My father was in Nagasaki 11 days after it was bombed. He had photos of the city taken with his little brownie camera. He said it looked better than Tokyo, which had been firebombed. Of course, Tokyo didn't have radiation.
i heard it looked exactly like it had been firebombed
i also saw pictures of 'plumb of smoke' from multiple angles.. somehow the plane actually flew around the none-moving plumb of smoke to take the photos that we have.
below is the nuke scare vid from the 50s .. it is clearly a production designed to produce maximum scare..
none of the shots below appear to be 'outside' .. just like seeing the moon landing crap, there is no space visible in any pictures/videos of the moon, only black space. they appear isolated because they are
When I was younger watching these videos I saw the destructive power of nukes... Now all i see is little house dioramas being blasted with compressed air...
No. You don't leave flash shadows on walls from people who have been vaporized, in a firebombing. (My father was in Nagasaki.) And it takes a raid of hundreds of bombers to fire-bomb a city.
The plane flew across the bombed city and got the hell away. The photo of the mushroom cloud was taken from the the forward compartment or tail gun position on the bomber. They may have yawed temporarily to obtain a line of sight.
The "nuke scare" video was footage from a real test. The darkness of the image was because the camera was stopped down to prevent the film from being overexposed from the nuclear flash. (There are no stars visible in the Moon shots for the same reason; the brightly lit Moon surface would have exposed all the film if it had been stopped open enough to image the stars.)
The other comments:
The houses are all full scale real construction. No models would have such minute detail and show such detailed air flows. Why make scale models when the point was to find out how things behaved in real life? You have falsehood on the brain.
The camera was mounted in a sufficiently sturdy enclosure. Perhaps a concrete embrasure or a tank bolted to a ground pad. That part was not rocket science. And the camera was not pointed at the blast, so nothing would have vaporized the lens. (Other camera shots have taken frontal views of the detonations without problems.)
The pics from the moon have a dark space background because the light from the lunar surface exposes the film well before the much less bright stars can. Let's shut down the 'didn't go to the moon" nonsense.
Daddy said it was not and there was no firestorm there. He said Tokyo looked a lot worse. He and other sailors from his ship walked all over and were told nothing about dangers of radiation. He bought a set of china from some local guy by the side of the road and sent it to his mother. It never arrived. I'm sure someone ran a geiger counter over it and dumped over the side of the ship.
We were shown films, we didn't have videos back then, at school and they were the opposite - designed to convince us we could actually survive a nuclear bomb on DC. We were about 20 miles from DC as the crow flies. Things like what to do if you're walking on a golf course and see the flash. (Hide in a ditch. No, really.) We also had drills to practice hiding under our desks - super nuclear protection there - and drills to walk home from school and time how many minutes it took. We were told during a nuclear attack to walk straight home and shove wadded up newspapers in our chimneys. Are you getting the idea? This was all to convince children that they would be just fine if a DC was bombed. I'm surprised they didn't tell us to use umbrellas.
None of this helped when, during the Cuban missile crisis, our teacher cried all day, telling us we were all going to die that night when the bombs hit DC. See, you young whippersnappers don't have a monopoly on crazy teachers.
All known nuclear weapons created thus far run primarily on nuclear fission, with gen 2 nuclear weapons such as the hydrogen bomb using a hybrid form of fission with a limited amount of fusion. Pure fusion hasn't yet been mastered (that we know of) and doesn't cause long lasting nuclear fallout the same way fission does.
Plus, their methods of achieving the fission/fusion reaction are so inefficient, it leaves much of the radioactive material behind, to be dispersed as fallout. A close to 100% efficient reaction would consume all of the uranium/plutonium, and they could either use much, much less material to achieve the same effect, or they would be able to destroy much much larger areas of landmass.
It's a very good question. I believe they are large amounts of conventional explosives, and in some cases aided by special effects.
There are many inconsistencies and logical fallacies of what we are told about the bomb. Today I think the population has generally fallen victim to propaganda. Obviously if one blows up, I would change my opinion. But Chernobyl did not result in childhood mutations or mass death; neither did 3-Mile Island or Fukushima (at least not from radiation). The articles about suitcase nukes since the 80's would suggest that some terrorist would get hold of one and detonate it somewhere, which hasn't happened. My personal favorite is that the nuclear symbol looks too much like a classic film reel for it to be coincidence. Certainly worth researching on your own.
