Erika Kirk was asked how much she knows. She said "Everything"
(www.instagram.com)
Comments (64)
sorted by:
Remember when she made her statement, she referred to the killer(s) in the plural form: they, them, doers.
I noticed that as well. Makes me wonder...
Did she elaborate further?
Context:
Megyn Kelly is talking with 3 people from the TPUSA team, including Andrew Kolvet, Kirk's executive producer, and (I think) two of Charlie's researchers/assistants
https://youtu.be/wpW04tdI0cw?si=RzSWOiFLvCoLs0Lx&t=566
The whole discussion is about the show, about TPUSA, about the work they did with Charlie, and NONE of the discussion at ANY POINT is about Charlie's assassination, the details, the murderer, etc.
To take this clip, and twist this up to imply that they are talking about who killed Kirk, all the secret, hidden, conspiratorial details behind the killing is not only a complete stretch, it's pretty offensive, imo, ignoring what the show was really about: Charlie, Turning point, his legacy, Erika, etc.
I'm not saying there wasn't a conspiracy behind the murder. I'm not saying there aren't things we do not know, or whether Robinson was the real killer, whether he acted alone, whether he was part of a larger operation, or even (who/what) was behind it if that is the case.
What I am saying is, taking a very small clip, piling on assumptions and conclusion based entirely on your biases - and by biases, I mean, your beliefs, closely held assumptions, or theories (and I mean the generic 'you', not Fat or anyone specifically) - it's not only NOT helpful. It's a negative. It doesn't advance the pursuit of truth. It creates noise where there should be and could be signal.
IMO.
A Transcript
MK: and now, there's a question about who's going to lead the team forward, and who's going to lead this enormously important organization...
AK: Since everything has happened, the number one question is, what is going to happen with turning point, what is going to happen next, and I'm pleased to be able to announce ..... that the turning point board has selected Erika Kirk as the new CEO and Chair of the board... Charlie told me, told Mikey, told others that if anything ever happened to him, that this is exactly what he wanted....
MK.... It had to be....right? I don't think anyone would accept a leader of the organization who they didn't feel completely understood Charlie and be 100% dedicated to fulfilling his vision... jump to clip
AK: and let me just add one more thing, and I want mikey to chime in here as well, in the immediate hours afterwards, Erika got a call from someone very important - I'll leave that vague out of privacy -
AK: she got a call from someone very important, and the question was: "what do you know". Sort of asking, how much of what's going on behind the scenes and with the relationship(s), like, what do you know?
AK: and her reply back was: "Everything. I know everything"
MK: that's good. You can tell, um, the bits of the two of them, and clips that you guys have released, show first of all, their immense, intense love story... and we pulled this one that you guys ran because its so touching ....
Runs clip of Erika with Charlie on set of TPUSA... when they were engaged...
(Pretty touching, actually. Worth watching, imo)
Given the whole context, and after listening to the podcast before and after the statements in this short clip are shown, I would say that AK is talking about what happened in the immediate hours after the turning point board appointed Erika as CEO & Chair. Someone important (could be someone important to the nation, or to the Turning Point operation or mission), asked her,
how well do you really know this operation? How well do you understand how it is run, and how it works, and what the relationships are behind the scenes. and Erika said (paraphrase):
I know everything. In other words, I know everything about Charlie's operation here and I am perfectly suited - best suited - to take up the position of leading Charlie's operation going forward.
Contextually, its a massive stretch to say that AK was reporting that Erika knows "everything" about the assassination, who did it, all the facts, the 'conspiracy' behind it, and all that stuff. That makes no sense (imo) in the context of everything they were talking about. There's no foundation here for assuming or thinking that Kolvet was talking about the hours after the assassination.
This is also borne out by Kelly's response. She doesn't go
Wow! Erika knows everything about the assassination! Wow. She's knows (Israel/Mossad/Antifa/Soros/Ukraine/The Khazars, blah blah) did it all! Shocking! Amazing!!
What Megyn Kelly does say is quite sedately, "that's good". and then proceeds to talk about the closeness between Charlie and Erica.
