Dylan Eleven (did this test himself I believe)
We have posted several articles on testing the vaccinated for a bluetooth signal using an android phone switched into developer mode. iPhones were not so easy until I found an App called BLE Scanner 4.0.
I have just tested and app on an iPhone without switching into developer mode and successfully picked up the signals from the vaccinated using this App.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
My Tests and Results
• BLE Scanner 4.0 downloaded from the Apple app store on an iPhone XR, software version 14.2.
• Inside a large Faraday cage 20 feet x 20 feet, with no wireless radiation present at all.
• Tested extensively with BLE Scanner App, found no signals at all.
• Tested extensively with high-end wireless radiation tester that picks up Bluetooth wifi and cellular signals; found no signals at all.
• Tested the area with 5 different unvaccinated people and the BLE Scanner app showed no signals at all.
• Tested the environment with the BLE Scanner App with 3 vaccinated people, found 4 bluetooth signals. All signals listed as N/A name not available. Each person had no bluetooth devices on them, air tags, watches or phones etc.
• Did extensive testing on distance from the subjects, showed clear relationship between the signal and distance to each person. The app shows the distance of each signal -25 very close to -60 futher away.
• Tested with 3 different vaccinated people found 6 signals.
• Tested with all 6 vaccinated people together and found 10 signals.
• Tested distances and removing people, direct correlation in the app.
It seems that some of the people were emitting only one signal and others more than one.
The vaccinated signal had a N/A for the name.
As a control I tried the app outside the Faraday cage in different locations and picked up several devices, Samsung TVs etc, and lots of N/A (name not available) which in my experiments were the vaccinated.
Try downloading BLE Scanner 4.0 on your iPhone and do your own tests.
i'm hesitant to believe this. only because it would be a good false flag to frame antivaxxers as scammers or insane.
Also fairly hesitant to believe it as well, if only because Bluetooth already doesn't have a ton of range and for it to be essentially microscopic means it should not be able to penetrate skin, much less travel noticeable distance.
In fact, it would probably cost a LOT of money to have Bluetooth emitting devices that small.
I have a hard time getting it to go past 40', frequently cutting off much earlier.
That 60' just doesn't make sense to me. Especially with such a short antenna.
That said, IF nano tech assembled clots that were 24+" it might be possible. I need to learn more about how these ultra radio short waves would work in this scenario.
You should research
Intra body nano technology.
Which has nothing to do with the physical properties of Bluetooth
Lol
Bluetooth capabilities are not possible at that size though. There is zero instance of it happening.
Says you?
Evidence is lining up that it is certainly possible/plausible.
You know that tech is far more advanced then the average person is lead to believe.
The average person has done 0 research on nano technology and micro robotics.
Thanks for your opinion though.
Says everything.
It's not possible. There is no instance of a bluetooth device working at that scale, that is small enough to fit through a vaccination needle.
I understand that you're going for the whole "anything is possible, we don't know what exists yet" angle, but I work with bluetooth technology professionally. I'm not just some "average person." It needs to be powered on to constantly be broadcasting a signal, and they just don't make bluetooth chips that small.
Is there more evidence than just stories like OP that have no verification?
Haha
"I work with bluetooth you're wrong and that says everything."
Never heard that one before from internet randoms.
Okay thanks.
I will put that in my opinions that don't matter stack.
It doesn't say everything just because I work with bluetooth, but there is also no evidence of it existing. No patents, no pictures, nothing. Just stories you read.
If it exists, what is the tech powering it? Who makes it?
Why aren't there any imitations?
Graphene-based plasmonic antennas. Unlike plasmonic antennas based on noble metals, these would allow smart dust to operate at frequencies at least 100 times (and in principle perhaps 1000 times) smaller than is possible using a conventional metallic antenna.
The operating principle is that an electromagnetic (EM) wave directed onto a graphene surface perpendicular to that surface excites the electrons in the graphene into oscillations. These electrons interact with those in the dielectric material on which the graphene is mounted, thereby forming surface plasmon polaritons (SPP).
When the antenna becomes resonant (meaning that an integral number of SPP wavelengths fit into the physical dimensions of the graphene), the coupling of the SPP and the external EM waves increases greatly, resulting in efficient transfer of energy between the two.
I looked up some information on this! Interesting stuff really. Unfortunately size constraints means it can't function at a level that you're proposing, where unique signatures can be broadcasted over a set range.
It can be capable of passive data transmission, but not active data transmission (which is what bluetooth is).
Lol okay? Why dont you look for videos of people doing the experiments and judge by that? There is plenty of videos.
Have you?
there are "plenty of videos" of lots of things that aren't real. all i'm saying is that fakery isn't impossible, and there's certainly motive to do so.
After everything I've seen over the last 7 years, nothing can be ruled out on first sight. It's more likely the truth as evil as these demons are.
I don't know why OP is silent on the questions people are asking if it's true. It really doesn't seem true.
There are plenty of videos of people with perpetual motion machines, magnetic objects sticking to their bodies and ghost encounters. Fact is that video is easy to fake, especially things like this. Would you believe a homemade video that “proved” the 2020 election was free and fair? Probably not. That is why evidence has to be independently verifiable. Don’t be too quick to believe something just because it is what you want to hear. It has happened to the best of us, I know it has happened to me.
