They will both have to testify about their individual actions on the day of shooting if this goes to trial, and what they saw before and during the shooting, and what was said.
Like all things in the law, there are exceptions when spousal privilege does not apply:-When both spouses are participants in illegal activity;-When one spouse is charged with a crime against the other spouse or a child;-When the marriage was a sham marriage;-When one spouse is being used by the other for human trafficking.
If the prosecution charges both for the same crime, they will have to answer every question at trial. Sure, if she had stayed home, she couldn’t be asked “Did you overhear…or did you see lots of bundled cash in closet…”
Crime-fraud nullifies privilege. If prosecutors can show one hid or planted evidence, the prosecutor can ask. If she buys a Ferrari after the shooting, the prosecutor can ask her if she got the money from her husband before or after the shooting.
A Catholic priest can’t be compelled to testify what a suspect said in confessional but if a Catholic priest is molesting a kid and the two rob a store and one kills a bystander, the prosecutor can ask any question about the abuse, or what happened on day of the shooting and compel testimony at court about who planned the crime. Prosecutor can ask priest if he molested and groomed kid in confessional.
Spousal privilege is intended to protect the sanctity of marriage so an innocent spouse can ask questions or not ask questions. A spouse cannot be forced to testify why they failed to discern crime, or if they were negligent. But if both are working together on a crime, one or both buy a Ferrari after, and one or both hide evidence or give false statements, that privilege goes away.
Privilege only protects you if you can say “I wasn’t at the crime scene. And I can’t be compelled to answer because as a spouse I’m not expected to ask my husband questions about where the bag with $100,000 came from.” Like, spouses should be able to ask one another “I might have broken a law, what do we do now?” So the law gives limited immunity for spouses so they feel comfortable talking about normal marital issues and minor infidelity and misdemeanors. But the privilege goes out the window when wife acts as spotter and the husband is bleeding and two people are dead and $100,000 down payment is in the closet and Q has you and spouse on surveillance hiding evidence, planning a hit.
Can’t hide evidence and cover CIA assassins like they did with JFK. Those days are over. The real investigators and experts do it for free and post evidence on internet before the Cabal can discredit it
Exactly, they have to fit the narrative to what citizen investigators are uncovering, why do you think we haven't heard anything from the FBI in over two weeks now?
Look at the roofing siding
On my phone appears to be ai photo
Why does the siding have to look like colored in shadows. Is an artificially dark shadow and example of an ai altered image? To say nothing of the chrome dome on the head reflecting the light of 1000 suns. The seesaw is about to hit 88mph
This part of that article, at the very end of it, really makes things glow...
"According to his LinkedIn, Nicol’s interests include the Justice Department, Black Rifle Coffee and the non-profit organization FBI-LEEDA, which is an acronym for Law Enforcement Executive Development Association."
Lots. After Rittenhouse their CEO denounced him because someone found an old pic of him wearing a Black Rifle shirt and basically came out saying that only former service members should have AR15s. Also, a history of dem donations including Hillary, they are anti-2nd ammendment cucks hiding behind the label of veteran to profit off of a conservative audience.
That would also explain the glass shattering. No one has explained this yet, did Greg shoot the glass, did return fire??? I mean inquiring minds wanna know
perhaps he just sucks at life and shooting a non moving target he sucks at as well. Who knows, maybe it was all just staged acting and we are watching a movie unfold.
I think it was Crooks after initially thinking it was Yearick.
I don't know why Yearick hasn't appeared anywhere and distanced himself from all of this. Unless he can't because he's dead or in custody or something.
Say he fires the first 3 rounds. How'd he know Crooks was ready, right at that exact moment, to immediately start blasting the 5 rapid shots? They weren't in radio contact I hope ;p
They didn't even need Crooks to fire a shot. If Sniper Greg had iced Trump, and then the USSS snipers took out Crooks before he fired, all the FBI would have had to say is they found shell casings and a recently fired AR next to the dead patsy, the lone shooter! No you can't see them, they're POOGI (part of an ongoing investigation)!! Nothing to see here
Or, alternatively...if you're the deep state, why shoot Trump yourself when you have an armed patsy to do it for you, whom you can then decapitate with sniper fire ?
