.....
A leading demographer has warned that the white British population may become a minority by the middle of the century if current trends continue as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared this week that the âopen borders experimentâ was a failure imposed on the country by âdesignâ.
In an apparent confirmation of what many derided as a âconspiracy theoryâ, the notion of a âGreat Replacementâ agenda, Prime Minister Starmer said that previous Tory governments âdeliberatelyâ decided to liberalise immigration following Brexit to âturn Britain into a one-nation experiment in open borders.â
âThis happened by design, not accident. Policies were reformed⌠Global Britain â remember that slogan⌠That is what they meant. A policy with no support⌠Well thatâs unforgivable,â he said.
While the prime minister was correct in noting that the so-called Conservative governments of Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak allowed in unprecedented levels of immigration following Brexit â by refusing to put an annual cap on immigration resulting in nearly one million migrants arriving last year, alone â the open borders agenda imposed on the country pre-dates Tory rule.
Indeed, prior to the Labour government of former PM Tony Blair, the UK had net migration in the tens of thousands, however, under Blair this began to soar into the hundreds of thousands per year. In 2009, former Blair advisor Andrew Neather claimed that this was a deliberate policy to transform Britain into a multicultural society and to ârub the rightâs nose in diversity.â
The mass migration policies of both Labour and Conservative governments have had a radical impact on the demographic make up of the UK, with the 2021 census finding that less than three quarters (74.4 per cent) of the population identify as a member of indigenous ethnic groups of the British Isles (English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, or British). This is compared to 80 per cent in 2011 and 87.5 per cent in 2001.
Associate research fellow at Birkbeck, University of London and a senior member at St Antonyâs College, Oxford, Dr Paul Morland warned this week that if the political class fails to reverse course, the native white British population could become a minority in their own country by 2050.
Dr Morland, who has been described as the UKâs leading demographer, said that since the Blair administration, the UK has seen âmore immigration than we had in the whole period from the Norman Conquest to the Second World War.â
He said that if the government continues on the same course, people in the country 30 years ago were overwhelmingly the descendants of people here a thousand years ago, thatâs not going to be the case in the middle of the century.â However, Dr Morland argued that ânothing is predeterminedâ, pointing to the example of former British colony Singapore, which strictly controls immigration.
âItâs a choice, what do we as a country want and does that manage to get expressed and implemented by our politicians. It seems quite clear to me that those two are not the same, the country wants one thing and the politicians are not prepared to follow,â he said.
Noting the ârelatedâ issue of declining birth rates, the top demographer said that cutting immigration must be accompanied with pro-natalist policies to encourage the native population have more children to mitigate the financial impacts of a declining population. Morland has previously pointed to policies implemented by the populist-conservative government of Viktor OrbĂĄn in Hungary, such as tax and other incentives for mothers, as a potential framework.
While Prime Minister Starmer committed this week to increasing economic opportunities for young people and reforming the immigration system, his government has refused to commit to an annual cap on immigration, which critics have argued is necessary to stem the massive influx of foreigners into the country.
Commentators on social media asserted that Starmerâs comments were an implicit admission of the much-derided âGreat Replacement Theoryâ. Although often portrayed as a âracistâ conspiracy theory, the concept, developed by French Renaud Camus, argues that the real aim of mass migration policies are motivated by economics, with leaders seeing their populations as little more than interchangeable cogs who can be changed out with little consequence to bolster GDP.
Speaking to Breitbart News in 2018, Camus said that globalist forces, such as those involved with the Davos-based World Economic Forum, support âthe change of people and civilisation for the sake of the industry of man, the economic system which produces the Undifferentiated Human Matter, the human Nutella, spreadable at will.â
.....
.....
Cheeky fucking cunt blaming it on the Tories and Brexit, he knows damn well this started in 1997 when he was a political nobody licking Tony Blair's arse whilst reading a copy of Das Kapital propped open on his back. And let's not beat around the bush, it's never been an 'open borders experiment', it's all along been a planned Islamic invasion.
Yes, FarmerHarmer lies every time he starts to speak. His beloved Bliar was the one who implemented the most dramatic liberalization leading to large increases in immigration. He allowed mass entry from anyone in the EU, no matter how they got there. So long as they could get through an EU border, they were allowed into Britain - no questions asked. He also set up the National Asylum Support Service (NASS) to provide housing and financial support and scattered asylum seekers throughout the UK away from big cities to forever change the culture of smaller towns and villages.
Bliar, I see what you did there
And make no mistake Blair himself is still hard at his Satanic Demonic work with his 'Institute For Global Change'. These ex-leaders opening 'institutes', 'foundations' and whatnot after leaving office should be a massive future red flag for Satanic Globalism and ideally outlawed, with the penalty commensurate to Crimes Against Humanity.
Blair and Osbourne run the UK, they are the puppet masters.