"That's good." Very sedately. In other words, its good that Erika knows how everything she needs to know to run the operation perfectly after Charlie. And, Kelly goes on immediately to talk about the relationship between Charlie and Erika.
No one here is talking about the assassination event.
I think its an easy leap to a conclusion based only on the very short narrow clip on instagram, to imagine that Kolvet was talking about Erika saying she knows everything about the assassination. I can understand why people might make that leap. But its a leap that too easily feeds to confirmation bias, imo, which is why I simply go to the facts: the context. What were they talking about? is there any other content there that supports the idea that <she was talking about the hidden/secret details behind the assassination>?
Confirmation Bias is more dangerous to us than the lamestream media and disinformation operations. It's the biggest distraction there is and it inhibits, imo, actually advancing the info war. Its generates so much noise - In OUR camp - and it dampens the signal so much. Unnecessarily. By simply practicing being self-guarded from confirmation bias, I think our overall effectiveness at GAW would be increased significantly.
Thank you, it seems ridiculous that the post seems to imply Erica knows everything about the conspiracy behind his death. When really this more so about her being able to run TP USA
The most reasoned response I’ve seen in a while. This echos my sentiments and responding as well.
This. Yes. o7
I shared it because I found it interesting that Andrew Kolvet (executive producer and close friend of Charlie) wanted to be sure he stated this. I have been listening to each of these shows in full and Andrew has been on all of them. But this statement stood out. His tone was different. As if maybe he was letting us know, not to worry, that Erica does know all the potential enemies she's a target for.
We on this board always listen for clues in what Trump is saying. We know sometimes there are messages being conveyed indirectly. This entire board is mostly people piecing potential clues together. Sometimes a post about something notable turns out to be nothing and that's fine. How is sharing this clip any different?
I'm not quite sure I understand your angle here. I don't see anything wrong with sharing this clip at all. It feels a bit like you're being defensive, but I don't think there is any need to be with simply sharing the clip.
The issue might be, however, the way you framed the Subject Line sort of tee'd this up for some folks here to LEAP to the conclusion: this is about the Assassination. Which I would say it is not.
But, you have been listening to all the shows in full, and if you picked up on something here that Kolvet was emphasizing, that would be post-worthy. But, I don't see how the actual context here supports the idea that he was talking about the assassination OR any potential enemies.
I guess all you can do is ask yourself if your own bias led you to think 'this statement stood out. His tone was different. As if maybe .....'. That's a possibility you might consider.
I think if it was me, from that point, I would jump into research. I would check to see if my hunch has any foundation. Does it hold up in a close analysis? Is there other corroborating data or evidence that upholds that idea?
But, not everyone does that and I think its OK to post to the board a clip like this. But if it were me, I'd be checking before I posted it with a subject that implies "conspiratorial leanings".
In any case, I don't see anything wrong with the posting itself, and I was directly addressing those who either saw that subject line and leapt to a conclusion, or listened to the isolated clip and then leapt to a conclusion. That's how confirmation bias misleads us: leaping to conclusions without the relevant vetting of ideas or theories.
Sorry about the downvote. Not sure who did that. Thanks for posting and thanks for being here, fren.
I bet she doesn't know the average airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow.
I reckon she does. So there.
Even Life, the Universe, and Everything??
I wouldn't be shocked that she knows that the khazarian mafia murdered Charlie.
She could be a Q follower for all we know. Charlie was on our level or at least appeared to be.
She knows exactly who killed Charlie. Everyone knows...
They need to be named though.
MUH JOOOOOSSSS
She can’t name them without proof. If the FBI doesn’t start revealing more evidence then it’s just “another crazy theory”.
And there will never be proof to tie the assassin to any one powerful. It’s always just insinuation or coded language used
The FBI gave us some complete bullshit text messages. They aren’t gonna say Israel had a hand in it.
Exactly. And if Israel still controls the FBI then we have jack shit. Erika would not be able to name names unless Trump okays things to be revealed and seeing how the Epstein list is going I don’t think we’re gonna see shit.
Yup I think Trump is trying to prevent us from being nuked by Israel.
This!
And Israel is very good at making Americans believe others are the enemy. They want us to believe they're our only ally.
