Because those chemicals they burned off are EXTREMELY carcinogenic even in small amounts. They won't just fade away over a short time. They will move from the ground into the water, into plant and aquatic life and bioaccumulate in fat cells. The nearby farms are all contaminated and it's going to take a long time to see the full effects.
Doesn't answer my question. If Vaccines are causing cancer and you want to hide it by creating a different event, how does it help to localize that even in a certain area? It wont help hide cancer proliferation in other areas.
You call what happened in Ohio localized!? That stuff went everywhere in the smoke and into the groundwater, the Ohio River, etc. It's going to get into the food and bioaccumulate in plants and animals all the way up the food chain and then how many places around the country get food distributed from that region? By the time it starts showing up and causing cancer in humans, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
By the time it starts showing up and causing cancer in humans, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Okay, you are now proving my point that this event is not going to provide cover for cancer caused by vaccines since (which was the thesis of the post), as you correctly observed, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Yes and that's why it will provide cover. Because a sharp rise in cancer cases can easily be blamed on the chemical spills when a large percentage may actually be due to the jabs.
And we don't expect the government to distinguish between types of cancer, geographics or anything relevant, do we? They will cherry pick whatever data they need to support their propaganda.
I'm saying it would be impossible to conduct rigorous research to conclusively trace the cause to a specific event, but in the aggregate data there would still be a sharp rise in cancer which the government will just say it's due to hazmat exposure and ignore all the jab damage.
I just don't see it killing that many people. They may try to use it as an excuse for the vaxxed getting cancer, but when the vaxxed are getting cancer on the west coast, midwest, and everywhere else not affected, it's going to be a hard sell.
Also, maybe this will help end train cars hauling liquids. You know what that would do to the deep states' easy money machine? Who owns the train cars/lines? Some of us have been screaming for years about pipelines being safer than train cars. The whole environmental movement is based on keeping train cars going, and nothing more. It was always about stopping pipelines, so they still had that easy money coming in to fund all their other BS. Why do you think the enviros aren't out in force? Because, trains are their lifeblood.
So, who benefits the most from trains going down? There is more to this than a chemical spill. This highlights how horrible trains are for transporting dangerous liquids.
Uh, well, because of the toxic cloud of carcinogenic compounds currently settling over the Eastern half of the continent. You only needed East Palestine, evidently.
Have you seen the fallout? greasy ashes and Styrofoam looking stuff. Covers hundreds of square miles. Watch the water? Honest tragedy or planned disaster, it's a great excuse for that entire region.
OP - this post contains a video that shows the decline in air quality in a large swath of the East coast since this train disaster. Great to post to the deniers here in your thread:
Farms grow food. Food gets distributed. People move around. Cancer takes a while to develop. By the time we start seeing the effects it won't be obvious where it came from.
The chemical cloud has spread over the entire Eastern half of the continent, and vinyl chloride is something which is extremely toxic even in miniscule amounts.
The location allows for contamination of the most fertile farmlands in the country, pollution Westward via the Mississippi River basin, and pollution East and South by wind. I can't think of a better location if your goal is to impact as much of the population as possible.
As for evidence, we have no evidence that the vaxx is a bioweapon and not just some colossal fuckup by greedy pharmaceutical giants, but we still think it because that's where the logic leads.
I believe it.
Explain why only East Palestine if you are seriously proposing this as a theory.
Because those chemicals they burned off are EXTREMELY carcinogenic even in small amounts. They won't just fade away over a short time. They will move from the ground into the water, into plant and aquatic life and bioaccumulate in fat cells. The nearby farms are all contaminated and it's going to take a long time to see the full effects.
Doesn't answer my question. If Vaccines are causing cancer and you want to hide it by creating a different event, how does it help to localize that even in a certain area? It wont help hide cancer proliferation in other areas.
You call what happened in Ohio localized!? That stuff went everywhere in the smoke and into the groundwater, the Ohio River, etc. It's going to get into the food and bioaccumulate in plants and animals all the way up the food chain and then how many places around the country get food distributed from that region? By the time it starts showing up and causing cancer in humans, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Okay, you are now proving my point that this event is not going to provide cover for cancer caused by vaccines since (which was the thesis of the post), as you correctly observed, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Yes and that's why it will provide cover. Because a sharp rise in cancer cases can easily be blamed on the chemical spills when a large percentage may actually be due to the jabs.
