Twitter is not a source. Ever. If you post about a study, link to the actual study and not some asshole spouting off about the study, invoking every politically charged buzzphrase he can muster and screaming about genocide trials.
If you want to evaluate research, you have to do it with a dispassionate distance. You have to set aside preconceived notions and simply look at what the methodology and data actually show. ClinicalTrials.gov is not showing any reported results. All we have is a poster from a French drug company. I have no actual data on the authors, when or where the poster was presented, links to actual data (rather than the sanitized conclusions a poster format requires), etc.
It's probably also noteworthy that this is for post-exposure prophylaxis, not pre-exposure prophylaxis or for treatment of a confirmed case of the Virus Which Cannot Be Named. The TOGETHER and ACTIV-6 trials both showed no benefit for treatment.
But doesn't Big Pharma use peer review to filter out contrary evidence to the narrative? I mean, if we only went with peer reviewed studies, then we would reach the conclusion that the vaccine actually saved lives and that Ivermectin did not help. All the peer reviewed research (and there is a lot of it) all basically backs up what the MSM has been saying.
Tucker Carlson told us a big part of what woke him up was reading the book "The Psychology of Totalitarianism" by Mattias Desmet. Among other things that book annihilates the so-called peer reviewed scientific community studies and lays bare how subjective and often corrupt they are. There's no way I can do the book justice, but I highly recommend it.
That's my way of saying I completely agree with you. My opinion on this may not be popular even on GAW but part of the Great Awakening has got to include smart people letting go of sacred cows. Science is not our savior! It has been corrupted as much as anything by the cabal which I call the Revelation 2:9ers now.
This is why we need to abolish the so called "scientific method" It's designed to lead to leftist conclusions so that even those who are searching for truth will be deceived. We already have the truth with what we can see with our eyes. You can just walk outside and see that climate change is a hoax and that the horizon is flat and not curved. We can see the truth of vaccines and voter fraud just from first hand experience.
I'm starting chapter 5 of the book and thought you would like the opening paragraph. Here it is in quotes. The parentheses are in the book (not added by me):
"In previous chapters, we discuss how science tipped from open-mindedness to dogma and blind conviction (chapter 1), how its practical applications isolate people from one another and from nature (chapter 2), how its utopian pursuit of an artificial and rationally controllable universe equates to the destruction of the essence of life (chapter 3), and how its belief in objectivity and measurability of the world leads to absurd arbitrariness and subjectivity (chapter 4). In this chapter, we will discuss the fate of another great ambition of science: to liberate man from his anxiety and insecurity and his moral commandments and prohibitions."
Needless to say, chapter 5 goes on to show that science didn't fare any better on those last points.
Read it? Nah, ain't nobody got time for that. But I'll vaguely reference it in a post about how it is proof that Covid came from a lab (the toddler said so).
And if you want to know (and pass on to frens and relly's) how and why they managed to throw the original Ivermectin study, watch this zoom call between Dr Tess Laurie and a scumbag called Dr Andrew Hill.
And if you've lost loved one's due to the use of Fauci's Remdesivir, prepare to be angry, very very angry because they knew Ivermectin worked!
Patients will never again get the Covid, Flu, stub their toes or need to pay taxes… ever. Got arthritis or gout? Sinus infection? Child support? Leaky sink? Bad credit? None of it will ever matter again after Remdesivir works it’s magic on you.
One of the things I can’t wrap my head around is how anyone will trust the medical industry from now on, and what that means for us.
How are we supposed to get medical care? Are we supposed to just roll over and die?
The vast majority of the medical field is untrustworthy. If they are removed as they should be, we’ll have a critical shortage of doctors and nurses. So even if we were willing to trust the industry again, how would anyone be seen in a timely manner?
Are we just screwed, or is there some kind of plan in place that we don’t know about?
And let’s not forget that the majority of treatments prescribed are just as bad as, if not worse, than the issue itself. The time it would take to train people to the real cures would be a lot, further lowering the number of staff.
Amen to that. If you had lost someone who was loved, you should join the class lawsuit that is sure to come up. BTW when I was admitted to the hospital with covid pneumonia, the first thing I asked for was Ivermectin. They just sort of laughed. I got the stuff that kills you, can't even remember the name. Oh, remdesivir.
There are people who have weak immune systems. Strengthening a weak immune system takes time to heal. Ivermectin can be used in cases when it's an emergency.