So anything they do to us will get blamed on someone else.
Mmm that’s an angle I didn’t think about. Ok I will put it under consideration. I just thought Israel had him under control for some other reason.
I've had this thought enter my mind. What if Tyler is OUR whitehat patsy that we recruited to make Israel think we don't suspect them?
Knows about …?
What Candace was talking about. What megyn Kelly was talking about and what Tucker was talking about. Zionist wants to control right wing influencers.
Pray for her safety and that of her children. Whatever happened with the 10 day countdown she was toting?
She had been counting down on her Instagram prior to what happened to Charlie. The countdown was family based posts. Many think they were getting ready to announce they are expecting their 3rd child. :( Unless there's a different countdown I didn't see?
Keep us up to date, Papa. It's good that you have your ears so close to the ground. Were you a big fan of Charlie's before all this happened? (just curious)
Did she say that or is this your assumption?
I believe it was in reference to the operation of TPUSA.
Just my assumption based on how Andrew Kovit led up to it, saying Erika got a call from someone really important and asked her how much behind the scenes she knew. And he said “everything”. And then how he also mentioned it was appropriate that Megyn was there and also given what Megyn had been speaking about lately regarding the pressure to not criticize Israel.
Watching the larger clip, its fairly clear and obvious that they are talking about how much Erika knows about how the Charlie Kirk show and operation are run.
he mentions its appropriate to make the announcement about Erika as the new CEO of turning point when Megyn kelly is hosting the show, because (as he talks about BEFORE this clip) Megyn and Charlie had a interesting relationship and connection regarding TPUSA.
Nothing in the whole discussion suggests to me, anyway, that its anything about Israel or pressure or even the assassination.
https://youtu.be/wpW04tdI0cw?si=cJBnZ7f-C9R7fka4&t=48
Ok fair but also why wouldn’t they just say she knew everything about the operations and how the organization was run. Seems very straightforward thing to say. Also would Megyn Kelly really say oh she knows the assassin on live podcast? Is she stupid? They’re raising questions so we the amorphous crowd can continue to dig and search for the truth. How can you do that without speculation?
There's nothing wrong with speculation. The problem happens when someone takes speculation and treats it like fact, or fails to acknowledge that its speculation and not fact, etc.
Because it was overly clear from the context. They were having a conversion about <topic> and when things are perfectly clear from context, you don't need to be saying things explicitly.
Example: Two people are looking at a door. One of them says: "Shut it!" He doesn't need to explicitly say Shut the DOOR, because both of them know from context what he is talking about. This is a very natural part of how language works.
I dunno. It seems to me that concluding that Kolvet is saying Erika knows everything about <assassination/enemies/etc> is a pretty big stretch.
And, I suspect, that some folks would just take that conclusion and bury it in their mental database as a fact. Oh, Erika Kirk knows all about who was behind the assassination, etc. Personally, its a conclusion I think requires a lot more corroborating evidence than the limited statements made in this short clip.
But you did say that this was your assumption, and you should get top marks for that. (Too many folks forget that they are making and presenting assumptions.)
And, to be fair, when I wrote: "its fairly clear and obvious that they are talking about how much Erika knows about how the Charlie Kirk show and operation are run..." I was actually stating my own conclusion, and not a fact. So, that one is on me.
Maybe we'll find out which it was one day, but I'm not going to hold my breath. I'm OK with my conclusion and my reasoning, but who knows?
Fair but Actually It wasn’t assuming she knows everything about the assaination. It was assuming she knows about the threat and pressures. What Candace Tucker and Megyn was saying was that there were a lot of behind the scenes pressure and threats from pro Bibi donors threatening Charlie and censoring him.
A lot of people jumped to conclusions that that’s what Candace said. She only raised concerns that it was sus bibi went onto national platforms to make Charlie out into such a friend of Israel when behind the scenes people knew he was not agreeing with them. That’s all.
This part of the show starts at 10:45 -- This is a link to the full show --
https://youtu.be/wpW04tdI0cw?si=vs02Wt5EZ2i3OMS3
.
T/u.
They want to control the world.....