You have to understand nuclear weapon nomenclature. A 20-kiloton nuclear weapon (Hiroshima class) would be matched in effect by 20,000 tons of TNT. The maximum bomb load for a B-29 (short distance) was 10 tons. The "It was only conventional explosives" hypothesis is bunk.
You are told the exaggerations about nuclear weapons and radiation by the people who don't want them, nor nuclear power in general. The people that know about the weapons can direct you to the source material. The radiation symbol is the simplest icon for radiation that was thought at the time. If you think it looks like a film reel, that is coincidence.
So the Nagasaki bomb was real, but the Tsar bomb is fake? And the suitcase nukes are real, but security on them has been 100% effective? Nuclear reactors on cruisers were safe, but nuclear reactors on land are not.
No 3-eyed fish from 3-mile island, no mutated fish from anywhere in the Pacific after Fukushima, no birth defects around Chernobyl or the other cities above? What they publish about nuclear power is riddled with contradictions that cannot all be true.
The symbolism links cannot be proven by their nature. But sure, it's a coincidence that Alone Gay flew the same time as Hiram Johnson died, ending opposition to open alliance with the USSR. And it's coincidence that the next plane's name sounds like boxcar, and so it could not possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railroad's recent completion, facilitating a USSR front against Japan. And it's coincidence that the nuclear symbol looks like a film reel, and coincidence that the #1 symbol of scantily clad ladies is just a tribute to a nuclear test site, and has nothing to do with compromising prominent politicians.
Man, are you jumping to unwarranted conclusions. The Tsar Bomba was real and was detonated, but it was an experiment (it was designed for 100 MT, but they relented and removed the uranium tamper final stage...good idea, the carrier plane barely escaped the blast), and they concluded it was more trouble than it was worth. No evidence of poor security on the "suitcase" bombs (which weighed upwards of 250 pounds). Nuclear reactors are safe on submarines and aircraft carriers, and can be also on land (but submarines are built and operate to more stringent standards, thanks to Admiral Rickover).
What 3-eyed fish? 3-Mile island didn't emit much (if any) radioactivity. Not aware of any mutated fish from Fukushima (which also produced very little radioactivity---just because they can measure it against a non-noisy background doesn't mean it was much to begin with). Birth defects from Chernobyl were close to normal, if not normal. Cancer rates were not elevated. "They" is not a single individual. You have to read the source material and learn the subject. Plenty of axes to grind, and the progressive greens should not be trusted to be truthful.
Coincidences happen all the time (thus, the term). When the Enola Gay flew, servicemen were being killed in the Pacific campaign. Wouldn't that have been meaningful? I don't know Hiram Johnson from anyone---and what's to stop him from dying when he wanted to? Or from anything else happening at the same time? The second plane was named after the flight commander, Capt. Frederick C. Bock (obviously a pun on "Bock's Car"). It was painted on it after the mission. So it could NOT possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railway. But I am sure that some housewife pulled a pie out of the oven at the completion of the railway. (And you are aware, are you not, that Nagasaki was not the primary target anyway?) And it is a coincidence that someone can see a film reel in the symbol, just as someone can see a toadstool (or a toad) in a Rorschach blot.
I have no idea what your remark about "scantily clad ladies" has to do with trinitite. Were you possibly referring to Bikini Atoll? Those were the days when nuclear testing was sensational news, and people would jump on a snappy association. There is even a decor style named after it: "Atomic Age."
You are letting your imagination run away with you. Stick to the facts and you will be sane.
You can't fire-bomb anything with only one bomber. The Operation Meetinghouse raid on Tokyo required 334 B-29 bombers, 279 of which were able to drop bombs. It required an elaborately coordinated dropping pattern. Only one very special B-29 was used on Hiroshima ("Enola Gay") and one similarly special one on Nagasaki ("Bockscar"). The bombers were specially modified to carry the nuclear bombs. The pilots had undergone specific training to make the drop. It happened.
The link leads to unmitigated bullshit by someone who knows absolutely nothing about nuclear weapons or their effects. If his story is correct, there could be no such thing as trinitite, a fused mineral made by the detonation of the Trinity device. I have samples of the mineral. My father saw the ruins of Nagasaki in November of 1945 and described them to me. I worked for a government contractor that made nuclear delivery systems...on strategic defense against nuclear weapons. I had a Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information (CNWDI) clearance.