Of course. I heard there were three agents in that building, not just two. Whatever the number, they all need to be skewered from eye socket to bunghole like a stuck pig on a spit and roasted with interrogation—just for allowing the incident to occur, with a rifleman on the roof right next to the open window where they either fired from or were just hanging out, enjoying the assassination. Was it murderous malevolence or colossal incompetence?
So I'm using "Sniper Greg" as handy shorthand for "the goddamn fucking son of a bitch who shot President Trump". If it turns out not to be Greg, that's OK. At this point my unending respect for the secret service is ended.
"How'd [Sniper Greg] know Crooks was ready, right at that exact moment, to immediately start blasting 5 rapid shots? They weren't in radio contact I hope."
Have you ever seen the movie Sniper, starring Tom Berenger and Billy Zane? The movie comes out in the early 1990's when one could consider radio communication technology of the last 20 years science fiction then. Both actors portray snipers who communicate in the field by aiming their weapons at each other while looking through their scopes. One raises his head to intitiate communication while the other looks through his scope.
One can see the first Secret Service sniper team atop the red building nearest the shooter's position in some video footage clearly. Notice the sniper whose rifle sits atop the tripod. He appears to have "the drop" on Thomas Crooks well before the first volley of shots. The sniper raises his head and then responds by flinching to the incoming fire while pulling back his mounted rifle. The SS sniper provides the signal for the assassin to shoot Donald Trump knowingly or unknowingly; he looks for Crooks instead of Sniper Greg.
In a hurry, I said shell casings. But only shotgun shells have shell casings, since the entire thing is the shell.
But cartridge isn't right either. The brass thing the bullet is stuck into is a case or casing. The bullet and the casing together are the cartridge. So they probably didn't find cartridges on the roof, unless the guy spilled his ammo.
Actually, that was the point. Cartridges are unfired. Speculation was they were planted. And who really fired the shots. It was something to think about.
This looks really bad for Nicole. I hope, if he's innocent, he has a real good alibi. Also, I hope if he took those first 3 shots at our president, he sings like a bird at gitmo and takes all involved down with him.
Here is what has been bugging me. Whether it was 5 or 8 shots or whatever. There is a long pause after that. Why? Why wasn't he firing rounds off constantly until he was killed? If you are coming to shoot up a crowd you would bring a high capacity magazine, or I'd expect at least a 15 round mag, if not 30. What happened, did the gun jam? Maybe he was told he wouldn't be countered? Was his gun tampered with? Was he going for his explosive remote?
Firing pins are the fingerprints of shell casings. After thought, if Crooks was at a gun range where FBI trained. It is very easy for someone to pick up Crooks brass after he finished going Pew Pew.
Court records also suggest Nicol filed for bankruptcy in 2000, but those records aren’t available online.
I know this bankruptcy was 24 yrs ago, but maybe he was having financial troubles and took a bribe to spread the info about Crooks to set him up, then look the other way while Crooks did the shooting.
I saw the video from the bodycam, she was very nervous on the roof, maybe scared of heights(?) or was she nervous because of involvement somehow(?), don’t know but didn’t watch everything she did, though I don’t remember her doing much but putting her gloves on, reach down and touch Crooks, then stand there for a bit, then walked down the roof near edge.
“Police Sergeant Gregory Nicol was in his office at the Monaca Police Station on December 15 when he unholstered his duty weapon to show it to another officer. His firearm accidentally discharged in the process, in what is being described as a ‘freak accident,’” the BeaverCountian reported in January, citing two unnamed law enforcement sources.
Headline USA also found that Nicol was sued in December 2005 for causing the wrong suspect to be arrested in a robbery investigation. In that case, Nicol admitted to confusing the identity of a woman, saying he made an honest mistake.
He seems to have one thing after another happen, I’m surprised he is still employed in LE.
