only been around 12 months since these things have actually been in full-swing production, the numbers just don't add up.
I'm not even counting vials that have gone unused and vials that have expired.
I'm not even getting into the fact they have to be sub 70° freezing to stay viable. The logistics in refrigerant technologies would be astronomical to consider.
Best case scenario for Pfizer is that they've had these "vaccines" in production for the last 3.25 years and kept them on ice.
Since they expire in just a few months, even in sub 70° temperatures, I doubt very much that they've stockpiled these that long.
Instead, I'm gonna be more optimistic and say the only way they have been able to produce these many "vaccines" is because, at most, only 30.08% of them can factually contain the the mRNA goop. That's the only way they can reach these numbers.
The rest probably contain saline; it's the only way it makes sense.
Disclaimer, I'm bad at math, but I gave it a fair shot just because I was curious.
Thoughts?
If they do expire, as they claim, then they couldn't have prepared them ahead of time.
Then again, I kinda don't trust anything they claim, so even all my math is up in the air.
By their own numbers though, they'd have had to started production in 2018 at the latest going by the current production numbers.
We'd have to see a swell of glass vial production starting in 2018 for the theory that they pre-gamed the vials to be true.
I've considered that.
I'm counting the gross number of vials Pfizer, specifically, say they can produce in a month on their site. By their own metrics, that should include all active plants they own/contract.
If they are stored at negative 80 degrees, I have a hard time believing they expire... only once thawed would I recon they start to degrade/expire.
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/millions-of-covid-vaccines-expire/
According to them, they do expire even when frozen below 70°
That's retarded. Biologists put living samples in permanent storage into the negative 80 freezers, sometimes for years and years. It's like suspended animation for biology. My guess is they just want to sell billions of unnecessary clotshot vials
All things decay due to background radiation. There's a reason that "Noah's Ark" like seed storage facilities have chromium-lead lined walls, perfect-dark carbon walls for light absorption, and vacuum-sealed storage units, on top of the redundancies in design around them.
Light alone can degrade things, especially proteins, even when frozen, that's why even beer bottles are tinted dark brown and dark green.
Freezing things does a number on complex nutrient structures. Everything you freeze degrades accessible nutrients by at least 20% from fresh. It preserves far better past that point than just about every other form of storage, such as canning, but the immediate hit on integrity is still taken.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29786843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411345/
It's an absolute rarity when something can preserve as long as, say, honey.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-science-behind-honeys-eternal-shelf-life-1218690/
The nature of honey reveals that anything preserved with any amount of water is going to degrade, regardless of the preservation methods. Bees actually produce hydrogen peroxide to seal honey in and prevents vapor flow.
Since viral structures and proteins damn near have to be suspended in a water solution to keep themselves from tearing apart, you can't avoid the degradation over time no matter the method. Freeze-drying them and removing the water will surely damage them, as is mentioned here:
https://www.nature.com/articles/206115b0
So, quite simply, the structures are too small and fragile to maintain peak performance after thawing -- with or without water.
Think about it this way: Snow doesn't melt in the exact same way it falls. Certain spots thaw faster than others, and it isn't solely due to sunlight. Many factors are at play. As something changes temperature, certain bonds break before others due to the chemical nature more than just physical.
Imagine draining a pool of water with a floatie in it. I can guarantee you that the floatie will not be in the same spot before and after you drain the pool. The act of draining moves the floatie around, jiggling it. When you thaw nutrients and proteins a similar "jiggling" occurs and is sufficient to break bonds. I can't be certain, but I'd wager the decay pattern due to freezing and thawing follows a catalytic curve as it pertains to decay:
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/chemistry/chapter/catalysis/
In other words, the temperature shift affects some parts of the virus more than others and each component follows their own separate catalytic-type curve as it pertains to thawing. The varied nature of thaw rates around different bonds means certain parts of the virus endure more strain than others. I should mention, when I say "thaw" I don't necessarily mean from a frozen state to an unfrozen state, just that the temperature is returning to the temperature required for the virus to be an active pathogen.
I hope I've given enough examples as to why things, even at the height of our scientific capabilities, are destined to decay over time.
It's only in special cases of things naturally occurring, after millions of years of trial and error through evolution/adaptation, that manage to find a way to preserve themselves indefinitely, as is the case with honey.