Here's the problem, anons. You allow the world to peek in on this page and laugh their heads off at your deliberate ignorance. All you need to do is read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone, and you would be up to speed. But no, you decide to go the way of the Know-Nothing...and prove you know nothing. I am wondering if the real anons are not on this page...
Yes it is. Many different radioactive isotopes are created in a nuclear explosion. The most dangerous ones are dangerous because of their intense radiation. Their radiation is intense because they have a short half life.
The most obvious difference is quantity. An RMBK reactor core like Chernobyl’s #4 reactor contains 194 tons of enriched Uranium fuel. In contrast, Little Boy carried 141 pounds of highly enriched uranium. And, since Little Boy was an airburst, most of the fallout ended up in the ocean while Chernobyl instead sat there and burned. And you can take a tour to Chernobyl, just wear a dosimeter because some areas have radiation levels high enough to be dangerous. It’s dangerous like a poorly-cleared minefield, not a ravening death zone.
A lot of the radioactive particles are washed away with the rain. BTW, a LifeStraw can be used on radioactive mudpuddles, as the radioactivity is in the particles, not the water itself.
Let's not forget Fukushima in 2011. That nuclear accident caused 3 core meltdowns. One core they don't even know where it is, allegedly. At the time, I figured we would all be getting cancers by now and I really thought it was a world extinguishing event. But we're all still here. Makes you wonder if the radiation stories are lies like most everything else.
Family member here in Japan does tissue diagnosis. Cancers are up across the board since 3/11, though it's not making the news. Used to find cancer cells once in a while, but now it's a regular occurrence, in all ages.
Food for thought, its not size as much as quantity launched. That said they are all bad.
The worlds largest (500 megaton) has a blast and fallout radius of about 80 miles. It will not be used and to big for an ICBM.
There are no 500-megaton weapons. There was only---once---a 50-megaton device. There are 500-kiloton weapons, and these are used for ICBMs, but the danger radius is not 80 miles. (The whole subject of risk is a sliding scale. There are various radii for different criteria.)
Your right, too many zeros. 50 MT
3rd degree burns estimated at the 100km (65 miles)mark. Shock wave 465 miles. The blast wave circled the earth 3 times.
I did estimate 80 miles as a somewhat distance to not experience damage.
But the 50-MT device was not a practical weapon. Even 10-MT weapons have been retired. More effective to use multiple lower-yield weapons, once delivery accuracy improved. "Damage" depends on overpressure tolerance, or bare skin.
I don't think there's much "if" at this point. Everything COULD be a lie.
The only reason I'd say the "nuke" thing may not be a lie would be because every time I research something I end up seeing some deliberate actions that cause physical harm to the planet that don't need to be taken.
They definitely seem to like to convince us that destruction of Earth is necessary for humans to be happy.
Think about it....the fact they said to children to get under their desk to be safe is clearly fear-based. Now after seeing years of scare tactics...its safe to say this was the greatest false flag ever. Because we know Nazi's escaped via Operation Paperclip logically speaking they had cover by "losing the war". They always had a plan to take over the world and used ww2 as "the start".
You get under your desk to be safe because the desk is strong enough to protect you from the collapse of the building---or at least you would be safer than not being under the desk. (This was when school desks were sturdy construction.) Are you not aware they give the same instruction against earthquakes? (I've been in an earthquake and had to do it. Steel desks.)
If you haven't seen enough footage of nuclear tests, you are laughing at something that shouldn't be laughed at.
And Operation Paperclip only gathered up German scientists who wanted to repose their knowledge with America, not with the Soviet Union. Calling them Nazis is just cheap racism, because ALL Germans were compelled to be members of the Nazi party in order even to earn a living, much less work on military projects. Their largest influence on the public life in America was to foster German restaurants in Huntsville, Alabama. (I've been there. It's good food.) The other influence was to get an American on the Moon. That's it. No evil, underground Nazi cabal festering in dark corners. Just stupid, venal Democrat progressives out in the open.
The more I learn about it the less I think the "war" had anything to do with anything except creating a group that can't be criticized and dispersing that group to create/manage the new institutions of the world.
American youths suffering in Europe and telling their children all about how scary war is was a nice bonus for them.
We never had any drills to get under our desks back in the 60s at my school. Of course my school was within the blast radius of a major military base, so there was no use doing anything. :)
This is some lefty bullshit tactics, if you're gonna question someone be intelligent about it. We don't need this low IQ low effort bullshit in our community. This is like asking of someone is a Nazi because they question the mainstream holocaust stories.
