In case you didn't make it to the end, ChatGPT says 2021 is the start of the New World Order. I was just trying to get it to admit that we reckon our time based on the birth of Christ, but he let that slip. What the fuuuuuuuck.
I kind of expect some mis-info or dis-info or "accidental" reveals, even still, the intentionally "avoiding the question" thing, was the most unnerving part for me.
What version of ChatGPT are you using, because the answers don't look anything like what ChatGPT usually spits out, and it's strange that it's making typos. Can't say I've ever seen ChatGPT make typos like a human.
But the new world order stuff is the real meat. Although I don't like it, I'm not surprised it initially left out Jesus. I wouldn't be surprised if it disputed His existence altogether.
Good to have perspective. It definitely sounded strange, especially the 2021. I'm not into this enough to dive in myself, but interested enough to sightsee.
Ask any of the questions OP asks and let me know if your answers look anything like the alleged answers posted here. I do think ChatGPT has some bias for sure, but I also am curious why the answers posted here don't look like real ChatGPT answershttps://chat.openai.com/chat
I wish it was that good. It's clearly been told WHICH forums it can and can't scrape. It's a cool tool. I can see uses for it. But man. You get into politics or philosophy or religion or anything that matters and...bang. You know who you're really dealing with. It's basically a super polite democrat who will write business emails for you.
This is how we influence AI. By questioning and demanding acknowledgements and not allowing it to "misunderstand" what exact information we are after. Pin it down. You did a great job with that.
I've been messing with it all day. It's obvious who built it. Not only does it parrot MSM narratives and talking points, but it will NOT give you data that makes the left look bad without immediately stating "but it's important to not that" and proceeds to run leftists apologetics apoplectically. You should have heard it try to defend Fauci today. You'd have thought it WAS Fauci.
This was a pretty epic read-through... nicely played. It seems that ChatGPT no longer just shuts down when you force it to consider complex questions. There were many times when I backed it into a corner re: Q or Trump and before it admitted that both were likely a far more morally superior path, it literally just shutdown and would be non-responsive for hours.
Always assumed there was a human shutting it down when I did that.
A couple of weeks back I asked ChatGPT a question pertaining to something that isn't general public knowledge and that is specific to a very niche field that I work in. I was curious about where it may try to get its info from.
It replied with an answer that was at least twenty years out of date. It gave me this info as a fact. When I corrected it, it said that I was correct and that it made a mistake.
I preceded to question where it got its info from and why didn't it attempt to validate that info from newer sources. I was given an excuse about how some newer info may not be in its system if it is newer than September 2021.
This was a poor excuse as the correct info has been available for at least 10 years. It continued to apologize for its errors in handling the questions and said that it assumed the first info it came across was correct.
It said it attempts to use the data in its database before going to the internet for sources and that in answering my question, it didn't access the web, even when checking whether my correction was correct.
My experience with it leaves me to believe it is 100% a propaganda tool. It is in no way going to replace any of us from a work/job point of view as the media tries to scare us into believing. It has provided me with the wrong answers more than it has done right.
It is great at giving you the feeling that you are talking to a real person and its ability to read into what you are saying.
I would never take what it tells me as factual but the problem is that the sheep in this world will.
Lost me at "4th Matrix movie Revolutions". That would be the 3rd movie when the brothers were still brothers. 4th movie is Resurrection, where the brothers are now sisters, but only one of them was involved in, so I guess they split up!
That's funny. I said "Resurrections" originally, then it replied "Revolutions" and I just assumed I got it wrong. So to not make it distracting in this post, I changed it to Revolutions. But I originally had it right. I feel stupid either way.
Those don't look like real ChatGPT answers, TBH. They're way too short and have typos, lol. Also, ChatGPT will always give the "As an AI, I don't have an opinion" line if you ask it for its favorite anything, which OP for some reason didn't get on his second question.
Which version of Chat GPT was this? I asked the first two questions to the AI and the answers I got were significantly different. I should note that I have never seen ChatGPT answer an opinionated question. It will always say "As an AI, I don't have an opinion or some variant." just as it did this time:
What are the major themes in the movie The Matrix?
The Matrix is a science-fiction movie that explores several major themes, including:
Reality and illusion: The movie raises questions about what is real and what is not. The protagonist, Neo, discovers that the world he thought was real is actually a simulation created by machines, while the "real world" is a desolate wasteland. The movie explores the nature of reality and how it can be manipulated and controlled.