Every security position I've ever been involved with requires a financial background check - to spot whether you are susceptible to bribery/blackmail/selling secrets etc.
And this guy is supposed to be a sniper when he accidentally discharged his weapon taking it out of his holster in the past? WTF? I know accidents happen, but this guy is supposed to be a sniper and supposed to know how to handle his firearms.
Also, the fact that he confuses people's identities, causing the wrong person to be arrested.
Not exactly the type of person you would want on a detail like this.
Yeah and her partner or guy who was with her when they were going to building and up onto roof, kept checking on her to make sure she was ok. I assumed she was either freaked out or scared of heights. At one point while standing over the body, I thought she was going to be sick.
I'd assume they were able to recover bullets, and you could tell if it was his gun or not that fired them based on ballistics.. so planting casings makes no sense unless the the investigators are in on it.. in which case why even bother planting casings?
Crooks would have had to load his weapon with 3 (or whatever number) fewer rounds than capacity, AND used the same weapon and rounds as Nicol. Even then the ballistics research would show whether they were fired from Crooks’ weapon. The investigators would have to be in on it. Is that why they did it on the AGR building? Does Butler County get to pull rank over federal investigators?
You know George Webb has been reporting that Crooks practiced shooting at the same range as many LE? They could’ve easily grabbed a few casings from his spent ammo at the range and planted those on the roof to thwart investigators as well. Even then I assume local LE is covering up. Maybe that’s why SS is silent - they really have egg on their face. They are probably too trusting of other LE and it creates holes in security, like this. Then again there could be a few there totally in on it. Wouldn’t take that many.
On reconsidering, I guess it could makes sense. If government actors are in on it, it would be foolish to believe every single person there would be in on it. So surreptitiously planting casings would be a good idea so you don't get whistleblowers coming forward saying they saw no casings
It’s the same exact ones that got JFK. But they missed Trump. It can’t be this quiet without the deep state making it that way. There is where you know you know …
gun# 3 2 shots bigger and longer sound 7&8 from ??
gun#4 and 9th shot is a maybe hard to tell, comparing to the others it has the spikes but not the bubble shape. from ??
gun #5 1 shot very different , possible handgun? from ??
At a later time hopefully this will help in determining how big the DS lie is.
–
My current theory is that there was either a gun battle between the noob shooter, a pro assassin, and the various LEOs who weren't in on the set-up,
or
as soon as the various LEOs who weren't in on thr set-up realized what was going on, they all piled shots onto the noob shooter with their various weapons.
It would be great if we could figure out what each LEO was wielding and see which ones match up with the gunshot audios"
But they can be taken to a black site and asked to talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75iv3RKQUAM
They will both have to testify about their individual actions on the day of shooting if this goes to trial, and what they saw before and during the shooting, and what was said.
Like all things in the law, there are exceptions when spousal privilege does not apply:-When both spouses are participants in illegal activity;-When one spouse is charged with a crime against the other spouse or a child;-When the marriage was a sham marriage;-When one spouse is being used by the other for human trafficking.
If the prosecution charges both for the same crime, they will have to answer every question at trial. Sure, if she had stayed home, she couldn’t be asked “Did you overhear…or did you see lots of bundled cash in closet…”
Crime-fraud nullifies privilege. If prosecutors can show one hid or planted evidence, the prosecutor can ask. If she buys a Ferrari after the shooting, the prosecutor can ask her if she got the money from her husband before or after the shooting.
A Catholic priest can’t be compelled to testify what a suspect said in confessional but if a Catholic priest is molesting a kid and the two rob a store and one kills a bystander, the prosecutor can ask any question about the abuse, or what happened on day of the shooting and compel testimony at court about who planned the crime. Prosecutor can ask priest if he molested and groomed kid in confessional.
Spousal privilege is intended to protect the sanctity of marriage so an innocent spouse can ask questions or not ask questions. A spouse cannot be forced to testify why they failed to discern crime, or if they were negligent. But if both are working together on a crime, one or both buy a Ferrari after, and one or both hide evidence or give false statements, that privilege goes away.
