(Edited) - I'd love to hear thoughts about the debate. Any specific answers from Vance that surprised you? What topics weren't covered that you wish would have been?
Have you found any good salty tears from social media?
Comments (57)
sorted by:
Vance put on a masterclass. I have not seen this type of utter annihilation in a long time. Well done!
I've struggled to think who will take over MAGA once Trump completes his next term.
Vance has won some major points with me tonight on that matter.
100% what I was thinking. Smart. Young and common sense. If everything goes right 12 years of MAGA and we can finally course correct to a new golden era
Vance in the Yan to Trumps Yin, it's by design.
They have a powerful one, two punch.
Learn rhetoric by Aristotle.
Vance is a horrible person.
Trump is decent.
Learn how evil works by first learning classic education.
Bible does a much better job than aristotle.
May you be condemned with a lifetime supply of only Macanudos.
Had to look that up. KEK!
Where is your proof that Vance is evil? Democrats insult and tell people they are stupid but never bring actual arguments. They then attempt to prove their superior intellect by naming someone other than themselves aka Aristotle, as reference source. They expect their reader will investigate knowing no one will and more importantly counting on it to uphold your superior intellect.
Lol, Democrat and intellect
Dude, I am versed in classical Trivium. Ya know, the ancient greeks.
And you mention democrats, lol.
Vance absolutely mopped the floor with Walz. So much so that I almost felt bad for the guy. Great performance.
The big thing about Vance is that he nailed Harris and Walz to the wall. He made SURE to firmly pin the shitty state of our country on Harris which is what Trump should have done more of last time.
If you are concerned you know you have no choice but to vote trump. At this point when I hear someone speak as though they still assessing who to vote for as if there is some wisdom being applied, I know theybare full of shit and there is no critical thinking present. In other words it's so obvious the only reason tonwatch the debates is for entertainment. The intended audience of this debate is the 4- 8 percent who have had their heads in the sand and really don't even understand what's going on. Personality voters.
idk, to me it was pretty clear that he was talking about being concerned about after trumps next four years. 2028 and onwards
possibly, but if you compare your writing with the other guy's comment, then you were way more succinct than him.
Vance was fucking awesome! I feel vindicated of my support of Trump's pick!
And I have more confidence in that pick than when it started.
Vance was amazing.
Tim Walz was terrible. Friends with school shooters,
Rides his bike in middle class town and enjoys his service,
Forming a coalition government with taylor swift?,
Very uncomfortable watching him answer the tiananmen square question
Walz showed his true colors during the Democratic convention, when he effectively manhandled his own son. Imagine how much worse he is when nobody is looking. At least he managed his flamboyance for the debate, but I would never allow a child near him. He is definitely Obama/Biden material. But he peddles JOY!
I give Vance a 9.5 out of 10. I would have liked a piercing response to the 2025 lie.
I wanted a few piercing responses too but I think he’s trying to win the moderates. Don’t want to rattle their brains too much.
It’s been shown the democrats are behind the 2025 agenda. By trying to associate it with Trump, they are deflecting.
Wow, first sticky... I feel honored!
Definitely looking forward to hearing anyone's thoughts about the Debate. I thought it was an excellent display of composure on the part of Vance. Walz came across as very... whiny? Seemed to be pleading with viewers to agree with him.
What caught your eye? What topics weren't covered that you had hoped would be?
When asked about the school shootings/mental health issue, I was hoping for the ‘dismantle the CIA’ response but I guess it’s a little early into the Storm for that.
Yeah, I was pleasantly surprised at how Vance was able to frame his replies in a way that would be palatable to normies.
That’s a good way to look at it. Dilute the response enough and throw a bone or two. He may change a few minds.’
Gratz :) You never forget your first sticky.
Glad you made this. I wasn't gonna watch this, but I'll catch it throughout the week!
99% of the time when the camera panned to Walz he had a "WTF is happening to me?' expression. Hilarious
u/#popcornride
This is probably the best comment overall re the vp debate 👏
WH's in charge of cameras?? We had consistent bald head shots of Walz and well-placed side-eye glances from Vance. Body language was fun to watch.
I did appreciate that they were both were well-mannered and polite.
I don't think I've ever seen a politician debate as smooth as Vance. Very impressive. To be honest, his speeches I've watched were kind of boring but Vance in debate-mode was very interesting and a joy to watch.
I bet Vance would be blushing if he read this comment :)
I love JD's eyes. They are so piercing blue.
I can't believe Walz brought up Dick Cheney being on the democrats side. LOL! Dumbass!
I was really impressed with Vance. He’s definitely future presidential material.
Trump Truth.
~ Pelosi calling her stock broker
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113235680892877913
JD killed it. I am so proud and impressed I can’t sleep. Almost felt sorry for Walz because he was so completely utterly outclassed. Almost. Found it interesting that they referred to the “Kamala” administration. I don’t think I heard the name of the Resident even once.
Vance definitely controlled the debate despite being outnumbered 3-1, but he failed to identify some of the crazy 🤪 issues that Walz supports. https://greatawakening.win/p/1995H80n9U/overall-i-believe-that-vance-did/
I would say the moderators were much better than expected considering the territory.
