Most important week in LAW since June 11, 1946 signing of Admin Procedures Act (which also might be unconstitutional) which codified Federal Rules for Civil Procedure (1938), now used in all Federal Court cases. It was imposed upon SCOTUS (Article III) by Congress (Article I) seemingly in violation of Separation of Powers specifically to facilitate replacement of Common Law with Corporate Law (UCC) in all states.
Note what also happened in April 1912 very likely also timed as a distraction from this LAW publication in addition to being preparatory killshot of opposition to Federal Reserve (private) Bank.
Yes those dots connected immediately. What a coincidence.
I can't wait for this whole American shit show to be over. I don't even care if I'm still alive to see that happen, I just hope that all ya'll's kids or grandkids or great grandkids get to live in the country this one was supposed to be. What it was built to be before the corruption and lies took hold.
W. Virginia v EPA (2022): Admin courts are unconstitutional, all Article II agencies must use Article III judiciary to enforce laws (applies to IRS, reinforced by SEC v Jarkesy)
[stripping of enforcement mechanism for ~95% of Fed gov’t]
Chevron Doctrine overturned (6-28-24): Article II “rules and regulations” are NOT Laws, but are now “UNOFFICIAL ACTS”
[stripping of authority for ~95% Fed gov’t]
Trump Immunity Decision (7-1-24): Executive branch has zero immunity for “UNOFFICIAL ACTS”, and individuals may be prosecuted personally for civil and criminal fraud when performing “UNOFFICIAL ACTS” while working in official capacity.
[stripping of immunity for ~95% of Fed gov’t]
BIG TAKEAWAY:If you are currently a Federal employee and you attempt to enforce ANY non LAW, you are probably going to prison, but expect to be sued for Civil Fraud at a minimum and pay out-of-pocket 3x actual and 200x punitive damages (statutory fraud penalties).
Note that fraud has no statute of limitations so we will be very busy for the next 20 years suing 2024 Federal workers (post 6-28-24 acts) into financial oblivion and putting them in prison (Looking at you new, armed IRS agents).
BIG TAKEAWAY: If you are currently a Federal employee and you attempt to enforce ANY non LAW, you are probably going to prison, but expect to be sued for Civil Fraud at a minimum and pay out-of-pocket 3x actual and 200x punitive damages (statutory fraud penalties).
Does this apply to the VA and all the bullshit they pull
Yes. Time to issue "Notice of Liability" to anyone trespassing on your or your family detailing the violation(s). If the violations do not cease or are not corrected to your satisfaction, then you have standing to sue in Federal District Court for $405 filing fee if you doing it Pro-Se (for yourself).
I have a question. Local police departments-most definitely the Democratic City police departments use a lot of federal funds for their yearly budgets. This also empowers many of the police officers to claim local tax payers do not pay their salaries.
If a police officer enforced policies over the Constitution- could they too also lose their qualified immunity automatically now? From what I have learned is they have to be informed by the person they are doing such a thing to…
I am for Police 100 percent if they are for the real law of the land. They were supposed to serve and protect the innocent but now they only say they serve and protect and leave the end out. lol
Unclear how this is going to shake out at the state level yet. We need to see a Writ of Prohibition or Writ of Mandamus against corporate county gov'ts which are subsidiaries of STATE CORPORATIONS which are Municipal Service Corporations laid on TOP of sovereign states in violation of Article IV, Section 4.
Every action by STATE, COUNTY, and CITY corporate employees is already unconstitutional, but Federal Gov't so far has refused to invalidate the contract that sovereign state has signed with the MSC, effectively delegating its sovereignty to a foreign entity, domiciled in D.C. Likely action will need to be sovereign state Governor issuing Executive Order cancelling the MSC contract.
This is a brutal blow to the deep state if taken to its logical conclusion. Not only is our Federal Government going to be sued for Billions upon Billions in damages, this should lead to the Federal Government shrinking massively. The FDA, for example, has over 100k employees alone. Most of the FDA's power has just been gutted. With a strong leader in the White House, the FDA should shrink by 90% if not abolished all together. Don't get me wrong. There is still a fight ahead of us. But the road is clear. Sue these 3 letter agencies into oblivion, then gut them or cut off their head.