Note Brexit won largely to âget outâ of European Union open border policies. So they (Swiss elites) punished the people by paying off British politicians to give the âBrexit supportersâ something even worse.
Note that puppet masters running the unelected EU elites live and hide in Switzerland where open borders are verboten (âforbiddenâ in German).
Great comment ! I havenât read the post yet but the âby 2050â disgusted me ! 25 years to fix . Most of The people who suffered by this planned destruction will be dead by then !
if there is no war in their countries, send every single one of them back. and do not ever let this happen again, ever.
insentivise Britians to have babies again. stop with the feminist BS. being a wife and a mother is a strong and honorable job.
They want you to have brown skin. Melting pot with Kalergi
I don't see this happening.
You will have more mixed half white/half black.
or half white/half hispanic kids.
Those mixed kids tend to date white more often. So those mixed kids will have a kid with another white person.
The color of new kids will be white looking.
No one cares about the "ONE DROP RULE"/. That's not logical.
Yea I mean, America has mostly selectively self segregated and still generally does. I don't doubt that they would try to do such a thing to destroy people's care about their heritage, and make pushing Globalism and a One World Government easier. I just don't think it's actually going to work for them. Most humans want to make kids that look like themselves. And forcing people together is like forcing magnets together, it just makes them bounce back harder.
Self segregation happens in my view due to Convenience of location.
Not sure what you mean by that. It's a proven fact that all races prefer to marry within their race. Making kids that look like you is instinctual. Most coalburners are fat whales that weren't contributing to the genome anyways. America's white population percentage is falling almost entirely because of people not having enough kids and mass illegal migration. Racemixing is a drop in the bucket comparatively.
The reason why that happens is due to being in proximity next to those who look like you.
It a nation is completely Irish. Their preferences will be Irish due to only having the options of Irish.
If other groups start to mix in with the Irish.
The next question would be.
Are they forced into their own separate areas legally like Jim Crow?
If the answer is yes. Then people would be forced to stick with their own.
If the answer is no.
Then next question comes in play:
Does this other group of people speak the same language as the Irish?
If the answer is no.
Then people will stick with their own due to not understanding each other.
If the answer is yes.
The next question comes in play.
Are there any negative stereotypes about these outsiders by the Irish.
For example. If the Irish thought these outsiders were criminals and degenerates.
Then there would be social pressures from the Irish to stick with their own.
Which would stop a lot of race mixing.
If the answer is no.
Then race mixing would happen: For example. Tons of white Americans are mixed: Such as mixed with white Irish and White Polish.
Young children do not have a problem with playing with different cultures of kids.
It is the kids parents that use social pressures and teaching to get their kids to distance themselves from different groups of people.
A person isnât born to dislike others.
A man is born to get an erection when he sees an attractive naked woman.
If a white man sees an attractive black or Indian woman walk without clothes on in front of him.
Are you telling me he would not get turned on by that???
If you believe that.
Than you believe attraction is a choice that we turn on like a light switch.
I disagree.
Attraction is a chemical reaction that a man will get turned on to seeing any naked woman that gives him a chemical reaction that he cannot control.
So I agree with you that people will stick with their own.
But itâs not because itâs natural.
Itâs because their are a lot of social, cultural and geographical factors that causes people to want to stick with their own.
I hope this makes sense lol. Sorry for the rambling.
I know this- even the physically hottest brown women don't turn me on. They smell wrong. Pheromones or whatever. And brown skin is just not appealing. Nor for me is curly hair. As a dumb hormonal teen/early 20s would I have gotten hard seeing one nude? Sure. As an adult? Nah. If I lived near mostly brown women I would still seek out a white girl. I think it's mostly just instinct even with people who never actively consider it.
That's your experience. And when you say, "They smell wrong," itâs clear you already have an emotional bias against brown or black women.
Also, you havenât met every black or brown woman on the planet.
People who say no to mixed dating usually do so for "social, cultural, economic, or geographical" reasons.
You arenât going out of your way to see if you find a black or brown woman attractive, and what youâre describing isnât instinctâitâs your personal preference.
If God wanted us to be separate, we wouldnât be able to bear children across ethnic lines.
A tiger cannot naturally procreate with a lion. A dog cannot naturally procreate with a frog. A cat cannot naturally procreate with a monkey.
I believe the reason God created people with different appearances is the same reason GM and Ford create cars in different colors and with different featuresâto give the human race options.
Could you imagine living in a world where every man and woman had the same face, color, hair, height, and weight?
From an artistic standpoint, think about how monotonous such a world would be.
Yeah, it's hard to see how this will turn out, but I know what their intention was, to weaken the west. They said as much.
Anyway to support your point about how people look, my kids are white looking but of mixed heritage.
The ones behind this need hunted down.
So Basically. Immigration and Economic policy of Western Nations for the past 30-40 years was decided by Economists, Monied Industrialists, and Intellectuals. All of whom are liable to view everyone who isnât them as interchangeable cogs in the machine. Not worthy of a second thought.