And we don't expect the government to distinguish between types of cancer, geographics or anything relevant, do we? They will cherry pick whatever data they need to support their propaganda.
Which is it?
or
I'm saying it would be impossible to conduct rigorous research to conclusively trace the cause to a specific event, but in the aggregate data there would still be a sharp rise in cancer which the government will just say it's due to hazmat exposure and ignore all the jab damage.
This shit blew all over the East Coast. Watch the video in this post - it's not long. I'd say they picked a really great spot to have this disaster:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aANBQibH/check-out-the-air-quality-at-sig/c/
Yea, rural Ohio is red and statistically the least vaxxed. Makes no sense.
The plume blew through the mid-Atlantic and the NE USA. Statistically the most vaccinated.
More people won't be affected than will be. Now if there are 10 more, all over the country, then sure.
80% of the U.S. population lives in or East of the Mississippi River Basin.
I just don't see it killing that many people. They may try to use it as an excuse for the vaxxed getting cancer, but when the vaxxed are getting cancer on the west coast, midwest, and everywhere else not affected, it's going to be a hard sell.
Also, maybe this will help end train cars hauling liquids. You know what that would do to the deep states' easy money machine? Who owns the train cars/lines? Some of us have been screaming for years about pipelines being safer than train cars. The whole environmental movement is based on keeping train cars going, and nothing more. It was always about stopping pipelines, so they still had that easy money coming in to fund all their other BS. Why do you think the enviros aren't out in force? Because, trains are their lifeblood.
So, who benefits the most from trains going down? There is more to this than a chemical spill. This highlights how horrible trains are for transporting dangerous liquids.
Uh, well, because of the toxic cloud of carcinogenic compounds currently settling over the Eastern half of the continent. You only needed East Palestine, evidently.
Perhaps to spread cancer to the Amish. They make a wonderful control group, I am sure they didn't take any vaccines.
They found spike protein in every cancer cell. The vaxx leaves it's signature.
This! If your loved one passes get an independent autopsy
That’s crazy.
We live in a world of augmented reality, your perception is on par with a Jedi. Keep it up.
gotta blame it on something!
Have you seen the fallout? greasy ashes and Styrofoam looking stuff. Covers hundreds of square miles. Watch the water? Honest tragedy or planned disaster, it's a great excuse for that entire region.
And you believe these pictures?
I live 50 miles away there is nothing.
My husband's son lives in the epicenter and there is nothing like those pictures.
I live 65 Miles away. I havent seen a thing
Yet people in other states show cars with stuff on it. They probably threw stuff on to take a picture.
That's interesting. Thank you for your feedback.
Not theory. Truth.
This was my first thought when they saud chemical fire. Idgaf what was burning its all toxic
Makes perfect sense... why would they not.
I believe it too.
Not far enough.
C19 jabs worldwide + toxic air and water worldwide =
I said the same thing to some friends. Evil genius plot twist.
OP - this post contains a video that shows the decline in air quality in a large swath of the East coast since this train disaster. Great to post to the deniers here in your thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aANBQibH/check-out-the-air-quality-at-sig/c/
Thanks!
Give everybody cancer so you can't say it's just vaxxed ... makes sense to me. "When everybody's special, nobody is."
only issue with that, is it's too localized
Farms grow food. Food gets distributed. People move around. Cancer takes a while to develop. By the time we start seeing the effects it won't be obvious where it came from.
Except it's not localized. There are reports of contamination across the Eastern half of the continent.
Won't account for all the increases in areas that aren't East Palestine. Interesting thought but not really big picture.
The chemical cloud has spread over the entire Eastern half of the continent, and vinyl chloride is something which is extremely toxic even in miniscule amounts.
Twofold. It is designed to accelerate cancer rates and to cover up the vaccine’s role.
The location allows for contamination of the most fertile farmlands in the country, pollution Westward via the Mississippi River basin, and pollution East and South by wind. I can't think of a better location if your goal is to impact as much of the population as possible.
As for evidence, we have no evidence that the vaxx is a bioweapon and not just some colossal fuckup by greedy pharmaceutical giants, but we still think it because that's where the logic leads.