Hence why a lot of people who were dying from COVID were morbidly obese or already sickly with other ailments. A lot of them didn't have to die. Fee fees and greed got in their way.
agreed. i'm not saying that it isn't effective, just caution everyone to tread lightly with ivermectin. do you know the mechanism of action for that big pharma drug? it's highly toxic, so much so that your body stops it's natural detox process to deal with the high toxicity causes by the ivermectin.
people's first reaction with be to downvote me and deny this outright without even given it critical thought, same as the vax-tard sheeple did to us nay-sayers about the death vaxx. do you homework and you'll see.
Ivermectin is one of the safest medications on the planet and has been used safely for over 30 years. It has a wide therapeutic range and is not toxic. Over 700 million cases of river blindness have been successfully treated with 80-90 million treated every year in 33 countries. Over 300 million cases of lymphatic filiariasis have been successfully treated with about 90 million cases being treated yearly in 15 countries. Ivermectin is so safe and has such minimal side effects that it is administered by non-medical and even illiterate staff in remote rural areas.
Twitter is not a source. Ever. If you post about a study, link to the actual study and not some asshole spouting off about the study, invoking every politically charged buzzphrase he can muster and screaming about genocide trials.
If you want to evaluate research, you have to do it with a dispassionate distance. You have to set aside preconceived notions and simply look at what the methodology and data actually show. ClinicalTrials.gov is not showing any reported results. All we have is a poster from a French drug company. I have no actual data on the authors, when or where the poster was presented, links to actual data (rather than the sanitized conclusions a poster format requires), etc.
It's probably also noteworthy that this is for post-exposure prophylaxis, not pre-exposure prophylaxis or for treatment of a confirmed case of the Virus Which Cannot Be Named. The TOGETHER and ACTIV-6 trials both showed no benefit for treatment.
Link to the ClinicalTrials.gov listing here.
Link to the poster (this is not yet published or peer-reviewed) here.
For me, I'll wait to see a full write-up and some proper peer-review before passing judgement. Downvote away.
Glad to see a serious person here once in a while. Great post.
But doesn't Big Pharma use peer review to filter out contrary evidence to the narrative? I mean, if we only went with peer reviewed studies, then we would reach the conclusion that the vaccine actually saved lives and that Ivermectin did not help. All the peer reviewed research (and there is a lot of it) all basically backs up what the MSM has been saying.
Tucker Carlson told us a big part of what woke him up was reading the book "The Psychology of Totalitarianism" by Mattias Desmet. Among other things that book annihilates the so-called peer reviewed scientific community studies and lays bare how subjective and often corrupt they are. There's no way I can do the book justice, but I highly recommend it.
That's my way of saying I completely agree with you. My opinion on this may not be popular even on GAW but part of the Great Awakening has got to include smart people letting go of sacred cows. Science is not our savior! It has been corrupted as much as anything by the cabal which I call the Revelation 2:9ers now.
This is why we need to abolish the so called "scientific method" It's designed to lead to leftist conclusions so that even those who are searching for truth will be deceived. We already have the truth with what we can see with our eyes. You can just walk outside and see that climate change is a hoax and that the horizon is flat and not curved. We can see the truth of vaccines and voter fraud just from first hand experience.
You really made my day! It's so encouraging to know there are like-minded people like you on this!
I'm starting chapter 5 of the book and thought you would like the opening paragraph. Here it is in quotes. The parentheses are in the book (not added by me):
"In previous chapters, we discuss how science tipped from open-mindedness to dogma and blind conviction (chapter 1), how its practical applications isolate people from one another and from nature (chapter 2), how its utopian pursuit of an artificial and rationally controllable universe equates to the destruction of the essence of life (chapter 3), and how its belief in objectivity and measurability of the world leads to absurd arbitrariness and subjectivity (chapter 4). In this chapter, we will discuss the fate of another great ambition of science: to liberate man from his anxiety and insecurity and his moral commandments and prohibitions."
Needless to say, chapter 5 goes on to show that science didn't fare any better on those last points.
My cousin Daryl did an ivermectin study with six chickens and a toddler, want to read it?
Read it? Nah, ain't nobody got time for that. But I'll vaguely reference it in a post about how it is proof that Covid came from a lab (the toddler said so).
Peer-review is overrated stupid bullshit.
No actual discovery or new science can be made through peer review, only suppressed
And if you want to know (and pass on to frens and relly's) how and why they managed to throw the original Ivermectin study, watch this zoom call between Dr Tess Laurie and a scumbag called Dr Andrew Hill.
And if you've lost loved one's due to the use of Fauci's Remdesivir, prepare to be angry, very very angry because they knew Ivermectin worked!
Link for the Rumble vid https://rumble.com/vwg569-a-letter-to-andrew-hill-dr-tess-lawrie-ivermectin-suppression-killed-millio.html
Andrew Hill is an especially stinky, vile piece of shit. He needs to be tried, convicted and executed... hopefully one day that will happen.