*have been
If it’s true that the Khazarian Mafia assassinated Charlie Kirk, then Erika Kirk will 100% be next. Only a presidential detail /security system can prevent that level of access/intel/assassination power, and no U.S. citizen can have that. Broadly though, I think I’m becoming more convinced of the true depths of the cabal inside 🇮🇱 Government and global influence/power (obvious distinction between the nation of citizens and the cabal who operate and control them from the highest levels, much like how the U.S. has cabal operators and their control over the citizens and all countries, etc.).
I’m still confused, however, as to why Candace and Charlie had no professional or personal connection… yet she was visibly seething in her recent podcast/stream when talking about Bibi assassinating Charlie. Was it only because of the Israel aspect? I ask because her stream was focused not on Kirk but solely on Bibi. But if Bibi/the cabal did this, is there evidence of this? Can it be proven Tyler Robinson was accessed and influenced by Israel? Kash and his FBI concluded the assassination in 33 hours, the charges are set, evidence prepared, and death penalty is guaranteed. But still, similar to how the Dems were proclaiming Trump is in the Epstein files without evidence/proof, was Charlie Kirk going to expose the Israeli Govt. regarding Epstein or anything else? Was Charlie supposedly and merely planning on publicly distinguishing between the Israeli government cabal and the citizens? Most people did that already, so that doesn’t really satisfy (at least not for me?).
This is the line of reasoning I’m going through currently and so if these theories are true, on what basis should we believe Candace and Erika are not going to be assassinated? Are they allegedly going to expose Israel for Charlie’s assassination by Robinson and the other people on discord? Hard questions because God allowed Charlie to be assassinated and martyred for His divine purpose and will.
Candace was with Charlie in the infancy of TPA and they did campus tours together
That’s not the same as what is being alleged today. There is a difference between years ago and today. On what basis would their past connection result in a “connection today”? Knowing how much Charlie based his beliefs regarding Israel and the end of the age (specifically God’s unbreakable covenant with His people—the cabal actors in government being excluded) it stands to reason why there was no connection in recent years and today as there was a long time ago.
Part of the disconnect involved (in a big way) the “everything” comment that was taken out of context and elaborated on/demonstrated elsewhere in the comments.There is nothing to point to that would bolster the idea that Charlie believed the same as Candace regarding Israel. It’s fine that she called out Bibi, but Charlie Kirk “being on her side” or “being aligned with her” is the disconnect. That does not materialize in reality.
https://www.youtube.com/live/sreYYcID-QY?si=kJW6KN6ks995E3c4
Start @38:00. Candace states she went on tour with turning point across college campuses last year with Charlie. She names names specifically about who wanted her out and how they threatened Charlie to cut ties with her or they’ll pull donations. And then they did the same with Tucker. And he saw how this was going and decided not to go along with it. Candace asserts that Charlie was planning on bringing her back to the line up this year. And she claims she has proof. But hasn’t showed it yet.
Candace very specifically and very clearly said she is not saying Bibi was involved with Charlie's assassination. She said he is grossly misrepresenting his relationship with Charlie, and she has the receipts to back it up. She's an exceptional investigative reporter. She doesn't get ahead of the facts.
Have you seen the photo of Tyler Robinson at Dairy Queen and how it fits into the timeline? You would if you watched the entirety of the videos Candace has put out since the assassination.
As to your "years ago" point in your subsequent comment. Candace said she was with Charlie at some of his events last year. Here is the result after a simple internet question:
"In 2023, TPUSA’s Live Free Tour included both Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens. TPUSA +3 TPUSA +3 TPUSA +3
In Spring 2024, there was announcement of the Live Free Tour featuring Charlie Kirk, Candace Owens, and others. TPUSA
Owens spoke at multiple TPUSA campus events as part of that tour."
Please don't make declarative statements about Candace and Charlie and about what Candace said and then use those statements to back up your logic and reasoning without first-hand knowledge of what Candace has actually said.
One thing I can say for certain, whoever was involved with Charlie's assassination, they murdered the wrong person's friend. Of course receipts matter (and Candace always brings them), but there is no one I trust as much as Candace to get to the truth (wherever it leads) of everyone involved (or not involved) and what role they played in the murder of her dear friend. One of her recent videos included the caption "Hell Hath No Fury" in the thumbnail, and for good reason.