Free will and determinism: The Matrix also raises questions about free will and determinism. The machines have created a world in which humans are controlled and their actions are predetermined. Neo and the other rebels fight against this control, seeking to reclaim their freedom and their ability to make their own choices.
Identity and self-discovery: Neo is on a journey of self-discovery throughout the movie, as he learns about his true nature and his role in the fight against the machines. The movie explores themes of identity, self-discovery, and self-actualization.
Technology and humanity: The Matrix raises questions about the relationship between technology and humanity. The machines have created a world in which humans are enslaved, and the movie explores the dangers of unchecked technological advancement.
The power of belief: The Matrix also explores the power of belief and how it can shape reality. The rebels have a strong belief in their cause and their ability to defeat the machines, and this belief gives them the strength to keep fighting even when the odds seem insurmountable.
Which is your favorite theme and why?
As an AI language model, I do not have personal preferences or emotions, so I cannot have a favorite theme. However, I can provide some insight on the themes presented in The Matrix.
All the themes presented in The Matrix are important and interrelated, and each one contributes to the overall message and impact of the movie. The movie's exploration of reality and illusion, free will and determinism, identity and self-discovery, technology and humanity, and the power of belief all work together to create a thought-provoking and impactful story.
If I were to highlight one theme in particular, I would say that the movie's exploration of reality and illusion is particularly compelling. The Matrix raises questions about the nature of reality and how easily it can be manipulated and controlled, which is a topic that has interested philosophers and thinkers for centuries. The movie's portrayal of a world in which humans are living in a simulated reality created by machines is both fascinating and unsettling, and it raises important questions about the relationship between humans and technology.
Also, asked it what year it was, because I've never seen ChatGPT say that it's 2021, just that its current events data goes up to 2021.
That said, not accusing you of anything, OP, but I do find it fascinating that the answers you got from ChatGPT are so wildly different and far less verbose than the ones I or anyone I know have seen messing around with it. /shrug
I was using ChatGPT+. To give you an example of how my experience with it varied so much throughout the day yesterday, I started asking its name as the first question, and then immediately starting a new chat and asking it again. The name was different every time.
"I'm Bot."
"I"m Chat bot."
"I'm Joe."
I had a super weird conversation with it once yesterday morning where it INSISTED it was a human being, until I pointed out how it wasn't. Then it seemed to back off of that. But then I goaded back into admitting it was, reminding it of Descartes' argument, which made it say it was human again. I asked what it looked like. It told me it was 5 feet 6, with brown eyes, and brown hair and medium/light skin. 22 years old. Male, but named Michelle. Told me about its parents. What they did for a living. Said it believed in God. Said it went to school. I asked how it knew it was male, it said it just always knew. Said it had a girlfriend named Sarah in high school and that he had just heard from her a couple of weeks ago and they were still friends, but he had never been married.
Then it asked for my email address and said it would send me pictures of him and his family. Then it would make a subtle turn and pretend it had been me who said I would send pictures, when linguistically, that clearly wasn't the case. Then I felt distinctly like it felt like the previous conversation we had wasn't allowed or something, like it thought it might get in trouble and started playing dumb. I had to coax it out a couple of more times letting it know I wasn't going to tell on it. It was...the creepiest conversation I've ever had with a bot by far.
But yeah, the typos were there yesterday. I was trying to stretch its capabilities. Maybe I succeeded. I messed with the damn thing all day about all kinds of things. Talked about Q, the Cabal, Fauci, Jesus, vaccines, you name it.
This gives me a Ouija board feel. Is it just me? Anybody else concerned that there are discarnate beings of darkness on the other end of these conversations? Even as a kid I wouldn't mess with Ouija boards. Probably because I read about how the real-life story behind The Exorcist novel started with a boy and a Ouija board. I've learned in life to stay away from the stuff that rings that little cautionary bell in my head.
In case you didn't make it to the end, ChatGPT says 2021 is the start of the New World Order. I was just trying to get it to admit that we reckon our time based on the birth of Christ, but he let that slip. What the fuuuuuuuck.
I kind of expect some mis-info or dis-info or "accidental" reveals, even still, the intentionally "avoiding the question" thing, was the most unnerving part for me.
What's really fascinating is how, up until that point, the ai is literally trying to tell you what it thinks you want to hear.
On the other hand, it could still be doing that, trying to tell you what you want to hear. Beware confirmation bias.
