If Elon never bought Twitter, millions would have seen this tweet without Community Notes to correct it..
Without control of the “fact checks”, the Deep State have SIGNIFICANTLY less control of public perception..
Do you recognize the value of Twitter now?..
Information Warfare..
(media.greatawakening.win)
FIFTH GEN WARFARE
Can Trump sue Swalwell for liable now?
Libel...
reported for beating me to the correction. dammit...
kek
I would correct an awful lot on this site but I really try to restrain myself so I don't become too offensive...I am a closet perfectionist...
I can relate. I often restrain myself because I don't want to be the spelling police. (I really do though).
I can relate...I would love that job....
I constantly see “apart” used instead of “a part” on here. I want to let people know that they’re saying the exact opposite of what they intended to say, but of course then I’ll get flack for trying to help/teach.
I think we can all agree the English language, spelling, cursive and punctuation has not been taught in schools for a very long time...it has been replaced with sex education, gender studies, critical race theory, and other such nonsense...
There was a guy at work who did that. I tried to tell him. He didn't get it.
FAST FINGERS YOU AIN'T....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨🧨😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thank you
Haha...bet you won't ever make that mistake again...forgive us spellaholics....
That is how the tables turn. Basically turn their weapon against them.
Where is MTG on this, she likes to call out these idiots in public and totally embarrass them, especially this male cunt.
Swalwell is one person out of many I would love to see get pied.... a big, juicy blueberry banana cream pie right in the face.
I always called him Eric Swallows.
He bang bang fang fang.
SwallowsWell
Or Eric Fartswell....it's crude but he has proven that he deserves that name.
Ditto that. I can't stand that weasel.
Pie too expensive, just throw some eggs at him. A lot cheaper.
cow pie
Yikes. LOL
You're right, but eggs are expensive, too. Could just spray some Barbasol on a paper plate... that would do the trick.
Why waste expensive food? Just try him, convict him, and hang him at GITMO.
Swalwell Bang Bang Fang Fang. Let them fact check him banging a Chinese spy.
Maybe we have it backwards and it was Fang Fang that was banging the Chinese spy?
What, he's "liable" to have committed sexual assault?
Fake news.
When you're rich and famous, gorgeous women throw themselves at you constantly. You aren't doing an assault on a nutcase she-beast in the dressing room at Bergdorf's like the nutcase fantasized about after watching a TV show with an assault in the dressing room at Bergdorf's. FFS you can't make this shit up.
It numbs the synapses to reflect on some recent ‘jury’ verdicts. Trump being found libelous for some bullshit a geriatric cabbage patch doll claimed happened 30 fuking years ago … J6’rs guilty of “conspiracy” because they were “thinking” about committing INSURRECTION. THINKING about it. What the actual FUK! This has got to be some kind of set up to a punch-line.
Trump, go for the libel lawsuit. Don't be shy.
Eric Swalwell belongs in a prison
That muther fuker belongs at the end of 13 knots.
To hell with pie!
Swalwell is a fucktard.
Don't you just love it when they make Swalwell trip over his own tongue?
What’s with the orange square?
The Civil Court System has become the preferred system for the Commies, it seems to me. Only needs 50.1% "he did it" for the person to be "guilty", and infinite bites at the apple. We can try a person 10000 times for the same "crime".
Somehow we need to stop this. Because this lawfare is the end of the USA.
Yep, and, as you see, the decisions made by these fake courts can be weaponized just the same by the media.
And, the worst of it, is that it is common to be found innocent in criminal court, but then still found liable for damages in civil court... for a crime you've been proven to not have committed. It makes zero sense.
Just an FYI - Defendants are found "guilty" or "not guilty" in US criminal courts. A prosecutor has the burden of proving a defendant's guilt of the charge(s) beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant refutes the charge(s) brought against him, but he does not have to prove his innocence because, in the US, he already has the presumption of innocence.
The "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard in criminal cases is a higher standard than the less stringent "more likely than not" or "reasonable person" standard in civil cases because of the gravity of wrongly depriving someone of their most precious, guaranteed rights - those of life and liberty/freedom.
Because of the differing standards, some "degree of justice" can be attained in civil court even if a criminal prosecution fails - ex. O.J.
Yea, I know. And that's fucked.
As was OJ.
It's still not right.
Trump was found "not liable" on the rape charge.
He was found "liable" for defamation, basically for calling her a liar when she said he raped her.