plausible deniability? Truth Social would have to let "Q" username be available to any random person, otherwise that would be suspicious if Trump reserved the "Q" username.
(well considering the number of undeniable Q proofs we have, i don't think they need plausible deniability anymore)
But i do believe Q has finished their main posting, They want the Q movement to become grassroots during the arrests, then we are all trusting and looking to each other, Instead of just relying on a central figure (Q) to look to each day.
The P in the killbox was for Payseur. The top of the European bloodline family pyramid. It doesn't stand for "president" in the context of that post. Were you guys following along all these years or...?
You know anytime the [brackets] are used by Q it indicates a target of the white hats, right? It's why they call it the killbox.
Q uses it two other times in the same post denoting targets they have taken out. [2] down out of [44]. The killbox has always been used as a taunt towards the cabal. "You're in our sights" type messaging.
That doesn't mean we can just photoshop words in and pretend it means whatever we want it to mean. We have to do better, try harder, not be intellectually lazy to the point of just repeating rhetoric catch phrases. That's not the type of discourse Q is trying to encourage by using the Hegelian dialectic. But this is usually the part where I'll get called not a "true scottsman"...
Q later expanded their reach, and started infiltrating the Web, via anons in subreddits, etc.
Q later moved to 8chan.
Q later got their own research board on the chans.
Q later got their own private board, where no one could post but Q.
Q went mainstream.
Q posted.
Q disappeared.
Don't you think it would be extremely Q-like to create mystery, create doubt, come back quietly, in a way no one expected? And, by quiet, I mean, not on the chans, and in a way where there is a big question about all this, like, "what? is this Q"?
The facts:
Single character user names not possible on Truth Social (unconfirmed)
Q user name created BEFORE potus, before nunes (CEO)
Q account established on deltas indicating (return) and more.
Nunes POINTS to Q account, fully knowing that the entire Q movement will be watching.
The stance
As with so many things Great Awakening, I adopt the stance: until I have enough info to know what is going on, what this is, I will reserve my judgment, and wait, while placing faith in God, trust in what I DO know, and acting, to the best of my ability, to support the work of waking the world.
Great awakening going into overdrive....
Is that a Tucker pepe?
That face is SPOT ON!
Haha!
And he looks unhappy. GOOD!
Truthsocial is more "inside" than 8kun.
Truth Social is outside 8kun.
8kun is more outside Trump and the military, than TruthSocial.
I've always wondered how drop #64 came in to play, long term.
Perhaps the lights going out was on Trump being president.
"for good" - okay but from where? reality? chans? kuns? - We don't know, but it leaves a return open nonetheless.
With everything geared around Truth Social, it makes most sense for that return to happen exactly how it seems to be happening.
But who the fuck am I, amirite? - That's just the weed talking and I want to be a guessfag like everyone else.
As you were, Jack's Healthy Skepticism.
Finally
Been wondering where all the other anons are besides me who remember NO OUTSIDE COMMS
Unfortunately, anyone can read Q posts from February 10th and quote them.
plausible deniability? Truth Social would have to let "Q" username be available to any random person, otherwise that would be suspicious if Trump reserved the "Q" username.
(well considering the number of undeniable Q proofs we have, i don't think they need plausible deniability anymore)
u/#trumpdance
I agree with you. We all felt truth would be big, I think we really missed it because single digit user names are so rare. Most places prevent them.
that's a good point.
But i do believe Q has finished their main posting, They want the Q movement to become grassroots during the arrests, then we are all trusting and looking to each other, Instead of just relying on a central figure (Q) to look to each day.
One thing happening is anons going "WTF happened to NO OUTSIDE COMMS?"
Apparently you can't choose single character usernames on Truth. I'm on Android so I haven't checked.
Unless you are.....
hmmmmmm
Sure, there is a lot of compelling evidence, but I want those solid Q proofs.
This is about as solid as it has ever been tbh
How is this solid
The real Q insisted over and over NO OUTSIDE COMMS
Stuff like this.
https://qalerts.app/?n=991
https://qalerts.app/?n=2775
Right. You could spread this over a biscuit and eat it.
Do you believe Q repeatedly said "NO OUTSIDE COMMS"?
u/Zeitreise
THIS TOO
The P in the killbox was for Payseur. The top of the European bloodline family pyramid. It doesn't stand for "president" in the context of that post. Were you guys following along all these years or...?
You know anytime the [brackets] are used by Q it indicates a target of the white hats, right? It's why they call it the killbox.
Q uses it two other times in the same post denoting targets they have taken out. [2] down out of [44]. The killbox has always been used as a taunt towards the cabal. "You're in our sights" type messaging.
Double meanings exist.
That doesn't mean we can just photoshop words in and pretend it means whatever we want it to mean. We have to do better, try harder, not be intellectually lazy to the point of just repeating rhetoric catch phrases. That's not the type of discourse Q is trying to encourage by using the Hegelian dialectic. But this is usually the part where I'll get called not a "true scottsman"...
I'm getting tingly. :)
P = C
So.... GEOTUS = THE CHAIR???
And the Pedes/Pepes are the cavalry!
Hmmm wat do you know the contractor says i am his.
https://qalerts.app/?n=714
Dunno if [P] for president makes sense. Why would you put president in the kill box?
Just a friendly reminder
Let's think about this for a minute.
The history
Q began posting on 4chan, anonymously.
Q later began posting on 4chan as Q.
Q later expanded their reach, and started infiltrating the Web, via anons in subreddits, etc.
Q later moved to 8chan.
Q later got their own research board on the chans.
Q later got their own private board, where no one could post but Q.
Q went mainstream.
Q posted.
Q disappeared.
Don't you think it would be extremely Q-like to create mystery, create doubt, come back quietly, in a way no one expected? And, by quiet, I mean, not on the chans, and in a way where there is a big question about all this, like, "what? is this Q"?
The facts:
Single character user names not possible on Truth Social (unconfirmed)
Q user name created BEFORE potus, before nunes (CEO)
Q account established on deltas indicating (return) and more.
Nunes POINTS to Q account, fully knowing that the entire Q movement will be watching.
The stance
As with so many things Great Awakening, I adopt the stance: until I have enough info to know what is going on, what this is, I will reserve my judgment, and wait, while placing faith in God, trust in what I DO know, and acting, to the best of my ability, to support the work of waking the world.
That's some wise words there fren. I 100% agree with you
Thanks, magalorian*
I am fucking livid holy shit