This is another one of those "What? They need a study for this?" and then they use it for propaganda by leaving out critical details.
There are so many factors involved, Unvaxxed tend to lean 'not left' and are not afraid of life. They are much more responsible (as indicated by not being vaxxed) and are much more likely to be going out everyday taking care of business which most definately will mean much more driving.
More driving = more miles = more accidents.
The vaxxed are perpetually scared of life and will minimize their times of going out because of their fear.
The entire 'study' cottage industry is a fraud perpetrated on humanity and is simply a money grab. Anyone citing any studies to try and make a point automatically loses any debate in my book.
Oh, look! Another "Unvaxxed = Bad Thing Happens" piece in the news to distract us all from the real story: "Vaxxed = Baffled Thing Happens."
(and when I say "us," I'm not referring to my enlightened frens here, but the sheeple who are wrapped inside the warm, gooey nougat of their MSM-induced stupor.)
I refuse to give this side-show absurdity any more oxygen.
This is one of the most common faults in "studies," sampling error. There could be many ways to pick the wrong sample. And the results could be quite true, for the sample, but quite wrong for every other sample. If a study doesn't have a thorough description of the sample subjects, how they were picked, who picked them, when and where, what happened to all of them from start to end, then imo it shouldn't be taken too seriously.
Where were you when people we comparing vaxxed deaths to unvaxxed deaths, when clearly more elderly people were vaccinated and likely to kick the bucket than unvaccinated children?
Also, people who got the covid shot probably didn't go out as much, so were on the roads less, and are probably such paranoid people who are so afraid of death that they actually might be safer drivers.
I learned in Statistics that such coincidences extend to 'studies' showing homes with nesting storks on their rooftops had more babies. According to the study above, the conclusion would mean storks deliver babies to homes.
The study was driven by data from Ontario (pop. 14,789,778) and the study analyzed 11,270,763 of them. Of that 11 million or so people, 9,425,473 had received the vaccine.
In the 18-39 age range, 3,000,000 had received the vaccine and 938,000 hadn't.
So unless there was more nuance to what Jikky was arguing than presented here by @freenemo, their analysis is incorrect.
EDIT: And to follow up (I'm digging on it some more), another thing that is impressive on this study is it's probably the only cabal vaccine study I've seen that doesn't treat one dose as "unvaccinated":
It's all in the 18-39 age range. That's too big to filter out the differences in the ages. 18 yo are by far the most likely to get into a serious crash and by far the most likely to not be vaccinated. It would be obvious if they compared each age. They can hide the data by lumping them all in together. Likewise, the 80+ yo group is by far the most likely to be vaccinated, and by far the least likely to be driving much.
And there could also be some "survivers bias" I think is what it's called. Meaning traffic accidents leading to ER visits are counted but they acknowledge for privacy reasons, they didn't have data on people that died at the scene. So, it's possible that the vaxxed were more likely to die at the scene and the pure bloods were more likely to survive but need medical treatment.
In short, pure bloods naturally fall into groups that are more likely to be in traffic accidents (young and male).
Correlation, definitely not causation as they imply when they suggest that doctors talk to pure bloods about their risk for traffic accidents.
Comparing entirely different things and coming up with a wildly generalized statement that you could never actually prove to fit the narrative = science
Also, people who got the covid shot probably didn't go out as much, so were on the roads less, and are probably such paranoid people who are so afraid of death that they actually might be safer drivers.
How in the hell is this metric recorded? what does it have to do with car accidents , wow! I want to know because we could snuff this before it gets big maybe
Also, they just lie.
Anyone who believes such an absurd “study” is an absolute moron.
'Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.' Voltaire
very interesting, i just assumed the vaxxies were all hiding at home so most of the drivers were pureblood in general
And the purebloods were banned from public transportation lol
Bingo!
There was a time when 100% of car crashes we unvaxed
That and they just flat out change the definition of "vaccinated" in real time.
This is another one of those "What? They need a study for this?" and then they use it for propaganda by leaving out critical details.
There are so many factors involved, Unvaxxed tend to lean 'not left' and are not afraid of life. They are much more responsible (as indicated by not being vaxxed) and are much more likely to be going out everyday taking care of business which most definately will mean much more driving.
More driving = more miles = more accidents.
