The irony! By bringing all these silly, creative claims against President Trump for keeping a few boxes of “classified documents,” and because his bookkeeper wrote the wrong thing on a check stub, the Supreme Court got an unprecedented opportunity to end forever the silent, implicit protection previously enjoyed by every other previous President. That de facto absolute immunity is gone, never to return.
And now it’s open season on serious crimes committed by Presidents.
If President Trump wins the election, this decision provides exactly the right tool his DOJ needs to prosecute the last twenty years of Presidential malfeasance and abuses of authority. It almost seems like Trump planned it this way. In hindsight, it couldn’t have gone any better for Trump in the big picture. When Trump’s DOJ brings its first charges against Biden and Obama, the media cannot wail about it being “unprecedented.” He’ll just be following the law.
Liberal Justice Jackson, dissenting in Corner Post, also noticed how revolutionary this decision was. Jackson wrote, “At the end of a momentous Term, this much is clear: The tsunami of lawsuits against agencies that the Court's holdings in this case and Loper Bright have authorized has the potential to devastate the functioning of the Federal Government.”
Great point. The new immunity legal framework not only helps Trump, but provides the groundwork to prosecute actual crimes of former presidents.
...the High Court incinerated de facto Presidential immunity, and replaced it with a clear de jure prosecutorial process. Former and future Presidents susceptible to more serious crimes than Trump’s are now fair game.
That's a good high level overview of the tiers established and what sorts of actions would fall under which tier.
TBH the only reason this case is before the SC is the leftist AGs going full retard. But it sets some nice boundaries for how the alleged traitors will be prosecuted.
All part of the plan. The deep state is so predictable. Just another example of why it had to be this way. Trump has to the victim. He couldn’t get this done on his own. It had to be done TO him.
All these these doors that they have kicked open for the first time in US history, are not going to hurt Trump. But now that they are open, now that “the seal has broken”, they can be used against all of these treasonous fucks.
This is one more demolition of the standard argument against Q. “They can’t do that! No one has ever done that before.”
Well now it has been done before. And yes they can do it.
This is the stuff that shows the retardation of the violent leftists on Xtwitter:
Tier 2: Presumptive Immunity for Official Acts. The Court declared that “the President must be immune from prosecution for an official act unless the Government can show that applying a criminal prohibition to that act would pose no dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.” In short, if the President acts officially, as President, that act is immune—but a prosecutor can still proceed if they can show criminalizing that type of conduct will not hinder the Presidential office.”
Tier Two answers the Democrats’ most deranged temper tantrums. Prosecuting Presidents who order the military to assassinate (i.e. murder) their opponents would not harm the Presidential office, because presidents are not supposed to murder people, and it wouldn’t hinder the Presidential office to criminalize murder. Duh.”
So, does anyone think it might be a good idea to start a thread that would list examples of all of the possible lawsuits that I might be able to unleash against bureaucrats, under these rulings?
Go a little light on the loss of internet points. This is "The Great Awakening," after all.
Agreed. He's the only daily blogger who I elect to keep receiving the daily emails from.
I agree.
He's also continuously insinuated, without actually explicitly saying it, that the pedo stole the election.
Crux of the article
Thanks bb! I hang my head in shame because I'm not aware of this gentleman..
Wow! YUGE!
Bring it jabroni...Just bring it!!!
I’m actually LOVING that leftists are theorizing Biden going and taking out the Supreme Court with seal team 6.
It allows for pointing out to liberals that:
This “immunity” ruling actually seems to OPEN UP the presidency for prosecution, but within a reasonably narrow window
Great point. The new immunity legal framework not only helps Trump, but provides the groundwork to prosecute actual crimes of former presidents.
I get his emails. He always gives a humorous spin on even the worse news.
That's a good high level overview of the tiers established and what sorts of actions would fall under which tier.
TBH the only reason this case is before the SC is the leftist AGs going full retard. But it sets some nice boundaries for how the alleged traitors will be prosecuted.
Excellent. This needs a sticky.
Nice read. Very nice!
All part of the plan. The deep state is so predictable. Just another example of why it had to be this way. Trump has to the victim. He couldn’t get this done on his own. It had to be done TO him.
All these these doors that they have kicked open for the first time in US history, are not going to hurt Trump. But now that they are open, now that “the seal has broken”, they can be used against all of these treasonous fucks.
This is one more demolition of the standard argument against Q. “They can’t do that! No one has ever done that before.”
Well now it has been done before. And yes they can do it.
This is the stuff that shows the retardation of the violent leftists on Xtwitter:
(this isn't directed towards OP, because we all know this already, but to the people who write about Q, Anons on their own sites, X, etc.)
There is Q.
There are Anons.
There is no QAnon.
that's not hard for normies to understand.
i wish closet Q supporters would just clarify this for their readers & listeners.
the less "QAnon" or "QAnon people" gets thrown around, the better.
Agreed. Its sole purpose to confuse and conflate.
I think Childers got this part wrong:
He was being facetious. Justice Thomas handed her what she would need, just as a law clerk would
Yeah - I figured that one out when I read the comments on the article. At least I wasn't the only one that thought the same.
So, does anyone think it might be a good idea to start a thread that would list examples of all of the possible lawsuits that I might be able to unleash against bureaucrats, under these rulings?