To be blunt… GAME OVER.
(twitter.com)
Comments (50)
sorted by:
Awww yeaaahhhh
I love me some good datefagging! It's been a while since I got an infusion.
this makes you feel better?
You never tried hopium before?
The come down off it, sucks tho
what am i hoping this translates to in real life?
That the Supreme Court takes the Constitution seriously enough to hear this case and see that the actions of so many of our leaders were unconstitutional. And then act on that.
because a vague q drop aligns with when the court is hearing cases, this will snowball into a supreme court case that will rule on things outside the scope of this one?
Uh .. no. Nothing to do with the Q drop. It's all about the case.
Why are you HERE?
Also 2+1+7+2+0+2+3=17 2/17/2023
That would be the most Q day of all Q days in this calendar year.
Two MOAR weeeeeeeeeeeks!
I've told the mod team that we really need to have a Total Recall "two weeks" meme on here.
Holy shit 🤯
That is hilarious!
It’ll be a nothingburger, but the comms are becoming blatent.
Here’s some truth I wanted to believe the Brunsons case would work. I read it and believed. But it didn’t happen bc like Derek Johnson says it’s all about continuity of Government and the military being in control.
He said from the beginning it’s impossible for them to succeed the authority is not there for the court to remove and replace the executive branch. By what method could they enforce it?
I want to believe but it’s not going down that way. Also, God has a lot to do with timing.
Someone asked @SharonSaysSo about Marbury v Madison today. Her answer got me to thinking about this case. The Supreme Court rarely goes the full way on an initial ruling. So the Brunson brothers are focusing on the oath of office. I think the focus of this case may be on ruling on the importance of the oath of office. I agree. I don’t see how they get rid of the legislative branch except by the military coming forward and saying the whole govt is unconstitutional and we need all new elections.
Funny how there is now a push by the 17th SOG, Juan O Savin to get patriots to run for local offices… Just in time for all new elections everywhere?
It’s a bullshit case.
The remedy they’re asking for (SCOTUS to remove duly elected members of Congress) is something the SCOTUS is prohibited from doing according to your Constitution. Only the Congress itself, or the voters, can unseat elected members.
We should be happy that the SCOTUS aren’t allowed to remove senators, representatives or the POTUS/VP.
Trump wouldn’t have lasted 10 seconds in the WH if this was a possibility.
As I said, this case is bullshit because the remedy they’re asking for goes against the Constitution.
Well, I have seen a lot since 1/20/2021 that I never expected to see happen: a military funeral gun salute at a Presidential inauguration, a “President” arriving at Andrews in a dirty Suburban with the Secret Service wearing jeans, a fake White House set in the old Executive building, Biden showing a silicone mask tab on his ear at a 9/11 ceremony, not to mention a heck of a lot of other of not-easily explained happenings.
We are in uncharted territory. So maybe we will see something else that isn’t easily explained.
They aren’t prohibited. Fraud vitiates everything. Courts have ruled people were not duly elected before. They also ruled against corrupt politicians.
If the SCOTUS rules that members of Congress are not duly elected, the Congress itself will have to remove those members.
However this is not the remedy the B brothers is asking for, they want the SCOTUS to do the unseating themself.
Which is strictly prohibited.
The Brunson case is not about the cheating, it’s about not investigating the cheating, and breaking their oath not doing it.
This is a bullshit case that lacks standing, and even a 5 year old can see it.
The Brunson are grifters, and have made a fortune out of this case.
How did they make a fortune off this case? Show me some receipts.
Where is it prohibited?
In the Constitution.
Under Article I, Section 5, clause 2, of the Constitution, a Member of Congress may be removed from office before the normal expiration of his or her constitutional term by an “expulsion” from the Senate (if a Senator) or from the House of Representatives (if a Representative) upon a formal vote on a resolution agreed to by two-thirds of the Members of that body present and voting.
So a member of the Congress can be remove if he resigns, dies, is voted out by his constituents or an expulsion from office voted by his peers.
The SCOTUS can never remove an elected member.
I don’t have any reason to not consider it as you have. Perhaps they could rule on the constitutionality of breaking the oath and afterward they would be prosecuted locally in their home towns.
Probably military is the only way but this could be in tandem along with Durham. Maybe the perfect storm would kick start the open military action?!
Interesting. Still a long shot. But there are no coincidences, especially when it comes to Q.
Genesis flood started on the 17th day of the second month.
Brother, it's beginning to rain.
https://www.bible.com/bible/406/GEN.7.11-24.ERV
https://qalerts.app/?q=biblical
This is some confirmation. Nice.
u/#q3872
If I understand this right it could completely paralyze USA for a while. Rumors are Russia is preparing for big attack. And what about Taiwan? Interesting timing.
One of my favorite post !
Remember before January 6, the Brunson’s were saying there’s a chance it gets denied and moved to a later date, and not to worry? Almost like they knew… Almost like it’s all part of the Plan?
Wouldn't that be nice!
Lord - please wrap you loving arms around our country. Help those blinded to see the horror that has been going on. Keep us safe from ourselves. Amen
Three is the number of redemption, so…I like it!! 🙏
I'm old enough to remember when the Brunson case went to comity 2/6/2023 and the SCOTUS never even picked it to be read.
Well that would make Q a time traveler. With Q’s approach and track record, I’m not holding my breath on this one. I trust Q and follow with the fate of humanity at stake. I’ve taken the oath. I just don’t think they can see the future. They can plan moves ahead of time to make it appear that way but not actually do it. If im wrong we certainly can’t lose. Also im not.
The first case was on J6....... January 6th. Here we go again?
Date fag, God I wish this was over. Sweet thanks for the hopeium hit.
17 - 3 = 14 / 7 days = 2 more weeks!
Oh hell, that is some grade A hopium there, damn.
DATE FAGGING HOPIUM at it's finest!
Gamestop
I’m guessing MOASS will happen around this time as well.
the military is the only way....