Privilege only protects you if you can say “I wasn’t at the crime scene. And I can’t be compelled to answer because as a spouse I’m not expected to ask my husband questions about where the bag with $100,000 came from.” Like, spouses should be able to ask one another “I might have broken a law, what do we do now?” So the law gives limited immunity for spouses so they feel comfortable talking about normal marital issues and minor infidelity and misdemeanors. But the privilege goes out the window when wife acts as spotter and the husband is bleeding and two people are dead and $100,000 down payment is in the closet and Q has you and spouse on surveillance hiding evidence, planning a hit.
Yeah, if I am ever put into this situation I'm using the Hilary Clinton method, "I don't recall, I don't recall, I don't recall"
Can’t hide evidence and cover CIA assassins like they did with JFK. Those days are over. The real investigators and experts do it for free and post evidence on internet before the Cabal can discredit it
Dis gon b gud 🪑
🍿
We Are The News NOW!
Exactly, they have to fit the narrative to what citizen investigators are uncovering, why do you think we haven't heard anything from the FBI in over two weeks now?
Look at the roofing siding On my phone appears to be ai photo Why does the siding have to look like colored in shadows. Is an artificially dark shadow and example of an ai altered image? To say nothing of the chrome dome on the head reflecting the light of 1000 suns. The seesaw is about to hit 88mph
This part of that article, at the very end of it, really makes things glow...
"According to his LinkedIn, Nicol’s interests include the Justice Department, Black Rifle Coffee and the non-profit organization FBI-LEEDA, which is an acronym for Law Enforcement Executive Development Association."
Like every point of it is burning!
LinkedIn.
Justice Departmet.
Black Riffle Coffee.
FBLIE-LEEDA!!!
Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with Black Rifle Coffee?
Lots. After Rittenhouse their CEO denounced him because someone found an old pic of him wearing a Black Rifle shirt and basically came out saying that only former service members should have AR15s. Also, a history of dem donations including Hillary, they are anti-2nd ammendment cucks hiding behind the label of veteran to profit off of a conservative audience.
Correct. Their product is only suitable for use in litter boxes. They are grifters, for sure.
I heard on the Dilley show that it tastes bad too!
All-around shit-tier
Thank you for the details! That's so ass backwards. I can't stand these two faced grifters.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZWyaIBQB/soros-funded-actblue-donations-t/c/
Thank you fren.
That would also explain the glass shattering. No one has explained this yet, did Greg shoot the glass, did return fire??? I mean inquiring minds wanna know
Wouldn't the flags behind Trump provide an indication to an experience sniper?
you don't need spotters or adjustment at 150 yards
perhaps he just sucks at life and shooting a non moving target he sucks at as well. Who knows, maybe it was all just staged acting and we are watching a movie unfold.
The window or the teleprompter?
Period blood; Greg is a woman.
We need a Biologist.
Isn’t there one on the Supreme Court?
I don’t know.
I’m not a Biologist.
KEK
Must be Greg.
It’s that time of the month.
Greg is such a pussy.
I bet the ones who shot them just did it to silence them like they did LHO. They’re in on it. Fully. Have we heard from them??
What about Yearick...he has connections to both antifa and dick Cheney...
I think it was Crooks after initially thinking it was Yearick.
I don't know why Yearick hasn't appeared anywhere and distanced himself from all of this. Unless he can't because he's dead or in custody or something.
Great post!
Called it. Sniper Greg in the window FTW
Say he fires the first 3 rounds. How'd he know Crooks was ready, right at that exact moment, to immediately start blasting the 5 rapid shots? They weren't in radio contact I hope ;p
They didn't even need Crooks to fire a shot. If Sniper Greg had iced Trump, and then the USSS snipers took out Crooks before he fired, all the FBI would have had to say is they found shell casings and a recently fired AR next to the dead patsy, the lone shooter! No you can't see them, they're POOGI (part of an ongoing investigation)!! Nothing to see here
Or, alternatively...if you're the deep state, why shoot Trump yourself when you have an armed patsy to do it for you, whom you can then decapitate with sniper fire ?
