Fossil Fuel, J. D. Rockefeller meme
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
100% true. I'm sick of hearing people use the term fossil fuel. Oil is formed via the abiogenic method of hydrocarbon production. Not biogenic (dead plants and animals). This has been proven by astronomical data and by lab data simulating conditions in the deep crust and upper mantle. This is why old dry wells often recharge voluntarily.
Youtube Fletcher Prouty interview on oil.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zSff0pwc1Xc&pp=ygUeRmxldGNoZXIgcHJvdXR5IG9uIG9pbCBhYmlvdGlj
This is true. If it were a fossil fuel and we pump millions of barrels a day out of the ground we would have used it all up by now
Uhh, we also haven't dug up all the gold in the earth and it's worth way more than oil and we've been mining it for thousands of years. Just because something isn't all gone from the Earth doesn't mean it must be continually formed there, it might simply be because the Earth is massive and has massive amounts of things in places we haven't even looked for it yet.
That said, I agree with the evidence of the theory of the abiogenic origin these fuels.
See: seabed + freshwater (71% of Earth)
For the doubters. Here is a study and evidence from a bunch of smarties. Not sure how this is still available info. I can't get pdf to load to save it.
Good find. I'm also surprised it's still accessible.
This is a great paper, nice experimental, legitimately proves in lab in experiments they repeated 6 months later that hydrocarbons were generated under typical pressures/temps/other chemicals present in the deep earth. The rate of cooling of the reaction mixture determines the distribution of hydrocarbons by weight (faster cooling = more longer chain/heavier hydrocarbons vs slower cooling had more lower ones like methane ethane etc)
Thanks, doubter here. Where's the proof Rockefeller paid scientists off?
Rockefeller made money from oil. Scientists lied about oil.
Crude oil does not contain the same array of elements as any animal or plant, other than the usual carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
QED
Not sure we can ever have proof that John Davis said it. I'd try to dig it but whether he said it or not, to me, is fairly irrelevant at this point. The take away is we are lied to for the profit of (insert whatever insult) people. Just like everything else we expose.
And another one. PDF Download.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/63735cd7ea1d630935b81b96/t/6374b17e9c89187c0efddc00/1668592039147/Bendall+et+al+2015+APPEA+paper_MW.pdf
Thank you
Thanks. It says, with a whole lot of heat and pressure, Earth will make petroleum out of chalk (calcium carbonate, the carbon donor), water (the hydrogen donor) and FeO (ferrous oxide, the oxygen extractor). You get petroleum, the calcium becomes calcium hydroxide and the iron becomes ferric oxide (more oxygens per iron). (The equation wouldn't print).
I've been in the alberta oil field for my entire career. They are now drilling the sites they first tapped out here. Because they are again full enough to start doing so
Well, I've been able to create natural gas quite easily for a very long time now.
My secret?
Baked beans and hamburgers.
When eaten together they work great.
oh hell no lol
A nice charred burger. Know what I mean!? LOL
u/#Merica
Please don't believe every nonsensical thing people tell you.
Yes, abiotic oil is possible in the "weak" sense. But the "strong" abiotic theory is nonsense. No, it can't regenerate faster than it can be depleted.
Geology didn't suddenly change because we started pumping oil. If oil was being created at ludicrous speed, it would have been created at ludicrous speed for millenia. There would be so much oil it would be forced out of rocks in geysers and puddling on the surface of the earth. There would be literal oceans of the stuff. Our ancestors, who had no use for oil, would have been drowning in it.
Think. Use your brain. It's not possible. Yes, the "weak" theory, that it is produced...slowly...by things other than decaying fossil carbon, is a possibility. But the replenishment rate MUST be very, very slow or you can't explain the hundreds of thousands of years prior to when we started pumping. If the Earth is producing 100 million barrels a day, Then over the last 10 million years it will have produced more oil than you could fit in the Pacific Ocean! And the continents (i.e. crust and mantle) have been in their current configuration for a lot longer than that.
Whatever theory you choose to believe, whether abiotic or fossil, we are using oil faster than it can be produced, and very soon it will cease to be a cheap, usable fuel source capable of powering an industrial civilization. Don't let anyone else gaslight you into thinking otherwise.
I know nothing at all about it but let's say God is pretty smart and the earth regenerates it up to a certain point... sort of like how your body generates things up to a point and then stops until it depletes
I'm open to the subject, but your argument is poor. Natural chemical processes are subject to thermodynamic conditions, such as temperature and pressure. It is possible that high pressure can disable a slow process. And that a sudden reduction in pressure (e.g., by extraction of the reaction product from geologic layers) can enable the stalled process to revive and continue. Something can stay corked up for a long time, once all the easy paths have been blocked.