Dear Joe, Fuck You for what you did in 1991. And I'm not yet done dismantling you and your administration, you dumb, racist asshole.
-Justice Thomas (2024)
...as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks, who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas. And it is a message: that unless you kow-tow to an old order, this is what will happen to you: You will be lynched, destroyed, cariciatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate, rather than hung from a tree.
-Clarence Thomas (closing statement on confirmation hearing 11OCT1991)
I wonder if this allowed people with mineral rights to now legally force renegotiations with oil/gas lease companies to pay more, instead of having a lifetime lock on the percentage they pay?
You may have to challenge "General Mining Act of 1872" which is likely also unconstitutional for imposing Federal "rules and regulations" on sovereign states. SOVEREIGN means SUPREME. Federal gov't is subservient to the states, not their master or owner.
Now let them repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act which basically clobbered the original Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 (and the subsequent strengthening of it by amendment in 1972 and 1985). This "modernization" is what has allowed the MSM to lose it's very soul and allow propaganda to be fed to the American public, becoming FNM in the process.
That would be a nice third pillar, to form a legal tripod, with this "Corner Post" and the removal of the Chevron Deference, IMHO.
Article (by leftists) that describes the strengthening amendments in 1972 and 1985. The leftist author(s) who support Obama clobbering this protection in his "Modernization" claim that allowing Americans to be subject to the same propaganda as foreigners is a-ok. Still, the write-up about the amendments has some good nuggets of info - that the 1972 one was implemented to quash an infiltrating communist influence and the 1985 one was to prohibit taxpayer funding of any propaganda (NPR anyone?). For example of a corrosive propaganda outlet that should not be taxpayer funded -- During Obama's first fraudulent term, George Soros, through his OSI, was able to get his lizard talons into NPR just before Obama clobbered the protections of the original Smith-Mundt Act and it's amendments with his 2013 "modernization".
From wiki on NPR -- "... In October 2010, NPR accepted a $1.8 million grant from the Open Society Institute. The grant is meant to begin a project called Impact of Government that was intended to add at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states by 2013.[28] The OSI has made previous donations but does not take on-air credit for its gifts.[29] ..."
The Q team needed the current version of the law so it could create propaganda. We know they replaced people in all of the news corporations as far back as 2018. Yet, nothing changed (until after the debate.)
By not changing their attacks on Trump and conservatives, people have been red-pilled much more than if their favorite news orgs had suddenly changed the narrative. They see for themselves, rather than being told.
Remember how communists destroy everything they touch by being malicious evil? They have built SOME things like bureaucracies of law making bodies though, all full of idiotic malicious and evil control. They sure love their creations.
So it’s pretty glorious to watch the law abiders destroy the communist playhouse room by room using clever lawful means.
Q Drop #1105 -- includes
"CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS ARE VERY EFFECTIVE."
and "REGULATION OR KILL?"
https://qagg.news/?q=&q2=1105
Honest question Should we sue for back taxes......on everything?
How to correct your W-2 to get payroll taxes back: https://greatawakening.win/p/16aA4T1R4C/success-constitutional-action-ag/c/
Template letter for defending yourself if needed: https://greatawakening.win/p/16aADrV8r4/for-anons-needing-irs-assistance/
I'm filing for 1 of those tax exempt ids
This is so much bigger than people seem to realize.
Most important week in LAW since June 11, 1946 signing of Admin Procedures Act (which also might be unconstitutional) which codified Federal Rules for Civil Procedure (1938), now used in all Federal Court cases. It was imposed upon SCOTUS (Article III) by Congress (Article I) seemingly in violation of Separation of Powers specifically to facilitate replacement of Common Law with Corporate Law (UCC) in all states.