I agree. I think part of the moderators being better was when Vance immediately called them out for fact checking.
He went further but they cut Vance's mic in horror as he obliterated the mods.
I think that was a moment where the mods basically said to Tim, you're on your own.
There were many times after that when Tim looked at the mods for them to throw in the towel and save him and they remained silent.
No more lifelines and it showed.
Insightful
It wasn't about attacking Walz, it was attacking Kamala. And Vance did it masterfully. He kept tying her to everything that is messed up on the border and the economy and shutting down all of her false promises of hope with "she's in office now, why doesn't she do anything?"
He NAILED IT... what a diplomatic and enthusiastic candidate!!! He really was able to get his points across well
Vance vs Tim Walz showed us the difference between libtards and MAGA:
Walz lied consistently - squirming around and never giving a straight answer (NASA) - Like that tiananmen square bullshit
Vance was calm, collected, PRESENT and CONSCIOUS - completely staying on point and actually answered MOST of the questions directly - he didn't take shit from moderators
Walz was every bit of the swamp puppet we thought he was and more - he consistently mixed up his lines and jumbled words - you had to do mental gymnastics to figure out of he actually answered a question. It was impossible for him to agree with Vance FULLY on anything, because he always came back with bs about Trump to poison agreement.
Walz was a sweaty hog vs Vance cool and dry. WTF was this ahole writing a book? He was so unconscious he said:
This sums up the difference between the two: Predator vs Prey
https://x.com/JoshRainerGold/status/1841291779402059962
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/im-a-knucklehead-walz-gives-disastrous-answer-when-questioned-on-inaccurate-claims-at-debate/
Vance did great. However, I wish he would have mentioned the flaws in the Senate border bill S4361 that Walz kept praising. Republicans liked the House Bill HR2, which actually tightened border security. Democrats wouldn't vote for that bill. The Senate Bill weakens border security over all. It funds the transportation of migrants to our cities and expedites processing into our country. It also provided more money for Ukraine. The details of the bill need to be explained every time Kamala and Walz accuse Trump of squashing it just to keep his talking point.
Also, I was surprised Vance didn't debunk the Project 2025 connection to Trump.
I wish politicians would quote statistics about lives saved because guns deter crime. The lives saved are bigger than lives lost.
The part that made me sick was the accusation that Trump asking Pence to send the 2020 election back to Congress was illegal. This would have been a perfect time for Vance to quote the Electoral Act and finally get normies to understand that contesting states, showing evidence for 2 hours per state, then sending the matter back to Congress WAS the legal remedy. The democrats benefited when the session was halted. Pelosi called the special session in which she did not allow any states to be contested or any evidence shown. Trump's supporters were there to show their congressmembers that we wanted them to contest the stolen states. The riot started immediately after AZ was contested and ruined our Constitutional path to remedy. I wish Vance had mentioned all of this.
About the accusations that Trump tried to overturn the election, I wish Vance would have mentioned that Trump is being prosecuted for that phonecall with Raffensberger, but Trump was reading straight off an audit of SOS's website, listing the tens of thousands of illegal registrations. I do realize he cannot bring up all the evidence of voter fraud. I would have loved to hear this much at least, and maybe quote the law allowing an alternate slate of electors.
I wish he would have mentioned the voter registration conflicts in AZ. On the leaked phone call, Hobbs and the AG stated the inaccurate registrations do make the 2020 and 2022 elections contestible. Yet, the AG is prosecuting election officials for doing their jobs (deciding whether or not to certify the election).
I do think he could have brought up how all democrats voted against the bill that would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote. They also sue to prevent states from trying to clean up the voter rolls. Why? And CA just passed the law prohibiting election workers to require ID from the voters. I would have loved to hear Walz answer to those democrats policies.
Over all, though, Vance had a great debate. He showed us his likeable, compassionate side and made a lot of sense. He showed wisdom and leadership while still being kind and humble.
Hugely important point, thank you. I didn't know much about this bill Walz kept praising and really wanted Vance to speak to it. Thank you for this!
I got nuked from Facebook a couple days ago. I'm missing all the tears lol.
20 years of photos gone. :(
That's why you shouldn't store photos on Facebook.
I think you can request them
You'd think, but the file they provide me is stripped of almost everything. 20 years in a 16mb file.
Good luck contacting their support.
It is common for politicians to launch into diatribes and platitudes after being asked a question. I appreciated that Vance, while doing this, with haste brought it back to the question being asked, and stated directly, that he would answer the question. Obvious strategy to point out that Walz was not answering the questions.
Vance set the tone for the entire debate. Trump and vances personalities actually cover all the bases of what people who focus on personality want. For those who don't like trump soley for personalities sake now can have confidence that after trumps 4 years we have a candidate they can't complain about on that ridiculous point. Those who like trumps direct approach can have confidence Vance understands what is at stake in the coming 20 year period of recovery. As for me trump.is the first guy who kept his word when elected in my 63 years. It should help those who are still shallow about such things have a little more confide.ce in voting for trump. The need to do this in the first place is due to some people's incredible inability to really see what is at stake. I still hear people claiming the economy is good. You have to be completely numb in the brain to think that.
Vance Mops the Stage With Walz