https://ianbrighthope.substack.com/p/mrna-is-a-class-one-carcinogen
(Found cross-posted by Dr. Jessica Rose, who introduces the link by saying "I literally said this yesterday").
This substack column is particularly important given that Big Pharma and Big Food are working feverishly to use mRNA in, apparently, everything.
For a quick summary in support of that (admittedly hyperbolic) assertion, I asked Leo, the Brave browser AI, "What products are mRNA being used in or considered to be used in?" and got the following reply:
mRNA technology is being explored for various products, including vaccines, cancer treatments, and gene therapies. Some companies are also investigating its use in agriculture and food production. However, it's important to note that most of these products are still in development and have not yet been approved for widespread use.
Ian's column includes detail about carcinogenicity and how various authorities define "carcinogenic" and provides some evidence (a very small amount compared to the totality of what is out there) that the mRNA "vaccines" are indeed carcinogenic. Below, the Conclusion:
CONCLUSION
Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS- CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown.
Commentary by Dr. John Campbell: (embedded YouTube video of Dr. Campbell speaking on the subject follows)
Two waves of mRNA tech so far:
one, the initial set of labs that generated the clotshot doses over the last twenty years, as evidenced by the patent filings indicating when it likely started - no relation to 'warp speed'. Could have been some of the biolabs in ukraine. How did it come to be in every country with so many doses all at the same time when no other freight or transport was functioning and ports of entry had shipping delays and backlogs that were just absurd? Thats how.
two, the labs built subsequently all over the world, partly to add to the bluff and pretense that mRNA isnt a poison, and partly for that $$$ that they are desperate to get flowing.
How do you pretend that 10M+ mRNA murders haven't happened? With media and political capture.
"How do you pretend that 10M+ mRNA murders haven't happened? With media and political capture."
You're touching on something so important here, Impera. And I think this sentence is at the core of why it can be so difficult to wake people up to the truth of these "vaccinations".
When you talk to someone about the reality of the situation with C19/jabs, as you work your way backwards, logic dictates that you extrapolate something very scary: The entire Western world (Federal politicians, Newspapers, Cable News, government & NGO medical entities, nearly every doctor, state governments) were ALL IN LOCKSTEP ON THIS ISSUE. "Get the fu**ing jab!".
That doesn't happen without some very, very powerful people pulling the rope to get them all aligned. And this scares the hell out of normies and they just shut down.
nailed it!
I first read 'Federal' as 'Feudal' in your response and had to go back to check.. it may as well be a feudal system with the money controllers and string-pullers and their network of woke nobility all distributed around the world and acting as the front-men and coordinators of the incursion.
Cue one thousand news readers all from 'independent' and 'competing' orgs all mouthing the 'this is very dangerous to our democracy' speech in perfect synchronized lockstep.
The silver lining in this cloud is that we just have to find a single isolated pedo-baron and start heating up the pincers and thumbscrews. And watch the rats all scurry..
Damned interesting comment.
Indeed. Warp Speed™ was just a smokescreen, Trump being influenced by his bad advisors. He didn't know any better.
All those dead people will be glad they are finally telling the truth. /sarc/
Not before casting a vote for a Democrat.
Still being mandated: https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/panel-physicians/vaccinations.html#covid-19-vaccination
More sauce: https://theethicalskeptic.substack.com/p/the-state-of-things-pandemic-week-206
https://open.substack.com/pub/makismd/p/turbo-cancer-literature-is-growing?r=20pd6j&utm_medium=ios
Medical studies on turbo cancers growing (sauce for normies).
https://gettr.com/post/p33x31607e6
What took you so long?
Life insurance companies report a sudden rise in non-COVID-related deaths - World Socialist Web Site
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/02/24/life-f24.html
A little too late!
The J&J jab did not use mRNA technology.
All who took the J&J jab should still be cautious but my understanding is that it does not appear to yield the same, in severity or like, problems as mRNA tech.
Not a medical professional and not giving advice.
This is the misconception everyone thinks with the J&J.
If you listen to the doctors like Dr. Tenpenny she stated they are exactly the same thing.
The only difference is the delivery system.
Everyone keeps saying they are not mRNA. THEY ARE.
This is true.
The patented nano lipid protein is the delivery vehicle.
Wasn't J&J the shot that President Trump "warp speeded" to the public? Didn't the other companies have to immediately roll out their own products (as if they had just finished developing them) lest they lose the entire global market for a jab to J&J? .
By the way, my take on "Warp Speed" has always been that President Trump had leverage over J&J that prevented them from deliberately holding back their vaxx in order to prolong the pandemic. J&J had done a lot of damage to the trusting public long before Covid.
President Trump would only have to get one company to release its jab for all the others to suddenly announce they had jabs of their own ready to sell.
That's my understanding as well. If you absolutely positively had no other choice than to get the jab for whatever reason, that was the one to get.
However, it was still using the spike protein which is a toxin and consequently there was still serious risk of inflammation & clotting. You just weren't at risk from whatever programming the RNA is doing to your DNA with the other jabs.
This is the misconception everyone thinks with the J&J.
If you listen to the doctors like Dr. Tenpenny she stated they are exactly the same thing.
The only difference is the delivery system.
Everyone keeps saying they are not mRNA. THEY ARE.
They are two separate delivery technologies.
