you can copy/paste โLenny Faceโ from a search engine or you have an iphone with Japanese keyboard, select the emoji to bring up a huge list of Japanese emojis.
A big takeaway from this hearing for me was that Jackson Lee had a big role in oversight of the Secret Service. And shes dead 6 days after the attempt on Trump????? Was this an execution for treason?????
YES. So many liberals are all so certain that orange man bad. When does he get justice? They have TDS now and will always, unless they are cured with some truth.
Media reports are saying that Lee announced last month that she had pancreatic cancer, but also, as of two days ago, apparently no cause of death was or has been disclosed
As far as I know, pancreatic cancer is usually a very virulent form of cancer. However, when she announced the cancer, she reportedly also said "By Godโs grace, I will be back at full strength soon", so, if accurate, it indicates the narrative is that she expected to recover.
She was 74, and old, but the connection
Certainly worth digging into.
Written testimony released by Cheatle:
"I would be remiss if I did not also extend my condolences on the passing of your colleague, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee. Ms. Jackson Lee was always engaged in the oversight of the Secret Service and her passing is a great loss to this body."
Dan Bongino reported that Secret Service agents were telling him their jobs were being threatened. I suspect they are worried about more than their jobs and this woman is more afraid of Mayorkas than Congress - with good reason, as we've seen nothing but weakness, complicity and cuckery from Congress. I don't think it's going to take long for the truth to emerge.
It's not over yet. Hopefully one Congressperson will call for her immediate arrest so they can arrest her & throw her in the clink. Once arrested she will sing like a bird, all of a sudden & tell them who was really behind this. Don't forget, she is a minion
Really, you were able to tell that when no useful information was given in testimony?
Please post here the exact parts of testimony that made it clear to you.
BTW - I think like you, that they definitely were involved, but I did not hear anything in the testimony today that either strengthened or weakened my belief..
Well letโs see, when she refused to answer how many shell casings were found on the roof. And she refused to answer basic questions. But she vehemently denied there was another shooter, and the question if the sniper was told to stand down she denied it.
The Secret Service specifically ignored the single most obvious threat point on top of the building. They also classified the kid with a range find as suspicious rather than a threat on multiple encounters. She said he was only suspicious when caught with the range finder in the high threat area. Then again only suspicious during a second encounter in the same area. Finally, she said a man crawling around on the roof is only suspicious and not a threat and that is why the secret service did not interrupt the rally.
That was kind of really being stupid in that they didn't consider someone crawling on a roof not being a threat and yet if they looked a little harder that might have seen the rifle he was also carrying as he was crawling on roof.
I think ATF needs some questioning. Who was the mysterious ATF Agent Ron Johnson said had "gone dark" and why were the crime scene photos sent to him? ATF has been at the root of some serious evil in the past.
I was going to add the same, even with a spray foam on the backside, a metal / tin roof is going to resonate some noise. He belly crawled supposedly, but between the fact that this was the roof of the snipers nest, you would think that overhead surveillance from a drone or rotary winged craft would have picked this up. Now, there are stories with the cell phones that have been linked to his house, his work and DC, multiple times. The "Patsy" theory is proving out.
The Secret Service specifically ignored the single most obvious threat point on top of the building.
Question: can we leap to the conclusion that the SS specifically ignored this threat point? On what basis? What if they were deliberately under-staffed, undermanned, making it impractical or impossible to adequately cover this threat point?
Personally, I think it is more likely that the SS detail was deliberately understaffed to make the rally situation as unsafe as possible, which would make penetration by an assassin easier and less preventable.
Reportedly, they had only one day (ONE DAY!) to review the location and prepare. Moreover, all of the detail bar one were temporary assignments.
Am I missing something here? On what basis are you claiming that the SS deliberately ignored the threat point. I appreciate that this is your opinion, but to figure out the entire puzzle, we need facts, evidence, and not mere opinion (obviously).
The short fat one that ducked and hid behind Trump (then fumbled the holstering) seems to actually be in a supervisor role. She was videoed on location as part of the prep team days before the shooting.
Also the fact Jill Biden had an event nearby is now being used as an excuse for Trump getting the idiot DEI team.
This video from the same guy is a good breakdown of the event.
Temporary assignments from other agencies. Some may actually have been paper pushers, or perhaps placed to ensure Trump was less than adequately protected.
