So does this mean that the workers who were there to clean up the aftermath suffered radiation poisoning in addition to all the toxic dust they breathed in? Many of them died of cancer, but radiation poisoning was never checked for.
If radiation poisoning isn't suspected right away, then it rears its ugly head as aggressive cancers later on. It's easily overlooked simply because there was no reason for anyone to suspect it, especially after we're told airplanes caused the buildings to collapse.
Since these buildings were cited having asbestos and ordered to be removed, it is plausible asbestos contamination may have caused cancers. However, asbestos causes an unique type of cancer called mesothelioma and lung cancer. It is determinable diagnosis of causation. The asbestos in those buildings turns out to be one of the major motives of the crime.
Regarding the nuke theory "debunked" statement. Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this suddenly occur? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this way. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. She has been greatly attacked by the official narrative spokespeople. Yet, the many incredible scenes and oddities of this tragedy are left unexplained and denied to ever have occurred. Let's look at some of them. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off his body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.
The information I put forth is from Jeff Prager, Don Fox, and Ed Ward MD. Mini nukes are far different than the ones in the Nevada desert. This is what the official narrative merchants are poisoning the town water with.
How did all the people that managed to escape, well, survive a massive explosion? A video I watched hypothesized a small nuke, enough to create a large enough cavern under the buildings for a lot of the debris to fall into.
As for no toilets, well, with everything turned to ash/dust, I doubt you'll find intact toilets.
Thanks for sharing this video, very interesting. I saw how long it was and only expected I’d watch a few minutes but ended up watching the entire thing. I think this theory explains so much of what all the others do not. I had never heard about the cars exploding before, either. The comment Judy Wood makes towards the end about it being an attack on people’s thoughts reminds me of what we are witnessing with covid.
This doesn't make sense fyi. H-3 Tritium is a radioactive isotope. If tritium is present, beta radiation emission is present. May have gone undetected because it requires a specific detector in the form of a scintillation scope specific to alpha and beta particle counter.
And this place is crawling with Israeli Internet Intelligence people. I can feel them in here because this place is shifting their research and focus on these dirt bags. Israel is indeed last.
I believe it is possible. At least it is worth a try anyway. Zeolite is very effective for latching onto and removing toxins from the body. It's cheap if you know what to look for. Zeolite has many uses. Your water softener uses it to purify your water. It's also very good at soaking urine in horse stalls. At Fukushima, they used many tons of it. I bought a 50 lb. bag of Sweet PDF some 20 years ago and I put a teaspoon if it in juice or water and drink it down. It's best reading about it for protocols. I take it more in the winter months for some reason.
We know cancer is one of the end products of radioactive poisoning. The aftermath of Chernobyl we saw some very amazing things that were used to treat those that were sickened by radiation. Many of those 'first responders' were successfully treated and lived a normal life afterwards. However, the problem there was readily identified and it was treated immediately. With the Twin towers, mini-nukes were used in the underground levels. This has been determined by several experts, but continuously denied by our government to this day.
Unfortunately, all too many of these heroes who were the first responders were of the mindset that our own government wouldn't possibly do this and then consistently lie about it. Their health problems in these people were misdiagnosed and because of this, they died.
Has anyone else noticed this? The "memorial water monument" built on the 911 crime scene looks like it's designed to cool down residual heat. Thermal footprints remain from a nuke event intense enough to vaporize buildings.
I've been thinking about that water monument too. The waterfalls going inward and down makes me feel like its either the baddies rubbing the implosion in our faces, or it's the good guys leaving a hint.
Trump inferred it was an implosion during his 911 interview two years ago
I disagree with this entirely as far as the nuclear aspect is concerned. Radiation does not equal nuclear detonation. Radiation more likely equals depleted uranium Warheads from the drones that were fashioned into bunker busting bombs.
There is no radiation emission from depleted uranium. In fact depleted uranium is specifically used, among other applications, as one of the best shielding materials for gamma radiation, but there is no radioactive emission from that material fyi.
Fair enough. Context and detail matter. Measurable or reportable levels of radiation in DU ar negligent to near not existent. I should have worded it differently. All radioactive isotopes and materials have some radiation emissions depending on specific activity and decay rate and half life. Anyway yes how I worded my response is patently false. Either way point I was making is DU in a weapon would not be the result of radiation levels as described.