By definition they are NOT both mRNA "vaccines".
J&J is a vector virus delivery system where as Moderna and Pfizer are using the mRNA delivery system.
That is not to say that either one is less harmful than the other.
As of now and all I have heard is that the mRNA technology is the worst of the two since the delivery technology (vehicle) itself contains harmful components aside from instructing your biology to create the spike protein which itself is also harmful to your biology.
In other words, mRNA technology has the harmful spike protein synthesis with the added toxin of the delivery mechanism. J&J appears to only have the spike protein synthesis.
I, of course, am always willing to entertain new information. Including any information that may not be convenient. So if indeed, end result, is one in the same, it should be known in order for all to be in a better place to protect themselves and their loved ones.
Yes they are. Look up Dr. Tenpenny and her work on these vaxxes.
J&J has mRNA.
Several doctors have reported this.
They are NOT the same.
There.
I found this.
All three vaccines deliver genetic material to your cells: mRNA vaccines deliver mRNA, and Johnson & Johnson delivers DNA.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/how-the-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-works
Saying that two distinct "vaccines" deliver DNA material to the cell is way too simplistic and honestly only serves to confuse and overly concern readers. Honestly, it's irresponsible.
Yes the two vaccines deliver DNA to the cell. The difference is 'how?', 'what dna?' and 'how does the body react to that DNA material?'.
Vector vaccine: delivers a modified previously existing virus to the cell. The modified virus contains, in this case, pieces of COVID. The body then recognizes the DNA as foreign then instructs the cell to create antibodies. That is to say, the body writes it's own prescription against this foreign body via the transcription process then creates messenger RNA and disburses this recipe to the rest of the body so that the entire body is able to create the antibodies therefore recognize the foreign invader and defeat it.
Vector vaccines use the body's already existing and natural process to create mRNA.
mRNA vaccine: delivers bits of the corona virus to the cell using a different mechanism. Since the cell will recognize this mRNA as foreign because it was NOT made by the individuals body. As a result the mRNA vaccine has no chance to enter the cell on its own. As a result the makers of this vaccines cover the mRNA with a synthetic fat molecule. This synthetic molecule is a lipid nanoparticle. The cell does not recognize the particle that hides the mRNA within. Therefore allows this invader in without any checks. It simply does not question it. Once it's in the cell it releases the synthetic messenger RNA and instructs the body to create replicas of itself. That is to say it tricks the human biology to create the spike protein. Since the body created it the body does NOT recognize this protein as foreign therefore does NOT create antibodies INSTEAD trains the body to recognize it as benign therefore allows this spike protein to roam freely to damage as it sees fit. Why? Because, although harmful, since the body created it it begins to recognize it as NOT harmful because the body can't possibly create something harmful to itself. This mechanism is naturally occuring in the human body via the IgG4 function within our own immune system. This mechanism is the same tool the immune system uses in order to NOT react with inflammatory behavior towards other benign bodies like pollen and peanuts. That is how one may be affected by pollen early on in ones life but in their later life are unaffected by it. Because the body created a false identifier library for that foreign object and calls off the attack from your immune system so resources are not wasted on benign foreign bodies that do not cause damage to the human biology.
Since mRNA vaccines deliver THE instructions and bypass the body's naturally occuring process the body never has a chance to create a custom prescription for the disease.
More boosters yield more and an enhanced IgG4 reaction therefore hindering the body's ability to fight more with every booster. As a result we see the gravity of the disease and instances of death rise in synchronicity with booster uptake.
Again. Yes they deliver DNA to the cell. But the mechanism and body's reaction is very different. To say otherwise is irresponsible.
Do they both cause harm? Yes. But it appears, so far, the gravity of damage and amount of time that damage can occur is much different.
I did not say J&J was good in any way. I was simply bringing attention to the differences and possible outcomes.
Rockz, not disagreeing with you but could you provide some data? I've spent literally hundreds of hours researching the C19 crime and every bit of data has pointed to the J&J shot being very dangerous for the reason I detailed in my original comment, but not using MRNA.
MRNA IS THE DELIVERY SYSTEM for the pfizer and moderna "vaccines". J&J does not use MRNA as a delivery system, it uses a disabled adenovirus to deliver the instructions. Both methods are extremely dangerous because they're programming your cells to produce spike protein for your immune system to react to. But every bit of research I've done points to a very distinct difference in these two methods.
I will reiterate: I do not endorse any of these death shots. But I stand by my original statement in that the J&J shot is slightly less lethal/dangerous than the MRNA-based shots.
https://www.vcuhealth.org/news/covid-19/johnson-and-johnson-vaccine-how-is-it-different#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20difference%20between,more%20traditional%20virus-based%20technology.
I remember Dr Tenpenny saying that is no different. It destroys the DNA the same way.
I looked for the video but can't find it now because you know how they pulled so much of that off the internet.
Question…
When the shots were first going to be released, while Trump was still in office, it was stressed how important it was that the vials had to be kept extremely cold, in special freezers, and then there was a limited window of time that the shots could be injected into people, after being removed from the freezer. At the time, it was so important that the military was going to be involved in overseeing Operation Warp Speed.
Has all that been memory holed? Once Biden came in, all that suddenly disappeared. Did the science change along with the political science?
It's a good question, and I have no idea what the answer is.