Thanks for the pertinent research. We have yet to determine what possibilities else than saline could explain this.
Great analysis. I'd say that the production of glass vials could have predated the vaccine. Glass vials have been used at least for decades (100+ years?). There could have been a preexisting stockpile of glass vials originally created for other purposes but repurposed for COVID vax.
Similarly, the vax production would have started before the vax became available for public consumption.
The glass production article addressed this. They are using specialty glass/plastic vials due to the temperatures and to prevent glass fragments from accumulating due to mass-production methods necessary.
Stockpiling it would also be unlikely, considering the glass shortage the industry was already experiencing.
Finally, they claim there is no way to recycle them.
All this suggests it is unlikely they stockpiled them. Again, it's only one article's position, but I tend to agree with the landscape it presents only because other factors indicate the goop doesn't store well to begin with.
You've clearly done your homework on this topic. Well done fren!
I remember reading on here a could weeks ago, someone said they had some experience in this kind of thing and they caculated it would take about 32 years to make that much.
I remember seeing that too but it's not public knowledge how many satellite manufacturing plants were opened/adapted to produce the goop so the investigation here can only go so far
Facts vs Lies
That's a good video.
I've seen several videos of vials being rapidly filled by automated machinery.
This is done in large rows of vials, twenty or so at a time. These machines are undoubtably pricy but not a problem for companies taking in billions a month. They can buy as many filler machines as they want. Mass product ramps up exponentially when well organized. The base number of one a second or 6 per second is the problem. Getting enough material to fill 2 billion vials is a different issue, agreed.
The problem with the math is we have no idea how many plants are making the glass vials it isnt 1 guy making 1 a second. It could be 100 plants making 10000 an hour. Also the stuff they are calling vaccine is most likely brewed up in giant vats like beer but without the fermention time. So unless you have the proper inputs. The math will always be fuzzy.
Fuzzy? You mean retardedly WRONG.
That's what happens when you point the autism laser at some dry hay.
I’m sure vaccine production is not only done in parallel (multiple factories or production lines) but can also grow exponentially (economies of scale). And it’s probably going on 24/7.
Even if people are working 80-90 hours a week the factory is running 168 hours. Your napkin math is easily underestimating by 1/2. But I figure you’re also missing production increase over time as more equipment and systems come online.
Figure they have had carte Blanche to purchase all the equipment they need with no risk of loss since Warp Speed started. And they may have switched products on existing lines. I’m sure the filling and mixing equipment could be reused with a little recalibration. If I were an evil pharma-villain I would be using the Gov’s credit card to obtain any and all production equipment I could while profits are guaranteed. These are all durable equipment which will print money for many years to come and have resale value to third world countries to boot.
Maybe try to find out who makes the line equipment and how their numbers look. Pfizer is spending their money somewhere.
Saline as a theory isn’t bad though. Is the general public the real phase 3 trial?
They could have started production back in 2016 for all we know.
Nailed it.
Wouldn't we see this discrepancy with people who were putting the vials under microscope. At least one should have come back with nothing.
We do see that.
Stories like this:
https://www.fox9.com/news/2-patients-receive-saline-shots-instead-of-covid-19-vaccine-doses-in-sauk-centre
Are the cover story.
The only way they could have found out their batches were pure saline were if they tested the vials.
They claim they mixed them up, but I have my suspicions. It's far too wide-spread an issue for it to be an honest "mistake."
Not sure about the math above, but there are 11, sometimes 12 doses per vial, not 6.
I addressed that. I applied percentages considering just Pfizer at 6 doses, per the CDC, and the math still didn't favor their narrative.
Even at 12 doses, they would fall short of the number they claim. Double the figure, and you still have 19.47 months, which is still excluding vials produced that have gone unused thus far.
Even overly optimistic, they can't meet the numbers they claim.
I'll leave the math to geniuses such as yourself. I had to oversee a covid shot clinic for 3 months and just know it was typical to obtain 12 doses. Thx for answering. And just so you know, I am not in favor of injections for all. :)
Another research angle for you. The EUA license granted by the FDA includes approval of the proposed manufacturing site(s). If you know that, you might be able to find out what kind of equipment would be used, and get a better idea of throughput.