Absolutely not. Very wrong interpretation, OWi. It's not just "radiation." It's the specific isotopes involved. I am not jumping you, but, even the phrase "depleted uranium warhead" shows an incredible amount of ignorance (and I'm not calling anyone "stupid," here), because that's exactly what "depleted" means. No fuel. Mostly inert. The extra neutrons needed to feed the nuclear fission reaction that drive the whole deal in the first place comes from U238 (normal uranium in nature is mostly U235, and is considered inert unless it's part of a tamper in the 2nd stage).
Read the presentation. The "radiation" isotopes found are literally fingerprints of putonium fuel. Uranium wouldn't produce cesium, for instance.
Plutonium=assassination ops...see Kobe's widow recent court case suing fire department for pictures of the crash site. The text messages between the first responders revealed their superior told them to get rid of any crash site pictures because "that stuff is plutonium".
Plutonium wasn't salted throughout the building. The total amount used among all 6-10 devices would weigh 12g-20g, tops. But nuclear charges, especially plutonium ones, if the device is precise enough and successfully consumes all its fuel, 99% of the energy created will be X-rays (which will be absorbed by all the steel in the core, hence, all the molten steel we had for months and months).
The residual radiation created is also different (and significantly less long-lived) than created by uranium-based nuclear devices or other radiological bombs. Only the USGS would see it; most other detection regimes (such as the IAEA) are looking for North Korean/Iranian style bombs, which have an entirely different radiation profile. It was pure luck we discovered this.
These are interesting theories. I have not came across theories of weaponized nuclear reactions as a cause for the tower failures. I moved away from researching 9/11 long ago because it started getting convoluted and harder to dig into without supposition and lack of physical evidences to back up theories, since these matters rely heavily on detailed specifics in order to proof out. For instance, video footage I have seen specifically showing the main support columns that exhibited near 45 deg molten steel cut failures. This condition can and would be created by thermite but would require a mold to encase the beam precisely with a precise reactionary device in place.
Have any references you recommend, preferably read material over video presentations. Specifically that speak to the use of Uranium.
The question is was Kobe and daughter killed? Were they saved before and are "erased". Same with Paul Walker of Fast and Furious fame who was investigating pedo's. Kobe obviously knew what was going on.
Most celebrities entire identity is a complete fabrication for comms. Their date of birth, their claim to fame, etc. are tied to specific symbolism comms. Their deaths are usually comms too, date, method, details, etc. Most of the celebrity deaths are fake, but used to send whatever comm is tied to them. When that comm needs to be sent, they retire from the spotlight. Now there are some celebrity deaths that are signaled long in advance which is clearly a different comm, my theory is these are the people that will walk out alive into the spotlight to completely destroy any remaining hold the media has on the public(think Alex Trebek, Betty White, Shinzo Abe, these were signaled multiple times over 6months).
Fascinating. So where do you think these celebrities are? In disguise like JFK?
Also which side are the coms coming from?
Also thanks for that information. I really appreciate it.
There used to be a five hour interview series with an engineer who claimed convincingly that mini-nukes brought the towers down.
After that his life became a living hell, and he moved to Thailand to get away, but eventually ended up in jail anyway. Fortunately he had a number of encrypted file dumps.
He released the first key and although the information seemed harmless he was promptly released.
Sorry, I can’t remember his name or anymore details…
CONGRATS... I just checked your post history and am sending you to the sidelines for a month!
This WIN is for diggers, researchers, and decoders. Your comment doesn't change the USGS data, which detected these SMOKING GUN isotopes. You don't got what it takes to be here. Go find a different WIN. ----->
I have an ironclad post history. I totally disagree with nuclear devices being involved. More than likely and almost certainly, radiation readings came from depleted uranium Warheads.
Your post history is about as untouchable as it gets. But, read my previous comment. I disagree with you, and, of all the conspiracy nutjob stuff, I consider this my specialty. Whatever that means, LOL.
I believe these were not planes, but retrofitted drones. Packed with high explosives and perhaps hardening of the leading edges of the Drone including the nose cone and wings. I appreciate your understanding of the architecture of high-rise buildings. Knowing that to steel at the top is quarter inch. My theory is not conspiracy not job wacko stuff. Based on scientific observation. Also, knowing that Dov Zakheim is the central figure of the 9/11 plot.
