Chemotherapy adds only 2% to the 5-year survival rate of cancer patients.
(pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Comments (58)
sorted by:
If I am not mistaken these treatments or poisons cost many tens of thousands of dollars. We have learned that Ivermectin and HCQ could be cancer cures, but big pharma wants to keep a lid on that because they are cheap to manufacture.
Add Quercitin to the mix. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26264923/
Does it make sense to take poisons that cause cancer in order to kill cancer? Does it make sense to take radiation that causes cancer in order to kill cancer?
It does work sometimes.
Cancer is not an easy thing to defeat, since it’s your own body you are attempting to kill off. It’s the poisonous aspect of the treatment that makes it effective. You start to kill off the entire body, hoping to get the cancer first before the rest goes.
Glad I quit smoking and drinking in my 30s.
It makes more sense to quit eating sugar and engage in intermittent fasting and allow autophagy to do its thing.
what does intermittent fasting do?
Ketosis is the burning of fat and protein to produce energy as opposed to sugar in the form of glucose. When glucose runs out your cells switch gears and different DNA activates. Your cells undergo a transformation to burn fat and protein (96% fat and 4% protein). Cancerous cells cannot undergo this transformation, they become weakened when the sugar runs out. Your transformed cells become stronger and more resilient. Fasting is beneficial. I do 7 days of water only every 3 months. It is like a vacation for your internal organs and gives your body a chance to remove toxins. The first 3 days are hard as hell, but after that it gets much easier and you feel better because of a release of endorphins and serotonin. Cancer cells get extremely weak and cannot divide. It gives a better chance for your own immune system to eradicate and dispose of cancer cells.
That’s intermittent? I thought iternmenttient was like 18 hours
Since cancer cells are not as robust as normal body cells, they are more susceptible to the stress caused by the chemical or radiological treatments. I get that, but those methods should be far down the list of treatment options, and normally they would be, IF Big Pharma who controls the treatment protocols wasn't getting rich from it, along with the hospitals or clinics who administer the treatments. So the most dangerous options are the first options.
It wouldn’t surprise me single bit if early use of drugs like ivermectin ad other cheap drugs are the most effective treatment and they have been hiding it from us.
I’m damn sure gonna try if I do get it.
That is exactly how vaccines used to work in days gone by ...
I cannot attest to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Especially not in light of the new found long running medical fraud. However, when you are talking about death as an outcome, 2% is not insignificant. If you are facing death, and taking this stuff increases your survival odds 2%, I'm thinking I'll go ahead and do it.
The other thing that is actually useful about chemotherapy is shrinking down tumors so they are easier to surgically remove. Apparently it causes blood vessels to shrink, so patients in surgery will need less blood units as well as have less risk of uncontrolled bleeding or potential bleed out deaths.
If at some point in life, I am diagnosed with cancer, my first treatment option would be to go on a fast. Cancer cells live on sugar, so a fast will starve the cancer cells, and when the body enters the autophagy stage in a fast, it will consume unneeded cells for energy. In essence the tumor shrinks due to starvation and is killed off by the body for energy. Then the body creates new stem cells which boost the immune system to further kill the cancer. This would be my first treatment option.
I'm with you on this.
Fast, zero sugar/processed foods/starches/alcohol, bump up the vitamin levels, ivermectin/HCQ/Quercetin/Zinc/B/D/K, etc.
And fenbendzolone
B17 as well they try to claim its poison but it's not
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/248783.World_Without_Cancer
In addition, for late stage Fenbendazole and med beds have shown promise.
i think colonoscopies and chemotherapy are just sick practical jokes invented by the ultra wealthy to laugh at us. when's the last time a world leader went through chemo?
Steve Jobs, probably
Don't know about that, but I went through throat cancer in 2013, with chemo and radiation, and I'm now in the prime of my life and health. I figure I'll probably last quite a few more years too.
Congratulations, Survivor! ❤️
Good that you're feeling better and over your ordeal.
When they say it adds 2% to the five year survival rate, they mean something like:
Ty for sharing. My spouse fighting cancer now, nasal area. Glad to hear success.
My prayers go up for you and your spouse.
Hope to be there with you!
Hard to tell. These days EVERYTHING under the sun is diagnosed as ‘cancer’.
"Conclusion: As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required."
I personally don't like the idea of chemo at all, as I think there should be a better way than poisoning the body further, but I have a close relative who is alive after having a virulent form of ovarian cancer. She had surgery, radiation and chemo, age 40. It has been 4 years. Which one of those treatments helped the most, I dont know. It was a horrible year for her, but every year is a blessing now.