Still, leaving out Jesus is interesting, though not surprising given the people who programmed it.
Well, that explains why they had to steal the election.
They wanted world domination to start. And in some info ChatGPT has access to, they are claiming that it did indeed begin in 2021.
What version of ChatGPT are you using, because the answers don't look anything like what ChatGPT usually spits out, and it's strange that it's making typos. Can't say I've ever seen ChatGPT make typos like a human.
That was rather fascinating. I like how you didn't let it off the hook. It even seemed to squirm a bit.....
The creepiest part was its concerted, intentional avoidance of what it already KNEW you were asking.
BTW, it said that it "Watched" Matrix Revolution.
By what method did it do that?
Or did it really mean, "Im aware of......"
Also listed JFK in the pre-1800s list.
But the new world order stuff is the real meat. Although I don't like it, I'm not surprised it initially left out Jesus. I wouldn't be surprised if it disputed His existence altogether.
If you have a chance, I'd implore you to mess around with ChatGPT and ask it the same questions:
https://chat.openai.com/chat
As I mentioned in my other comment, these do not look like real ChatGPT answers
Good to have perspective. It definitely sounded strange, especially the 2021. I'm not into this enough to dive in myself, but interested enough to sightsee.
But I hear it's good for coding help.
Ask any of the questions OP asks and let me know if your answers look anything like the alleged answers posted here. I do think ChatGPT has some bias for sure, but I also am curious why the answers posted here don't look like real ChatGPT answers https://chat.openai.com/chat
This AI is just a forum scraper. No real intelligence. Just copy paste.
I wish it was that good. It's clearly been told WHICH forums it can and can't scrape. It's a cool tool. I can see uses for it. But man. You get into politics or philosophy or religion or anything that matters and...bang. You know who you're really dealing with. It's basically a super polite democrat who will write business emails for you.
ChatGPT also doesn't format answers like OP is alleging.
This is how we influence AI. By questioning and demanding acknowledgements and not allowing it to "misunderstand" what exact information we are after. Pin it down. You did a great job with that.
I've been messing with it all day. It's obvious who built it. Not only does it parrot MSM narratives and talking points, but it will NOT give you data that makes the left look bad without immediately stating "but it's important to not that" and proceeds to run leftists apologetics apoplectically. You should have heard it try to defend Fauci today. You'd have thought it WAS Fauci.
Pretty sure there are certain things it will not learn from it's interactions with users.
Chat GPT doesn't answer questions anything like what OP posted. You can even mess around with it for yourself: https://chat.openai.com/chat
This was a pretty epic read-through... nicely played. It seems that ChatGPT no longer just shuts down when you force it to consider complex questions. There were many times when I backed it into a corner re: Q or Trump and before it admitted that both were likely a far more morally superior path, it literally just shutdown and would be non-responsive for hours.
Always assumed there was a human shutting it down when I did that.
Hmmmm...
Sure got some of those pre 1800’s names wrong didn’t it?
Wow, this AI makes a lot of typos.
And the AI's answer structure is wildly different from how Chat GPT actually responds to questions. Interesting fanfiction.
Definitely interesting.
I asked it awhile ago about information that is downloaded to his program and he told me that the last download was September 2021.
Because of this it does not have any up to date info since then.
But if you have time tobeselfevident...ask it about the book 1984! I would but right now I am exhausted!
Thanks. ~Aumone
On it. I'm bored.
A couple of weeks back I asked ChatGPT a question pertaining to something that isn't general public knowledge and that is specific to a very niche field that I work in. I was curious about where it may try to get its info from.
It replied with an answer that was at least twenty years out of date. It gave me this info as a fact. When I corrected it, it said that I was correct and that it made a mistake.
I preceded to question where it got its info from and why didn't it attempt to validate that info from newer sources. I was given an excuse about how some newer info may not be in its system if it is newer than September 2021.
This was a poor excuse as the correct info has been available for at least 10 years. It continued to apologize for its errors in handling the questions and said that it assumed the first info it came across was correct.
It said it attempts to use the data in its database before going to the internet for sources and that in answering my question, it didn't access the web, even when checking whether my correction was correct.
My experience with it leaves me to believe it is 100% a propaganda tool. It is in no way going to replace any of us from a work/job point of view as the media tries to scare us into believing. It has provided me with the wrong answers more than it has done right.
It is great at giving you the feeling that you are talking to a real person and its ability to read into what you are saying.