Not that it would be impossible, but then you need to reanalyze the flight characteristics of whatever drone you're modifying. Increased weight, altered center of balance. Some have cameras on the bottom of the fuselage; not sure about the radar. The nose cone of regular planes are made out of plastic for minimal disruption of the radar.
Dov Zakheim developed the Flight Termination System, that was intended to bring domestic airliners down safely if they were ever hijacked. It could remotely control eight different airliners simultaneously. He also worked for raytheon, developers of bunker busting bombs. He also was the Pentagon comptroller looking for Rumsfeld missing trillions. Oh, and he had a contract with the US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767 as refueling platforms. The more you know.
It's not a nuke. It's a nuclear device. It would likely only be the size of a soda can. The installation would also include magnetic lensing, which would be much more complex (and take up the entire room). I was serious about saying to look up the "BB18 WTC" image. Note the installer wearing a static wrist strap. The BB18 is a capacitor/switch/relay kinda thing, from what I read. It's part of the electronic setup that surrounds the device.
Weapons tech is several generations ahead of this. The Israeli nukes are rumoured to have been manufactured in extremely advanced and precise processes utilizing atomic deposition, yielding perfectly spherical combustion of the nuclear fuel. The efficiency of the reaction is related to 1) the purity of the sample (atomic deposition allows for insane purity levels) and 2) how perfectly spherical the detonation is. This required perfectly spherical fuel and perfectly timed shaped charges around the fuel. The Israelis can 3D print the explosives shapes needed from 3D printers (allowing them to control the purity there, as well). (Source: Am nuclear weapons nerd)
Measuring the yields in tonnes is counter productive/intuitive to the explanation since the nuclear cutter charges are optimized to produce X-rays, not explosive power, and so are therefore not analogous to chemical reactions. The goal is to produce high energy that can be then magnetically lensed (redirected) towards a target structure (in this case, the WTC's core). So, this device isn't measured by yield but by radiation output. Please see:
The devices are designed from the ground up to direct its radiation in a specific direction:
Tthere is a potentially large “lumpiness” or spatial variability in the
prompt radiation output at any given point, particularly for high-altitude detonations,
that results from mass absorption shadowing. The flux or fluence of prompt gammas,
neutrons and X-rays is by no means isotropic about the burst point of a high-altitude
detonation. Clumps of materials (thrusters, gas bottles, propellant tanks, firing units,
etc., for example) surround a warhead in a non- symmetric fashion and make radiation
output estimation inherently three-dimensional. In realistic situations, some warhead
components will shield the prompt radiations from other components, creating a large
shadow cone in a preferential direction.
There is also something called "cold" X-rays, which of course they don't want. Low energy. They want the highest energy X-rays.
On p39 you can see them targeting structures themselves:
Radiation can cause damage in many
different ways. Energy deposition from neutrons or X-rays will rapidly heat materials,
causing deformation, decomposition, spallation, delamination, degradation of material
properties, and the generation of intense shocks. Neutrons will cause displacement
damage, activation, heating, and charged particle production in materials. X-rays and
γ-rays will generate charge deposition and photocurrents that can upset or burn out
electrical systems and cause dielectric breakdown in insulators.
On p43 you can see them talking about ways to engineer the weapons to create tightly focused beams, but these systems become very large. The background here is mostly Star Wars type systems where nuclear explosions are themselves used to create very temporary but powerful lasers that can take down nuclear warheads in space. The sat would literally explode, almost like the way anti-tank armour works.
The charges are referred to as "nuclear demolition charges" but that is an old Soviet term/distinction. In this case the purity of the yield was the key. It's exponential so the last four decimals and last few nanoseconds are what hype up the yield to insane levels for such a small device. Then the magnetic lensing reflects the X-rays produced towards the core's steel super structure, flash-melting a good portion of it all at once. It's literally as if someone at the press of a button could turn large sections of the core to the consistency of oatmeal. Hence, the free-fall speeds. And all the molten steel is camouflaged in the dust. Many of the conventional charges were only there to create the dust to hide the real reactions going on at the core.
