Never occurred to me, but makes sense. Is this something you just noticed w/hindsight or do you recall signals from news reporting at the time that it may have been something beyond an impulsive move from Musk?
I was always a little sad that X's emergence undercut Gab & Truth--who had done the right things--but X has really blossomed into the place for real discussion w/the widest demographic reach. Maybe just another of Trump taking one for the team in the short term.
Agree. Feel like the TV direction they are going makes more sense & has the natural alignment with Trump's skills.
It's easy to envision Trump running a faith-based conglomerate that supplants some of Fox/Netflix/Youtube. Biblical cartoons for kids and young adults, movies & television series that inspire us rather than degrade us and make us fearful. News channels that investigate rather than deliver the 3:00 AM narrative. With Trump as the master of ceremonies overseeing it.
I have always envisaged that it will take things like well made documentaries to awaken most people, the people who can't quite make those leaps on their own without narrative support.
Truth+ the TV app is awesome. Very nice HD content. No buffering. Can rewind live shows. Record shows for later. All of the best conservative news outlets are there already. More programming to come. It is legit!
I've always thought this. The way they got rid of Jack. And Elon does government contracts. But Elon could have easily read the Q posts. 🤷♀️
I just went over to qagg and searched for "let that sink in", and got post 621 from 01/27/18. Elon walked into twitter headquarters on 10/27/22 with a sink (ignore zeros and have 127). I searched qagg for all posts on 01/27/18. Some seem very relevant.
Hmm...interesting. Possibly not related, but I was just noticing:
621 - "Let that sink in"
622 - "Black Forest" - A region in SW Germany, containing, among other things, The Devil's Ground (Teufels grund), an ancient flourite mine which has a "Stollen" (an adit)
623 - The drop "Who owns Twitter"
All these on Jan. 27 within 8 hours of each other. Seems like there could be a relationship here. At least something intriguing enough to merit further reflection.
Not particularly but I hadn't really thought about it. I don't think any particular person is Q, it's a collective collaboration. Maybe there's a head of Q but above my pay grade. I just eat popcorn.
I do doubt they had much to do with the VP pick. We're watching a movie, the script has been written, I don't think much adlib is going on.
“We could never fake a company being publicly traded when it wasn’t, or shares of ownership in a company being fake when they weren’t. That would never happen. Everything is legitimate.”
One, you can find out everyone sanctioned under 13818. Go to the Treasury Page and search for the GLOMAG sanctions.
Two, 13818 can't apply to Americans. And any American could have stock in Twitter as it was a public company.
Three, Twitter was a public company. If somebody did something where there assets could be seized that wouldn't affect my Twitter stock or your Twitter stock.
Four, Twitter wasn't seized. Stockholders got paid. They got a premium over the current stock price.
Think of the share sales by Gates, Soros and others. What will the value of the shares be after the crash, when all the bad guys lose their wealth at almost the same time, hopefully! Better to do it now and convert the earnings into real money.
Musk sold all seven of his mansions in 2020 and now lives on a $50k prefabricated house that he rents. When asked why he did this his one word response was “freedom”.
The man has been stripped of his assets and is forced to cooperate. He certainly did not buy Twitter.
I always thought the "hostage" with the new puppet master was Alwaleed bin Talal, since he owned a near majority portion of Twitter and Bank of America, and was thrown in jailed after the coup. Q had said he was cooperating and his assets seized.
But Musk could make sense too since he was used for developing rocket technology outside of NASA to smuggle to NK.
I always thought the "hostage" with the new puppet master was Alwaleed bin Talal, since he owned a near majority portion of Twitter and Bank of America,
Don't know about Bank of America, but nobody owned more than 10% of Twitter
Never occurred to me, but makes sense. Is this something you just noticed w/hindsight or do you recall signals from news reporting at the time that it may have been something beyond an impulsive move from Musk?
I was always a little sad that X's emergence undercut Gab & Truth--who had done the right things--but X has really blossomed into the place for real discussion w/the widest demographic reach. Maybe just another of Trump taking one for the team in the short term.
I don't know about Gab, but don't worry about Truth, it's probably just a placeholder.
Agree. Feel like the TV direction they are going makes more sense & has the natural alignment with Trump's skills.
It's easy to envision Trump running a faith-based conglomerate that supplants some of Fox/Netflix/Youtube. Biblical cartoons for kids and young adults, movies & television series that inspire us rather than degrade us and make us fearful. News channels that investigate rather than deliver the 3:00 AM narrative. With Trump as the master of ceremonies overseeing it.
https://help.truthsocial.com/truth-plus/introduction-to-truth-plus
That's just what I think too.
I have always envisaged that it will take things like well made documentaries to awaken most people, the people who can't quite make those leaps on their own without narrative support.