I wouldn't immediately pin it on Sniper Greg...I would say both him and his partner are suspects.
Both of them need to be questioned.
Of course. I heard there were three agents in that building, not just two. Whatever the number, they all need to be skewered from eye socket to bunghole like a stuck pig on a spit and roasted with interrogation—just for allowing the incident to occur, with a rifleman on the roof right next to the open window where they either fired from or were just hanging out, enjoying the assassination. Was it murderous malevolence or colossal incompetence?
So I'm using "Sniper Greg" as handy shorthand for "the goddamn fucking son of a bitch who shot President Trump". If it turns out not to be Greg, that's OK. At this point my unending respect for the secret service is ended.
"How'd [Sniper Greg] know Crooks was ready, right at that exact moment, to immediately start blasting 5 rapid shots? They weren't in radio contact I hope."
Have you ever seen the movie Sniper, starring Tom Berenger and Billy Zane? The movie comes out in the early 1990's when one could consider radio communication technology of the last 20 years science fiction then. Both actors portray snipers who communicate in the field by aiming their weapons at each other while looking through their scopes. One raises his head to intitiate communication while the other looks through his scope.
One can see the first Secret Service sniper team atop the red building nearest the shooter's position in some video footage clearly. Notice the sniper whose rifle sits atop the tripod. He appears to have "the drop" on Thomas Crooks well before the first volley of shots. The sniper raises his head and then responds by flinching to the incoming fire while pulling back his mounted rifle. The SS sniper provides the signal for the assassin to shoot Donald Trump knowingly or unknowingly; he looks for Crooks instead of Sniper Greg.
Were they casings? or cartridges? I thought I saw a report that stated they found cartridges on the roof. That's an important detail.
We are using wrong terminology.
In a hurry, I said shell casings. But only shotgun shells have shell casings, since the entire thing is the shell.
But cartridge isn't right either. The brass thing the bullet is stuck into is a case or casing. The bullet and the casing together are the cartridge. So they probably didn't find cartridges on the roof, unless the guy spilled his ammo.
(Still not the only shooter)
Actually, that was the point. Cartridges are unfired. Speculation was they were planted. And who really fired the shots. It was something to think about.
Why go to the trouble and risk of planting full cartridges? That seems................weird.
Bingo...if he wasn't the shooter, did the cartridges spill when he was shot?'
This looks really bad for Nicole. I hope, if he's innocent, he has a real good alibi. Also, I hope if he took those first 3 shots at our president, he sings like a bird at gitmo and takes all involved down with him.
Here is what has been bugging me. Whether it was 5 or 8 shots or whatever. There is a long pause after that. Why? Why wasn't he firing rounds off constantly until he was killed? If you are coming to shoot up a crowd you would bring a high capacity magazine, or I'd expect at least a 15 round mag, if not 30. What happened, did the gun jam? Maybe he was told he wouldn't be countered? Was his gun tampered with? Was he going for his explosive remote?
If the 3 shells were planted by the wife could they have aborted their failed mission and also planted the remote?
Firing pins are the fingerprints of shell casings. After thought, if Crooks was at a gun range where FBI trained. It is very easy for someone to pick up Crooks brass after he finished going Pew Pew.
Public records. The range should have cameras. These cameras might show more than brass. It might show them talking.
For every question answered, three to five more are created.
I know this bankruptcy was 24 yrs ago, but maybe he was having financial troubles and took a bribe to spread the info about Crooks to set him up, then look the other way while Crooks did the shooting.
I saw the video from the bodycam, she was very nervous on the roof, maybe scared of heights(?) or was she nervous because of involvement somehow(?), don’t know but didn’t watch everything she did, though I don’t remember her doing much but putting her gloves on, reach down and touch Crooks, then stand there for a bit, then walked down the roof near edge.