Come on man, when the airplane took off from the ice wall fortress and was chemtrailing NYC that day - it ALSO dropped a tiny nuke while blasting the buildings with energy weapons. Also quantum - doesn't matter what, just 'quantum'...oh and AI...lots of AI.
So does this mean that the workers who were there to clean up the aftermath suffered radiation poisoning in addition to all the toxic dust they breathed in? Many of them died of cancer, but radiation poisoning was never checked for.
If radiation poisoning isn't suspected right away, then it rears its ugly head as aggressive cancers later on. It's easily overlooked simply because there was no reason for anyone to suspect it, especially after we're told airplanes caused the buildings to collapse.
Since these buildings were cited having asbestos and ordered to be removed, it is plausible asbestos contamination may have caused cancers. However, asbestos causes an unique type of cancer called mesothelioma and lung cancer. It is determinable diagnosis of causation. The asbestos in those buildings turns out to be one of the major motives of the crime.
Regarding the nuke theory "debunked" statement. Debunked by who? The Fake News fact checkers? It's a fact that radioactive particulates was widely detected, but is still denied by these so called "fact checkers" and the government. The Department of Energy (DOE) collected water samples from the basement of Building 6 eleven days after 9/11 that showed tritium levels 55 times greater than background. How does this suddenly occur? For each building, some 1200 ft. of material went missing. Watch this short video and the ridiculous statement that steel beams were turned to dust. Compare a sky scraper that has collapsed as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster and you will see that large portions remain intact after the fall.
Nano-thermite has been oversold as the answer to how those buildings imploded into dust. To begin with, nano-thermite doesn't work this way. Since it is a principle of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can’t get there from there!
Furthermore, the explosives that demolished the Twin Towers were so powerful that North Tower debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out over 600 feet into the Winter Garden. This feat alone puts an end to the notion that the buildings were “dustified” where they stood or that an incendiary like nano-thermite was responsible for the destruction of two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers or that the buildings collapsed due to fire. No way, no how. Impossible!
Engineers estimate that 1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized. And as Judy Wood likes to point out no toilets were found in the rubble. She has been greatly attacked by the official narrative spokespeople. Yet, the many incredible scenes and oddities of this tragedy are left unexplained and denied to ever have occurred. Let's look at some of them. 90% of the debris from the Twin Towers destruction landed outside the building’s footprints. What type of explosives could cause this sort of damage? The only thing known to man that can explain this is nuclear bombs. And there was a surviving witness who was in the WTC several stories down in the sub-level that experienced the explosions under him several minutes before the jets flew in the building. This witness saw the elevator door open and the victim there he described as having skin melted off his body.
Then there are over a thousand melted cars and trucks as far as 7 blocks away from WTC along the East River. Some of these photos show burning cars and paper everywhere that strangely doesn't burn. There is no way on God's green earth that these cars and trucks were due to the collapse of the WTC buildings. I"f you look at the map, these vehicles were shielded by many blocks of buildings unaffected by the WTC collapse.
Look at "Irrefutable" by Judy Wood on Youtube.
The information I put forth is from Jeff Prager, Don Fox, and Ed Ward MD. Mini nukes are far different than the ones in the Nevada desert. This is what the official narrative merchants are poisoning the town water with.
They look like the vehicles at Lahina
How did all the people that managed to escape, well, survive a massive explosion? A video I watched hypothesized a small nuke, enough to create a large enough cavern under the buildings for a lot of the debris to fall into.
As for no toilets, well, with everything turned to ash/dust, I doubt you'll find intact toilets.
This is why they all died from blood diseases (radiation outcomes) at a rate 100x above baseline
Radiation poisoning would have been at least mentioned by someone on the "news."
Should we believe that there was no radiation there? I mean most everything we've been told by these monsters is a lie.
Thanks for sharing this video, very interesting. I saw how long it was and only expected I’d watch a few minutes but ended up watching the entire thing. I think this theory explains so much of what all the others do not. I had never heard about the cars exploding before, either. The comment Judy Wood makes towards the end about it being an attack on people’s thoughts reminds me of what we are witnessing with covid.
This doesn't make sense fyi. H-3 Tritium is a radioactive isotope. If tritium is present, beta radiation emission is present. May have gone undetected because it requires a specific detector in the form of a scintillation scope specific to alpha and beta particle counter.
I never heard of that word before but thanks for the video.
