Articles 106 and 107 of the UN Charter give Russia, as the legal successor to the victor of World War II, the right to take any action, including military ones, against Germany, Hungary, Austria, Romania, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia. , Czech Republic, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Ukraine for attempts to revive Nazism.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres was surprised to learn from Putin that there is an article in the UN charter that allows a Russian special operation to be carried out in Ukraine.
RUSSIA HAS THE RIGHT TO PUNISH NAZIS ANYWHERE (according to UN Charter)
The Nuremberg Tribunal sentenced to criminal liability all those who fought against the UN and committed genocide. The greatest genocide was committed against the Soviet people. UN Charter, Articles 106 and 107, gives the victors of World War II - the USSR, USA, Great Britain and China - the right to take action against the countries that fought against them to prevent actions that aim to revise the results of the Second World War. .
In particular, the use of military force against these countries is permitted. To do this, you only need to NOTIFY the other three winning countries, but not get their consent. Russia, as the LEGAL successor to the USSR, can also use force against states that want to overhaul the Yalta-Potsdam system in Europe. Russia can stop attempts to revive Nazism in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Slovenia and the Czech Republic, which acted as the protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia during the war.
Whelp, there you have it!
An Inconvenient Truth.....
Al Gore enters the chat.
Hopefully people are not taking this post at face value and sharing this information as written. This post implies that the UN charter explicitly states certain things that it doesn't. Hopefully people are going to read it for themselves.
You know they won't and will run with the headline. You maybe able to wake a normie up but you cannot make them have critical thinking and research verification skills.
Assuming this is real and our interpretation accurate, that means the US and Britain can as well
Is this why they always call us nazis because that gives them the legal authority to kill us?
It sure does sound like trying to set the stage by pre-dehumanizimg your political rivals.
Since they actually are Nazis they probably don't want to whip up too much hatred for nazis. Probably just want a boogie man in people's mind to keep Israel at the top of the pyramid
The interpretation is not accurate. The document referenced says that the UN charter does not preclude actions taken as a result of WW2. It would be a stretch to apply it to the Ukraine conflict.
Lol chapter 17
u/#careerended
26 Million Russians died not just in their own land but DEFENDING those nations from the NAZIS in WW2. And how do these nations repay them. By falling in line with the very agenda (NAZIS) that tried to wipe them out in WW2. Hearing from military sources that around 1,500 Poles that were dressed in Ukrainian uniforms have died in Ukraine just recently. The Russians have been meticulously collecting and logging Ukrainian and foreign mercenaries dead soldiers and removing any identifying documents like passports etc. If they are able, they are put in body bags and left at designated areas or buried with coordinates noted.
Here is the excerpt from the UN Charter:
The conclusion is that the UN members must CONSULT with each other as to the necessity to conduct a JOINT ACTION against another country. Nothing in the UN charter states that Russia by itself is allowed to take any military action against whomever it wishes. Learn to read legal documents. Also, here is an in-depth essay on these UN charter articles: Article 106 of the United Nations Charter
They can not consult 2 of the 4 parties because 2 of them openly support the side that is being called the nazi threat. Some say that the US started all off this...that will be hard to give notice. So maybe legally they can do this since they consulted China before the operation.
Consult does not mean to ask permission. Open to incredible interpretation.
This essay explains that article 106 is intentionally vague. It may or may not require consensus. It can apply to any situation involving the maintenance of international peace and security.
We are in new territory. Regardless of what we think article 106 means-Putin is doing it.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1495242
100%
Ultimately, Sovereigns do not ask permission.
So #7 makes the U.N. action in Ottawa against those scary bouncy castles a violation of its charter, it seems to me.
My bad. CNN and AP tell me that this UN plane was only in Canada "for maintenance".
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-710322416559
Dasting.
Encouraging to think so, but this does not seem to be spelled out in the referenced Articles. It would be nice to walk us through the park by the hand. It is terribly important to understand this correctly.
Interesting bits Q pointed out in the drops: Look at post 4635- “was the Nazi party ever truly destroyed?”
Look at drop 140 - “What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating with POTUS to eliminate the NWO?”
u/#q4635
u/#q140
Worthy. You got the link in it and everything. SauceFag proud.
Yep.
Edit. But I didn't read the 1943 thingy.
Edit #2. When was the United Nations formed? Before or after the 1943 thingy?
Edit #3. Related to the 1943 thingy. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943v01/d527
From which I note in the addendum:
Ummm, it seems to me that the U.N. is a child of the 4 country agreement, not the other way around.
The U.N. was established in 1945.
It is not and was never intended to be the world ruler.
They have grotesquely overstepped, imho, in many areas.
“Pending the coming into force of such special agreements referred to in Article 43 as in the opinion of the Security Council enable it to begin the exercise of its responsibilities under article 42, the parties to the Four-Nation Declaration, signed at Moscow, October 30, 1943, and France, shall, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of that Declaration, consult with one another and as occasion requires with other Members of the United Nations with a view to such joint action on behalf of the Organization as may be necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.”
Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.”
So.... What happens if Russia can link the revival of nazism to the funding and money laundering of the democratic party through Ukraine... And the biolabs...
Surprised not more response or discussion of your question.
