Furthermore, preventative measures such as bullet proof glass should be used to shield high profile speakers where they stand or sit.
Thoughts on drones? 💭 🤔
Comments (35)
sorted by:
That was suggested after 'Butler' & nobody listened, it's a 'no-brainer' if they have one.
Butler 2.0 had a lot of drones present. So they did listen.
We have the technology to create a rotating mesh of drones that scan for people with gun like objects or in places they don't belong. I mean have you seen some of these christmas drone shows? This should have been in place 5 years ago.
Oh they already do, how do you think they know for sure where they are attacking from? They know in advance and let it happen anyway.
Yeah I already have seen police drones monitoring over carnivals and festivals in my area. The problem is when people in the security staff are in on allowing deliberate gaps.
There is a difference between federal government overreach for the evil plan of injustice and immorality and control of the lives of the collective individuals and families and communities, and local, state (even federal) operating for the purpose of goodness and safety and protection of the collective individuals and families and communities.
You are forsaking the good and righteous and necessary aspects of safety measures LE should and do have for the sake of making a broad statement (and quite honestly a fallacious one) like “less police state.” You’re not required to understand why some things are good and necessary in order for them to exist and be acceptable by most, if not everyone else. But it would sure help your own piece of mind if you did understand.
What I sound like to you has no meaning and makes no difference. Drones monitoring rooftops would be useful whether you agree to not.
They should.. every security company should provide drones.. lots of them.
also, Chyna beats us when it comes to drones and making use or making tech accessible and affordable to their citizens. Maybe the drones break easily/ don’t last but only cost 50 bucks lol
They are quite good with drones!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44KvHwRHb3A
I love watching that.. very impressive. Thank you for sharing!
5000 drones Christmas Lights Show
https://youtu.be/bxIc969qtYo?si=kTAhGm3fH5OPpGd3
Thank you for that. I had not seen any American displays before. I particularly liked the "walking" reindeer and people. It makes the Chinese displays look a bit static by comparison.
However, I see your 5,000 and raise to 11,787! I think that is the current Guinness world record. I worry when I think that every drone could be carrying a hand grenade or similar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waGGR5rKmco
They may already. But they monitor Christians or mothers at PTA. Violent trannies not so much.
Come on, man! Now you're using your noodle for logic and reason and you know damn well that's not how Govt thinks or operates.
Charlie’s security team is a private business I believe..
The first question I asked was, "Why didn't his private security team have drones looking at rooftops? They are cheap as hell compared to the cost of hiring an elite security team."
It's reprehensible, in my opinion, and makes me wonder if they were in on it.
They do. They also have secret service or informants with each county and city that is present during public gatherings. All of the streetlamps and cameras in so many places as well. You just aren't aware of it because its not necessary to tell you, though it has been there the whole time. Something we kinda forgot worrying about years ago still evolved. They get comms in advance of anything like this going on, if they need security detail.
Bullet-proof glass should be promoted, if not mandatorily required and drones are an extremely smart idea due to low cost and ease of use.
Just be aware that something like a 6 by 6foot square sheet of bullet proof glass capable stopping large caliber rounds would weigh over 500lbs.
It seems we'd get to the point of why even bother with in person events.
The evil bastards are already attempting to terrify speakers into submission by doing what they've been doing for a decade and now by assassination. Making the speaking more complex with added imagery of bullet-proof screens would definitely assist in getting the message across to those that come to listen.
Absolutely. A simple solution that would prevent any compromise with security, cheaper as far as manpower. Bullet proof glass should be required from here on out.
We don't need more laws and requirements. People should be free to decide,otherwise they can use " security" to shut down speakers they don't like.
I assumed that was already done. Crazy.
They are cheap enough that conservative organizations could.supply them. For their own events. Their presence alone might be a good deterrent
They can and do; Charlie and Butler were permitted
Yes, ones with small explosives onboard. If you ID a threat and can can confirm, "pop goes the weasel" KEK
This is how they build sky net
I get what you are saying but I meant drones operated by the security team, not flying bots operated by AI, which really would be sky net.
Yes,but people will get lazy and let the AI do it....
These are the things we need to change in our world. We need to engage and stop just wanting to be left alone. I get down voted for a shit post, but at the same time what's the difference from having a drone spot a threat and a sniper taking him out than just having the HUMAN GUIDED drone do so....
I believe that Charlie was warned his tour could be dangerous this year, and that Charlie went ahead with it. I don't think bulletproof glass would've sent the message that he wanted. Hard to have an open dialogue with a very obvious barrier between him and the people he's speaking with.
The drones monitoring rooftops is a decent idea, however that is a piece of logistics that needs to be fully prepared for. Typical drone can last at most 30 minutes on its battery charge in stable stationary flight, less if its a windy day, so you'd need several drones all connected to the same monitoring system, with battery backups sufficient to cover DOUBLE the event's scheduled time for redundancy's sake.
Edit: Another potential use of the drones is that if a shooter or suspicious person IS spotted, the drone can be flown in their face or in front of their optic to disrupt their aim so they can't line up a killshot. If they tried to shoot the drone they would alert the entire event. The drone can then be used to track the suspect and get them apprehended
The problem.
The deep state would find away way to take over the drones by hiring corrupt people who run the drones.
So I don't have a problem with the bulletproof ING, but the drones... Ehhhh... It just creates a new vector for assault. The concept of a suicide drone bot has been used in conjunction with political violence elsewhere, and if drones at public events becomes fully normalised it increases the risk of that type of attack being drone activated.