I have been trying this for some time on Android, there are a multitude of signals just about everywhere I scan.
The fridges and TV are easy to spot as they declare what they are, but its the ones that move around are the ones to watch, they do not have an identifiable code to them. Either they are bluetooth earbuds and similar gadgets or they are people.
Fuck shit, the mark of the beast, the brand of a slave.
They aren't people
I'm an electrical and electronics engineer, I work as an expert witness in these fields amongst other things. I have some problems with this theory:
In the most basic of terms wouldn't a person heavily polluted with various heavy metals be a walking antenna?
How do you explain putting a car key fob to your chin and making the signal reach farther to the car you are trying to start?
Could a person with nano tech in their body possibly amplify the signal they are producing by holding a device such as a cellphone?
What do you think of intra body nano technology?
Thank you, you've said everything I wanted to say about this.
Good info to look at & digest. I appreciate this input.
The newest approach involves graphene-based plasmonic antennas. Unlike plasmonic antennas based on noble metals, these would allow smart dust to operate at frequencies at least 100 times (and in principle perhaps 1000 times) smaller than is possible using a conventional metallic antenna.
The operating principle is that an electromagnetic (EM) wave directed onto a graphene surface perpendicular to that surface excites the electrons in the graphene into oscillations. These electrons interact with those in the dielectric material on which the graphene is mounted, thereby forming surface plasmon polaritons (SPP).
When the antenna becomes resonant (meaning that an integral number of SPP wavelengths fit into the physical dimensions of the graphene), the coupling of the SPP and the external EM waves increases greatly, resulting in efficient transfer of energy between the two.
Man, doing a Google search on this shows the propaganda and fact checking are out in full force. I'm skeptical but that alone makes me think there might be something to this.
I've seen nothing like this myself, couldn't detect any signals that couldn't be traced to a phone or other device. If it was that easy to reproduce then I should be seeing several times more signals when scanning at the office or in a public space.
Same, it's only picking up electronics here
You must have missed the one detail that would be very important if the testing is true as this says. 20 X 20 Faraday cage and they state there is no wireless radiation for their "experiment".
This is totally plausible with all the technology in the jab.
You should test NFC. NFC responds to powered signals from NFC to enable a powered identity in an NFC entity. I assume the technogy would be self or responsive powered generated identity to create a unique identity that can be scanned through an NFC signal.
https://dangerousthings.com/product/xnt/
The idea being that the jab would put in place the ability to enable a digital identity from a local unique digital id that would act like this NFC device. The jab creates a powered identity like an NFC chip from the nanoparticle distribution in your body - basically a digital fingerprint.
And why they were so adamant that everyone especially the children get the shot. A trackable identity with no physical connection would please the 3letters and China very much.
Pardon my ignorance, but how does one build a Faraday cage if we wanted to try to replicate these results?
You can use metal screening. like for a screen window or door. Just make sure it's metal and not plastic..or you can buy online..i know people sell them as Faraday screen..but probably a lot more expensive.
Thank you very much. I think I may try to test this theory.
I would think chicken wire fence would work as well.
Another good suggestion, thank you. I like that both (metal screening and chicken wire) are readily available. I'll need to do some research on Faraday cage construction.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5qDHUXx/the-mac-address-phenomenon-in-th/c/ u/freebass has some takes on it
There is no take there at all.
He just basically said it was stupid and he will try it out and didn't come back with any results after 12 days.
Unless you can see something I missed?
why do u think I also tagged him (;
Has anyone who received a J&J jab emit a bluetooth signal?
Interesting thanks, I've seen a few of these tests now and none seem doctored or fake. Imo.
Any convincing video of people testing this?
Some company with a reputation needs to test this like Tom’s Hardware. If this is fake, hammer. Faraday cage? People in the country ought to be showing this in videos everywhere planet wide. I’m not buying this. Show the video. Also, battery? How long ago was everybody jabbed? My Bluetooth batteries don’t last for shit.
Did you test unvaccinated?
You have access to a 20 x 20 Faraday cage?
Can you run this test again with a video recording and post to rumble?
I didn't run the test myself.. it was done by a person named Dylan..he runs a website that posts a lot of truth news. I just didn't want to post his site without permission.
It says he tested 5 unjabbed people.
Test for IQ more like it.
Had some family over for Christmas. Had 10 people over, phone was showing me 16 MAC addresses. Was the strangest thing, but then again first time I ever checked for MAC addresses during a get together lol
Have to specify type of vaccines and any boosters and country and city…
Plus it was experiment, so they probably won’t put on 100% but maybe 5-10% for testing and see who is lucky
So even if test results is zero it doesn’t meant 100% not exist…
Thanks for exsplaining ,
I have and Android so I guess I can' t try this.
Yes you can.
Turn developer mode on.
Thanks.
Also test NFC - lots of apps for that on Android.
How NFC works is to send electricity out to a dormant NFC device, and the device uses that power to respond to the request. This is why Bluetooth is seeing the signal as undefined.
I bet NFC will see something.
Thanks.
Where did you get 6 vaccinated people to stand inside your faraday cage to test? How did they react?
Okay, this IS weird.
But if it works, that's one way to tell if someone is vaxxed and lying about it.
You know, I'm thinking they did this because they can only go to Hell once, so may as well make the sins doozies.
Damn