how do you know Trump was there if it was CGI'd? Trump could have been CGI'd also and just signed off on it, or he could have written his responses and they could have cgi'd him with his own responses. AGain, no confirmation it was live
I didn't say he did. I just said you can't confirm that he didn't.......
.......incidentally, if you don't think green-screens are being deployed on the world "stage", you might want to start with Q Drop #1, read them all, sift through some QResearch, and try to wrap your mind around the concept of 5th Gen Warfare.
If Democrats steal another election this year, will that be part of Q’s “plan” and “movie” too? I think the Qannon op will be determined to be fake or not depending on if another steal happens..
But they did show video of Jill having to help Joe down the steps to talk with the reporters after Trump left the stage, why would they do that? To help with the narrative that Joe is feeble?
Q+? He wouldn't have to tell the difference between anything. That dilemma would never have been presented.
He'd have been a part of the production.
Trump has doubles. He's deployed Deep Fakes on several occasions, (most notably his post Jan 6. video speech). Trump is an entertainment producer. This is his forte.
Not saying the debate was Deep Faked, but his opponent sure AF was wearing a mask.
Could've been an actor. AI would've performed much better.
If this theory is true, actors would make sense for occasional live appearances, especially with little dialog. And this jives with all the very mindful handlers.
There was a post here and/or on YouTube about how the SeeAyeAyy invented human face masks in 1993 that were so realistic, that you could be talking to someone wearing one of these masks, and you wouldn’t be able to realize it was a fake mask.
It could have been the actor in the head mask. Since there was no live audience (witnesses), the video we saw could have been sliced and diced all kinds of ways. If Trump complained about it, we'd never hear about it in the mainstream new media.
Ok, then who was at the debate?
Well, there was no studio audience for the first time ever. So, no one to confirm that this debate was actually live and not CGI'd.
Trump was there. He cooperated with this scheme?
Q+? Absolutely.
Its a movie. He's reiterated this over the years more than just about anything else.
He's only said "Central Casting" a bazillion times, to get us to pay attention.
Might explain why neither one of them shook hands before or after the debate!
I had more people than I can think of...slooooowly waking from their Slumber...after that debate ;) Brilliant Move!
how do you know Trump was there if it was CGI'd? Trump could have been CGI'd also and just signed off on it, or he could have written his responses and they could have cgi'd him with his own responses. AGain, no confirmation it was live
You’ve entered “unhinged from reality” territory. Lol
Exactly, what an idiotic theory.
What's more idiotic is assuming a theory you yourself cannot definitively prove is idiotic. No offense just a little advice.
Trump did not have a debate with a green screen. What the hell are you smoking…
I didn't say he did. I just said you can't confirm that he didn't.......
.......incidentally, if you don't think green-screens are being deployed on the world "stage", you might want to start with Q Drop #1, read them all, sift through some QResearch, and try to wrap your mind around the concept of 5th Gen Warfare.
If Democrats steal another election this year, will that be part of Q’s “plan” and “movie” too? I think the Qannon op will be determined to be fake or not depending on if another steal happens..
But they did show video of Jill having to help Joe down the steps to talk with the reporters after Trump left the stage, why would they do that? To help with the narrative that Joe is feeble?
No audience at the inauguration either
You think Trump would not be able to tell the difference?
Q+? He wouldn't have to tell the difference between anything. That dilemma would never have been presented.
He'd have been a part of the production.
Trump has doubles. He's deployed Deep Fakes on several occasions, (most notably his post Jan 6. video speech). Trump is an entertainment producer. This is his forte.
Not saying the debate was Deep Faked, but his opponent sure AF was wearing a mask.
Its all a movie
Its all a movie.
Is it though?
West coast Bidan.
Hah. Like the Blue Man Group, we've got regional performing POTATOUS'
Could've been an actor. AI would've performed much better.
If this theory is true, actors would make sense for occasional live appearances, especially with little dialog. And this jives with all the very mindful handlers.
There was a post here and/or on YouTube about how the SeeAyeAyy invented human face masks in 1993 that were so realistic, that you could be talking to someone wearing one of these masks, and you wouldn’t be able to realize it was a fake mask.
It could have been the actor in the head mask. Since there was no live audience (witnesses), the video we saw could have been sliced and diced all kinds of ways. If Trump complained about it, we'd never hear about it in the mainstream new media.