Truth+ the TV app is awesome. Very nice HD content. No buffering. Can rewind live shows. Record shows for later. All of the best conservative news outlets are there already. More programming to come. It is legit!
Like Angel Studios?
I learned it from the link I posted. I also gave it to GPT4 and it drew the same conclusion without a hint.
I've always thought this. The way they got rid of Jack. And Elon does government contracts. But Elon could have easily read the Q posts. 🤷♀️
I just went over to qagg and searched for "let that sink in", and got post 621 from 01/27/18. Elon walked into twitter headquarters on 10/27/22 with a sink (ignore zeros and have 127). I searched qagg for all posts on 01/27/18. Some seem very relevant.
https://qagg.news/?q={d%201/27/2018%20}&q2=
u/#LetTheSinkIn
Hmm...interesting. Possibly not related, but I was just noticing:
All these on Jan. 27 within 8 hours of each other. Seems like there could be a relationship here. At least something intriguing enough to merit further reflection.
This makes more sense than he just bought it.
I always thought it weird him just essentially walking in and buying it.
Do you think Peter Thiel is Q?
Thiel urged Musk to buy it. Thiel and Musk also got the VP spot for Vance
Not particularly but I hadn't really thought about it. I don't think any particular person is Q, it's a collective collaboration. Maybe there's a head of Q but above my pay grade. I just eat popcorn.
I do doubt they had much to do with the VP pick. We're watching a movie, the script has been written, I don't think much adlib is going on.
And, would the deep state really sell it to their enemy? Out of all available buyers?
Probably where rhe EO comes into play. They had no choice but to sell
My sentiments exactly.
True. That would have been a very bad investment.
https://rumble.com/v4at72t-how-trump-took-over-twitter.html
This was brought up before, and there's a very high probability it was seized under EO 13818.
Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Owned a big chunk of Twitter when he was arrested.
Nobody owns more than 10% of Twitter
You're right Prince Alwaleed bin Talal own 5 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/oct/07/saudi-princes-investment-stake-twitter-alwaleed-bin-talal-kingdom-holding
Especially as the deep staters who owned the majority of the stock didn't have to sell to him (unless forced to.)
This. No way would they sell it for any amount of $. It was their major propaganda platform which is priceless.
That's not how things work.
Twitter was publicly owned and the board had to present a legitimate offer to the shareholders to vote on it. No single entity owned more than 10%
“We could never fake a company being publicly traded when it wasn’t, or shares of ownership in a company being fake when they weren’t. That would never happen. Everything is legitimate.”
It was absolutely not seized under 13818.
One, you can find out everyone sanctioned under 13818. Go to the Treasury Page and search for the GLOMAG sanctions.
Two, 13818 can't apply to Americans. And any American could have stock in Twitter as it was a public company.
Three, Twitter was a public company. If somebody did something where there assets could be seized that wouldn't affect my Twitter stock or your Twitter stock.
Four, Twitter wasn't seized. Stockholders got paid. They got a premium over the current stock price.
Keep in mind handshake that we only have 20% (the public part) of the picture. 80% happens behind the scenes.
Nope.
We know who has been sanctioned under 13818.
Kek. Ok handshake 🤝 👌
Do you want to know how you find out who has been sanctioned
I know. What I am saying is we only have 20% of it
There may have been some testicle twisting in the background however, seizure of enough stock to leverage the buyout etc.
Thanks for bringing it up. I wondered about this
Think of the share sales by Gates, Soros and others. What will the value of the shares be after the crash, when all the bad guys lose their wealth at almost the same time, hopefully! Better to do it now and convert the earnings into real money.
I believe it was seized as was Microsoft and facebook and several others.
I still remember that big FB outage that in no way could just 'happen'.
Sounds Plausible...Here is My thought..The Cabal combined has more $ than Elon. Why would they allow this to fall out of their Control?
Musk sold all seven of his mansions in 2020 and now lives on a $50k prefabricated house that he rents. When asked why he did this his one word response was “freedom”.
The man has been stripped of his assets and is forced to cooperate. He certainly did not buy Twitter.
I always thought the "hostage" with the new puppet master was Alwaleed bin Talal, since he owned a near majority portion of Twitter and Bank of America, and was thrown in jailed after the coup. Q had said he was cooperating and his assets seized.
But Musk could make sense too since he was used for developing rocket technology outside of NASA to smuggle to NK.
Musk was the DoD's highest paid contractor under Trump. Who knows what he has been tasked with.
This
Don't know about Bank of America, but nobody owned more than 10% of Twitter
White Hats are in control
Bye @jack
SPACEFORCE COMMANDER TRUMP
"EO 12/21" and then just a few months later we learn Musk has been buying shares
Wow great find, anon. Quite possibly it was seized especially if the Patriots are in Control