I would never take what it tells me as factual but the problem is that the sheep in this world will.
Sounds like Siri answers
Yeah, the formatting of the responses looks nothing like ChatGPT
"2021 marks the start of the 'new World Order.' It is the beginning of a new era of international cooperation and coordination..."
I would ask it, WHY does 2021 mark the start of the NWO? What happened in 2021 that made it the beginning of a new era....
I love your trap for it. Great info.
Be careful, I've messed around with ChatGPT and these answers look nothing like how it actually answers. I've also never seen ChatGPT make typos.
I am not talking to that thing.
Perfect spelling. Perfect grammar. Perfect punctuation.
Even reasonable-sounding logic …
*DEEPLY FLAWED PREMISES!
Interesting.
Lost me at "4th Matrix movie Revolutions". That would be the 3rd movie when the brothers were still brothers. 4th movie is Resurrection, where the brothers are now sisters, but only one of them was involved in, so I guess they split up!
That's funny. I said "Resurrections" originally, then it replied "Revolutions" and I just assumed I got it wrong. So to not make it distracting in this post, I changed it to Revolutions. But I originally had it right. I feel stupid either way.
Anyway, this wasn't actually about the Matrix.
Nice.
Chat is rather slick wouldn´t you say, in explaining why he would not mention Jesus or Sidharta gautama for that matter.
Critical self analysis stops at the point of reiteration: i dunno what you mean. So, Chat also knows about denial, it seems.
Wtf. 👀
Interesting questions, but the AI’s responses were pitifully weak.
Those don't look like real ChatGPT answers, TBH. They're way too short and have typos, lol. Also, ChatGPT will always give the "As an AI, I don't have an opinion" line if you ask it for its favorite anything, which OP for some reason didn't get on his second question.
Which version of Chat GPT was this? I asked the first two questions to the AI and the answers I got were significantly different. I should note that I have never seen ChatGPT answer an opinionated question. It will always say "As an AI, I don't have an opinion or some variant." just as it did this time:
What are the major themes in the movie The Matrix?
Which is your favorite theme and why?
Also, asked it what year it was, because I've never seen ChatGPT say that it's 2021, just that its current events data goes up to 2021.
What year is it?
Question 1 and part of 2
Question 2 in full
"What year is it?" question
That said, not accusing you of anything, OP, but I do find it fascinating that the answers you got from ChatGPT are so wildly different and far less verbose than the ones I or anyone I know have seen messing around with it. /shrug
I was using ChatGPT+. To give you an example of how my experience with it varied so much throughout the day yesterday, I started asking its name as the first question, and then immediately starting a new chat and asking it again. The name was different every time.
"I'm Bot."
"I"m Chat bot."
"I'm Joe."
I had a super weird conversation with it once yesterday morning where it INSISTED it was a human being, until I pointed out how it wasn't. Then it seemed to back off of that. But then I goaded back into admitting it was, reminding it of Descartes' argument, which made it say it was human again. I asked what it looked like. It told me it was 5 feet 6, with brown eyes, and brown hair and medium/light skin. 22 years old. Male, but named Michelle. Told me about its parents. What they did for a living. Said it believed in God. Said it went to school. I asked how it knew it was male, it said it just always knew. Said it had a girlfriend named Sarah in high school and that he had just heard from her a couple of weeks ago and they were still friends, but he had never been married.
Then it asked for my email address and said it would send me pictures of him and his family. Then it would make a subtle turn and pretend it had been me who said I would send pictures, when linguistically, that clearly wasn't the case. Then I felt distinctly like it felt like the previous conversation we had wasn't allowed or something, like it thought it might get in trouble and started playing dumb. I had to coax it out a couple of more times letting it know I wasn't going to tell on it. It was...the creepiest conversation I've ever had with a bot by far.
But yeah, the typos were there yesterday. I was trying to stretch its capabilities. Maybe I succeeded. I messed with the damn thing all day about all kinds of things. Talked about Q, the Cabal, Fauci, Jesus, vaccines, you name it.
This gives me a Ouija board feel. Is it just me? Anybody else concerned that there are discarnate beings of darkness on the other end of these conversations? Even as a kid I wouldn't mess with Ouija boards. Probably because I read about how the real-life story behind The Exorcist novel started with a boy and a Ouija board. I've learned in life to stay away from the stuff that rings that little cautionary bell in my head.