Have you seen a nuke go off? We're you in Hiroshima or Nagasaki? Have you done 10 thousands hours of research on nukes and are a master on nuclear physics? No? Then don't act like it's a stupid question. It's valid and your retarded "are YoU a FlAt EaRThEr?" question adds nothing.
The driving philosophy behind the Q movement is freedom of thought. I enjoy expanding my mind and consider anything in the realm of possibility until I decide otherwise. Anyone who discourages freedom of thought and expression should be shamed.
Exactly. Discussion is the most important regardless of if it's about the most concrete and provable things like MSM bias or the stolen election, or seemingly silly things like flat earth or fake nukes.
There's quite a few Jews who survived the holocaust who will tell you that the Nazis played soccer with dead babies, made Jew skin lamps and made jew fat soap...
There's survivors from 911 who will tell you planes hijacked by Al Quieda went into the building and destroyed it.
Survivors from Pearl Harbor will tell you the Japanese attacked.
Survivors of Libia thought babies wee pulled out of incubators and died on the floor.
Survivors of Syria thought chemical weapons were used on civillians.
Afghani survivors thought that the US soldiers were androids or had robotic suits.
Do I need to go on? How would a random Japanese dude be able to tell the difference between fake nukes and real? I didn't know that simply surviving somthing gave you all the knowledge and information that related to it.
Yeah, don't visit where that photo was taken (Hiroshima), if you need a TS security clearance to keep your job. I have no definite proof, but I have suspected that they flag visits like this when you renew and have to submit a new SF86.
My father was in Nagasaki 11 days after it was bombed. He had photos of the city taken with his little brownie camera. He said it looked better than Tokyo, which had been firebombed. Of course, Tokyo didn't have radiation.
i heard it looked exactly like it had been firebombed
i also saw pictures of 'plumb of smoke' from multiple angles.. somehow the plane actually flew around the none-moving plumb of smoke to take the photos that we have.
below is the nuke scare vid from the 50s .. it is clearly a production designed to produce maximum scare..
none of the shots below appear to be 'outside' .. just like seeing the moon landing crap, there is no space visible in any pictures/videos of the moon, only black space. they appear isolated because they are
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMopb1eN2t4
When I was younger watching these videos I saw the destructive power of nukes... Now all i see is little house dioramas being blasted with compressed air...
I wonder what the camera housing was made of to not move at all during the blast.
And to keep the glass in the camera lens from vaporizing like the windows
No. You don't leave flash shadows on walls from people who have been vaporized, in a firebombing. (My father was in Nagasaki.) And it takes a raid of hundreds of bombers to fire-bomb a city.
The plane flew across the bombed city and got the hell away. The photo of the mushroom cloud was taken from the the forward compartment or tail gun position on the bomber. They may have yawed temporarily to obtain a line of sight.
The "nuke scare" video was footage from a real test. The darkness of the image was because the camera was stopped down to prevent the film from being overexposed from the nuclear flash. (There are no stars visible in the Moon shots for the same reason; the brightly lit Moon surface would have exposed all the film if it had been stopped open enough to image the stars.)
The other comments:
The houses are all full scale real construction. No models would have such minute detail and show such detailed air flows. Why make scale models when the point was to find out how things behaved in real life? You have falsehood on the brain.
The camera was mounted in a sufficiently sturdy enclosure. Perhaps a concrete embrasure or a tank bolted to a ground pad. That part was not rocket science. And the camera was not pointed at the blast, so nothing would have vaporized the lens. (Other camera shots have taken frontal views of the detonations without problems.)
The pics from the moon have a dark space background because the light from the lunar surface exposes the film well before the much less bright stars can. Let's shut down the 'didn't go to the moon" nonsense.
Even the “astronauts” couldn’t agree on if stars were visible from the moon or not during a press conference following the “historic accomplishment.”
Oh and telemetry data lost.. honk!
Nukes are probably fake otherwise we would have seen one by now. Hydrogen bombs on the other hand…
Anyone who believes in the moon landing is not thinking or a kek
I don't believe the movie they made for us, but I think we do go there.
If the moon landing was so real do it again.
Never happened
No! As new people come over to this side we WANT them to think we're completely batshit crazy, flat-earth, chemtrail, numerology-believing freaks.