And rather than acknowledge the fact that the Economists, Industrialists, and Intellectuals. And the political sock puppets they prop up. Quite deliberately fucked over everyone. In pursuit of their own benefits and beliefs.
Theyâre going to play word games, back pedal, and all kinds of shenanigans. To avoid losing the cushy positions the Post WW2 Economic order gave them.
Back to at least 1971 and establishment of the WEF as Kissinger's reward to Klaus for being his protege.
Even a gay clock is right twice a dayâŚ
The fallacy of human fungibility stems from the mythology of equalism.
IMHO this is only surface related to race and used to obscure the real objective. This is a CULTURAL genocide attempt. On a global level. A actual âmeltingâ pot designed to merge all cultures into one with only the state as the authority of acceptable traditions and ideas. Skin tone is a red herring that they are using to prevent people from fighting for culture. It just so happens that the culture with the most fight and biggest threat to totalitarianism is the west and thus light skinned. If the culture they wanted to destroy was dark skinned this would be happening to Africa. Actually it did but in a smaller scale. Ignore history at your own risk. The Elites were slave masters and they learned from that. Before you can own a people you must erase their cultural identity. Rome were discovered this power and this fact has not changed. There was a documentary I saw as a child that discussed Anglo history and at the end the host said something very profound.â The biggest obstacle to globalization is the Anglo Saxon culture and that must be dealt with first there to be a true global stateâ this was before they knew to hid such open intentions. Anglo Saxon culture is the worst blend for easily ruled people. It emphasizes enough self autonomy that it demands any authority be loose enough to allow men to self rule for the most part BUT it also retains enough social ties within the family and greater community to allow for assembly in defense and in times of need. The warrior cultures that blended had both protective and self sustaining identity in balance to make it a culture that is almost impossible to impose rule on with out their consent. When we let them frame the discussion and turn it into a race discussion we are loosing the thread. The fact is England ground zero to erase those pesky rebellious mutts who keep insisting that man is subservient to no other man without respect of free will. Thus the big waves of immigrants. If this was racial it would be more effective to trickle in and hide the negative individuals that give connotations which repel the dominant culture. This would facilitate more interbreeding. Instead they are pushing cultural clashes on purpose in hopes of being able to step into the chaos and impose order. A race war is a great way to wipe out all the fighters. When that happens it wonât matter the skin color any vestiges of all cultures especially those that will fight for their identity
Time for crusades 2.0?
The gov't was infiltrated by the enemy and is destroying the UK as well as other western nations, including the US. These people need to be identified and eliminated.
I'm American, I always say "better you than me"
I don't know what the British politicians expect to gain from uncontrolled immigration.
Britain isn't going to become an industrial powerhouse again. Bringing in millions of untrained workers with no national loyalty or work ethic isn't going to spur innovation or industry.
Britain isn't going to become a world agricultural producer. They won't become an energy power center. They won't become a global financial center, as other financial centers will prove better and less troublesome. They are now losing former colonies and may soon lose Canada and Australia as well.
Britain's only thing to sell at this point are safety, quiet countrysides and the British / Scottish culture for tourism, in addition to stability for property owners and visitors. Under uncontrolled immigration = uncontrolled crime... kiss all of that goodbye. Multi-culturalism is NOT a reason to visit Britain. It makes Britain, with it's higher costs, far less attractive than many global alternatives. The only reason to visit Britain is because it's Britain, with full history and culture. Destroy that... and you become nothing.
Britain is hardly going to transformation non-loyal immigrant population into a military power.
What good is importing Millions of mouths to feed when there is no income?
How do that define this rule?
Are they using the stupid "ONE DROP" rule???
What about people like Rebecca Hall?
They are probably using self reported ethnic background, ie. how people see themselves.
The British gov is always asking us what ethnic group we're in. It's on a lot of forms.
Ahh.. I see.
I personally see it as "White Looking" or "Black Looking".
When it comes down to it. If you saw me in real life.
You would call me Black.
I do not think "White Looking" people will ever go away.
Don't know why someone is downvoting you for your PoV.
I suspect bots or shill lurkers mark certain comments with -1 for whatever reason.
Theyâve -1ed prayers.
A lot of people believe that sticking with one own race is nature.
I disagree:
Because if we break down marriage at its core.
Marriage is about physical attraction between a man and woman.
You cannot control who you find attraction with.
When you break down men.
Men are attracted to the female body parts such as her breast and butt.
That is bare base nature right there.
If a white man sees a naked black or Indian woman who he thinks have nice breast and butt:
That is enough to produce a chemical reaction for him to want to pursue her.
Now..
Due to social and cultural pressures. He might tell himself no:
I am not going to pursue her because it might cause a problem with his family.
So he chooses to go against nature of natural attraction.
Thatâs my argument.