I'll second that anon.
It's also extremely effective against the flu.
Seriously, take a dose of ivermectin as soon as you start feeling the onset of the flu and it will be gone within 24 hours.
Gets rid of cancer too.
Why would you take horse de-wormer?
Should take Remdesivir; it's got what lungs crave.
And ventilators.
Weird how it’s been known for decades that Corona viruses, lungs and ventilators don’t go well together.
It was also known for decades that face rags do less than nothing; they're actively harmful.
Fraudci even wrote a paper about it in the early 2000s.
So...yea.
Well aware. He’s even said it in video. The mask info has been known since 1918.
It’s true. In fact it’s a hospital cure-all…!
Patients will never again get the Covid, Flu, stub their toes or need to pay taxes… ever. Got arthritis or gout? Sinus infection? Child support? Leaky sink? Bad credit? None of it will ever matter again after Remdesivir works it’s magic on you.
Not sure
covid = hospital/doctors/nurses/cdc etc ... the real disease was the protocol used to treat covid, protocol killed more than the actual disease.
So business as usual?
unfortunately
Lets see this cunt Hill's bank statement.
Did covid really cause millions of deaths? What about the flu which didnt exist? That causes millions of deaths a year.
70% of those contracted covid according to the PCR-method. Also note the safety notice.Compare this to the vaxx which was pushed from day one.
Lockdowns were totally unnecessary.
Maybe it is time to nail these bastards to the lawfare cross with class-action.
One of the things I can’t wrap my head around is how anyone will trust the medical industry from now on, and what that means for us.
How are we supposed to get medical care? Are we supposed to just roll over and die?
The vast majority of the medical field is untrustworthy. If they are removed as they should be, we’ll have a critical shortage of doctors and nurses. So even if we were willing to trust the industry again, how would anyone be seen in a timely manner?
Are we just screwed, or is there some kind of plan in place that we don’t know about?
And let’s not forget that the majority of treatments prescribed are just as bad as, if not worse, than the issue itself. The time it would take to train people to the real cures would be a lot, further lowering the number of staff.
Eat less. Eat healthy. Exercise.
No need for majority of doctors.
That does nothing for a broken bone or illnesses unrelated to what you eat.
But do we need thousands of doctors on hand for a few cases of broken bones?
Even eating healthy as a lifestyle can prevent you from hundreds of ailments.
Imagine if we all did that.
Then the pharma industry is to be wiped out cleanly.
Before or after tar and feathering?
I like that you said "Ivermectin deniers", throw that shit right back in their faces.
Stickied 1more time for the America’s Peeps to read.
You know, I've always wondered, what triggered someone to try Ivermectin in the first place.
Amen to that. If you had lost someone who was loved, you should join the class lawsuit that is sure to come up. BTW when I was admitted to the hospital with covid pneumonia, the first thing I asked for was Ivermectin. They just sort of laughed. I got the stuff that kills you, can't even remember the name. Oh, remdesivir.
There is no covid 19 virus so what are they even testing this on. the flu?
Are they using pcr test to identify covid for these studies?
70%bbetter than 2 out of 3 almost 3 out of 4.... That would make you more than twice as effective as the best baseball player out there...
There are people who have weak immune systems. Strengthening a weak immune system takes time to heal. Ivermectin can be used in cases when it's an emergency.
Hence why a lot of people who were dying from COVID were morbidly obese or already sickly with other ailments. A lot of them didn't have to die. Fee fees and greed got in their way.
Immune system? Don Lemon says you’re a conspiracy theorist.
agreed. i'm not saying that it isn't effective, just caution everyone to tread lightly with ivermectin. do you know the mechanism of action for that big pharma drug? it's highly toxic, so much so that your body stops it's natural detox process to deal with the high toxicity causes by the ivermectin.
people's first reaction with be to downvote me and deny this outright without even given it critical thought, same as the vax-tard sheeple did to us nay-sayers about the death vaxx. do you homework and you'll see.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3GGjYlLVqP4g/
Ivermectin is one of the safest medications on the planet and has been used safely for over 30 years. It has a wide therapeutic range and is not toxic. Over 700 million cases of river blindness have been successfully treated with 80-90 million treated every year in 33 countries. Over 300 million cases of lymphatic filiariasis have been successfully treated with about 90 million cases being treated yearly in 15 countries. Ivermectin is so safe and has such minimal side effects that it is administered by non-medical and even illiterate staff in remote rural areas.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/
Right
First, name checks out. https://communities.win/u/Buttwipe/
Second, you obviously have not had enough boosters, since you are still here, posting stupid shit.