Edit: I don't mean for this to (and I'm sorry if it does) come across as a personal attack. It's just that I haven't seen anyone else work as hard as Candace on this and it has moved me deeply. She loved him as a little brother.
It's possible that when Candace woke up to Israel she tried to warn Charlie but he didn't see things the same way and that created a distance between them.
Fast forward, Charlie experienced Butler PA, the MAHA alliance( the big announcement of RFK and Trump uniting happened on a TPUSA event stage with fireworks). Then Trump won the election thanks to the young voter turnout Charlie inspired. Suddenly the heat is turned up and Charlie starts to feel the pressure from the enemy he thought was his friend and realizes Candace was right and starts having private conversations with her and others about it.
They invited Tucker to be today's guest host. I'm listening now. He is doing great. Just talking about how inspiring Charlie was and his producer sharing stories of their fun times through the years.
oh thanks... gonna tune in....airwaves would go crazy if candace was the next host
Robinson didn't kill Kirk.
He’s proven to be the shooter and the state of Utah has already brought the charges, and is pursuing the death penalty. Kash and his FBI are running this, and he’s not lying.
Wow. I think you’ve mistakenly come to the wrong website. BlueSky is the next door on the left,
I don’t see anyone opposing and contradicting Kash and his FBI nor calling him a liar. We see the justice system, the courts, the lawyers and the judge conducting themselves precisely as they would and should since capturing the gunman. If Trump had lost the election, Charlie Kirk would be dead and with no sense of justice upon the guilty party. But we are getting that now, and we’re going to kill him via the death penalty.
Your desire for an alternative outcome or opposing narrative is not based on facts or reality. Your refusal to accept it is symptomatic to a bigger problem. For example, in the same way you trust Ice is identifying and removing illegal criminals; in the same way you trust murderer-rapists have been charged/sentenced/are serving time; in the same way you trust terrorists in GITMO were convicted and are serving sentences, you have an obligation to logic, reason, and reality by trusting Kash, his team, LE, and courts (which is all being documented by Law&Crime on YT so you can follow the latest updates) that they are dealing with this case according to the law.
You have never met any of the criminals in the scenarios mentioned above, you have not been present in court for their cases, nor have you run their 🧬 tests or touched their evidence submissions, but all of those things happened, and without your input or approval. The results and conclusions are those criminals were convicted, charged, and sentenced. The same is happening with Tyler without your input or approval. You don’t have to like it, but you cannot change it. You have every reason to believe Kash, his team, LE, the veracity of their evidence collection and their ongoing investigations into the other people in the Discord chat rooms and social media who are involved.
Wow. Last time I checked, DISCERNMENT is an important trait to be utilized to the fullest right now. Remain open. Give events time to marinate. Respect the right of others to hold differing opinions. Be a good person. Be patient. Listen.
You sound like a Karen.
And that’s fine if you perceive me that way, but it doesn’t change anything about the case as it stands based on facts, evidence and reason. You lose the argument and the narrative but at least you pretend to satisfy your conscience with defiance and projection.
Slow 👏🏼
If you suddenly believe authority because it's your color team in charge; you're not awakening.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PzK4e1bXK2c
Nothing about the argument insinuated the color of the jersey but with the content and quality and devotion of the people in charge, which accomplished measurable quantifiable change for the better. You can either burn down your own strawman or I can. That part makes little difference to me.
How many cameras did TPUSA have? I’m sure she has all of the footage from all of the angles of all of their cameras.
Wow! I was watching the podcast and heard this. I, immediately. came here to see if anyone posted it. I hope it means what I think it means.
So far, loving Megyn guest hosting this show. Okay, back to watching it!
What was her original name?
Andrew clarified his comment on today's (Friday) show. Was specific to TPUSA operations, missions, donors, etc.
We won’t know anything without the bullet. One bullet oh where could it be???
If she knows everything it may also be why she is under a protection order.
Her and the kids need U.S. Special Forces Vets they know how to protect people.