Daddy said it was not and there was no firestorm there. He said Tokyo looked a lot worse. He and other sailors from his ship walked all over and were told nothing about dangers of radiation. He bought a set of china from some local guy by the side of the road and sent it to his mother. It never arrived. I'm sure someone ran a geiger counter over it and dumped over the side of the ship.
We were shown films, we didn't have videos back then, at school and they were the opposite - designed to convince us we could actually survive a nuclear bomb on DC. We were about 20 miles from DC as the crow flies. Things like what to do if you're walking on a golf course and see the flash. (Hide in a ditch. No, really.) We also had drills to practice hiding under our desks - super nuclear protection there - and drills to walk home from school and time how many minutes it took. We were told during a nuclear attack to walk straight home and shove wadded up newspapers in our chimneys. Are you getting the idea? This was all to convince children that they would be just fine if a DC was bombed. I'm surprised they didn't tell us to use umbrellas.
None of this helped when, during the Cuban missile crisis, our teacher cried all day, telling us we were all going to die that night when the bombs hit DC. See, you young whippersnappers don't have a monopoly on crazy teachers.
Itsreal it is Hiroshima. It was rebuilt. also remember the bombs back then where many times weaker than the nukes everyone has these days.
Is this fallout the reason for the death of the coral reefs ?
They are now flourishing; it surprised the divers.
All known nuclear weapons created thus far run primarily on nuclear fission, with gen 2 nuclear weapons such as the hydrogen bomb using a hybrid form of fission with a limited amount of fusion. Pure fusion hasn't yet been mastered (that we know of) and doesn't cause long lasting nuclear fallout the same way fission does.
Add to this, Japan had moved mounts and mounds of topsoil to a centralized place, the same they moved Fukushima soil when the earthquake hit
Nuclear vs atomic. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a23306/nuclear-bombs-powerful-today/
The first bomb was a uranium bomb. It would have been potentially dirtier. The second one was plutonium and cleaner in terms of radiation potential.
Plus, their methods of achieving the fission/fusion reaction are so inefficient, it leaves much of the radioactive material behind, to be dispersed as fallout. A close to 100% efficient reaction would consume all of the uranium/plutonium, and they could either use much, much less material to achieve the same effect, or they would be able to destroy much much larger areas of landmass.
You will recover to about 1847
"Is there still radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?" https://www.city.hiroshima.lg.jp/site/english/9809.html
"How much radiation still exists in Hiroshima?" https://www.grunge.com/191959/how-much-radiation-still-exists-in-hiroshima/
"Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Long-Term Health Effects" https://k1project.columbia.edu/news/hiroshima-and-nagasaki
Try this. With historical sauce, and valuable links, suggesting that both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were likely traditional firebombing. https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/
Right, and the houses were made of wood and were consumed quickly in the massive fires.
I am not discounting the idea that this is used for comms but I have to ask what this is?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_MFrnkOo3A
It's a very good question. I believe they are large amounts of conventional explosives, and in some cases aided by special effects.
There are many inconsistencies and logical fallacies of what we are told about the bomb. Today I think the population has generally fallen victim to propaganda. Obviously if one blows up, I would change my opinion. But Chernobyl did not result in childhood mutations or mass death; neither did 3-Mile Island or Fukushima (at least not from radiation). The articles about suitcase nukes since the 80's would suggest that some terrorist would get hold of one and detonate it somewhere, which hasn't happened. My personal favorite is that the nuclear symbol looks too much like a classic film reel for it to be coincidence. Certainly worth researching on your own.
You have to understand nuclear weapon nomenclature. A 20-kiloton nuclear weapon (Hiroshima class) would be matched in effect by 20,000 tons of TNT. The maximum bomb load for a B-29 (short distance) was 10 tons. The "It was only conventional explosives" hypothesis is bunk.
You are told the exaggerations about nuclear weapons and radiation by the people who don't want them, nor nuclear power in general. The people that know about the weapons can direct you to the source material. The radiation symbol is the simplest icon for radiation that was thought at the time. If you think it looks like a film reel, that is coincidence.
So the Nagasaki bomb was real, but the Tsar bomb is fake? And the suitcase nukes are real, but security on them has been 100% effective? Nuclear reactors on cruisers were safe, but nuclear reactors on land are not.
No 3-eyed fish from 3-mile island, no mutated fish from anywhere in the Pacific after Fukushima, no birth defects around Chernobyl or the other cities above? What they publish about nuclear power is riddled with contradictions that cannot all be true.
