Well lets be logically correct; they are fugitives. They have committed a crime against a nation of laws, and are within their territory, and actively hiding from law enforcement. And that in no way is being irrational.
Problem is, we are still having this conversation after 60 years of "migration policy". Enforce what was on the books, problem doesn't exist.
if they came here legally, but then helped family members come here illegally or housed them here, knowing they were here illegally, what should the punishment be? they violated immigration law, right?
Turn off the welfare in the form of money, food, phones, education or medical. Immigrants should NOT be given welfare, ever. (I am 100% against government being used to take money from one citizen by force and give it to another, much less non-citizens or immigrants. Churches and other organizations used to take care of poor but they really were just needing a hand up. And most of the donations actually are used for the needy instead of a holiday trip to Vegas or Epstein island.
Fine anyone caught using illegals for labor unless they are migrant farm workers or some other form of heavy low paid labor group.
Once the freebies stop they will go home on their own.
Prisoners sent from Venezuela and other countries go first and tariffs will cover their expense trawler/ deuce and a half) ride home.
I have thought for a long time that if a town wants to end their homeless problem, all they need to do is provide them with one-way bus fare to another state, along with some "starter money", and a signed agreement that they will never come back, and if they do, they will have to pay back the "starter money" and the bus fare, and if they can't pay, they will be put in jail.
The country was angry because of immigration, because of the people, you know, millions and millions of people. I was saying it could be 21 million people. They were saying a much lesser number, but it wasn't a much lesser number. But even if it was, it was irrelevant, because it was—they were allowing anybody to come into our country. They are right now. They opened it up again. You see what's going on? They're coming. They're pouring up through Mexico and other places. And they weren't using common sense. I said, We’ve become the party of common sense. As an example, they really don't want to see men playing in women's sports. You can have a—and this is one: They don't want to see, as another example, open borders. They want to see people come in. Everyone's okay with it, and I am certainly. I want to have a lot of people coming, because we're going to, we're going to bring back a lot of jobs. We'll bring record numbers of jobs, and we'll do it through good taxing policy, and, you know, using some basic business intelligence. But we're going to bring back record jobs. Record companies are going to come into our country. They're not going to be able to be able to steal our companies anymore. And I talked about that, but I differed, maybe, perhaps, from you people, I thought the economy was a big factor, especially the real economy, which is the economy of going out and buying groceries or buying a car or buying a house, which was, you know, between interest rates and between costs—as an example, the cost of a house is—a big chunk of the cost of the house is just the approval process and the regulations.
Anyone referring to “illegal aliens” as “migrants” can get deported too.
Foreign invaders.
Well lets be logically correct; they are fugitives. They have committed a crime against a nation of laws, and are within their territory, and actively hiding from law enforcement. And that in no way is being irrational.
Problem is, we are still having this conversation after 60 years of "migration policy". Enforce what was on the books, problem doesn't exist.
Fake "migrants" who are here "illegally"! Does that sound acceptable?
if they came here legally, but then helped family members come here illegally or housed them here, knowing they were here illegally, what should the punishment be? they violated immigration law, right?
Sounds like human trafficking to me.
Yeah. They can all just get the fuck out, and don't come back. Ever.
Their American citizenship should be revoked and they should be deported with the rest of the illegals.
That's a good question. I wonder if it does violate any laws.
The whole damned family needs to be hurled over the border wall.
Give them a choice - trebuchet or catapult. Or they can walk their asses back over the border or onto a flight back to their home country.
Once the wall is built it would be impractical to not use a projectile launcher
And leave all the cash and property they obtained illegally here behind!
Correct
Turn off the welfare in the form of money, food, phones, education or medical. Immigrants should NOT be given welfare, ever. (I am 100% against government being used to take money from one citizen by force and give it to another, much less non-citizens or immigrants. Churches and other organizations used to take care of poor but they really were just needing a hand up. And most of the donations actually are used for the needy instead of a holiday trip to Vegas or Epstein island.
Fine anyone caught using illegals for labor unless they are migrant farm workers or some other form of heavy low paid labor group.
Once the freebies stop they will go home on their own.
Prisoners sent from Venezuela and other countries go first and tariffs will cover their expense trawler/ deuce and a half) ride home.
This is huge. Go after the money and they will leave in their own. Stop the employers hiring illegals, and stop all the handouts.
You shouldn't be able to survive here as an illegal. You shouldn't be able to work or get any assistance
Sounds fair
Sounds reasonable
https://x.com/LeadingReport/status/1866310107539308834
Airfare….Always cheaper than welfare.
I have thought for a long time that if a town wants to end their homeless problem, all they need to do is provide them with one-way bus fare to another state, along with some "starter money", and a signed agreement that they will never come back, and if they do, they will have to pay back the "starter money" and the bus fare, and if they can't pay, they will be put in jail.
I guess in a hilarious juxtaposition, that's what other nations are already doing to us.
Many places DO this...
I forget if it's ca or what, but maybe places literally do this to get rid of excess homeless
Free trip to Paris! One way.
Reminiscent of a "South Park" episode.
That’d make a great t-shirt!
And all the bleeding heart liberals say...........that's sooo cruel!
That's my President!!!!
Thank you President Trump.
Normally, harboring a fugitive is a crime, so this makes sense.
That's the game they play. "But then you will separate families!'
Well no, they'll separate themselves.
Like convincing kids that their sexuality is a significant moral controversy rather than just being a kid, which separates families.. I'm with ya.
Correct answer.
The country was angry because of immigration, because of the people, you know, millions and millions of people. I was saying it could be 21 million people. They were saying a much lesser number, but it wasn't a much lesser number. But even if it was, it was irrelevant, because it was—they were allowing anybody to come into our country. They are right now. They opened it up again. You see what's going on? They're coming. They're pouring up through Mexico and other places. And they weren't using common sense. I said, We’ve become the party of common sense. As an example, they really don't want to see men playing in women's sports. You can have a—and this is one: They don't want to see, as another example, open borders. They want to see people come in. Everyone's okay with it, and I am certainly. I want to have a lot of people coming, because we're going to, we're going to bring back a lot of jobs. We'll bring record numbers of jobs, and we'll do it through good taxing policy, and, you know, using some basic business intelligence. But we're going to bring back record jobs. Record companies are going to come into our country. They're not going to be able to be able to steal our companies anymore. And I talked about that, but I differed, maybe, perhaps, from you people, I thought the economy was a big factor, especially the real economy, which is the economy of going out and buying groceries or buying a car or buying a house, which was, you know, between interest rates and between costs—as an example, the cost of a house is—a big chunk of the cost of the house is just the approval process and the regulations.