Q916 “We are saving Israel for last”
And this place is crawling with Israeli Internet Intelligence people. I can feel them in here because this place is shifting their research and focus on these dirt bags. Israel is indeed last.
DEPORT! We'll handle this.
Wow! That is one tough task but then you probably see them before we do.
Thank you sir!
shouldnt they be first??
I know right? I Like Inspector Callahan's philosophy.
Harry Callahan – “Yeah, well, when an adult male is chasing a female with intent to commit rape, I shoot the bastard – that's my policy.”.
He nose!
This means our President Trump was exposed to it too at a smaller amount of time.👀
There's many ways to eliminate radioactive particulates in the body. For one, zeolite is an extraordinary detoxifier. There's many more.
Yeah but pulverized dustified glass? That part freaked me out
What if you don't know for a long time? Is it still possible to clear your body?
I believe it is possible. At least it is worth a try anyway. Zeolite is very effective for latching onto and removing toxins from the body. It's cheap if you know what to look for. Zeolite has many uses. Your water softener uses it to purify your water. It's also very good at soaking urine in horse stalls. At Fukushima, they used many tons of it. I bought a 50 lb. bag of Sweet PDF some 20 years ago and I put a teaspoon if it in juice or water and drink it down. It's best reading about it for protocols. I take it more in the winter months for some reason.
We know cancer is one of the end products of radioactive poisoning. The aftermath of Chernobyl we saw some very amazing things that were used to treat those that were sickened by radiation. Many of those 'first responders' were successfully treated and lived a normal life afterwards. However, the problem there was readily identified and it was treated immediately. With the Twin towers, mini-nukes were used in the underground levels. This has been determined by several experts, but continuously denied by our government to this day.
Unfortunately, all too many of these heroes who were the first responders were of the mindset that our own government wouldn't possibly do this and then consistently lie about it. Their health problems in these people were misdiagnosed and because of this, they died.
Great research.
Has anyone else noticed this? The "memorial water monument" built on the 911 crime scene looks like it's designed to cool down residual heat. Thermal footprints remain from a nuke event intense enough to vaporize buildings.
Interesting theory….
I've been thinking about that water monument too. The waterfalls going inward and down makes me feel like its either the baddies rubbing the implosion in our faces, or it's the good guys leaving a hint.
Trump inferred it was an implosion during his 911 interview two years ago
Would love sauce on that interview if you have time to find it.
“Watch the water”
I'm still wondering what happened to the planes & passengers that were supposed to have hit the buildings.
What planes?
bluebeam
Oh no, a CGI faggot.
Oh look, a conspiracy denier.
I'll tell you what faggot. You produce the proof that those planes were CGI and I will look at it.
911 was a Mossad CIA Inside Job. You dipshits with your CGI crap at the World Trade Center are an embarrassment to the Truth movement.
By the way, there were absolutely no planes and Shanksville and at the Pentagon.
I disagree with this entirely as far as the nuclear aspect is concerned. Radiation does not equal nuclear detonation. Radiation more likely equals depleted uranium Warheads from the drones that were fashioned into bunker busting bombs.
There is no radiation emission from depleted uranium. In fact depleted uranium is specifically used, among other applications, as one of the best shielding materials for gamma radiation, but there is no radioactive emission from that material fyi.
That is patently false.
https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/depleted-uranium/en/l-2/4.htm
Fair enough. Context and detail matter. Measurable or reportable levels of radiation in DU ar negligent to near not existent. I should have worded it differently. All radioactive isotopes and materials have some radiation emissions depending on specific activity and decay rate and half life. Anyway yes how I worded my response is patently false. Either way point I was making is DU in a weapon would not be the result of radiation levels as described.
Absolutely not. Very wrong interpretation, OWi. It's not just "radiation." It's the specific isotopes involved. I am not jumping you, but, even the phrase "depleted uranium warhead" shows an incredible amount of ignorance (and I'm not calling anyone "stupid," here), because that's exactly what "depleted" means. No fuel. Mostly inert. The extra neutrons needed to feed the nuclear fission reaction that drive the whole deal in the first place comes from U238 (normal uranium in nature is mostly U235, and is considered inert unless it's part of a tamper in the 2nd stage).