The 60% survival rate of cancer and the conclusion that chemo isn't worth the money made me question as the studies I read following that statement doesn't really prove out, especially since the form.of treatment has been chemo, radiation, and surgery (when able).
The powers that be have also tried to get rid of dialysis for people who are older and have multiple health problems, due to "cost effectiveness".
You can see where this is going when people were denied transplants because they weren't vaccinated.
Who decides who lives and who dies?
...' DR didn't have an answer as to why in remission ' , says it all folks !!!
Even if the doc knows they cant say due to the cancer Mafia.
"but it does make some serious cash!"
-Big Pharma
I'd like to see the numbers on Fenbedazole.
Agree
there are fenben groups on fb, check them out if you dare enter fb.
I’m sure there are some doctors families or people in the know that have cured cancers with no chemo or radiation.
Been using the Joe tippen protocol for almost two years post surgery/treatment. Clear scans since. Knock on wood but I direct EVERYONE to mycancerstory.rocks
There used to be a website, americaisretarded.com (yes, really), that first told me this.
It also talked about Vitamin B17, commonly found in apricot seeds, which had a far higher success rate.
But Jimmy Carter banned their sale.
EDIT: Huh, the website still exists. Thought it got taken down years ago.
Amygdalin is found in the raw seed of the apricot and other stone fruits, apples, etc. is a precursor to strychnine (poison), and I believe this is why it works.
https://natoxaq.ku.dk/toxin-of-the-week/amygdalin/
"An apple a day keeps the doctor away" is from back when we ate the seeds as well. Those seeds have some of this poison.
The low dose of the poison enters the body and initiates a response from the body's immune system. This is what is called "hormesis". That immune system response then also goes after the cancer.
Or at least that is the operating theory of it.
I personally think it's true.
I literally eat AT least an apple a day. Eat one apple's seeds too? Lol
According to Jesus'teachings you're supposed to eat all of the fruit including the seeds. Strange watermelon is mostly seedless now.
The essene gospels of peace is more of Jesus teachings that were found in the dead sea scrolls
Talks about eating properly and removing parasites
I recommend it.
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/248783.World_Without_Cancer
This book gets big into B,17 other countries use it to treat cancer but banned in the US
I would be hesitant to cite a 2004 article on cancer. Back then the cancer I dealt with had a survival rate of about 50%. By using genetic information of the cells, different poisons, learning to do dose adjusted administration and introducing monoclonal antibodies the current 5 year survival rate of anybody not already elderly is in the 90's. Studies are just now coming out to show this, yet my oncologist called it more than a handful of years ago.
Yes, chemo is expensive and it does poison your body. My treatments were about $500k, including tons of scans, weeks of hospital stays, and even an emergency surgery to check out a cyst just in case. But chemo works because the cancer cells metabolize things way faster than the rest of you. Docs carefully monitor things to make sure your tumor is dying while your body suffers minimal harm, considering. And monoclonal antibodies seem to be the next big thing in treatment. Expect to see more drugs ending in -mab to be introduced as they learn how to target more cancer types. Maybe one day they'll end the use of chemo entirely. That would make things so much easier on people.
Congratulations, Survivor! ❤️
I think it depends on they cancer type. Some respond better than others. Also, if surgery is planned to remove a tumor, chemo might be used before surgery to shrink it and allow for it's complete removal.
Conclusion: “The cost effectiveness is urgently required”. Another words, it is not cost effective to try and keep you alive for a pittance of 5 years. You are to costly with no contribution to society! Forget the fact that you were poisoned by contaminated water at a Camp LeJeune, or by asbestos in your job, or by agent orange while serving in the military , or by cancer from our government insisting on the a Covid shot being forced on medical personnel, military and big business. You have become a bottom feeder, so die already. Never mind that to you 5 years might make the difference in seeing your children graduate from high school or college, or walking your daughter down the aisle in marriage, or seeing your first grand child. This tells you what your government and the NIH in particular thinks of you. Ask the government and Big Pharma why they are hiding cures and killing scientists who discover them. Actually foregoing chemo and trying alternatives might be the better option, because chemo kills your healthy cells.
https://www.fenbendazole.org/
Chemo kills far more than cancer does.
And across all types of cancer, those who choose alternative therapy or no therapy at all have a 7-year life expectancy, giving them a 2-year ADVANTAGE over those choosing conventional medicine's options.
Chemotherapy weakens the body to the point that death occurs. Chemotherapy is not a choice anyone that wants to live would make.
Many credit chemo with saving their lives. I'm more likely to believe that they survived despite the chemo.