This is similar to lechateliers principle in chemistry, the state may be trying to reach equilibrium again once the oil is removed. Not 100% on the oil theories overall either way but I can understand that line of thinking
Oil was first discovered because it actually was "puddling on the surface of the earth." Nobody ever thought, "Well I think I will spend a fortune digging really deep wells in hopes of finding something that will burn."
Oil is formed to fill the available space. In chemistry, there is a term for that. Look it up.
We are not running out of oil. Period.
You're gonna be downvoted, as am I, but you're 100% correct. Abiogenic oil exists, but not even close to the amount of fossil-derived petroleum. I think folks around here hear 'fossils' and think dinosaurs and trees. We're talking mostly algae and planktons.
Crude oil does not contain the same array of elements as found in algae and planktons. Research it yourself, as I have. Some oil wells are over 4 miles deep in the ground, way lower than any life has ever been.
It does though... Carbon ;) We could all be oil, given enough time. You're barking up the wrong tree with me on this. But I'm not here to change your mind. Keep on, pede!
I'm talking about the minerals, such as phosphorus, calcium, etc. Of course they both contain carbon. Duh.
you win? lmao. I don't have time my guy. Have it. gold star for you, fren. I recognize you and your feelings.
Of course I win, because I'm right. I don't post anything but facts. I personally researched what crude oil contains and what plants and animals contain, and I found significant differences which make it impossible for crude oil to have been made from either dead dinosaurs, dead ferns, or dead algae.
The problem is that no one has time for anything but staring at screens today.
Okay Sweet boy!!!
I'm a bit late to this, has any human or animal ever degraded into oil? The way is observe is eventually our flesh disappears after few years just leaving bones.
So you say given enough time, how much time 100 years...1000...1,000,000?
So your saying a long time after every thing has disappeared into dust we will just turn into an oily soup?
Why don't we find dinosaur fossils in oil? I'm sure they've had enough time in evolutionary theory.
Just asking for a friend, anon.
Seems like you're not ;) There is plenty of oil (fats) in our bodies. If I stuffed you in a bag, in anaerobic conditions, and added heat, pressure and time, then yeah. Boom, Hydrocarbons. How much? I'm not sure, someone could math it out though.
The weird way you structured your questions- would our fleshless desiccated bodies become oil - well no, obviously. But those aren't the conditions in which biogenic ('fossil') fuels are created.
I wonder if we could invent some enzymes to facilitate the reaction from dirt and water to oil.
Virtually endless supply combined with extremely low carbon emissions. Truth.
Co2 = .054%
Another one of those pesky numbers.
Percentage of carbon dioxide in an atmosphere of many gasses.
How much of that could mankind produce?
Grain of sand on a world full of beaches.
.....
Documentary
"The Great Global Warming Swindle"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rrX0mzJ0aZz5/
The whole thing is a fraud, and it's easy to show.
.....
Am I right in thinking that oil is found deeper down in the earth than the fossils are?
How could oil be dead plants/animals when there's a hundreds of metres of sterile soil, clay and rock separating it from the earliest fossils?
Yes. Some oil wells are deeper than 4 miles. There are zero fossils that deep in the ground.
My father has been telling me this my whole life. I actually thought he was just a bit nuts but now I know he was right.
The myth of oil scarcity is just like the myth of climate change. It's nothing more than an excuse to sell you throwaway products and take away your personal property rights.
Odd how you can't seem to find any materials online about oil regenerating--not any discussion or scientific explanation. Just "it's propaganda" and such. Like they were removed or something.
On a localized basis it is absolutely possible to pump faster than it creates. This is why wells experience production declines. Perhaps on a global basis it is true that it creates faster than we use it, but we can absolutely pump down large deposits of these fuels. Just like subsurface aquifers of water can be depleted.
I imagine where the oil is closer to the surface its in a underground cave/reservoir. Then the intake into that reservoir would be a different size in each well, and how many barrels are taken out (output) differs as well.
Big intake with small output => lasts longer and regenerates faster
Small intake with with big output => drains quicker but takes longer to refill requiring downtime.
I don't think we have discovered its replentishment speed yet.
However, assuming it does not regenerate, we still have oil to burn at our current rate for the next 180 years.
How long has oil even been around in common use? Less than that. By the time we actually drain it, we'd likely be on a third wave of newer energy and technology that surpasses oil's common use.
I did s research paper on this in high school science class. Teacher gave me a c Snd told me i didn't take the assignment serious. The information was already there. The earth's a giant chemistry set.
Did he say "trust the science?"
"Dinosaur" "fossils"
🙃
That same dinosaur, Dino, was on the signs at Sinclair service stations when I was younger. There was even a large billboard beside the one on my town.