Haha I know, I thought I may have had a pretty important revelation.
Great dig, jus surprised it took "us" nearly a year to learn these crucial, legal, U.N. chartered facts?
Yet not as surprised, apparently, as a UN Secretary General? TF?
"UN Secretary-General António Guterres was surprised to learn from Putin that there is an article in the UN charter that allows a Russian special operation to be carried out in Ukraine"
Edit to add this would perfectly explain the UN's non action/interference v Russia in Ukraine, as Putin has explicitly stated they're there to eradicate the Nazis.
Yep! Thought so too and the US and UK trying to keep it down-low (muh money laundering in Ukraine). And China supporting Russia. The big 4.
Little help please. If engrissh not my first language then help me find this words in document
Little help please. If engrissh not my first language then help me find this words in document
In short, there's a Plan including international White Hats to eradicate Deep State satanists and truly free the world from oppression, tyranny, and all things evil humanity has endured since (at least) Babylon. Op's post helps reinforce, at least partly, the "goals" of this Plan, as it shows WHY surprisingly the UN hasn't interfered with Russia's efforts to remove Nazis in Ukraine. The UN is legally bound to stand down. [They] would normally ignore any so-called "charters" if it didn't align with their agenda. Or, perhaps, key UN members have been flipped/forced/freed?
Moar proof that we're indeed watching a "movie"
Please put Schwab on the 1st to do list. Nazi fuck.
Help me out here, but didn't Germany INVADE Ukraine in WW 2? And millions of Ukrainians were shipped back to Germany as laborers under Reichskommissariat Erich Koch. I don't follow how the right to take action against countries that fought against you would apply to someone Germany invaded.
The language has changed in the charter. Enemy State was replaced. Lawyers can argue, but basically anyplace Nazi ideology springs up, Russia can mobilize. Ukraine was part of USSR. The victor rights applies to the russian federation, successor of ussr.
This is very interesting. Thank you!
Just wait until normies realize their money went to actual Nazis.
Some of them are accepting the fact that Ukraine is infiltrated with Nazis, yet fir some reason they have this image of them in their minds as being Nice Nazis or something. Guess they are not ready to accept the whole truth yet!
Russia still can’t go to Antarctica though
Nothing in the link says anything remotely close to what you wrote here.
Interesting!
It’s right there, man
It’s not that simple. It’s a living document. It gets updated to reflect the current world. A simple quick search shows it was updated maybe in 2010 to remove the term “enemy state”. Understand the original purpose of the document. In today’s world Nazi ideology is alive and well in Ukraine. They have been committing genocide in Donbas for 8 years against ethnic Russians. Nazism in Germany was the reason for the document and the UN. If the UN does not act, russia gave many warnings and updates, 1 of the 4 victors can act to keep world peace without approval of the other 3. Article 106 is the escape clause for that.
Research, fren
Wow! Kudos on this anon, I'm going to dive into this a bit 🧐
United Nations Charter, Chapter XVII: Transitional Security Arrangements
Article 106
Pending the coming into force of such special agreements referred to in Article 43 as in the opinion of the Security Council enable it to begin the exercise of its responsibilities under Article 42, , the parties to the Four-Nation Declaration, signed at Moscow, 30 October 1943, and France, shall, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of that Declaration, consult with one another and as occasion requires with other Members of the United Nations with a view to such joint action on behalf of the Organization as may be necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.
Article 107
Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/chapter-7
Article 42
Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.
Article 43
All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security. Such agreement or agreements shall govern the numbers and types of forces, their degree of readiness and general location, and the nature of the facilities and assistance to be provided. The agreement or agreements shall be negotiated as soon as possible on the initiative of the Security Council. They shall be concluded between the Security Council and Members or between the Security Council and groups of Members and shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.
It doesn't say that, and even if it did, there is nothing else saying it runs in perpetuity vs getting cancelled or amended. It talks of setting up the UN and transitional arrangements. The only thing Nazi is related is that anyone who committed nazi atrocities would be sent back to the country the committed them in to be judged and punished.
Unless the allegation is Russians SMO is to capture historical nazis from WW2, (it isn't) there is nothing in those links that would imply an open ended "right" to go after modern day nazis.
That is all open for debate. The language has been revised over the years to eliminate “enemy state”. But the victors still have the rights as intended- knowing that it was a living document as the world changes.
Russia can basically stomp Nazi ideologies that rise up. Remember the USSR suffered greatly.
It’s there. That’s why it was written. Lots of word salad. But nobody wants to see how the sausage is made.
I read through lots of it and it'd takes time because your correct when you say this is word salad
No, it doesn't. Neither articles 43, 106, 107, or the 4 nations agreement mentions the revival of naziism
This is not what this post says. This post with great assurance makes it sound as if these articles explicitly say things these articles do not explicitly say. That is what I'm arguing about, because with over 200 upvotes, people are showing too much confidence in this post, and if they go off and share it, they will look foolish.
They all clearly do, did you not read what the OP posted? Why are your arguing? This is some doomer shill shit right here.
I don't see it either
106 is an escape clause if the UN does not act. Granted to the Big 4 and maybe France.
Sticky please
This is huge. It’s all there.