An easily concievable allegory comes to mind. Vice president of a bank is scheming to steal from the bank and he hires a crew of bank robbers to execute his plan. Then, he tells them the bank schedule, when it is least protected, when perhaps a safety drill might be planned (so that any alarm is treated as benign by outside police forces), and then even arranges to have only 2 guards on that night, instead of the usual 4 marching the perimeter.
It doesn't mean the guards were in on it, or the police were in on it. Rather, the situation has been orchestrated by someone in a position to do it to make the conditions for a successful heist to be at their maximum.
I think OP simply takes one line of reasoning, probably playing in to OPs biases, and goes full steam on that, instead of considering alternative possibilities.
OP forgot to insert "it is clear to me the secret service was complicit".
It puts out an assertion which is the OP's belief and presents it as a fact.
This is not critical thinking, or empirical data. It's opinion.
Even worse, OP claims "The secret service was complicit" as if the Secret Service as an organization (the entire entity, group and organization) WAS complicit. As if the Secret Service from top to bottom is all in on it, instead of asserting that certain people, individuals or elements of the SS were complicit, which would actually make sense.
I dunno. In this case, I think it's important to more clearly define where blame is being assigned. Because one could easily read the OP's assertion (opinion) and come away thinking that the OP blames all the SS on the field that day, in the offices and everyone else.
In fact, in his/her comments OP appears to think so (i.e. that the SS at the Trump Rally itself were in on the assassination and/or somehow cooperated in it).
OK. Maybe the OP actually means that the SS every dog man of them, are corrupt and are complicit.
Seems exceedingly sloppy to me. Particularly on such an emotional issue, I personally think frogs should take more care. But then, that's MY opinion.
Actually, the interchange suggests the opposite. Hat tip u/BigMikesDingALing
He asks, "If he had been the sitting president, would he have had the same security he had on July 13th or would it be beefed up?"
She answered, "There is a difference between the sitting president and continuity of government and the responsibility we have."
She is essentially saying that because Trump is not president, the continuity of government necessity is not in place and so that lowers the responsibility of the secret service.
He responds, "OK, so he did not. There wasn't a full CAT team, etc..."
They are both agreeing that Trump did not have full protection because Trump isn't president. He is implying that posture is negligent and ridiculous. She is trying her best to dance around the fact that Trump wasn't provided adequate security by hiding behind continuity of government protocols only applying to a sitting president.
That was a real gong show! Nice to watch the senators talk tough to her and let her know we all think she is lying, should step down and outright be fired!
Now they are talking about an open window on the building the shooter was on facing the stage, are you kidding me? Rule one for Secret Serviceโฆ. Well in the top five, NO OPEN WINDOWS!!!!
The only way that Commie Bitch will answer any questions is while being waterboarded in GITMO.
It is now known as tactical baptism
lol love it
*with Diesel
Blamo
JD Vance did his first solo rally today and they are using Military to protect the event. Plenty of armed soldiers and armored vehicles.
https://rumble.com/v57r40t-live-vice-presidential-nominee-jd-vance-holds-a-hometown-rally-in-ohio-7222.html
Holy shit, seriously??? Where do you see that? It's a 3.5 hour long video..... I'm skimming it now...
Does it violate posse comitatus to have the security pull even security / guard duty for a candidate or elected?
Armored vehicle at 38:20.
When the secret service can no longer be trusted to do their jobs, the military is the only way.
Why'd they have the dump truck out front?
To block car/truck bombs. That's what they expect.
That's a good guess. I was curious about that.
PUT HER ON A SLOPED ROOF.
a HOT sloped roof
With her head facing down, so the water we'll pour on her feels......nice and cool...yeah, that's it.....
Less than 5 minutes. She doesnโt have the fortitude to last any longer.
( อกยฐ อส อกยฐ)
how the hell do you make that thing
you can copy/paste โLenny Faceโ from a search engine or you have an iphone with Japanese keyboard, select the emoji to bring up a huge list of Japanese emojis.
สโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขสโขฬซอกโขส
your terms are acceptable
A big takeaway from this hearing for me was that Jackson Lee had a big role in oversight of the Secret Service. And shes dead 6 days after the attempt on Trump????? Was this an execution for treason?????