He seems to have one thing after another happen, I’m surprised he is still employed in LE.
Every security position I've ever been involved with requires a financial background check - to spot whether you are susceptible to bribery/blackmail/selling secrets etc.
Exactly why it caught my attention.
And this guy is supposed to be a sniper when he accidentally discharged his weapon taking it out of his holster in the past? WTF? I know accidents happen, but this guy is supposed to be a sniper and supposed to know how to handle his firearms.
Also, the fact that he confuses people's identities, causing the wrong person to be arrested.
Not exactly the type of person you would want on a detail like this.
Yeah and her partner or guy who was with her when they were going to building and up onto roof, kept checking on her to make sure she was ok. I assumed she was either freaked out or scared of heights. At one point while standing over the body, I thought she was going to be sick.
I'd assume they were able to recover bullets, and you could tell if it was his gun or not that fired them based on ballistics.. so planting casings makes no sense unless the the investigators are in on it.. in which case why even bother planting casings?
Do ballistics work on hypersonic rifle rounds? They fragment and splatter into tiny shards...
The cases need to match the number of shots,or their is stone cold proof of another shooter.
And not a single investigator has come out and verified "Yes, the shells ALL came from Crooks' gun"
You know, kind of an important detail, in an assassination attempt!
Crooks would have had to load his weapon with 3 (or whatever number) fewer rounds than capacity, AND used the same weapon and rounds as Nicol. Even then the ballistics research would show whether they were fired from Crooks’ weapon. The investigators would have to be in on it. Is that why they did it on the AGR building? Does Butler County get to pull rank over federal investigators?
You know George Webb has been reporting that Crooks practiced shooting at the same range as many LE? They could’ve easily grabbed a few casings from his spent ammo at the range and planted those on the roof to thwart investigators as well. Even then I assume local LE is covering up. Maybe that’s why SS is silent - they really have egg on their face. They are probably too trusting of other LE and it creates holes in security, like this. Then again there could be a few there totally in on it. Wouldn’t take that many.
On reconsidering, I guess it could makes sense. If government actors are in on it, it would be foolish to believe every single person there would be in on it. So surreptitiously planting casings would be a good idea so you don't get whistleblowers coming forward saying they saw no casings
Its time they just release the real time video and tracking evidence from starlink
they can tell if all the casings are from the same rifle, as the mark from the firing pin and the mark/dent from ejection would be the same....
https://x.com/TMWNName/status/1818424727536365595
i think this twitter post shows Nicol did leave his post at time of shooting. https://twitter.com/JD_Cashless/status/1818287776665841680
If you watch the ABC GMA interview with the sniper team you'll see Greg. His face is very red and he looks like he's about to cry. Fear?
There's also a woman in that group. Is that his wife?
It’s the same exact ones that got JFK. But they missed Trump. It can’t be this quiet without the deep state making it that way. There is where you know you know …
Speaking of the acoustics, here is an interesting post on 8kun which goes into that: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/21233082.html#21233607
"9 or 10 total shots fired total guns 4 or 5.
1st group 3 shots
2nd group 5 or 6 shots
3rd 1 shot
gun#1 5 shots 1st-5th shots from noob shooter
gun#2 1 shot 6th shot from ??
gun# 3 2 shots bigger and longer sound 7&8 from ??
gun#4 and 9th shot is a maybe hard to tell, comparing to the others it has the spikes but not the bubble shape. from ??
gun #5 1 shot very different , possible handgun? from ??
At a later time hopefully this will help in determining how big the DS lie is.
–
My current theory is that there was either a gun battle between the noob shooter, a pro assassin, and the various LEOs who weren't in on the set-up,
or
as soon as the various LEOs who weren't in on thr set-up realized what was going on, they all piled shots onto the noob shooter with their various weapons.
It would be great if we could figure out what each LEO was wielding and see which ones match up with the gunshot audios"
Ridiculous bullshit.
What's the history behind the EMT wife and the guy on the second floor. Shouldn't be too hard for an enterprising autist to track down.
Obunga confirmed