Here's a bit of nightmare-fuel regarding this nonsense just in case you have not yet seen enough.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10321773/Horseshoe-crab-BLOOD-high-demand-vaccine-drug-testing-extinct.html
20 years? That would match when we started seeing the patent filings for this novel coronavirus stuff.. the disease, the mrna substances, the test kits.. what are the chances?
I think its been manufactured and stockpiled for probably most of this time. All waiting for the trigger to be pulled by whatever evil fucker decided to give the green light to operation kill-the-world.
The batch expiry meme might have been used as another marketing psyop bludgeon to try and force people to take the vax... 'oh it might EXPIRE! You better take it when you can, it might be scarce afterwards!'
Some numbers from 2011:
From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164579/
From 2018:
From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7151793/
We might come by this one honestly. Santa's workshop does produce a lot of toys each year.
They are building stuff as fast as possible here in Portage, MI I can assure you of that, second large building being erected in 2 years. Started about covid time.
If most injections were shooting blanks, then warp speed did save millions.
This shit is mostly automated and done a huge scale with automated machines.
I used to make the servos for those machines. I dont think you realize how easy it would be to swap other mines lines over and set bee lines up in multiple factories in every region to crank this out.
Ive seen how drugs and vaccines are physically produced. Its very high capacity dude. Im talking automated machines moving very fast fulling dozens to hundreds every few seconds. They could have hundreds of these machines cranking everywhere.
You honestly think in the age of biowarfare weve never had to the capacity for immediate serial production to supply the country on short notice?
Something to consider is the OP is using Pfizer's statements. This makes your point irrelevant IF (big if) Pfizer is being truthful. There's 3 possibilities I see here, considering the OP's math. 1: They are producing more than they claim, maybe at less "reputable" sites to make numbers work. 2: They are lying about how many vials and shots have been administered. 3: They gave out X amount of COVID vaccines, and X amount of saline, called them all COVID vaccines.
Lol. Dude. I have personally witnessed thousands of batched made in seconds via machine. I used to make the servos for all the robotics the entire pharmaceutical industry uses lol.
You people are slightly retarded sometimes. It is literally a giant fucking machine moving as fast as possible filling tons of vials with multiple doses every few seconds. Thats just one machine. There are dozens to hundreds of machines. Multiple factories.
They are not making them all in one machine in one central locations to ship out from lol. Holy fuck you people are retarded. There are factories all over cranking this shit out in every region to reduce trucking.
Don’t waste time deducing from their own statements. Corporations lie and keep secrets. All of them. They also do not spill trade secrets. I’ve worked in places that make shit which isn’t patented. But they sure as fuck do not tell people their process or biz model.
They didnt batch and sandbag this shit. It goes bad. Stop overthinking nonsense lol.
Again, I'm not saying you are wrong, read my comment again, he's talking about Pfizer's statements on production, not how many he's guestimating can be produced. I don't disagree with your statement about production capability. I think, personally, that they are lying, because it's just what they do.
Agreed that with an infinite number of machines, and and infinite amount of the necessary ingredients and supplies, we can make an infinite number of doses.
The point however, is that Pfizer has stated what their output is. How long that takes them (machine run time) is irrelevant for this analysis. Pfizer did the math for us by giving a quantity per month. Whether they did it on one machine or a thousand doesn’t change the stated output.
The gist of this analysis, is that Pfizer’s stated output, calculated in with their percentage of market share and claimed doses given doesn't allow for them all to be vaccines. They haven’t made enough doses to support the claimed doses given based on their market share.
Let’s break that down a bit looking just at those three data points. What numbers are likely incorrect?
Output? - I don’t see a logical reason they would lie by claiming they can make less doses than actual. What would be the benefit?
Market Share? This can be subjective data of course, but it seems like it’s an account of actual. Moderna isn’t going to sit by and let Pfizer make market share boasts by taking the numbers for them, and vice-versa.
That leaves us with claimed doses administered. This number certainly is ripe for manipulation, so it’s possible it’s way high, and that explains everything. It’s also possible that it’s accurate, in which case people were given more doses than were made. If that is what happened, then they were given something else, and saline seems like a logical choice.