This is the bombshell, not sure how people have missed it
This stuff needs to be made public or the shit will keep happening.
YES. So many liberals are all so certain that orange man bad. When does he get justice? They have TDS now and will always, unless they are cured with some truth.
Was Cheatle sending a message by mentioning the death of Rep. Lee???
Holy shit! Iโm scared and excited right now.
Media reports are saying that Lee announced last month that she had pancreatic cancer, but also, as of two days ago, apparently no cause of death was or has been disclosed
As far as I know, pancreatic cancer is usually a very virulent form of cancer. However, when she announced the cancer, she reportedly also said "By Godโs grace, I will be back at full strength soon", so, if accurate, it indicates the narrative is that she expected to recover.
She was 74, and old, but the connection
Certainly worth digging into.
Written testimony released by Cheatle:
"I would be remiss if I did not also extend my condolences on the passing of your colleague, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee. Ms. Jackson Lee was always engaged in the oversight of the Secret Service and her passing is a great loss to this body."
https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/07/written-testimony-director-kimberly-cheatle-oversight-committee-attempted
Dan Bongino reported that Secret Service agents were telling him their jobs were being threatened. I suspect they are worried about more than their jobs and this woman is more afraid of Mayorkas than Congress - with good reason, as we've seen nothing but weakness, complicity and cuckery from Congress. I don't think it's going to take long for the truth to emerge.
She needs to be held in contempt with jail time until she complies..
Because they are controlled opposition. It's just political theater.
Agree
The deep-state probably told her not to resign until they tell her to.
It's not over yet. Hopefully one Congressperson will call for her immediate arrest so they can arrest her & throw her in the clink. Once arrested she will sing like a bird, all of a sudden & tell them who was really behind this. Don't forget, she is a minion
No one from the criminal gang gets arrested, let's be real
yet
Imagine a presidency and a nation being held over the fire like this....by a woman.
We have truly lost our way as a species.
Really, you were able to tell that when no useful information was given in testimony?
Please post here the exact parts of testimony that made it clear to you.
BTW - I think like you, that they definitely were involved, but I did not hear anything in the testimony today that either strengthened or weakened my belief..
Well letโs see, when she refused to answer how many shell casings were found on the roof. And she refused to answer basic questions. But she vehemently denied there was another shooter, and the question if the sniper was told to stand down she denied it.
Shell casings on the roof is the "tell" for sure.
The Secret Service specifically ignored the single most obvious threat point on top of the building. They also classified the kid with a range find as suspicious rather than a threat on multiple encounters. She said he was only suspicious when caught with the range finder in the high threat area. Then again only suspicious during a second encounter in the same area. Finally, she said a man crawling around on the roof is only suspicious and not a threat and that is why the secret service did not interrupt the rally.
That was kind of really being stupid in that they didn't consider someone crawling on a roof not being a threat and yet if they looked a little harder that might have seen the rifle he was also carrying as he was crawling on roof.
I think ATF needs some questioning. Who was the mysterious ATF Agent Ron Johnson said had "gone dark" and why were the crime scene photos sent to him? ATF has been at the root of some serious evil in the past.
Let's add on to that with the fact that the building in question housed secret service / police / security (sharp shooters).
Yeppers. They had the same line of fire as the shooter/patsy.
Get a Miitary Sniper to take her out . Then state there will be more executions
They would have heard him clomping around on the metal roof.
They were there to protect the SHOOTERS, not Trump
I was going to add the same, even with a spray foam on the backside, a metal / tin roof is going to resonate some noise. He belly crawled supposedly, but between the fact that this was the roof of the snipers nest, you would think that overhead surveillance from a drone or rotary winged craft would have picked this up. Now, there are stories with the cell phones that have been linked to his house, his work and DC, multiple times. The "Patsy" theory is proving out.
๐and she said the latter with such serious. Are you fucking kidding me? A man on his belly on the roof is suspicious! ๐๐๐.
Question: can we leap to the conclusion that the SS specifically ignored this threat point? On what basis? What if they were deliberately under-staffed, undermanned, making it impractical or impossible to adequately cover this threat point?
Personally, I think it is more likely that the SS detail was deliberately understaffed to make the rally situation as unsafe as possible, which would make penetration by an assassin easier and less preventable.
