Okay, I'm not trying to forum slide, but I have something incredibly stupid I have to know.
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
...Did anyone ever ask Q what Covfefe meant before s/he went dark?
Trump had just returned from Saudi Arabia. He sent out a tweet at midnight (daytime there) saying, "Despite the constant negative press covfefe." Until that night, typing covfefe into google translate produced the translation "I will stand (up)" because covfefe is a poor transliteration of cov'fe fe (or something close to that. To make Trump appear stupid, google translate was updated overnight to give a shrug emoji as the result instead. The next morning, Trump deleted the covfefe tweet, then tweeted "Who can figure out the true meaning of covfefe??? Enjoy!"
The entire transaction highlighted the realtime information war that we are still fighting today. He who controls the information controls the narrative.
A month or so later, a Democrat introduced a bill to preserve presidential communications (prevent deleted tweets) called Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement Act. This was, most obviously, to mock Trump, and the proposed act went nowhere in congress.
👆
Really interesting. And people here say there are no coincidences!
Others here have covered "covfefe" adequately, so I will address another part of your question, about "before s/he went dark." I think the common belief here is that Q is not a person, but rather a team consisting of fewer than 10 people, some of whom are in military intelligence. Whenever I see Q referred to as an individual in the negative MSM reports, I think the author(s) knows NOTHING about Q.
It first dawned on me that Q was not a single person was about a year into the posts when the tone (or "voice") changed from phrases and talking points, to more fully formed sentences and vocabulary. Then it changed again to a different writing style.
I'm sensitive to such things because for many years I worked as a technical writer and technical editor of scientific documents. I came to believe that whoever was writing those posts were at least 3 different people. Much later came the widespread belief in this community that Q was made up of fewer than 10 persons, some of whom served in military intelligence.
I hope that helps.
That's very interesting. What do you think about the writer of the new Q posts?
Great question. To me the last few drops have either been by the original Q poster, or someone who emulates that style. We could speculate all day as to why different posters were active over the past 5 years but we would probably be wrong.
Duty assignments, personnel reshuffling, even prosaic causes like illness, vacation, or family matters could be in play. We may never know the full story of the Q Team until after The Plan has been thoroughly fulfilled and the books are written and the players come forward.
And if the military intelligence members are psy-op operators, we may NEVER know who they are.
But rather than focus on "who is Q" I think it is more important to not lose sight of the actual drops and what they mean. Just my 2-cents' worth.
Thanks. I'm not focusing at all on who is Q, rather whether new Q is legit.
Got it. So I do believe the current Q is of the original Q team, so yes, I believe the drops are legitimate. Of course we are all entitled to our opinions, and that is mine.
Thanks. I appreciate your observation.
It's convenient to speak of Q as an individual. The alternative is what? Every time you say Q include a lesson about how Q is probably a group and maybe even Trump, at times. But Trump is actually thought to be Q+.
Maybe Q's pronouns are "them" and "they"? 8>)
...maybe it's an ai?
Granted it would be the first ai that the internet didn't turn into a nazi, but...
https://www.americanelements.com/iron-cobalt-vanadium-alloy
A few weeks after Trump's tweet I read where a Biblical scholar said the word covfefe could be traced back to the Adamic language (before the Tower of Babel) and that roughly translated it meant 'we win" or "God wins". I wish I had saved that article because now I can't find it.
https://www.worthychristianforums.com/topic/208711-finally-historian-and-bible-scholar-uncovers-the-meaning-of-covfefe/
eaglerising dot com seems to have been scrubbed
Thanks. I'll save it this time for sure.
Yes...put it in the seatch
COVFEFE Act of 2017: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2884
One answer was it was an acronym for some agency or committee, I don’t remember which one.
Name of a Democrat introduced Bill that would make it illegal for a president to delete tweets essentially.
You have to understand the importance of Comms, and how it utilizes symbolism. Not esoteric symbolism, but something like water = info, duck = to duck/escape. Celebs often have symbolism attached to them, Pamela Anderson = sex tapes, as that was her infamous rise to fame.
There is therefore specific meaning when unexplainable events like Pamela Anderson hand-delivering Julian Assange a sandwich at the Embassy. To us, it's an offbeat headline that makes you go "huh". To Comms Aware, it tells them something very important. Repeat this for 100s of different headlines on a weekly basis, and the masses get more deluded while Comms Aware become educated about s*** that actually matters.
Establishing what Trump did in this time period with a word, a symbol, "Covfefe", meant that it could then be invoked later, and the entire Comms Aware class would understand precisely what it meant.
Covfefe tweet happened same day as the Kathy Griffin decapitation video that 'poor little Bannon saw on TV' and thought it was real.
"I go over Coffee comms in a number of posts. Coffee = filtered and hot news. Because water = info, Coffee is “info” but “filtered” and “Heated up” by the MSM.
Basically CNN/MSNBC/etc reporting daily news = daily coffee.
Covfefe meanwhile is a “error” as reported of “Coffee” mixed with “Negative Press Coverage” meaning the message is a joke about how they spilled “Coffee” on themselves as they tried to serve it to him."
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2022/03/27/science-of-stardom-deconstructing-michael-jacksons-red-shoes/#Covfefe