I wonder what the difference in freeze point is with saline vs. the vax and if someone has noticed any differences amongst doses at various temps. Saline certainly doesn’t remain liquid at -70.
I didn’t validate any of the math from the OP. It’s entirely possible there is an error in the calculations that make this a dead end, and all is as claimed. If the math adds up however…
Jesus fuck dude pfizer cannot cannot be trusted. Ive personally seen this shit and know how fast one system can be set up and KNOW at least how many are running today lol.
Difference today is they're all in it together. I would imagine there's maybe a 3-5% difference between each clot shot. They're going for broke, and likely don't care about the profits at this point, though that's a nice incentive. They're all evil and need to exterminated.
To argue that has mis-quoted or lied about what Pfizer said is another angle, but I would like to assume people aren't that dishonest here with such easy ways to disprove their claims. In all honesty, I personally don't care, I'm not taking the shot.
Fuck the shot. I believe they can and have produced tons of shots. But that they are trying to hide the genocide by making you have to play Russian Roulette 10 times.
I personally think they were making them ahead of time too. I mean, how long have they had the patent for.
Same. Fucknut OP hasn't even WATCHED a factory video let alone been in the presence of those awesome machines.
I was on one production line that was a continuous production item, that I won't get into, but it was 24/7 continuous, stopping for just a second, fucked everything for a week or more to do cleanup. At the point it became more solid, it was moving so fast, it would cut your arm off. CLEANLY.
This guy has no idea about FPS or PPS movement of assembly lines.
Yeah dude when those oem companies work out the kinks and those systems can run full speed it is almost unbelievable how fast it can repeat without error for months.
You can more than one vial at a time
Some more math.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/pfizer/index.html
It says that the dosage for Pfizer is 0.3 mL.
That's 1.8mL per vial.
At 459,998 vials per day, that comes to 827,996.4 mL of goop a day.
That's 218.73 gallons of goop per day and 79,836.45 gallons per year.
Which, honestly, doesn't sound too impossible.
It would take 8.267 years to fill up an Olympic sized swimming pool (660,000 gallons) at that rate.
They could have already had some of the bad shit already made, and Trump forced them to make something relatively harmless.
These vaccines were already made I believe just waiting for launch
"Vaccines"
My Company makes pharmaceuticals. My facility makes and bottles liquids.
We've got one central system where the ingredients are mixed, upwards of 200,000 lbs of product mixed within an hour or 2. There are 31 total tanks for this, so as batches are completed just some cleaning and valves to get the next run started. These tanks are 3 stories tall.
These are piped to the appropriate filing line (2oz, 8oz, and 32oz)
Each of these lines operate at 1,000 -1,500 BOTTLES PER MINUTE.
We've got temperature control and facilities to put any liquid in any container, some containers may require small modifications.
1200 8oz bottles per minute equates to 576,000 ounces per hour we are producing, just on the 8oz line.
2oz line has 2 parallel fillers, capable of 950 2oz bottles per minute each machine.
That's 228,000 ounces per hour.
Please don't talk about what you don't understand, this is all on late 80s and 90s technology. Our new line, not fully running yet, can do 1900 2oz bottles per minute.
All the data I used was pulled from their own site. It's all we've been given to work with.
I understand it as far as they'll let us.
If they simply told us the real figures, then I wouldn't have to do any of this math.
As it stands, you're criticizing me for calling them out on their own bullshit facts and figures that don't jive with one another.
1 Imperial fluid ounce is 28.4131 mL.
So that's 6,478,186.8 mL those two machines can put out an hour; 155,476,483.2 mL per day.
There are 1.8 mL in a vial, per Pfizer's own website.
That would be 86,375,824 vials per day, by your own metric.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7723768/
A shipper for the finished transport of the vials is 3.1382ft³ and holds 975 vials.
Which translates to 88,590.59 total shippers.
That's 278,014.99ft³ of space just to hold what you claim can be produced by a single factory per day.
A 53ft semi-trailer has a capacity of 3,489ft³
Which would be at least 79.68 individual semi trucks servicing a single factory per day to move the vials off site.
https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/pfizer-vaccine-supply-chain-BioNTech-fedex-ups-dhl/588784/
So, Pfizer's factory, according to your metrics, is only performing at 15.06% of what it should be.