Reportedly, they had only one day (ONE DAY!) to review the location and prepare. Moreover, all of the detail bar one were temporary assignments.
Am I missing something here? On what basis are you claiming that the SS deliberately ignored the threat point. I appreciate that this is your opinion, but to figure out the entire puzzle, we need facts, evidence, and not mere opinion (obviously).
This youtuber is doing some good work providing more data points.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEaLabBmHsU
The short fat one that ducked and hid behind Trump (then fumbled the holstering) seems to actually be in a supervisor role. She was videoed on location as part of the prep team days before the shooting.
Also the fact Jill Biden had an event nearby is now being used as an excuse for Trump getting the idiot DEI team.
This video from the same guy is a good breakdown of the event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKSJJ_c31EU
Thank you AllMost.
Hope to check it out..
Temporary assignments from other agencies. Some may actually have been paper pushers, or perhaps placed to ensure Trump was less than adequately protected.
I think that is very likely the case.
An easily concievable allegory comes to mind. Vice president of a bank is scheming to steal from the bank and he hires a crew of bank robbers to execute his plan. Then, he tells them the bank schedule, when it is least protected, when perhaps a safety drill might be planned (so that any alarm is treated as benign by outside police forces), and then even arranges to have only 2 guards on that night, instead of the usual 4 marching the perimeter.
It doesn't mean the guards were in on it, or the police were in on it. Rather, the situation has been orchestrated by someone in a position to do it to make the conditions for a successful heist to be at their maximum.
I think OP simply takes one line of reasoning, probably playing in to OPs biases, and goes full steam on that, instead of considering alternative possibilities.
OP forgot to insert "it is clear to me the secret service was complicit".
It puts out an assertion which is the OP's belief and presents it as a fact.
This is not critical thinking, or empirical data. It's opinion.
Even worse, OP claims "The secret service was complicit" as if the Secret Service as an organization (the entire entity, group and organization) WAS complicit. As if the Secret Service from top to bottom is all in on it, instead of asserting that certain people, individuals or elements of the SS were complicit, which would actually make sense.
Agree, thanks.
The same standard we apply to the local police is also applied to the SS and other agencies as well.
I dunno. In this case, I think it's important to more clearly define where blame is being assigned. Because one could easily read the OP's assertion (opinion) and come away thinking that the OP blames all the SS on the field that day, in the offices and everyone else.
In fact, in his/her comments OP appears to think so (i.e. that the SS at the Trump Rally itself were in on the assassination and/or somehow cooperated in it).
OK. Maybe the OP actually means that the SS every dog man of them, are corrupt and are complicit.
Seems exceedingly sloppy to me. Particularly on such an emotional issue, I personally think frogs should take more care. But then, that's MY opinion.
She also admitted we're in a continuity of government. That in it's self is a massive BOOM!
Actually, the interchange suggests the opposite. Hat tip u/BigMikesDingALing
She answered, "There is a difference between the sitting president and continuity of government and the responsibility we have."
She is essentially saying that because Trump is not president, the continuity of government necessity is not in place and so that lowers the responsibility of the secret service.
He responds, "OK, so he did not. There wasn't a full CAT team, etc..."
They are both agreeing that Trump did not have full protection because Trump isn't president. He is implying that posture is negligent and ridiculous. She is trying her best to dance around the fact that Trump wasn't provided adequate security by hiding behind continuity of government protocols only applying to a sitting president.
If Cheatle believed in the continuity of government, you would think she'd be MORE protective of Trump, not less.
That was a real gong show! Nice to watch the senators talk tough to her and let her know we all think she is lying, should step down and outright be fired!
Now they are talking about an open window on the building the shooter was on facing the stage, are you kidding me? Rule one for Secret Serviceโฆ. Well in the top five, NO OPEN WINDOWS!!!!
That window is where the first three shots originated, including the one that hit Trump
The more we learn, the more it sounds like Dealey Plaza all over again!
This is all so fake and staged. All of it. Every detail. Cmon man
How many shells found on roof? ask FBI > Do you Know how many shells were found on roof? YES > How many? Ask FBI > How many?? Wont Comment....
^ What a cunt
All I know is I couldn't handle what Cheatle is going through. Way too much stress for me. I would've resigned a long time ago.
Or it's supposed to look this way.