The symbolism links cannot be proven by their nature. But sure, it's a coincidence that Alone Gay flew the same time as Hiram Johnson died, ending opposition to open alliance with the USSR. And it's coincidence that the next plane's name sounds like boxcar, and so it could not possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railroad's recent completion, facilitating a USSR front against Japan. And it's coincidence that the nuclear symbol looks like a film reel, and coincidence that the #1 symbol of scantily clad ladies is just a tribute to a nuclear test site, and has nothing to do with compromising prominent politicians.
Man, are you jumping to unwarranted conclusions. The Tsar Bomba was real and was detonated, but it was an experiment (it was designed for 100 MT, but they relented and removed the uranium tamper final stage...good idea, the carrier plane barely escaped the blast), and they concluded it was more trouble than it was worth. No evidence of poor security on the "suitcase" bombs (which weighed upwards of 250 pounds). Nuclear reactors are safe on submarines and aircraft carriers, and can be also on land (but submarines are built and operate to more stringent standards, thanks to Admiral Rickover).
What 3-eyed fish? 3-Mile island didn't emit much (if any) radioactivity. Not aware of any mutated fish from Fukushima (which also produced very little radioactivity---just because they can measure it against a non-noisy background doesn't mean it was much to begin with). Birth defects from Chernobyl were close to normal, if not normal. Cancer rates were not elevated. "They" is not a single individual. You have to read the source material and learn the subject. Plenty of axes to grind, and the progressive greens should not be trusted to be truthful.
Coincidences happen all the time (thus, the term). When the Enola Gay flew, servicemen were being killed in the Pacific campaign. Wouldn't that have been meaningful? I don't know Hiram Johnson from anyone---and what's to stop him from dying when he wanted to? Or from anything else happening at the same time? The second plane was named after the flight commander, Capt. Frederick C. Bock (obviously a pun on "Bock's Car"). It was painted on it after the mission. So it could NOT possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railway. But I am sure that some housewife pulled a pie out of the oven at the completion of the railway. (And you are aware, are you not, that Nagasaki was not the primary target anyway?) And it is a coincidence that someone can see a film reel in the symbol, just as someone can see a toadstool (or a toad) in a Rorschach blot.
I have no idea what your remark about "scantily clad ladies" has to do with trinitite. Were you possibly referring to Bikini Atoll? Those were the days when nuclear testing was sensational news, and people would jump on a snappy association. There is even a decor style named after it: "Atomic Age."
You are letting your imagination run away with you. Stick to the facts and you will be sane.
You can't fire-bomb anything with only one bomber. The Operation Meetinghouse raid on Tokyo required 334 B-29 bombers, 279 of which were able to drop bombs. It required an elaborately coordinated dropping pattern. Only one very special B-29 was used on Hiroshima ("Enola Gay") and one similarly special one on Nagasaki ("Bockscar"). The bombers were specially modified to carry the nuclear bombs. The pilots had undergone specific training to make the drop. It happened.
The link leads to unmitigated bullshit by someone who knows absolutely nothing about nuclear weapons or their effects. If his story is correct, there could be no such thing as trinitite, a fused mineral made by the detonation of the Trinity device. I have samples of the mineral. My father saw the ruins of Nagasaki in November of 1945 and described them to me. I worked for a government contractor that made nuclear delivery systems...on strategic defense against nuclear weapons. I had a Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information (CNWDI) clearance.
Here's the problem, anons. You allow the world to peek in on this page and laugh their heads off at your deliberate ignorance. All you need to do is read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone, and you would be up to speed. But no, you decide to go the way of the Know-Nothing...and prove you know nothing. I am wondering if the real anons are not on this page...
Suit yourself.
Not exactly how half life works....
Yes it is. Many different radioactive isotopes are created in a nuclear explosion. The most dangerous ones are dangerous because of their intense radiation. Their radiation is intense because they have a short half life.
Why is chernobyl still empty and treated loke a nuclear wasteland then?
How can you have Nagasaki and Hiroshima being completely fine a few weeks later but Chernobyl having to be abandoned for years?
The most obvious difference is quantity. An RMBK reactor core like Chernobyl’s #4 reactor contains 194 tons of enriched Uranium fuel. In contrast, Little Boy carried 141 pounds of highly enriched uranium. And, since Little Boy was an airburst, most of the fallout ended up in the ocean while Chernobyl instead sat there and burned. And you can take a tour to Chernobyl, just wear a dosimeter because some areas have radiation levels high enough to be dangerous. It’s dangerous like a poorly-cleared minefield, not a ravening death zone.