The vaxxed are perpetually scared of life and will minimize their times of going out because of their fear.
The entire 'study' cottage industry is a fraud perpetrated on humanity and is simply a money grab. Anyone citing any studies to try and make a point automatically loses any debate in my book.
Oh, look! Another "Unvaxxed = Bad Thing Happens" piece in the news to distract us all from the real story: "Vaxxed = Baffled Thing Happens."
(and when I say "us," I'm not referring to my enlightened frens here, but the sheeple who are wrapped inside the warm, gooey nougat of their MSM-induced stupor.)
I refuse to give this side-show absurdity any more oxygen.
Correlation not causation. Isn’t that the wokes term for claiming the childhood vaccines don’t do harm to kids.
This is one of the most common faults in "studies," sampling error. There could be many ways to pick the wrong sample. And the results could be quite true, for the sample, but quite wrong for every other sample. If a study doesn't have a thorough description of the sample subjects, how they were picked, who picked them, when and where, what happened to all of them from start to end, then imo it shouldn't be taken too seriously.
Where were you when people we comparing vaxxed deaths to unvaxxed deaths, when clearly more elderly people were vaccinated and likely to kick the bucket than unvaccinated children?
Fake news, fake polls, fake climate change, fake women, fake science
Another "study" brought to you by the Office of Statistical Distortion.
Also, people who got the covid shot probably didn't go out as much, so were on the roads less, and are probably such paranoid people who are so afraid of death that they actually might be safer drivers.
I learned in Statistics that such coincidences extend to 'studies' showing homes with nesting storks on their rooftops had more babies. According to the study above, the conclusion would mean storks deliver babies to homes.
Does anyone have the link to the argument "Jikky" made?
I've seen multiple "debunks" of this study from our side but honestly haven't come across one that washes with the data.
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext#%20
The study was driven by data from Ontario (pop. 14,789,778) and the study analyzed 11,270,763 of them. Of that 11 million or so people, 9,425,473 had received the vaccine.
In the 18-39 age range, 3,000,000 had received the vaccine and 938,000 hadn't.
So unless there was more nuance to what Jikky was arguing than presented here by @freenemo, their analysis is incorrect.
EDIT: And to follow up (I'm digging on it some more), another thing that is impressive on this study is it's probably the only cabal vaccine study I've seen that doesn't treat one dose as "unvaccinated":
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext#seccesectitle0034
It's all in the 18-39 age range. That's too big to filter out the differences in the ages. 18 yo are by far the most likely to get into a serious crash and by far the most likely to not be vaccinated. It would be obvious if they compared each age. They can hide the data by lumping them all in together. Likewise, the 80+ yo group is by far the most likely to be vaccinated, and by far the least likely to be driving much.
And there could also be some "survivers bias" I think is what it's called. Meaning traffic accidents leading to ER visits are counted but they acknowledge for privacy reasons, they didn't have data on people that died at the scene. So, it's possible that the vaxxed were more likely to die at the scene and the pure bloods were more likely to survive but need medical treatment.
In short, pure bloods naturally fall into groups that are more likely to be in traffic accidents (young and male).
Correlation, definitely not causation as they imply when they suggest that doctors talk to pure bloods about their risk for traffic accidents.
Thank you - an actual fact check for a change - rather than a BS narrative defence by opinion.
Comparing entirely different things and coming up with a wildly generalized statement that you could never actually prove to fit the narrative = science
Toilet paper use historically leads to atom bombs being used.
Ok, who the fuck thought it was wise to spend money even studying this?
So now that winter is here in NY, it's not that people refuse to slow down on wet or icy roads, it's because they're non-vaccinated?
This is getting kind of sad.
Also, people who got the covid shot probably didn't go out as much, so were on the roads less, and are probably such paranoid people who are so afraid of death that they actually might be safer drivers.
How in the hell is this metric recorded? what does it have to do with car accidents , wow! I want to know because we could snuff this before it gets big maybe
They Only Considered You Fully Vaxxed After Both Jabs and After the Full 28 Day Period!
You Hit My Funny Bone! Let's Add----Usually When Your Numbers Up!!!!!
This is the way I've always seen myself going out.
"Fuck it." BOOM.
(Side note this is the reason I still have a VHS player. Well, and Two Lane Blacktop)