Read the presentation. The "radiation" isotopes found are literally fingerprints of putonium fuel. Uranium wouldn't produce cesium, for instance.
Standby, investigating.
Ya! It's such fascinating stuff. Pls see this comment:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JmxKyP5U/x/c/4OdiBDdoGCH
Plutonium=assassination ops...see Kobe's widow recent court case suing fire department for pictures of the crash site. The text messages between the first responders revealed their superior told them to get rid of any crash site pictures because "that stuff is plutonium".
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/
Plutonium wasn't salted throughout the building. The total amount used among all 6-10 devices would weigh 12g-20g, tops. But nuclear charges, especially plutonium ones, if the device is precise enough and successfully consumes all its fuel, 99% of the energy created will be X-rays (which will be absorbed by all the steel in the core, hence, all the molten steel we had for months and months).
The residual radiation created is also different (and significantly less long-lived) than created by uranium-based nuclear devices or other radiological bombs. Only the USGS would see it; most other detection regimes (such as the IAEA) are looking for North Korean/Iranian style bombs, which have an entirely different radiation profile. It was pure luck we discovered this.
These are interesting theories. I have not came across theories of weaponized nuclear reactions as a cause for the tower failures. I moved away from researching 9/11 long ago because it started getting convoluted and harder to dig into without supposition and lack of physical evidences to back up theories, since these matters rely heavily on detailed specifics in order to proof out. For instance, video footage I have seen specifically showing the main support columns that exhibited near 45 deg molten steel cut failures. This condition can and would be created by thermite but would require a mold to encase the beam precisely with a precise reactionary device in place. Have any references you recommend, preferably read material over video presentations. Specifically that speak to the use of Uranium.
Polonium, not plutonium. Po-210 to be specific.
Edit: thought you were referring to Litvenyenko assassination.
Still, an important clarification to add.
The question is was Kobe and daughter killed? Were they saved before and are "erased". Same with Paul Walker of Fast and Furious fame who was investigating pedo's. Kobe obviously knew what was going on.
Most celebrities entire identity is a complete fabrication for comms. Their date of birth, their claim to fame, etc. are tied to specific symbolism comms. Their deaths are usually comms too, date, method, details, etc. Most of the celebrity deaths are fake, but used to send whatever comm is tied to them. When that comm needs to be sent, they retire from the spotlight. Now there are some celebrity deaths that are signaled long in advance which is clearly a different comm, my theory is these are the people that will walk out alive into the spotlight to completely destroy any remaining hold the media has on the public(think Alex Trebek, Betty White, Shinzo Abe, these were signaled multiple times over 6months).
Fascinating. So where do you think these celebrities are? In disguise like JFK? Also which side are the coms coming from? Also thanks for that information. I really appreciate it.
Betty White was as old as dirt though.
Very true! Which is why the multiple signals for fake death made me raise an eyebrow...hopefully it means the end is near...
i just watched the Air Crash Investigation episode on this. Seemed pretty straight forward but who knows.
Is that in the OP? Just got back in and I'll check it out.
The work was published by Prager in 2012. Any updates to this?
You know your over target when the CIA Shills try and throw shade on things by deflecting at Israel.
There used to be a five hour interview series with an engineer who claimed convincingly that mini-nukes brought the towers down.
After that his life became a living hell, and he moved to Thailand to get away, but eventually ended up in jail anyway. Fortunately he had a number of encrypted file dumps.
He released the first key and although the information seemed harmless he was promptly released.
Sorry, I can’t remember his name or anymore details…
Congrats... the most retarded post I've seen this month!
I know not everyone can have a newk degree... but this is SOOOOOO retarded.
CONGRATS... I just checked your post history and am sending you to the sidelines for a month!
This WIN is for diggers, researchers, and decoders. Your comment doesn't change the USGS data, which detected these SMOKING GUN isotopes. You don't got what it takes to be here. Go find a different WIN. ----->
I have an ironclad post history. I totally disagree with nuclear devices being involved. More than likely and almost certainly, radiation readings came from depleted uranium Warheads.
Your post history is about as untouchable as it gets. But, read my previous comment. I disagree with you, and, of all the conspiracy nutjob stuff, I consider this my specialty. Whatever that means, LOL.