Lots of longer-lived isotopes that remained in place. And caution.
A lot of the radioactive particles are washed away with the rain. BTW, a LifeStraw can be used on radioactive mudpuddles, as the radioactivity is in the particles, not the water itself.
Looks better than some of our cities.
Japan got nuked twice, then gave the world manga and anime. You're welcome, world.
Let's not forget Fukushima in 2011. That nuclear accident caused 3 core meltdowns. One core they don't even know where it is, allegedly. At the time, I figured we would all be getting cancers by now and I really thought it was a world extinguishing event. But we're all still here. Makes you wonder if the radiation stories are lies like most everything else.
How do they not know where a core is?
Here is an article showing they did find it after searching for 6 years: https://www.sciencealert.com/probe-captures-images-melted-uranium-nuclear-reactor-fukushima-daiichi
Family member here in Japan does tissue diagnosis. Cancers are up across the board since 3/11, though it's not making the news. Used to find cancer cells once in a while, but now it's a regular occurrence, in all ages.
If you really thought we were all going to die from Fukishima, you really didn’t know anything at all about radiation. Sorry, fren.
Why not educate him then instead of just being an ass?
You are the one name calling.
So? I was describing what he's doing. Feigning empathy with his sorry while really just commenting to be superior. That's being an ass.
If he really cared about his fren he'd write a comment educating him with his knowledge of radiation instead of just implying he's dumb.
A more physical-evidence writeup without the comms angle is here: https://web.archive.org/web/20160807214559/https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-06/atom-bomb-anniversary-youre-being-lied-about-hiroshima-and-much-more
You don’t hear about deformed babies and high cancer rates in those cities. Makes you think.
This thread has shown me how closed minded this community really is...
You guys are more like Patriots.win then you'll ever know, and there much much crazier things out there thrn fake nukes.
Food for thought, its not size as much as quantity launched. That said they are all bad. The worlds largest (500 megaton) has a blast and fallout radius of about 80 miles. It will not be used and to big for an ICBM.
There are no 500-megaton weapons. There was only---once---a 50-megaton device. There are 500-kiloton weapons, and these are used for ICBMs, but the danger radius is not 80 miles. (The whole subject of risk is a sliding scale. There are various radii for different criteria.)
Your right, too many zeros. 50 MT 3rd degree burns estimated at the 100km (65 miles)mark. Shock wave 465 miles. The blast wave circled the earth 3 times. I did estimate 80 miles as a somewhat distance to not experience damage.
But the 50-MT device was not a practical weapon. Even 10-MT weapons have been retired. More effective to use multiple lower-yield weapons, once delivery accuracy improved. "Damage" depends on overpressure tolerance, or bare skin.
What if "nukes" aren't even a thing?
Some folks prefer their cage @ PatriotEazy
What if we have been lied to? Just think what you know today from what you knew yesterday? Think about what you will know tomorrow? From the father of nuclear energy. A great hour and a half video which collaborates some of the posts already in this thread. Open your mind.................. https://libertariannews.org/2012/06/27/man-eats-uranium-drinks-and-swims-in-reactor-water-ignites-plutonium-in-his-bare-hand/?fbclid=IwAR21D8V-BLKmJ151rF2iVmgMk2J5uhT_g4CxyCzLDf8K3o0VocPgusLcQMg
I don't think there's much "if" at this point. Everything COULD be a lie.
The only reason I'd say the "nuke" thing may not be a lie would be because every time I research something I end up seeing some deliberate actions that cause physical harm to the planet that don't need to be taken.
They definitely seem to like to convince us that destruction of Earth is necessary for humans to be happy.
Think about it....the fact they said to children to get under their desk to be safe is clearly fear-based. Now after seeing years of scare tactics...its safe to say this was the greatest false flag ever. Because we know Nazi's escaped via Operation Paperclip logically speaking they had cover by "losing the war". They always had a plan to take over the world and used ww2 as "the start".
You get under your desk to be safe because the desk is strong enough to protect you from the collapse of the building---or at least you would be safer than not being under the desk. (This was when school desks were sturdy construction.) Are you not aware they give the same instruction against earthquakes? (I've been in an earthquake and had to do it. Steel desks.)
If you haven't seen enough footage of nuclear tests, you are laughing at something that shouldn't be laughed at.
