Twitter is DONE (media.greatawakening.win) N C S W I C
posted ago by JordyTheCat ago by JordyTheCat +491 / -1
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Radian_333 37 points ago +37 / -0

And on top of all that, look at how many people exposed themselves by complaining about a future lack of censorship under Musk.

Retaining_H2O 31 points ago +31 / -0

There is another thing to consider as well.

Twitter claims to have 330 Million users. 66 Million of those are proven to be bots and fake accounts.

Imagine if 50% of Twitter's "users" haven't sent a single tweet in a year. They are possibly 165 Million inactive accounts.

Now imagine that the 66 Million fake accounts and bots make up more than 50% of Twitter's daily postings. They might be only 20% of Twitter "users"... but they may be the most active, spamming Twitter with political messages and such. When they get to checking, the actual daily real users to Twitter may be far less than people think... perhaps as few as 60 Million +/- real active users.

Th4rd_R3ich 18 points ago +18 / -0

Now think about how easy it would be for them to suppress the prevalency of vaccine adverse events and miscarriages.

Just suspend all the real people sharing their experiences and program the bots to all call them liars and anti vaxxers.

Sounds like a genius way to hide evidence of a government sanctioned depopulation scheme. Evil. But genius.

Jacurutu99 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. And how many lives become lost due to amplifying a pro jab message while limiting accounts that people made an account just to send a warning out? Hell awaits.

posdnus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Now think about how many users have 3 or 4 accounts ...

mac1221 5 points ago +5 / -0

The amazing part of all this is that Musk and company are taking Twatter down and are not going to have to actually buy it to accomplish its demise. Absolutely brilliant. KEK

lovecymru 3 points ago +3 / -0

Q said 2x “sunlight kills” bringing all Twitter’s crimes and deception to the light will kill it

JackieDaytona74 4 points ago +4 / -0

You get it, R-water. I was trying to explain this in another thread a few days back, but it didn't seem to be understood.

The number of fake accounts is a distant second to the relative activity level of those fake accounts run by high quality bots. ESPECIALLY the activity that relates to political/social subjects and the accounts of leftist "thought leaders".

That's the big scandal here. The advertisers care about the number of fake accounts and their general activity. For everyone else, it's the activity level of these high-end bots and specifically what subjects those bots are commenting on.

M-I-vet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Correct. This is how the leftists use the bots to shape the opinions of the sheeple... and make it seem like a majority support their leftist agendas.

All fake. They are a small minority, and have to lie, cheat and steal to obtain the power they crave.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
DontTreadOnIT 11 points ago +11 / -0

Note the significance of who posted this. Devin Nunes re-truthing Gen Flynn who re-truthed George News. No public association between them until now, as far as I know.

Flynn took a picture instead of directly re-truthing George, so that all three names would be seen together.

stevethefish76 0 points ago +1 / -1

This board exposed George News as being a bit phony though, I remember. I stopped paying attention to George after that.

DontTreadOnIT 0 points ago +1 / -1

I would say you should read back over those posts, but the mod who wrote them left immediately afterward.

His arguments were full of holes and assumptions. Many here disagreed with his conclusion that George News is a fraud.

It seems Devin Nunes and Gen Flynn are telling us George is legit.

pawzo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wrote there are probably 90% of bots on Twatter. I guess we are getting slowly to that number, day by day.

SemperSupra 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hence why that poison pill was a terrible mistake. They thought the poison pill would just force Musk to sweeten the offer, but really they just doomed themselves. Now he'll walk away and leave them screwed.

Soperp 1 point ago +1 / -0

and poison pills are illegal if they are designed to limit shareholder's profits for no good reason, their reason being musk isn't woke enough. They knew they'd lose in court so backed down on that.

MileHiLife 4 points ago +4 / -0

What happened when Suckerberg admitted to Con-gress about all those fake FB accounts?Crickets from "advertisers" [They] are all playing the same game.

It's a big club and we ain't in it

SuperSaiyanPOTUS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Liberal Advertisers wont sue their own kind.

Island_Photo 1 point ago +1 / -0


ATLAS_ONE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just think about the splash damage to all the woke companies with overvalued stock based on inflated Twitter followers.

Hot_N_Throbbin 1 point ago +2 / -1

Funny how everyone here shit on George News and now they are purposely re-truthing him?

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of these companies will collapse under their own weight.

Remind me who said this? :)

billbuckner 1 point ago +1 / -0

I bet the advertisers knew that twit was bot farms. They advertised because it's membership fee

Soperp 1 point ago +1 / -0

i wonder if musk works for facebook and is trying to hurt twitter so facebook becomes popular again. that's what happened to myspace

LordSoth 1 point ago +1 / -0


deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
plutocedar 1 point ago +2 / -1

I agree, gab has been good for a while. Imagine how much better they'd be doing if they padded their numbers with a hundred million bots.

deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
DontTreadOnIT 6 points ago +6 / -0

Shills are so lazy and uncreative these days.

Soperp 3 points ago +3 / -0

use your justin castro.social lol

deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
Soperp 3 points ago +3 / -0

better than supporting potato head

Symko 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow! The Obamacare website actually blocked someone from Canadastan from signing up? I would have expected the opposite.