That was at the start of production mind you, but even if they ramped up production they would have to increase output by 6.64 times just to match the output you've claimed them capable of.
Do you not see how the numbers you've given are incredibly unlikely?
You gotta stop looking at the on-paper output of these machines and consider the full logistics of the factory output. A car may list 24.2mpg, but that doesn't mean it will always pull that number.
if you would have put as much autistic time into watching just 1 factory video, you would NOT have put all this autistic time into being wrong.
You're wrong. By magnitudes
You're working under so many assumptions it is painful.
First, you assume you know that their factory is exactly like the one you worked at -- in the 80s and 90s apparently. How can you claim it's the same size? How can you be so certain?
Second, you assume me watching any random factory video is going to matter at all. I've watched nearly every "How It's Made" episode and it's pretty damn clear that no two factories operate alike.
Third, you assume mRNA technologies follow the same procedure as any other vaccine or bottle pharmaceutical product. Considering mRNA technologies have never been in mass-production at this scale before, ever, in all of history, what makes you so certain you know exactly what can and cannot be done?
Fourth, you assume using their own numbers makes me wrong. Okay, sure, they are probably lying, but that's the whole point of me crunching the numbers. I KNOW THEY ARE LYING.
I don't understand! Are you saying their numbers are possible or not possible? Basically you've done nothing to prove either way, only that I'm wrong because I'm wrong. If you want to go tit-for-tat, try actually trying to prove your case.
I'm trying to prove that their numbers are impossible! I can't be wrong if my goal is to prove their numbers don't jive any way you cut them.
Let's consider your metrics even further.
Considering Operation Warp Speed kicking in pre-production of the "vaccines" around January, I'll count from then to now, which is 356 days.
At 86,375,824 vials a day, per the machines you claimed, they should have already put out 30,749,793,344 vials of the vaccine.
Which would be enough to vaccinate 92,249,380,032 people.
There are only 7,753,000,000 (2020) people in the world.
So they would have over-produced by 91.60% necessary to vaccinate the entire world.
And that would be capable by just one factory, by your metrics.
Let's get a little more accurate, though.
Here they say they ramped up production to 13 million doses a week, planning to double that by the middle of the year.
So that's 300,000,000 doses (50,000,000 vials) delivered by July and then 26 million doses a week (4,333,333.33 vials/week) from then on.
Crunching the math, that means from July 1st to now (25 weeks) they will have made 108,333,333.33 vials plus the 50,000,000 vials from the start of the year for a grand total of 158,333,333.33 vials thus far. (Note how even this figure suggests they would overshoot their 300 million dose goal by 68.42%)
Adjusting your figure of 86,375,824 vials a day at peak production, and limiting it to the period of July to now, we get 15,115,769,200 vials produced running on your figures.
That would mean Pfizer is underperforming by 99.29% of what your factory can run, just from the period of July to now.
Face it, your numbers are impossible given Pfizer's claims. They have every reason to be optimistic concerning their turn out. Why would they short-sell themselves 99.29% of what you claim is possible?
If your point is that they CAN put out these numbers easily, then why haven't they? By your numbers they can meet the demand of the entire world in 29.92 days of full production.
The only conclusion is that the numbers you claim are unrealistic to the actual process they are using. Considering you have no better an idea of how they are operating than the rest of us, using technology that hadn't even existed until 2020, how can you possibly claim anything one way or another without doing some math with me given the facts and figures they have put out?
Yeah, the one per second thing is way off, bottling plants fly. 1800 per minute would be something like 2.5 million vials a day, or 25 million doses a day from a single plant. About 3 or 4 months bottling time. I think the limiting factor is production of the clot goo, not how fast it can be put in vials.
You in Portage, Michigan too?
We would literally need 3 trucks for ingredients and new containers, a handful of engineers, and changing our setup to put out half a million OUNCES, NOT DOSES, of the vaxx if we needed to.
Could be why PDJT says he saved the world's ass.
Yeah it was called Operation Warp Speed, emphasizing how fast it was... If you boil a pepe slowly he doesn't notice, but if you do it at warp speed...
This is why most of the adverse effects trace back to only 10 lots!
Yep. Normalize the shots. Let everyone think there fine. Make people think they need a booster then kill them with the booster. Sounds likely