Admin Procedures Act 1946): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_Procedure_Act
Fed Rules for Civil Procedure (1938): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil_Procedure
Federal Courts would default to 1912 Federal Equity Rules if it was removed along with 1938 Act.
Federal Equity Rules (April 1912): https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1274870.pdf
FYI: If you file a Federal lawsuit, file a motion to demand use of FER instead of FRCP and watch the judges lose their minds.
o7
Note what also happened in April 1912 very likely also timed as a distraction from this LAW publication in addition to being preparatory killshot of opposition to Federal Reserve (private) Bank.
Yes those dots connected immediately. What a coincidence.
I can't wait for this whole American shit show to be over. I don't even care if I'm still alive to see that happen, I just hope that all ya'll's kids or grandkids or great grandkids get to live in the country this one was supposed to be. What it was built to be before the corruption and lies took hold.
u/#MindBlown
u/#paw
u/#updoot
Logic chain summary of recent SCOTUS rulings:
W. Virginia v EPA (2022): Admin courts are unconstitutional, all Article II agencies must use Article III judiciary to enforce laws (applies to IRS, reinforced by SEC v Jarkesy) [stripping of enforcement mechanism for ~95% of Fed gov’t]
Chevron Doctrine overturned (6-28-24): Article II “rules and regulations” are NOT Laws, but are now “UNOFFICIAL ACTS” [stripping of authority for ~95% Fed gov’t]
Trump Immunity Decision (7-1-24): Executive branch has zero immunity for “UNOFFICIAL ACTS”, and individuals may be prosecuted personally for civil and criminal fraud when performing “UNOFFICIAL ACTS” while working in official capacity. [stripping of immunity for ~95% of Fed gov’t]
SEC v Jarkesy (6-27-24) sauce:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-sec-jarkesy-securities-fraud/
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-jarkesy/
BIG TAKEAWAY: If you are currently a Federal employee and you attempt to enforce ANY non LAW, you are probably going to prison, but expect to be sued for Civil Fraud at a minimum and pay out-of-pocket 3x actual and 200x punitive damages (statutory fraud penalties).
Note that fraud has no statute of limitations so we will be very busy for the next 20 years suing 2024 Federal workers (post 6-28-24 acts) into financial oblivion and putting them in prison (Looking at you new, armed IRS agents).
^^^
Dear feds,
All your base are belong to us... as it should've been from the jump
good summary - weaponized liberty!
Does this apply to the VA and all the bullshit they pull
Yes. Time to issue "Notice of Liability" to anyone trespassing on your or your family detailing the violation(s). If the violations do not cease or are not corrected to your satisfaction, then you have standing to sue in Federal District Court for $405 filing fee if you doing it Pro-Se (for yourself).
I have a question. Local police departments-most definitely the Democratic City police departments use a lot of federal funds for their yearly budgets. This also empowers many of the police officers to claim local tax payers do not pay their salaries.
If a police officer enforced policies over the Constitution- could they too also lose their qualified immunity automatically now? From what I have learned is they have to be informed by the person they are doing such a thing to…
I am for Police 100 percent if they are for the real law of the land. They were supposed to serve and protect the innocent but now they only say they serve and protect and leave the end out. lol
Unclear how this is going to shake out at the state level yet. We need to see a Writ of Prohibition or Writ of Mandamus against corporate county gov'ts which are subsidiaries of STATE CORPORATIONS which are Municipal Service Corporations laid on TOP of sovereign states in violation of Article IV, Section 4.
Every action by STATE, COUNTY, and CITY corporate employees is already unconstitutional, but Federal Gov't so far has refused to invalidate the contract that sovereign state has signed with the MSC, effectively delegating its sovereignty to a foreign entity, domiciled in D.C. Likely action will need to be sovereign state Governor issuing Executive Order cancelling the MSC contract.
Now you’re talking my language.
I wish we could do this in Ireland.
