Let's talk about this some more. Why is Trump now praising the Covid Vax as a cure for cancer??
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (280)
sorted by:
Those are not vaccines - are they?
Yes! The DS (CDC or FDC) changed the definition of "vaccine" so mRNA would fit. Unfortunately for them, HCQ and Ivermectin do too.
No, they are 100% NOT vaccines. They are therapeutics.
Is Trump doing some linguistic legerdemain here, incorporating the "new (abusively wrong) definition" of vaccine to include HCQ and IVM? It's possible, because 5D chess and advanced level of genius. I'm not sure.
^^^ THIS ^^^
The narratives and actuals of the vaccines are being used to help get people to look at therapeutics and detoxificiation.
Not the vaccines in and of themselves through direct injection, but by waking people up and getting them into a sense of urgency big enough to look around.
“Used” By who? How?
“Saved us from Covid” How did they do that? What was their purpose? Who is “us”?
“It all depends what your meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”
Yes, it's understandable that some are unable to put these things together and panic. We don't know the comms or the way they think. Fortunately some are able to decipher somethings, but too many go with gut reaction and emotions. Stop...breathe...think
It's just speculation at this time on our part. What I believe is that, since Dr. Malone said mRNA tech is extremely expensive and they could not have made billions of doses, then something else was being injected. Could it have been immunity from cancer? What Trump says is definitely intriguing.
Trump didn't say it. He's quoting Joe Biden's speech from last night.
Just a quibble on this.
Therapeutics refers to their use for treatment and therapy, but if they are being used to prevent disease, then they are not therapeutics but prophylactics.
Vaccine means a substance that is used to trigger an immunological response, but I don't think either IVer or HCQ do this exactly. Rather, they maintain a set of conditions that do not allow the disease in question to arise?
Prophylactics for before the illness, therapeutics for after...is good
Yep. That's what I understand, anyway
They aren't jab but they prevent covid, so yes they are vaccines by definition.
So why didn't he mention them instead of talking about vaccines and 9 mth approval? HCQ and Ivermectin don't need approval. Weird.
He brought up HCQ early on and the media attacked him big time on it
I'm with you fren. I agree that something doesn't add up but I am trusting that this is somehow one of Trump's 5D chess moves.
This one truth bothered me last night and I woke thinking about it. Maybe the original ones he sent out were safe and as he got out of office they changed them? I don’t know
How about this? What if Trump knowing that the fact checkers will salivate at the chance of proving Trump wrong, intentionally threw out there that the Vax cures cancer so the fact checkers will "Actually, the Vax CAUSES cancer". Then they sit back in their chairs with a smug grin, thinking they got one on Trump.
The media and scientific community attacked Trump when he mentioned HCQ at one of the daily White House updates during the fake pandemic.
If there was an alternative treatment for Covid, the FDA could not approve the emergency use authorization for the vaccines.
All of the legit doctors warning about the risks with the vaccines and naming alternate treatments were banned from social media.
It was the media, social sites, medical agencies and big pharma that deceived you.
Trump says he is taking hydroxychloroquine to protect against coronavirus, dismissing safety concerns
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-says-he-is-taking-hydroxychloroquine-to-protect-against-coronavirus-dismissing-safety-concerns/2020/05/18/7b8c928a-9946-11ea-ac72-3841fcc9b35f_story.html
They may need approval because their use for Covid would be off label. I not exactly sure of the law on that but I think they do require it. If I am wrong please correct me.
MD's and DO's never need approval to use drugs off label. They've been doing it forever with no objections or repercussions from anyone.
It's simple: if in their professional medical opinion a substance would help a patient more than harm them, they can use it any time for any condition it will work for.
The goal is to help the patient. Or, at least, it was.
2020 was the first time a licensed, practicing MD ever said "I'm using these totally innocuous, safe drugs—with the fewest side effects of any pharmaceuticals, no less—for an off label purpose," and got any pushback whatsoever—let alone withering verbal and psychological abuse, professional assassination, and license cancellation. It is horrendously abusive to doctors, patients, and to the entire paradigm of being able to trust your doctor.
They, the deepstate, have literally destroyed the practice of medicine for the first time in thousands of years.
🐎
Don't think that's true.
prophylactic - a medicine or course of action used to prevent disease.
vaccine - a substance used to stimulate immunity to a particular infectious disease or pathogen, typically prepared from an inactivated or weakened form of the causative agent or from its constituents or products.
Q >> 'Learn Our Comm's'