And Operation Paperclip only gathered up German scientists who wanted to repose their knowledge with America, not with the Soviet Union. Calling them Nazis is just cheap racism, because ALL Germans were compelled to be members of the Nazi party in order even to earn a living, much less work on military projects. Their largest influence on the public life in America was to foster German restaurants in Huntsville, Alabama. (I've been there. It's good food.) The other influence was to get an American on the Moon. That's it. No evil, underground Nazi cabal festering in dark corners. Just stupid, venal Democrat progressives out in the open.
You did not mention beer🍺 I'll have another yard of Heffi please
I was on company travel and had scruples about buying beer with company funds. That was a long time ago. I've had time to reconsider.
The more I learn about it the less I think the "war" had anything to do with anything except creating a group that can't be criticized and dispersing that group to create/manage the new institutions of the world.
American youths suffering in Europe and telling their children all about how scary war is was a nice bonus for them.
We never had any drills to get under our desks back in the 60s at my school. Of course my school was within the blast radius of a major military base, so there was no use doing anything. :)
Of course not... there's mountains and stuff... kek
I'm just a dude that knows what he don't know.
This is some lefty bullshit tactics, if you're gonna question someone be intelligent about it. We don't need this low IQ low effort bullshit in our community. This is like asking of someone is a Nazi because they question the mainstream holocaust stories.
Have you seen a nuke go off? We're you in Hiroshima or Nagasaki? Have you done 10 thousands hours of research on nukes and are a master on nuclear physics? No? Then don't act like it's a stupid question. It's valid and your retarded "are YoU a FlAt EaRThEr?" question adds nothing.
Got ‘em
The people down voting are actually retarded. Its sad to see that even parts of our community are still attached to bullshit subversive tactics.
The driving philosophy behind the Q movement is freedom of thought. I enjoy expanding my mind and consider anything in the realm of possibility until I decide otherwise. Anyone who discourages freedom of thought and expression should be shamed.
Exactly. Discussion is the most important regardless of if it's about the most concrete and provable things like MSM bias or the stolen election, or seemingly silly things like flat earth or fake nukes.
Oh man there used to be some good discussion on this site. Nowadays there's lots of people that just downvote with nothing to say.
The smartest thing anyone could do would be admit we're all retarded.
As you've states, lots of holding onto "my truth" going on around here.
Except this shit happened. Ask the Japanese survivors. They are still around.
Theres about 150 Japanese survivors from both bombings who will tell you it's real.
Also staying indoors first 24 hrs insures survival after a nuke if your out of blast zone.
There's quite a few Jews who survived the holocaust who will tell you that the Nazis played soccer with dead babies, made Jew skin lamps and made jew fat soap...
There's survivors from 911 who will tell you planes hijacked by Al Quieda went into the building and destroyed it.
Survivors from Pearl Harbor will tell you the Japanese attacked.
Survivors of Libia thought babies wee pulled out of incubators and died on the floor.
Survivors of Syria thought chemical weapons were used on civillians.
Afghani survivors thought that the US soldiers were androids or had robotic suits.
Do I need to go on? How would a random Japanese dude be able to tell the difference between fake nukes and real? I didn't know that simply surviving somthing gave you all the knowledge and information that related to it.
Some covid survivers will tell us how scary and deadly coof was.
Some vaccine survivers will tell you how scary and deadly vaccines are.
These are two apposing views of thr "truth" that exist right now in America.
Flat earth theory prevents nukes from causing damage and radiation. Lochness monster and bigfoot also deflect nukes.
having democrats run your city is worse than getting nuked.
The Jew Who Bombed Both Hiroshima And Nagasaki
https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-jewish-world/the-jew-who-bombed-both-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/2016/03/10/
The secret is, none of those cozy-looking lights are actually plugged in.
Yeah, don't visit where that photo was taken (Hiroshima), if you need a TS security clearance to keep your job. I have no definite proof, but I have suspected that they flag visits like this when you renew and have to submit a new SF86.
I had a TS for decades and no one even mentioned such a thing. Unfounded suspicions are not helpful.
"Hiroshima. I thought a nuke caused a land to be unusable due to radiation for many, many decades."
Well, it has been many decades since Hiroshima was nuked. And it was a tiny bomb compared to what we have now.
Hiroshima has been occupied continuously the whole time – it's not just one data point today.
it possibly is, and it's quite probably why most japanese in the region can eat a big mac through a tennis racquet!
Must've dumped iodine everywhere lol