This is a brutal blow to the deep state if taken to its logical conclusion. Not only is our Federal Government going to be sued for Billions upon Billions in damages, this should lead to the Federal Government shrinking massively. The FDA, for example, has over 100k employees alone. Most of the FDA's power has just been gutted. With a strong leader in the White House, the FDA should shrink by 90% if not abolished all together. Don't get me wrong. There is still a fight ahead of us. But the road is clear. Sue these 3 letter agencies into oblivion, then gut them or cut off their head.
The Decision explained
Sauce
HOLY SHIT!!!!! We need to put Clarence Thomas on Mt. Rushmore for THIS!! Right next to DJT.....
-Justice Thomas (2024)
-Clarence Thomas (closing statement on confirmation hearing 11OCT1991)
https://youtu.be/ZURHD5BU1o8?si=CPPt1OLC8W5vyJSq
Updooted. Required watching people...
I wonder if this allowed people with mineral rights to now legally force renegotiations with oil/gas lease companies to pay more, instead of having a lifetime lock on the percentage they pay?
You may have to challenge "General Mining Act of 1872" which is likely also unconstitutional for imposing Federal "rules and regulations" on sovereign states. SOVEREIGN means SUPREME. Federal gov't is subservient to the states, not their master or owner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Mining_Act_of_1872
That is a good thought that I didn't consider.
Now let them repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act which basically clobbered the original Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 (and the subsequent strengthening of it by amendment in 1972 and 1985). This "modernization" is what has allowed the MSM to lose it's very soul and allow propaganda to be fed to the American public, becoming FNM in the process.
That would be a nice third pillar, to form a legal tripod, with this "Corner Post" and the removal of the Chevron Deference, IMHO.
.
Article from 2016 --
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/americas-current-economy/congress-authorized-propaganda-against-americans/
.
Article (by leftists) that describes the strengthening amendments in 1972 and 1985. The leftist author(s) who support Obama clobbering this protection in his "Modernization" claim that allowing Americans to be subject to the same propaganda as foreigners is a-ok. Still, the write-up about the amendments has some good nuggets of info - that the 1972 one was implemented to quash an infiltrating communist influence and the 1985 one was to prohibit taxpayer funding of any propaganda (NPR anyone?). For example of a corrosive propaganda outlet that should not be taxpayer funded -- During Obama's first fraudulent term, George Soros, through his OSI, was able to get his lizard talons into NPR just before Obama clobbered the protections of the original Smith-Mundt Act and it's amendments with his 2013 "modernization".
From wiki on NPR -- "... In October 2010, NPR accepted a $1.8 million grant from the Open Society Institute. The grant is meant to begin a project called Impact of Government that was intended to add at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states by 2013.[28] The OSI has made previous donations but does not take on-air credit for its gifts.[29] ..."
https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/pdin_monitor_article/smith-mundt-belatedly-enters-21st-century
The Q team needed the current version of the law so it could create propaganda. We know they replaced people in all of the news corporations as far back as 2018. Yet, nothing changed (until after the debate.)
By not changing their attacks on Trump and conservatives, people have been red-pilled much more than if their favorite news orgs had suddenly changed the narrative. They see for themselves, rather than being told.
I believe this as well.
Get to suing the people who signed and implemented that shit. They shouldn't prosper from their time of tyranny.
Remember how communists destroy everything they touch by being malicious evil? They have built SOME things like bureaucracies of law making bodies though, all full of idiotic malicious and evil control. They sure love their creations.
So it’s pretty glorious to watch the law abiders destroy the communist playhouse room by room using clever lawful means.
IRS collecting income taxes, I hear this was never legal, can I stop paying now? Can I sue the IRS and demand a return of my $$$?
Loving all this good news!
Corner Post + Chevron = WOW!
Holy crap that's a lot of wins in one week!!!
FDA, CDC, WHO
CDC is considered private but other regulatory agencies are fair game if I recall correctly.
Was it 6-3?
It is a great win for the USA, but also a loss.
Suing the agency involved rather than the individual civil servants means they compensate you with your taxes.
There is still no reason why these bureaucrats would stop harassing people as it has no impact on them or their little power trips.