I believe these were not planes, but retrofitted drones. Packed with high explosives and perhaps hardening of the leading edges of the Drone including the nose cone and wings. I appreciate your understanding of the architecture of high-rise buildings. Knowing that to steel at the top is quarter inch. My theory is not conspiracy not job wacko stuff. Based on scientific observation. Also, knowing that Dov Zakheim is the central figure of the 9/11 plot.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCbQwU5/two-very-similar-explosions/
Not that it would be impossible, but then you need to reanalyze the flight characteristics of whatever drone you're modifying. Increased weight, altered center of balance. Some have cameras on the bottom of the fuselage; not sure about the radar. The nose cone of regular planes are made out of plastic for minimal disruption of the radar.
Dov Zakheim developed the Flight Termination System, that was intended to bring domestic airliners down safely if they were ever hijacked. It could remotely control eight different airliners simultaneously. He also worked for raytheon, developers of bunker busting bombs. He also was the Pentagon comptroller looking for Rumsfeld missing trillions. Oh, and he had a contract with the US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767 as refueling platforms. The more you know.
Why because it doesn't fit your narrative?
Ok. Thanks for the heads up. I'll check it out.
Ok. I haven't seen that poster before.
Ok thanks.
Ok I agree that the buildings were demolished. So are you suggesting tiny nukes or thermite or??
I have heard of suitcase nukes so I suppose it is plausible.
It's not a nuke. It's a nuclear device. It would likely only be the size of a soda can. The installation would also include magnetic lensing, which would be much more complex (and take up the entire room). I was serious about saying to look up the "BB18 WTC" image. Note the installer wearing a static wrist strap. The BB18 is a capacitor/switch/relay kinda thing, from what I read. It's part of the electronic setup that surrounds the device.
Weapons tech is several generations ahead of this. The Israeli nukes are rumoured to have been manufactured in extremely advanced and precise processes utilizing atomic deposition, yielding perfectly spherical combustion of the nuclear fuel. The efficiency of the reaction is related to 1) the purity of the sample (atomic deposition allows for insane purity levels) and 2) how perfectly spherical the detonation is. This required perfectly spherical fuel and perfectly timed shaped charges around the fuel. The Israelis can 3D print the explosives shapes needed from 3D printers (allowing them to control the purity there, as well). (Source: Am nuclear weapons nerd)
Measuring the yields in tonnes is counter productive/intuitive to the explanation since the nuclear cutter charges are optimized to produce X-rays, not explosive power, and so are therefore not analogous to chemical reactions. The goal is to produce high energy that can be then magnetically lensed (redirected) towards a target structure (in this case, the WTC's core). So, this device isn't measured by yield but by radiation output. Please see:
https://irp.fas.org/agency/dod/dsb/nweffects.pdf p27
The devices are designed from the ground up to direct its radiation in a specific direction:
There is also something called "cold" X-rays, which of course they don't want. Low energy. They want the highest energy X-rays.
On p39 you can see them targeting structures themselves:
On p43 you can see them talking about ways to engineer the weapons to create tightly focused beams, but these systems become very large. The background here is mostly Star Wars type systems where nuclear explosions are themselves used to create very temporary but powerful lasers that can take down nuclear warheads in space. The sat would literally explode, almost like the way anti-tank armour works.
Interesting theory and actually makes sense. Thermite is slow but a small detonation at the steel structure would quickly bring the buildings down.
The charges are referred to as "nuclear demolition charges" but that is an old Soviet term/distinction. In this case the purity of the yield was the key. It's exponential so the last four decimals and last few nanoseconds are what hype up the yield to insane levels for such a small device. Then the magnetic lensing reflects the X-rays produced towards the core's steel super structure, flash-melting a good portion of it all at once. It's literally as if someone at the press of a button could turn large sections of the core to the consistency of oatmeal. Hence, the free-fall speeds. And all the molten steel is camouflaged in the dust. Many of the conventional charges were only there to create the dust to hide the real reactions going on at the core.
Makes sense if indeed these things exist.
Some on gaw think nukes are a conspiracy so I'm at a dead end on this one.
Come on man, when the airplane took off from the ice wall fortress and was chemtrailing NYC that day - it ALSO dropped a tiny nuke while blasting the buildings with energy weapons. Also quantum - doesn't matter what, just 'quantum'...oh and AI...lots of AI.
/s